|
Post by Coach.A on May 28, 2023 9:34:56 GMT -6
There are signs such from his HS coaching career, Prime Prep, and not winning a Celebration Bowl. To be clear there a solid chance he successful, consistent bowl team, but it not the slam dunk some people are making it out as. I'm not sure if it will be a "slam dunk" in terms of wins-losses. But I think it is 100% a slam dunk hire for Colorado that has already payed off tenfold. This seems to be the lowest risk "gamble" ever. The upside significantly outweighs the risk. If it doesn't workout, at the very least, Colorado will have significantly more talented players on their roster for the next head coach hire. Colorado has been struggling for decades. To change that, you would need an incredible staff that was given many years to gradually change things (and stayed at Colorado after they started to have some success)...or you can bring in a disrupter to completely change everything immediately. In the current college football climate, I think Deion might be one of the few people with enough influence and latitude to be that major disrupter. On another note, about great players being great coaches...it is 100% a math thing, but I also think great players are usually set up for failure in coaching. They are often gifted too much responsibility too soon instead of learning the profession in the trenches. While Deion's rise in the coaching profession was extremely fast, I do think the fact that he coached at the high school level first has helped him as a coach.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on May 28, 2023 11:24:01 GMT -6
There are signs such from his HS coaching career, Prime Prep, and not winning a Celebration Bowl. To be clear there a solid chance he successful, consistent bowl team, but it not the slam dunk some people are making it out as. I'm not sure if it will be a "slam dunk" in terms of wins-losses. But I think it is 100% a slam dunk hire for Colorado that has already payed off tenfold. This seems to be the lowest risk "gamble" ever. The upside significantly outweighs the risk. If it doesn't workout, at the very least, Colorado will have significantly more talented players on their roster for the next head coach hire. Colorado has been struggling for decades. To change that, you would need an incredible staff that was given many years to gradually change things (and stayed at Colorado after they started to have some success)...or you can bring in a disrupter to completely change everything immediately. In the current college football climate, I think Deion might be one of the few people with enough influence and latitude to be that major disrupter. On another note, about great players being great coaches...it is 100% a math thing, but I also think great players are usually set up for failure in coaching. They are often gifted too much responsibility too soon instead of learning the profession in the trenches. While Deion's rise in the coaching profession was extremely fast, I do think the fact that he coached at the high school level first has helped him as a coach. This is a GREAT post!
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on May 28, 2023 12:09:36 GMT -6
Because Renfrow is white and Moss is black? Well, how about Jerry Rice? He didn’t have super physical abilities like Moss but is the GOAT WR. Had he decided to go into coaching, he probably would have been a great position coach. How about someone like Jalen Hurts who had to kind of reinvent himself at QB? I would take him as a QB coach over most people.
Few things are absolute but players who had to have discipline, and work ethic, and smarts to be effective are usually going to be better coaches than those who were mostly just bigger, stronger, and faster than others.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 28, 2023 12:54:15 GMT -6
Because Renfrow is white and Moss is black? Well, how about Jerry Rice? He didn’t have super physical abilities like Moss but is the GOAT WR. Had he decided to go into coaching, he probably would have been a great position coach. How about someone like Jalen Hurts who had to kind of reinvent himself at QB? I would take him as a QB coach over most people. Few things are absolute but players who had to have discipline, and work ethic, and smarts to be effective are usually going to be better coaches than those who were mostly just bigger, stronger, and faster than others. Ah yes, the old "if you don't immediately agree with something, it's obviously because your racist". Gotta love it.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 28, 2023 12:55:32 GMT -6
Because Renfrow is white and Moss is black? Well, how about Jerry Rice? He didn’t have super physical abilities like Moss but is the GOAT WR. Had he decided to go into coaching, he probably would have been a great position coach. How about someone like Jalen Hurts who had to kind of reinvent himself at QB? I would take him as a QB coach over most people. Few things are absolute but players who had to have discipline, and work ethic, and smarts to be effective are usually going to be better coaches than those who were mostly just bigger, stronger, and faster than others. So to recap-- Bill Belichick when asked his about his first thoughts on a player : He is one of the smartest players I have ever met. He is definitely the smartest WR I have ever coached. HE HAS TAUGHT ME MORE ABOUT WR PLAY THAN ANYONE. jg78- yeah but he is tall and fast... so he probably wouldn't be anygood if he went into coaching. Belichick- HE TAUGHT ME MORE ABOUT WR PLAY THAN ANYONE! jg78- Yeah..but he has a really good 40.. and can jump high- no thanks.
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on May 28, 2023 13:18:26 GMT -6
Yeah, no thanks to a player who lost a scholarship to both ND and FSU, was drafted lower than he should have been out of character concerns, mooned Packer fans during a game, and whose highlight reel pretty much just consists of outrunning and outjumping people.
I will pass. He can coach your WR’s.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on May 28, 2023 13:28:13 GMT -6
Because Renfrow is white and Moss is black? Well, how about Jerry Rice? He didn’t have super physical abilities like Moss but is the GOAT WR. Had he decided to go into coaching, he probably would have been a great position coach. How about someone like Jalen Hurts who had to kind of reinvent himself at QB? I would take him as a QB coach over most people. Few things are absolute but players who had to have discipline, and work ethic, and smarts to be effective are usually going to be better coaches than those who were mostly just bigger, stronger, and faster than others. So to recap-- Bill Belichick when asked his about his first thoughts on a player : He is one of the smartest players I have ever met. He is definitely the smartest WR I have ever coached. HE HAS TAUGHT ME MORE ABOUT WR PLAY THAN ANYONE. jg78- yeah but he is tall and fast... so he probably wouldn't be anygood if he went into coaching. Belichick- HE TAUGHT ME MORE ABOUT WR PLAY THAN ANYONE! jg78- Yeah..but he has a really good 40.. and can jump high- no thanks. I'm not arguing against Belichick's assessment, and Moss may be the smartest wide receiver ever, (and to be fair this may be a bit of me playing devil's advocate) but I am unsure if that alone would make him a good coach. I'm sure that Stephen Hawking was a lot smarter than my daughter's 7th grade science teacher, but I doubt Hawking would've done a better job of teaching her science class (and that has nothing to do with his disability, he's just the most famous contemporary genius I could think of right now). Point is: knowing something really well, and being able to teach/instruct/coach said things are two different skill sets. Sure Belichick could learn from the genius Moss, because Bill is the eager student; ie the kid you could just assign bookwork to and they would still get an 'A'. But does Moss have the teaching/coaching ability to instruct a diverse group of players, and do so in a way that they correlate it and perform on the field? Maybe he did, maybe not, but I think knowledge & smarts themselves are just one of a handful of skills that make a good instructor.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 28, 2023 13:55:40 GMT -6
So to recap-- Bill Belichick when asked his about his first thoughts on a player : He is one of the smartest players I have ever met. He is definitely the smartest WR I have ever coached. HE HAS TAUGHT ME MORE ABOUT WR PLAY THAN ANYONE. jg78- yeah but he is tall and fast... so he probably wouldn't be anygood if he went into coaching. Belichick- HE TAUGHT ME MORE ABOUT WR PLAY THAN ANYONE! jg78- Yeah..but he has a really good 40.. and can jump high- no thanks. I'm not arguing against Belichick's assessment, and Moss may be the smartest wide receiver ever, (and to be fair this may be a bit of me playing devil's advocate) but I am unsure if that alone would make him a good coach. I'm sure that Stephen Hawking was a lot smarter than my daughter's 7th grade science teacher, but I doubt Hawking would've done a better job of teaching her science class (and that has nothing to do with his disability, he's just the most famous contemporary genius I could think of right now). Point is: knowing something really well, and being able to teach/instruct/coach said things are two different skill sets. Sure Belichick could learn from the genius Moss, because Bill is the eager student; ie the kid you could just assign bookwork to and they would still get an 'A'. But does Moss have the teaching/coaching ability to instruct a diverse group of players, and do so in a way that they correlate it and perform on the field? Maybe he did, maybe not, but I think knowledge & smarts themselves are just one of a handful of skills that make a good instructor. Let's be clear, I don't think anyone in this thread is saying "Take it to the bank. Sanders is going to be great at Colorado, and Moss would be a great coach". I am just trying to point out that those who don't think success is (or would be) on the horizon are basing their decisions on pretty shaky ground. For example, Moss being fast. Or Jackson State losing in the Celebration Bowl.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on May 28, 2023 14:06:46 GMT -6
I'm not arguing against Belichick's assessment, and Moss may be the smartest wide receiver ever, (and to be fair this may be a bit of me playing devil's advocate) but I am unsure if that alone would make him a good coach. I'm sure that Stephen Hawking was a lot smarter than my daughter's 7th grade science teacher, but I doubt Hawking would've done a better job of teaching her science class (and that has nothing to do with his disability, he's just the most famous contemporary genius I could think of right now). Point is: knowing something really well, and being able to teach/instruct/coach said things are two different skill sets. Sure Belichick could learn from the genius Moss, because Bill is the eager student; ie the kid you could just assign bookwork to and they would still get an 'A'. But does Moss have the teaching/coaching ability to instruct a diverse group of players, and do so in a way that they correlate it and perform on the field? Maybe he did, maybe not, but I think knowledge & smarts themselves are just one of a handful of skills that make a good instructor. Let's be clear, I don't think anyone in this thread is saying "Take it to the bank. Sanders is going to be great at Colorado, and Moss would be a great coach". I am just trying to point out that those who don't think success is (or would be) on the horizon are basing their decisions on pretty shaky ground. For example, Moss being fast. Or Jackson State losing in the Celebration Bowl. I feel you. I just like theories of knowledge and instruction and figured this was an opportunity to discuss
|
|
|
Post by wolverine55 on May 28, 2023 15:01:12 GMT -6
The last couple pages of this thread have been amongst the oddest I've read on here. We might as well let aceback and that one guy who had literally had five different usernames chime in at this point.
|
|
|
Post by tog on May 28, 2023 17:18:23 GMT -6
The last couple pages of this thread have been amongst the oddest I've read on here. We might as well let aceback and that one guy who had literally had five different usernames chime in at this point. they were all the same dude, and his lackey.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 28, 2023 17:51:29 GMT -6
The last couple pages of this thread have been amongst the oddest I've read on here. We might as well let aceback and that one guy who had literally had five different usernames chime in at this point. they were all the same dude, and his lackey. Coach, I think he is talking about aceback- and pithy/ chcox / 1862 / grad17. I don't think those screennames were Coach Mountjoy.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 28, 2023 18:07:11 GMT -6
About the question of great players not being good coaches: How many great players have gone into coaching in FOOTBALL recently?
|
|
|
Post by carookie on May 28, 2023 19:30:58 GMT -6
About the question of great players not being good coaches: How many great players have gone into coaching in FOOTBALL recently? I think you have to analyze "great" relative to what level? What I mean is that there have been very few great NFL players who have gone into coaching, because there arent many of them, but I have known a number great HS players (who went on to have NFL careers) who have comeback to coach at the HS level. If they have to be great NFL players, and then coaching in the NFL then that is rare. But great HS players who come back to be good HS coaches I have seen
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on May 29, 2023 7:17:12 GMT -6
I don’t think it’s so much that a great player can’t be a great coach but that it can be telling to look at “why” the player was great when determining how good a coach someone might be. Larry Bird and Peyton Manning are among the greatest ever in their sports, but they were also known for their mental game. Bird was a successful coach for a period of time, and I imagine Manning would be good too.
All else being equal, a player who was good or great because he was sharp mentally is likely to be a better coach than someone who was good or great because he was a physical freak.
Deion was a physical freak who faced few (if any) WR’s he couldn’t outrun in his career. He also played 20-30 years ago and pretty much just locked down one guy instead of executing complex cover schemes.
Do I think Deion is as X’s and O’s savvy as a Kirby Smart or Lincoln Riley or even the average P5 head coach? I doubt it. As a pure football coach, he’s probably going to be below average compared to other P5 coaches.
Fortunately for Deion, being a wizard of the chalk board isn’t that important to being a college head coach. Deion has a lot of charisma and star power and those are more important traits provided he has the leadership ability to keep the program on the road.
If I were a major college head coach at a program like Bama, Georgia, LSU, or Ohio State, would I hire Deion to be my OC or DC? No. If I were the AD at one of those schools, would I hire him to be HC? No. If I were the AD at Colorado, would I have hired Deion? Yes. That program is so bad that it’s worth the risk (there is no risk, really) to see if Deion is capable. John Doe coming from Fresno State isn’t going to do anything at Colorado. But Deion might.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 29, 2023 9:01:51 GMT -6
I don’t think it’s so much that a great player can’t be a great coach but that it can be telling to look at “why” the player was great when determining how good a coach someone might be. Larry Bird and Peyton Manning are among the greatest ever in their sports, but they were also known for their mental game. Belichick on Moss Jg78-- But he is fast, so that doesn't count. Also while we are on this point, Bird and Manning both had skills that are just as rare, if not more so than the physical attributes you claim are negative when predicting who may be a good coach. Manning could process the movements of 21 other human beings relative to both their interactive dynamic changes as well as to his own personal movements in an incredibly small time window and make decisions based on that. He isn't teaching that to anybody. Bird could do the same with the 9 other players on the court, plus he could shoot with precision. He isn't teaching the first to anyone, and as far as shooting- I am fairly certain there have been tens of thousands of individuals who have practiced as much if not more than Bird did growing in the state of Indiana alone. Not to mention nationwide. He is well known for coming out of the huddle in last second moments, telling the opponent exactly what he was going to do, and then hitting the shot in their face. That kind of shooting prowess is on par with being able to run fast and jump high. Coach we have likely all coached that kid who were stronger than others, faster than others, more explosive than others, but just couldn't grasp the entirety of what they were being taught. I believe you are projecting that inability onto everyone who is bigger, stronger, faster etc (relative to their playing level). What the heck is a "pure football coach" Other than Hugh Freeze, can you give an example of an impure football coach (rimshot). And as far as x's and o's savvy, there are likely hundreds if not thousands of guys nationwide who can get up and draw things on the board at the same level as the coaches you mentioned. Heck, we have guys that post here on huey that are so far up the "guru's" behinds that they could draw up everything just as well. This we agree on. Interesting. If I were a major college head coach at a program like Bama, UGA, LSU or OSU- I would likely interview candidates before hiring as opposed to making my decision based on how fast they were as a player.
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on May 29, 2023 10:12:38 GMT -6
I don’t think what made Deion Sanders a great football player is easily transferable to coaching and teaching as what made Jerry Rice a great football player.
Rice played a more technical position, had a legendary work ethic, great character, and likely a greater knowledge of the game. He is arguably the greatest NFL player of all time without being incredibly gifted physically.
I am not saying players can’t be both smart and physically gifted. I am just saying when looking at players to be coaches, I would look for guys who displayed the best intangibles. I’m not saying Deion was lacking in football acumen as a player, but I don’t think he was the “coach on the field” type either.
If you gave one coach 50 players and another coach 50 players of equal ability, who would you favor to win? No recruiting to get better players or assistants to handle all the technical coaching for you. You have to coach them up yourself. That’s what I mean by “pure coaching.”
I don’t think Deion would fare very well in this scenario against most other P5 coaches. Not because he’s black, stupid, flamboyant, danced in the end zone as player, or whatever else. I just don’t think he has the technical background of most of his peers. He played in a very different era (in a less technical role and position) and hasn’t coached a snap against P5 competition.
If Deion is successful, I think it will be because of his charisma and ability to recruit - not his technical knowledge of the game. I don’t think he would make a very good coordinator in a conference like the SEC. Nothing wrong with that. Dabo Swinney has made a living at Clemson in large part by being charismatic, recruiting well, and convincing the school to invest lots of money in facilities and assistants who are probably better technical coaches than he is. He probably doesn’t last there without the Chad Morris hire to revamp his offense - and now Garrett Riley to do the same thing.
It’s going to be interesting to see how things play out in Boulder this year. I think one challenge for Deion will be how resilient he is if the team takes a beating - and I think they will. Deion has plenty of money and his name is secure in the annals of football history even if the Colorado stint is an epic disaster and they lose every game 50-0. Will he stick with the program if he’s not wildly successful?
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 29, 2023 10:46:36 GMT -6
I don’t think what made Deion Sanders a great football player is easily transferable to coaching and teaching as what made Jerry Rice a great football player. Again, interesting- as I just pointed out that what made your two previous examples of potential future good coaches (Bird and Manning) is also not easily transferable to coaching and teaching. Respectfully coach- All I have been saying/asking this entire time is on what basis do you feel comfortable saying "I don't think" regarding so many situations. Have you ever sat down and talked ball with Sanders (or Moss). Have you ever seen him in a meeting room. In install prep? In Install? In Individual practice segments? I think the difference between your opinions here and mine were clearly outlined in the previous post- where you said you would not hire Deion as a coordinator (with your supporting arguments being he was a fast player) and I said I would probably interview him before making a decision.
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on May 29, 2023 11:30:30 GMT -6
As players, do you really think Deion’s role was in any way comparable to Manning’s? A coach-on-the-field QB vs. a lockdown cover corner? You really don’t see my point here?
Deion in his prime probably had one of the most simplistic roles in NFL history. Manning had one of the most complex.
Because it’s a message board and it doesn’t matter what any of us says, but it’s still fun to speculate based on limited information.
|
|
|
Post by CS on May 29, 2023 17:24:13 GMT -6
As players, do you really think Deion’s role was in any way comparable to Manning’s? A coach-on-the-field QB vs. a lockdown cover corner? You really don’t see my point here? Deion in his prime probably had one of the most simplistic roles in NFL history. Manning had one of the most complex. Because it’s a message board and it doesn’t matter what any of us says, but it’s still fun to speculate based on limited information. Yeah anyone arguing their OPINION is right is a dumb person in this case. We will see in a few years if he knows what he’s doing
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 29, 2023 17:56:26 GMT -6
This should be the banner message on every message board on the internet.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on May 29, 2023 18:00:59 GMT -6
This should be the banner message on every message board on the internet. TRUTH here. And wisdom. But still fun to show up and contribute.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 30, 2023 6:32:14 GMT -6
A thought I had last night while at work- how many people weighing in on Deion, either pro or con, even saw Jackson State play last year? More than the ESPN hype machine documentary or highlights?
I saw probably parts of 3 or 4 games that added up to probably an entire game.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith627 on May 30, 2023 6:42:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by jstoss24 on May 30, 2023 7:02:28 GMT -6
If you gave one coach 50 players and another coach 50 players of equal ability, who would you favor to win? No recruiting to get better players or assistants to handle all the technical coaching for you. You have to coach them up yourself. That’s what I mean by “pure coaching.” "Pure coaching" is about 10% of being a college head coach, though. The other 90% is recruiting, schmoozing donors, recruiting, dealing with BS from the athletic department, recruiting, defining and driving the culture of the program, building a staff, and recruiting. Colorado and Jackson State did not hire Deion because they think he is Bill Belichick. They hired him to bring in more talented players than they would get otherwise and to put butts in seats. Deion was smart enough to go out and hire some coaches who look really good on paper. Will it work out for them? Who knows? As others have said in this thread, they will probably struggle a lot this year, and probably next year too, due to all their attrition, but if they are able to consistently bring in even the level of players he brought in to Jackson State, they should be more competitive under Tucker and Dorrell.
|
|
|
Post by coachdmyers on May 30, 2023 8:35:46 GMT -6
It helps the transition if the player was great due to his aptitude rather than his freak ability. I would rather have Hunter Renfrow, who looks like an accountant but somehow plays WR in the NFL, coaching my WR’s than Randy Moss - who was just taller, faster, and could out jump everyone he faced. People who were overachievers as players usually make the best coaches. The mental side of the game is certainly part of the skill set that is required to be one of the greatest players to ever play your position. You can know the game inside and out and still be a terrible coach. Lots of elite former players struggle as coaches. Hell, Jeff Saturday is a great example. I can't imagine Payton Manning's center was a mental liability out there.
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on May 30, 2023 14:38:57 GMT -6
I said as much.
How’s that a great example? He took over a team at midseason that had fired its coach? What did you expect, a Super Bowl win?
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 30, 2023 18:34:07 GMT -6
A thought I had last night while at work- how many people weighing in on Deion, either pro or con, even saw Jackson State play last year? More than the ESPN hype machine documentary or highlights? I saw probably parts of 3 or 4 games that added up to probably an entire game. Nobody? Ok.
|
|
|
Post by Defcord on May 31, 2023 2:36:46 GMT -6
The odds makers have the over/under set at 4.5 for Colorado wins. The Buffalos were a really bad 1-11 last year. So Vegas is thinking Sanders will do a decent job finding improvement. Sanders thinks they will do even better. I have no clue and wouldn’t want to bet that line. But I’d take the over if it was set at 1.5, pretty comfortably.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith627 on May 31, 2023 4:43:49 GMT -6
The odds makers have the over/under set at 4.5 for Colorado wins. The Buffalos were a really bad 1-11 last year. So Vegas is thinking Sanders will do a decent job finding improvement. Sanders thinks they will do even better. I have no clue and wouldn’t want to bet that line. But I’d take the over if it was set at 1.5, pretty comfortably. Yeah...I'd probably take the under on this one. People really don't understand how terrible they were last year.
|
|