|
Post by Coach Huey on Nov 12, 2013 7:12:14 GMT -6
35 varsity football players or 35 TOTAL football players (9-12)?
We have around 280 boys in our school and 121 of them play football. (520 total students)
We play teams with 700-900 total students but have been fairly successful, for the most part, because their programs may not have any more football players than ours. (we've had upwards of 140 some years). Get as many players out as you can. Find ways to get them involved - this is why we like playing 1 side of the ball because it gets more people involved & gives ownership to the program.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 31, 2013 14:33:12 GMT -6
www.telex.com/cl/intercom/contactThat's the best I can do. I believe - from talking to 2 different vendors in the industry - that telex is pretty much on the way out. They are investing less and less into product development in the sports realm based on what I've been told. Of course, neither of these individuals were telex employees. But, at the same time, they weren't trying to sell me anything either, it was just technology talk. Coach, What head sets do you guys use? We have PortaPhones but are looking buying new ones this year and don't really know much about the other brands. We use HME and love them. Very comfortable, easy setup and take down. Love the clarity and sound quality.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 30, 2013 21:26:21 GMT -6
I don't know what huddle guess access is but think of it like this.
one person is the site administrator. They give players an access pathway. They do not give access pathways to others not on the team. The access pathway given to the player is for him to have access. That player doesn't have the authority to give another person an access pathway - that would be exceeding his authority or, in simple terms, going outside of the terms that were set up... the player and only the player can view via that access pathway.
I'm not making this stuff up. There are court records of various cases involving things like Facebook, Netflix, HBO, email accounts, to name a few that are very similar. Everything revolves around a few key points such as the allowable rights and duties that are given to each user at the time they received access. Exceeding authority is what some are charged with. Others - those that took the information, regardless of how they got it - were sometimes charged under a false identity statute.
You can continue to debate your ethics and what you think. I'm just sharing what little I know from similar situations.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 30, 2013 21:14:04 GMT -6
again...
each state's laws are different but this, in fact, could very well be a criminal activity regardless if the site was "hacked" or a password was given out by the player. scroll up and this has been mentioned already.
which means, whether or not you think it is not cheating, the courts may very well rule otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 30, 2013 16:11:31 GMT -6
again, depending on state laws, this actually can be a criminal matter, albeit probably only a misdemeanor.
* hudl owns the site * team A owns the rights to determine which people they allow to view it, this allowance is condoned by issuing a username/password to those for ability to view. * if player b gives password, then there is potentially a legal matter. player b is not authorized to give anyone authority to view team A's hudl account. * if person c views hudl under the assumed identity of being player b, then that could be a violation of terms and be treated as a legal matter.
so, depending on state laws there could be criminal charges brought up on player b or person c or both.
there are legal precedents where a person gave someone else a username and it was a misdemeanor when that person viewed the site. it is something like 'exceeded the authority given to them.' ... i.e. you are allowed to view the site, but you aren't authorized to allow anyone else to view it - meaning, you giving them your username/password to use exceeds your authority on that site and could be prosecuted criminally.
on another note, i LOVE the line "it the opposition job to not let me figure out their hudl sign in." that is hilarious ... it is your job not to let me figure out your bank account login... haha
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 30, 2013 10:38:07 GMT -6
www.telex.com/cl/intercom/contactThat's the best I can do. I believe - from talking to 2 different vendors in the industry - that telex is pretty much on the way out. They are investing less and less into product development in the sports realm based on what I've been told. Of course, neither of these individuals were telex employees. But, at the same time, they weren't trying to sell me anything either, it was just technology talk.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 30, 2013 9:22:22 GMT -6
in some states, this could actually be a crime... most likely a misdemeanor. using someone's personal information (passwords are considered person information) can constitute criminal activity based on varying criteria. quick example - sharing your netflix password with another is a misdemeanor & could even escalate to a felony should they watch a certain number of movies (based on monetary value).
the states with laws usually classify it in sections dealing with identity theft. i'm no lawyer so i can't argue this is or isn't a criminal event, but i would think the athletic governing body could have grounds to levy some type of reprimand.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 23, 2013 12:44:21 GMT -6
A thread was created. It wasn't in the form of "hey, I have an idea, what do you think? Can we discuss similar schemes?" It was "here's is my stuff". It was, basically, an article. It was written well, just seemed like an article... it didn't lend itself to really any open discussion.
So, on one of my visits, I felt it would be a good idea to move the nice article to the article section. why? because that's really what it was.
A few days pass, no PM was sent, not an email, but I happen to view the article section again and see that the original article had been deleted and replaced with a rather snooty, high-and-mighty reply about how awful, thoughtless, unprofessional I was in moving the thread and somewhat berating me into putting it back in the general forums. Problem with that was, the original had now been edited and no longer existed. The thread NOW was a rant against me & the moderators. It was THAT thread I deleted. So, in essence, the original poster deleted his own thread...not me.
What was designed as an "honor" in moving the thread was perceived as a slap in the face. Could have been avoided with a better approach into the why... but, apparently recognition for a well written piece isn't what the poster wanted. he wants validation that he is, in fact, a guru. This is my best guess because he took his ball and went home (modified his post rather than going through any communication or attempts to repost).
As of this post, we have been online for 3,060 days. That's a pretty good length of time for a simple 'ol forum with - in all honesty - very little hierarchy or rules. I think we're doing fine and will likely continue on a nice, steady, ride.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 22, 2013 21:38:37 GMT -6
I believe their time of possession was just around 9 minutes. 2 punts were returned for a TD and several "drives" were essentially a run for a TD. Much due to talent disparity but also due to poor tackling, poor effort, etc. Bottom line, there were guys carrying the ball - and scoring on long runs - that are simply not the type of player you go "man, that kid can score". They were using the backups to the backups. It's hard to tell a kid "don't run hard, don't score". a running clock was also in effect. Sometimes, it really is just that hard to keep from scoring. Crap, i've watched all Baylor's home games and they struggle keeping it under 80 at times.
we had a game this year where are 3rd tailback was breaking off long runs and scoring. had 50 by half. returned the 2nd half kickoff, picked off a pass, then 3rd stringer broke another. took our backup TE and taught him to play running back. we then "spread" the field (to help reduce the blockers for him) and gave him the ball the whole 4th quarter. if he had any speed - any speed at all - he would have broken several of them. he ran hard, the OL in the game played hard. fortunately, we didn't score our 11th TD that night.
sometimes, things just "align" where you can't help but put up points. all you can do is try to play as many kids as possible, calling plays that - in theory - aren't designed to be big plays. you don't want to humiliate by running out of bounds, or punting on 1st down, or playing your wr's at the OL and handing off to the center or crap like that... just try to have class and get the game over as soon as possible.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 17, 2013 6:56:51 GMT -6
brophydon't get sucked in... a fruitless endeavor
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 16, 2013 20:04:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 16, 2013 19:55:26 GMT -6
actually, pretty much, yes... naked, is naked for us. we will run it where we at some point at the snap end up in 2x2. Rite 43 Naked, Rex 43 Naked, Lott Zig 43 Naked. it is the EXACT same routes. When we run "naked" from trips back to the single receiver, we call it something else... Leo 43 Slip, Lab 43 Slip... but, here's the simple part ... it's naked, so guess what, all the routes end up being in the same spot. when we run "naked" INTO the trips, we call it a 3rd thing.... and, guess what, we get receivers to the same spot as we do on naked. Why? because how many naked, moving pocket routes do I really need? either a) the defense is playing the run fast & can be had on play-action or b) they can't. how many routes do I need with the same protection/backfield action if they aren't overplaying the run? what if you want a different action? It doesn't matter what it is, why you would do it. doesn't matter what the defense is....and you are already sort doing what I am sort of saying you have at least 3 different ways to call it and it has a reason...does it matter if that is not simple enough to some? is it to complicated for your kids? what types of play-action are there? qb fakes one way & moves the pocket the other qb fakes one way & moves the pocket in the same way. qb fakes one way but stays in the backfield what other "action" do you need? you can either move him opposite using a naked protection or by pulling a guard. you can fake a zone, stretch, toss, or lead action. you don't have to do all of them but depending on your system you might call it 2 ways .... say 43 naked and 49 naked. faking 2 different runs yet essentially the protection is the same with a slightly modified backfield. I don't need a myriad of routes with that concept. the qb is moving out of the pocket - it's a sprintout situation. i just need some type of "triangle" with a flat option, a deep/corner option, and some type of intermediate/middle/crosser option to complete the triangle. you can now do it from either 1 formation tree (2x2) or you can use motion into 2x2 or you can use a slightly different term when running it from say 3x1 that would still get you back into this "triangle" other play-action routes can be thought of the same way. now, what you are doing is trying to keep from having this long drawn out play call that says all of this. you don't need "naked with shallow" or "naked with mesh" or whatever. THAT's what i'm talking about, not the overall depth of a playbook. but, if you can eliminate some things you could gain things in another area - be it ... never mind. ... should have followed my own advice and just smiled and waved.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 16, 2013 19:35:36 GMT -6
actually, pretty much, yes... naked, is naked for us. we will run it where we at some point at the snap end up in 2x2. Rite 43 Naked, Rex 43 Naked, Lott Zig 43 Naked. it is the EXACT same routes. When we run "naked" from trips back to the single receiver, we call it something else... Leo 43 Slip, Lab 43 Slip... but, here's the simple part ... it's naked, so guess what, all the routes end up being in the same spot.
when we run "naked" INTO the trips, we call it a 3rd thing.... and, guess what, we get receivers to the same spot as we do on naked. Why? because how many naked, moving pocket routes do I really need? either a) the defense is playing the run fast & can be had on play-action or b) they can't. how many routes do I need with the same protection/backfield action if they aren't overplaying the run?
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 16, 2013 19:18:56 GMT -6
Brown boot rt Brown naked rt Brown waggle rt Brown sprint rt Four easy ways to communicate simple protection changes without having to use 8 {censored} words to call a simple play. There is NO reason to be that verbose. you really think that is all eh? watch: brown rt naked this week is going to be with mesh.... brown rt naked this week is going to be with shallow.... brown rt nake this week will be with the qb reverse pivot brown rt naked this week will be to the te brown rt naked this week will be with motioning away. brown rt naked this week will be with z setting the mesh and Y running the corner. brown rt naked this week will be with power blocking. brown rt naked this week will be off of g blocking. Now If you think kids easily get confused, then their is no way that will work every single week. Really? You're going to do all that by faking a run left & moving the qb out of the pocket to the right? you really think you need to do all of that off a moving pocket protection/route combination? why are you calling the play? which defender are you trying to "fool" with the playaction in the protection (thus, allowing the qb to get on the perimeter for run/pass option) and which defender do you need to "fool" so you have an ability to throw the ball to a vacated area? just how many of these really cool routes & blocking schemes in conjunction with the qb moving pocket away from the fake?
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 15, 2013 10:40:20 GMT -6
do most college / pro staffs have GA/interns perform these functions or do the coordinators do it? Is there value? yes Would you buy it? probably not can do a game in an hour that way. 3 hours later, all your games are broken down & labeled. time is still a resource. what else could you be doing in those 3 hours? What else? playing golf, fishing, spending time with my family.... I could do all kinds of things if I didn't this job. We watch the games. We break them down as we watch them. So, if you are watching the game offsite and entering my data for me during that time, what will I be doing? probably, uh, still watching that game film. So, I'm missing the point. You're watching it anyway. You can a) watch it with no data and keep it that way b) watch it & put data to it the 1st time you watch it c) outsource it to another staff member(s) or to some fictional company that will do it for you. now, you control c) if it is handled on staff. you will still likely have to modify a few things but not much. you lose quite a bit of control if the trade is occurring out of your hands and the fictional breakdown is being done offsite and by someone not on your staff - you don't have immediate access to speak with, help, encourage, etc. really, this seems somewhat silly ... if we must play along, then what other duties need to be done during the day on saturday and does everyone have to do each duty or can we delegate? can some coaches work the team out, can others do laundry & clean up, can others do input of data, etc.... if your staff isn't large enough, is your budget? if you don't trust your own coaches to do a good job, you're now going to trust joe computer guy? can you modify the film trade parameters to help with this time burden? i.e. trade earlier, trade breakdown data (i mean a 1st a 10 from the right has on the 30 here in Texas is probably a 1st and 10 from the right hash on the 30 over in Louisiana... so why not just trade that stuff?). what efforts can be made on this end - nothing financial - to help alleviate all this burden? go down that road first.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 15, 2013 10:05:53 GMT -6
divide & conquer. it doesn't take very long for a coach to input the D/D... another to do formations etc. Then, when you trade, you trade the basic breakdown data (odk, d/d, yd, gn/ls) and there is time already spent. I.e. someone does your game the night of (or before you trade it) then you aren't having to do any other games from your opponent. You do 1 game - yours.
maybe this seems silly to me, we have a staff that does this ourselves - each one of the "breakdown" coaches has a specific duty to get done. We trade 2 games early (Thursday) and only have 1 game to do on Saturday morning (Friday's game). We trade as much breakdown data as we can with other staffs.
in fact, you can "breakdown" the game the very first time you watch it. one coach calls out down/dist/yd, another calls out formation, another front, etc. - whatever data you want, have a coach call it out as you watch the game. can either write it on paper & input later or type it in as you watch it. blow it up on a big screen & do it as a staff. watch the game don't game plan the game. no "run that back...are they using #22 as a decoy?"... do that stuff later. get the game broke down. can do a game in an hour that way. 3 hours later, all your games are broken down & labeled. take a quick lunch break then start "game planning" by pulling reports, watching video in specific segments.
the more moving parts something has (the more it's outsourced) the more potential problems outside of your control.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 14, 2013 19:20:38 GMT -6
I would thinks teams would have to provide a terminology list of some kind. I wouldn't think it would be for everyone but neither are the "offense in a can". My district has the money but doesn't have the man power. I won't get too deep into this as I find it somewhat hard to conceive (I won't say silly or absurd) but if you "have the money" why not simply create a stipend for someone either on staff now or for a new staff position and simply make it an in-house thing.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 9, 2013 7:00:00 GMT -6
Mon/Tue after school... 3:30-3:45 -- position meetings 4:00 -- "zero" period (pre-practice) kids basically leave the locker room as soon as they get dressed/taped & have a specific thing to do on the field for warmup type stuff 4:10 -- period 1. we have a 24 period practice (2 hours)
wed after school... 3:30-3:45 -- position meetings 4:00 -- "zero" period 4:10 -- period 1. we have a 17 period practice
Thur after school ... 3:45 -- zero period 3:55 -- period 1. we have an 8 period practice
each period is 5 minutes long. We play 1 side of the ball with a few "crossovers" for things like 'goalline offense' or 'nickel defense'. those get worked wednesday & thursday.
Later in the year - usually around week 8 or so, we cut the periods down to 4 minutes. This allows us to keep our same format, just shorter time within the periods.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 5, 2013 22:31:12 GMT -6
during the period we do a 3 series offensive script (8 plays plus a "swinging gate" per series). Then we do a 25 play defensive script. this is in half pads vs a defense (vice versa when doing the defense script). we run the plays we think we'll use the most, those that we feel like we really need to hit. defense will work the opponent's best formations/plays. the whole thing takes about 35 minutes.
after school we come back for a complete special teams practice where we go through the kicking game. we'll do things like KO deep left, KO deep left with subs, KO pooch right, pooch right with subs, spread punt, spread punt with subs, etc., etc. basically go through all our special teams units in a team setting (we do special teams throughout the week where we also include individual work). the whole thing takes maybe 30 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 1, 2013 17:41:22 GMT -6
loaded question ...
WHY did you death spiral? in your case, you simply weren't any good and reality kicked in with the schedule. how to keep it from happening next year? 1) get better or 2) play the same terrible teams early on and work to get better (and hope the latter part has declined)
if you were good, but just lost close games you probably should have won ... well, isn't that a different thing? so now, you're talking about a mental aspect. the aforementioned scenario is pretty much physical (genetics).
so, you have to look deeper into the "why" did we lose those close games when it is a mental thing. then, you address that.. be it poor focus in practice, lack of confidence, etc. so find drills that build confidence, or install a few schemes, changes, that help reduce the amount of times a kid is in a position where he might be less confident.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Oct 1, 2013 12:57:59 GMT -6
Also, look at WHO the other team is playing. Last year, we had a school near us start 6-0 and were blowing people out like 50-7... everyone began touting "their back, lookout". problem was, the teams they were beating were just flat out terrible - they finished with a combined 5 wins. Then, after the 6-0 start, this team had to play a real schedule and proceeded to go 0-4 and miss the playoffs.
same thing this year - we'll see if they finish the same.
also, some years the schedule is just down so your record really isn't an indication that you're any good. the other guys just lost some players and you managed to beat them. so you have a "good" year or you're record is good. at some point, the balance of power begins to equalize and you either 'free fall' or, quite simply, reality sets in.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Sept 25, 2013 14:01:24 GMT -6
in 2006 we had a total of 26 players miss at least 1 full game. in week 10, we had 6 players STARTING that began the year on the JV. Weeks 9 & 10 were the only successive weeks where we had the same 5 OL starting.
how did it end? we lost 10 games - 4 in OT - and the staff was fired.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Sept 20, 2013 7:31:11 GMT -6
athletic period: 20 minute special teams meeting (film, report, etc.) followed by 25 minute weight session after school: 15 minute position meeting then 2 hour practice with 17 of the 23 periods always devoted to individual or group drills. only do 2 periods of no-hurry, up tempo offense - rest of team is more walk/talk before snapping the ball.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Sept 16, 2013 19:48:09 GMT -6
i recommend you not watch film as a team. not nearly as efficient as watching film only in position groups. you can get much more out of the time spent in the meeting. no need for the receiver to watch a play over and over while the OL coach is talking to the left tackle. you can now take a 30 minute session and make it seem much longer because you can be specific to your kids.
if you are concerned about meeting rooms - just use classrooms in the school. all you need is the internet. if you play both sides of the ball ... do 30 minutes on offense, 30 minutes on defense or split it however. you can grow by leaps and bounds through studying yourself on film. and this is enhanced by being very specific and to the point with little wasted time (i.e. waiting to go to next clip because the rb coach has to continue talking to the rb about the last play).
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Sept 15, 2013 11:13:08 GMT -6
Coaches, We have a group of our starters who are decent football players who do not watch themselves on game film after games even after we provide constructive feedback on HUDL. We watch a short segment of both O and D on Sat. morning and then expect the kids who played to watch themselves over the weekend. We have found that 3-4 kids are not watching themselves. What would you do? The sad part of this is that they are making the same mistakes on game day. As much as I love HUDL I don't believe that it's a replacement for watching film as a group. This is one reason. Another is that there's no one there to explain why they were right or wrong. Even if you provide notes, I don't believe that that has the same effect as live teaching. I assume you give homework in your class. or you require outside reading, outside/independent study of various topics prior to a test. I assume, as a teacher, you teach them when you have them in class but also provide avenues where they can enrich this teaching when they are at home. That is what Hudl does. So, watch film with them as a group (you are the classroom teacher) and teach them. Then, provide them the opportunity to watch film on their own by providing notes on Hudl (you are assigning homework & outside reading as the teacher). How? It's like any other aspect of a program... you have to make kids see the importance of getting better. they must see the relevance & relationship between watching film & correcting mistakes & getting better as a player. If they don't want to get better then any punishment is just that... punishment.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Aug 22, 2013 11:49:58 GMT -6
do you have kids that get dressed slow on purpose to miss some of the zero-period? We have kids that dress slow... do they do it to miss zero? who knows, who cares. Our HC is running kids out, moving them along. It is an expectation to get dressed and get some work in. there are no 'players' that miss zero period. and, there are 'non-player' players that miss either. it's an expectation to get work done. when we started, i can't remember but i'm sure there were a lot of players that were still dragging to get ready for practice. over time, we raised the expectations, we were able to convince the players that getting a handful of extra reps made them better, which better served their chances of performing at a high level, which made our team better, blah, blah. we didn't lower the bar for the ones that didn't want to hurry up. at some point, they got on board does everyone come out at the same time? no, they come out when they get dressed and jump into the drills. it is laid back, warm up, get your mind ready, ease into practice stuff as well as polishing some of the simple fundamentals involved .... i.e. throwing quick game routes on air, dynamic stretching, hurdles, barrels, ropes, etc. whatever. if a kid is going to be late to zero, he's going to be late no matter when you start. we create an environment that gives players something to get dressed for ... i.e. if there we're all going to come out at the same time then why should i worry about being the first one dressed? well, now we preach - get some extra work in. you want to improve, get dressed, get a few more reps. you stress it - get more reps, put in the work, put in the time, etc. we don't ever make policy or procedure based on the exceptions, based on the negatives. those kids that purposely avoid the extra work will soon leave you anyway.... the environment, the expectations, etc. will be too much and they'll simply avoid it .. move on to something else. we have some quit every year because they haven't been willing to do work and they get left behind by their classmates. you win with character. you lose with characters.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Aug 21, 2013 19:50:21 GMT -6
Period 1 has a set start time. Or pre practice is labeled as "zero period" and it "starts after meetings until period 1.
Example. We get out of school at 3:25. We meet/film from 3:30 to 3:50 every day. Period 1 starts at 4:10. So, "zero" is from 3:50 through when our HC blows his whistle & starts the segment timer at 4:10. Each day we have assigned zero period things to do... pat & go, ol boards, qb/rb mesh, etc. Coaches are present.
It is designed to give kids something to get dressed for...I.e. no more "hurry up and wait"for guys that dress fast waiting on whole team so we can start. Kids get dressed, come out, & there's something for them to do. Our hc rushes the kids out.
We end up getting about 10 minutes of work every day this way.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Aug 15, 2013 22:25:08 GMT -6
try this...
put the ball on the 10 with the offense coming out. They get 3 plays to make a first down. If they don't, they have to do updowns, burpees, whatever. If they do get a first down they get to turn around and go in from the 10. They get 3 plays to score a TD. If they score a TD, the defense has to do updowns, burpees, whatever.
can do same thing by giving X number of gassers to be completed at end of the drill. minus Y if the unit achieves a goal (i.e. offense would get to substract Y number of gassers if they got a first down. Defense would subtract if they stopped the offense, etc.)
sometimes, we simply spot the ball on the 40 yd line and go through a drive. it could be 3 plays or it could be 10, depending on what happens. if you are concerned that your practice field doesn't have all the hash marks & such just use the 5 yard line markers. always spot the ball on a 1st down on the nearest full yard line. i.e. if the offense gets tackled on the 29, just spot the ball on the 30 and play 1st down from there... much easier to measure 1st downs that way in a quick fashion.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Aug 15, 2013 13:20:52 GMT -6
august 5th this year. some years it is a week later.
4 days in shorts 6 days in pads then 1st scrimmage (fri scrimmage) 4 more days in pads then 2nd scrimmage (thu scrimmage) the following week is our 1st game. basically, 18 workouts and 2 scrimmages prior to our 1st ball game... plenty of time for us
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Aug 15, 2013 9:45:32 GMT -6
the beauty of having an established system in place from the ground up is that you get so much carry-over from year to year. The sophomores aren't needing a complete new indoctrination of the schemes because it is the same things - terminology, techniques - they ran as freshmen. By the time the kid's a senior he's been in the system long enough to have most of it down. 2-days or "fall camp" becomes more polish than install.
do we really need 4-5 hours a day of on the field practice to knock the dust off? use film to your advantage and you can "double" the time on the field without having to actually stay on the grass.
we practice for just over 2 & half hours (30-34 periods), do 40 minutes of weights. then meet for 30-45 minutes going over the film.
we don't feel like a 2nd practice that day would really be a huge benefit to us. we don't play a game until aug 30. we have plenty of time to get them geared up for a game. again, it's not like we're having to really "teach" anything. our kids have run "rope 43 aggie" for so long they can do it in their sleep... lol
|
|