|
Post by coachdirt on Aug 10, 2018 20:53:01 GMT -6
Hilarious fellas...this is a quote denoting the very irony you point out...though it is from dytmook...and sure enough, he finds it worthy of an uptick... Who the hell pays attention anymore? What a crowd. The only thing I know for sure is you're a DB who can't form an argument without calling someone a name. money You literally are forming an argument by calling someone a name. I now have to believe you only keep posting because you are still in school and your kids have taken their exams (eggs-ams) and you are trying to amuse yourself because you have nothing better to do before summer break officially rolls around.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Jun 3, 2018 9:37:25 GMT -6
I’m always amused how “snowflake” is always the term of choice for those who can’t handle being challenged by real evidence. What evidence? Product is less than ideal...Didn't aim at anyone's core being...What evidence??
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Jun 3, 2018 9:31:40 GMT -6
The only thing I know for sure is you're a DB who can't form an argument without calling someone a name.
money
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on May 26, 2018 21:30:46 GMT -6
Lol...if not for this White Knight...Attacking manner...buck up snowflake. You want a cookie for blindly dumping crap into kids because of ease and convenience and I'll be the JO who rips folk for it because it's lazy and ignorant. You can cry about 'being called lazy and ignorant', and think nothing of actually BEING those things. I'd chose being the JO 11/10 if that is the alternative. 'he called us dinosaurs, waaahhh' "Snowflake", "Lazy and ignorant", "Waaahh"? Is this what you consider a reasonable discussion? Do you have a critique on EGGS or a defence for Maltodextrin/Cattle Feed Over Real Food? Seems ignorant folks don't like being called out for being such. Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything here...being overly sensitive about someone calling a spade a spade can result in being encouraged to thicken ones skin...was this about pats on the back and participation trophies? Missed the memo. Crying about how the message is delivered but doing nothing about bettering ones methods IN SPITE of the messenger only confirms the ignorance. It isn't static or set in stone folks...just as some would appreciate a different delivery, and I assume are attempting correction, we can learn and improve. As opposed to just putting new tread on an old tire and spinning the same wobbly logic...
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on May 25, 2018 19:58:10 GMT -6
Lol. Reading comprehension. Get it. Anders posted the self deprecating slight. I responded with 'Hoss'...take the rod out of yer butt, Mooky. Agenda? Sure...less sick folk making better food choices. Could appear Pro Egg or Anti Cattle Feed. Considering throughout the thread you call people basically stupid, ignorant, poor educators, retreads, and probably several other things I don't have the time retrace, so before you question someone's reading comprehension of one post understand I made my observation based on all your posts in the thread. I get it, you don't like it. Cool. If you posted your agreement in a form like, "I prefer eggs over this because of xyz" and "I know it is approved for NCAA, but I don't like it because of "reasons""people would have likely more responsive to your argument. But since you started and continued in a condescending and attacking manner people were probably less likely to take your stance seriously. Glad after a month you continue to be a JO. Lol...if not for this White Knight...Attacking manner...buck up snowflake. You want a cookie for blindly dumping crap into kids because of ease and convenience and I'll be the JO who rips folk for it because it's lazy and ignorant. You can cry about 'being called lazy and ignorant', and think nothing of actually BEING those things. I'd chose being the JO 11/10 if that is the alternative. 'he called us dinosaurs, waaahhh'
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on May 24, 2018 19:56:06 GMT -6
Anyone just use a big tire instead of spending money on a ring ? I have heard of people buying the inner tube for a tractor tire and using that instead of the tackling ring. I have not seen anyone use an actual tire as a tackling ring. Commercial product that has an INSET valve called Tube In A Box comes in various sizes... tubeinabox.com/
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on May 24, 2018 19:40:20 GMT -6
Axe to grind much? I'd think from reading this you work for the egg lobby... Seriously, we get it, you're against the stuff. Naming calling and acting like JO isn't going to help any want to change their mind or take your side. Lol. Reading comprehension. Get it. Anders posted the self deprecating slight. I responded with 'Hoss'...take the rod out of yer butt, Mooky. Agenda? Sure...less sick folk making better food choices. Could appear Pro Egg or Anti Cattle Feed.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 17, 2018 10:30:01 GMT -6
So...if you can grasp the concept, what is the affiliation with maltodextrin canola oil soyboy Muscle Milk??? Doesn't make any sense unless you directly profit off of the sickness and disease created by ingesting garbage??? I’m a cornfed retard. I only understand things like man match coverages, back gapping run plays, and simulated zone pressures. I’m not smart enough to read a label and do nutritional research. Man...do you allow your players to exchange that type of bunkum excuse instead of doing work? You've got your answer right there, Hoss...you aren't livestock...quit consuming the FEED. www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/is-maltodextrin-bad-for-me
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:54:05 GMT -6
omelette bar...(fancier) in-shell hard-boiled...(no nonsense/lower budget)
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:44:37 GMT -6
Go find another source if this is not to your liking...I'd assume LS is about generating content, or likely regenerating content by reposting, thereby 'creating new' posts that reference older studies (and what exactly of studies from '07 & '10 is so dismissive worthy, anyway?) The Bias is Strong. Having an athlete consume 90g of Carbs to get 40g of Protein is ignorant. 'Essential Carbs' is Ignorance...An Essential Carb doesn't exist. Obesity, Diabetes...Carb Addiction. These things are REAL. God Put The Yolk & White Together. Who here is smarter than GOD? Surely not Slaves to Sugar. I am all for restricting carbs and sugar, especially refined versions, but that article doesn’t support the point you are adamantly attempting to make. You remain stuck on some falsehood that I shared the article for any other reason than a comparison of nut. values between the two versions of MM. I'm not attached to it if one were to have a side by side of the back labels, it'd serve my point and the rest of us far better. I've not the means to create such atm. Anyone can? It'd get us past the 'well if you use 4 scoops' trope...(Anders-the single serving size SAYS 4 SCOOPS ON THE LABEL - who has the reading comp. struggles?). Farts to the article, imo.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:38:49 GMT -6
*feedstock for cattle that end up sick and on anti biotics... check your role on the farm, fellas.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:32:08 GMT -6
Not as the Primary ingredient...Seriously...neither is a product I would ingest and honestly, I'd expect to be beaten to death for foisting this garbage on anyone's child. Your argument is bunk. This is just the Vanilla offering...the Choc Peanut Butter version is a complete clusterf*ck of garbage before ever hinting at Protein. EGGS EGGS EGGS EGGS EGGS. Hopefully they're pasture raised. You wouldn't want to put garbage in anyone's child or your body. So...if you can grasp the concept, what is the affiliation with maltodextrin canola oil soyboy Muscle Milk??? Doesn't make any sense unless you directly profit off of the sickness and disease created by ingesting garbage???
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:25:40 GMT -6
That article references studies nearly a decade old. Why does an article from 2017 have to use studies from 2007 and 2010? Go find another source if this is not to your liking...I'd assume LS is about generating content, or likely regenerating content by reposting, thereby 'creating new' posts that reference older studies (and what exactly of studies from '07 & '10 is so dismissive worthy, anyway?) The Bias is Strong. Having an athlete consume 90g of Carbs to get 40g of Protein is ignorant. 'Essential Carbs' is Ignorance...An Essential Carb doesn't exist. Obesity, Diabetes...Carb Addiction. These things are REAL. God Put The Yolk & White Together. Who here is smarter than GOD? Surely not Slaves to Sugar.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:15:56 GMT -6
You can't wash the {censored} out of Muscle Milk, but you can wash the {censored} off of an egg. One a chicken will give you for pretty much nothing and the other requires a serious investment in cognitive dissonance.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 11:10:28 GMT -6
First Ingredient in MMC is MALTODEXTRIN, ya Cornfed Retread...but yeah...nobody can compare the two...just take Anders' word for it. SMH. You realize that MM also has maltodextrin in it right? Not as the Primary ingredient...Seriously...neither is a product I would ingest and honestly, I'd expect to be beaten to death for foisting this garbage on anyone's child. Your argument is bunk. This is just the Vanilla offering...the Choc Peanut Butter version is a complete clusterf*ck of garbage before ever hinting at Protein. EGGS EGGS EGGS EGGS EGGS.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 10:52:55 GMT -6
You can choose to read the label. First Ingredient in MMC is MALTODEXTRIN, ya Cornfed Retread...but yeah...nobody can compare the two...just take Anders' word for it. SMH.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 10:37:49 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 10:31:03 GMT -6
MM Collegiate has 90g of Carbs per serving versus 18g of Carbs in reg. MM. MMC also has less fat than reg MM. Cholesterol is the building block, not a bogeyman...just as there is NO ESSENTIAL Carbohydrate...BOIL DEM EGGS...Cheap...Portable...Perfect. Well, when you put in more scoops of MMC than MM that would tend to happen. That's pure ignorance. PER SERVING. What is with the lack of comprehension with supposed educators? Your 'Ncaa approved' product serves up CALORIES. Calories made up of 2-3 times the amount of Carbs Versus Proteins. You have stock in INSULIN? Giving kids diabetes in the name of 'getting cheap Protein into em and hopefully some added muscle (to an athlete who is growing, so yeah...better hope to further physical dev. as opposed to stunting it/derailing it). Being wilfully ignorant about what you are feeding kids has no excuse. Figure out why YOU THINK YOU ARE ABOVE THIS.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 9:38:13 GMT -6
I see a whole lot of SUGAR and not much focus on PROTEIN. Taking two steps back in hopes that a step forward is gained doesn't move the chains in a favourable direction. Hardboiled Eggs, perhaps? We use Muscle Milk Collegiate. 1) It's allowed by the NCAA 2) 20g Protein and 3g Sugar MM Collegiate has 90g of Carbs per serving versus 18g of Carbs in reg. MM. MMC also has less fat than reg MM. Cholesterol is the building block, not a bogeyman...just as there is NO ESSENTIAL Carbohydrate...BOIL DEM EGGS...Cheap...Portable...Perfect.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 9:27:16 GMT -6
Magic Energy Balls From Chicken Butts!!! Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Apr 1, 2018 8:39:55 GMT -6
I see a whole lot of SUGAR and not much focus on PROTEIN. Taking two steps back in hopes that a step forward is gained doesn't move the chains in a favourable direction. Hardboiled Eggs, perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Feb 9, 2018 11:37:58 GMT -6
Yeah...Flag Football isn't football.. it's like Air Soccer or NoBasket Ball.. . The inability to adapt means what? Varied elements of beefing here. Poorly veiled politics fwiw. Here's the boildown: Prudently Prepare All Athletes Prior to 'Full Contact Ages' no matter talent level or athletic interest. Develop SKILLS and PHYSICAL STRENGTH. Teach The Sport/Game during their respective seasons and coach age appropriate techniques...Be Proactive and LEGISLATORS won't have much to REACT to. Be Proactive and Parents and Students won't have to be hard sold...Show Proactive Beats Reactive With Mindfulness. Sure...Reactive Due To Training...Thoughtless Repetition Of Mindless Drilling Feeds This Zombie Response. Great For Generals and Coaches To Feed Bodies To The Machine...Not So Great For Everything Else. Coaching Youth DOESN'T Have To Be Child Sacrifice. Unless YOU Insist.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Feb 8, 2018 12:31:55 GMT -6
FLAG FOOTBALL FOR 14 AND UNDER. FLAG. FLAG. FLAG. EVER HEARD OF IT? GREAT SHOWCASE PRIOR TO PROBOWL...PUTS 7V7 INTO A TOILET...YEAH BOB...ACT DUMB. HAVE TO BE TOLD HOW TO ADAPT. BE DIFFICULT TO COACH. BE DEAF TO THE OBVIOUS. Flag football doesn't limit tackling, it prohibits it. So excuse me for not understanding your English when you use words like "limit". The trouble is, for many children the only time in their lives they'll get to play tackle football is when they're less than 14 yrs. old., maybe less than 12. They're simply not the type of athlete that could play a passable open field game like flag; pretty much, they're not athletes, period. Tackle football is one of the few field games suitable for Fat Freddie, Slow Slim, or Clumsy Clem. Meanwhile, do you eliminate the "mat" contact sports for them, such as wrestling & judo, as well? But from what I've read, the experience of those coaching flag football thru the teen years is that it leads to more concussions and injuries in general than tackle football does. Incidental collisions seem to be the worst kind! Is MOLECH gonna come down on all y'all for not feeding the child sacrifice? Is that your beef? BULLGOD gonna be mad? Who cares about the useless snowflakes that don't play beyond their childhood? They aren't playing for anybody, so really who cares?? Not even a demographic that matters by your maths...WHO CARES IF KIDS WITH ZERO PERSEVERANCE DON'T GET AN 'OPPORTUNITY' TO QUIT/WASHOUT? BEFORE THEY EVEN SHADOW YOUR DOORSTEP??? NOBODY SHOULD.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Feb 8, 2018 8:51:35 GMT -6
Heck, fellas...USA Hockey & USA Soccer limit checking and heading, respectively, for 13 and under...they don't BAN. They adjust an element of adult sport to responsibly allow proper development of the youth athlete. Grow Up. Grow up a whole bunch. Quit your sky is falling tantrums and GROW UP. EVOLVE. BEND OR BREAK BECAUSE TIMES ARE A CHANGING WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. HS 'Presents Opportunities'...I mean...four five six fellas, you really think this is the thread that unravels every HS sporting outlet? Limiting tackling for under 14 all of a sudden equates to NO SPORTS. PERIOD. Ridiculous. Y'all are off yer rockers. How do you "limit tackling" in football? There are those who limit it in practice, but the consensus I see is that substantial limits on it are fruitful only w older, more experienced players. I attended Gabe Infante's clinic for USA Football last summer which went w the gen'l practice of having fairly little contact in practice sessions, & lots of substitute drills for contact ones -- but he's a HS coach. From what I've read, those coaching children who don't practice enough body-on-body technique at speed wind up playing not-so-safely in games. Do you have any ideas for how to limit tackling in games, yet still have it be tackle football? The only changes that I can think of to do that would make the game quite different, more like Rugby Union. You'd have to either make tackling less rewarding, so that the defense benefits less by doing it, or more difficult, or enough more rewarding that the offense takes greater pains to avoid being tackled. So you could make it legal for the offense to hold the ballcarrier up to prevent his being taken to the ground -- which would result in rugby mauls -- or make it so that the ballcarrier has a greater risk of giving up possession of the ball on being tackled, by having him release the ball such that it remains in play -- which would result in rugby rucks. Somebody I sat down w once explained an alternative a few yrs. ago that he's promoting: single scrimmage football. Pretty much the same as we have now, but w a big change: only 1 down, & no line-to-gain. You get tackled on 1st (& only) down, it's 1st (& only) down for the other team. So there'd be an awful lot of kicking; he'd allow Canadian/rugby style onside kicks, which would be the only way to put together a drive. Players in scoring position would lateral off the ball a lot to avoid being tackled. FLAG FOOTBALL FOR 14 AND UNDER. FLAG. FLAG. FLAG. EVER HEARD OF IT? GREAT SHOWCASE PRIOR TO PROBOWL...PUTS 7V7 INTO A TOILET...YEAH BOB...ACT DUMB. HAVE TO BE TOLD HOW TO ADAPT. BE DIFFICULT TO COACH. BE DEAF TO THE OBVIOUS. HAVE TO BE LEGISLATED. CRY ABOUT THAT, TOO. WHO SETS THE STANDARD? COACH OR CHILD? WHAT IS THE BENEFIT OF CLINGING LIKE A CHILD TO OUTGROWN ASPECTS OF LIFE?? WHAT EXAMPLE DOES THAT SET? SCALE ADULT ASPECTS OF ADULT SPORT INTO YOUTH COMPETITION AT RESPONSIBLE AGE/PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT LEVELS...Soccer & Hockey does it just fine...Since the Majority here seem to be HS Coaches, what the freakout is about is beyond me...spend your energies keeping up the structures of your programs to match the realities of the new day...evolve beyond the 'nah everthangs A-OK nevermind them fearmongrin doctors n hollywood moms...we do all the respect talks n heads up belly hugging drills so doncha worry none' to something a bit more akin to proactive and prudent preparation of athletes via a Neck strengthening protocol that begins prior to HS and continues throughout HS...Or just flail around sayin THEY'RE FOOKIN KILLIN FOOTBALL WAAAHWAAAHWAAAAH.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Feb 8, 2018 8:34:08 GMT -6
Heck, fellas...USA Hockey & USA Soccer limit checking and heading, respectively, for 13 and under...they don't BAN. They adjust an element of adult sport to responsibly allow proper development of the youth athlete. Grow Up. Grow up a whole bunch. Quit your sky is falling tantrums and GROW UP. EVOLVE. BEND OR BREAK BECAUSE TIMES ARE A CHANGING WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. HS 'Presents Opportunities'...I mean...four five six fellas, you really think this is the thread that unravels every HS sporting outlet? Limiting tackling for under 14 all of a sudden equates to NO SPORTS. PERIOD. Ridiculous. Y'all are off yer rockers. What are you talking about? First you mention hockey modifying rules, but this is a thread about banning the sport below age 12, not "modifying the rules". And who is saying anything about "NO SPORTS. PERIOD." in HS? What on earth are you talking about? I also can't believe anyone would ever point to youth hockey as support for anything resembling reasonableness...the only thing youth hockey is good for is to point out how screwed up adults are when it comes to youth sports. Being in Boston I have a front row seat to that madness. Follow along, though I doubt you will. Willingly ignorant seems to be a theme around here. Maybe the concept of Hockey still being called hockey without the checking (and fighting!!) element...Maybe if your lot didn't have a raging fit at the idea of scaling aspects of an adult sport for developing youth, you'd not have to be legislated like...what...yardapes? So perhaps digest the fact that FLAG FOOTBALL FOR 14 AND UNDER is How The Sport Should Be. Now if you are still paying attention and keeping up, you might be aware that DRAMATIC here cry foul at IF FOOTBALL NOW THEN EVERYTHING IS GONNA GET BANNED WAAAH WAAAH BOOO HOOOO. So that's where the 'Thread that unravels all HS sporting outlets' is derived from. Ya Keeping Up?? Yeah PAL...CRO-MAG GOONHAVEN HOCKEY HAS MANAGED TO NOT HAVE TO BE LEGISLATED INTO RESPONSIBLE PRACTICES...THOSE KNUCKLE DRAGGING SCUMBUCKETS MANAGED TO WHAT ...GROW UP? EVOLVE? TAKE RESPONSIBILITY? SORRY PAL...WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? ABSURD.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Feb 3, 2018 20:26:39 GMT -6
Youth Football isn't a means of acquiring post secondary scholarship...like all other youth sport...but HS Athletics DOES present these types of opportunities. So if you're going to ban youth football for safety reasons, you'll justify risking the safety of HS kids for the FEW who get scholarships out of it? My local HS's entire league doesn't even see one football scholarship per year. They have kids playing at the next level, but not on any kind of ride... Heck, fellas...USA Hockey & USA Soccer limit checking and heading, respectively, for 13 and under...they don't BAN. They adjust an element of adult sport to responsibly allow proper development of the youth athlete. Grow Up. Grow up a whole bunch. Quit your sky is falling tantrums and GROW UP. EVOLVE. BEND OR BREAK BECAUSE TIMES ARE A CHANGING WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. HS 'Presents Opportunities'...I mean...four five six fellas, you really think this is the thread that unravels every HS sporting outlet? Limiting tackling for under 14 all of a sudden equates to NO SPORTS. PERIOD. Ridiculous. Y'all are off yer rockers.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Feb 2, 2018 9:39:33 GMT -6
Why should HS football exist if youth football isn't allowed to? What's the argument to do one but not the other? And note - those places where youth football doesn't exist, I would imagine that isn't because of legislation, it's because of interest. No issue with that. If you can't get kids out to play, you shouldn't have the program. Youth Football isn't a means of acquiring post secondary scholarship...like all other youth sport...but HS Athletics DOES present these types of opportunities.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Jan 30, 2018 21:12:37 GMT -6
Can't see how a shift to Flag until 15 (I also think that a rugby program for 13-15 to develop sound form tackling skills would be a positive element of evolution of the game/player dev.) would threaten the possibility of retaining more players than are already deciding to play HS...quite the opposite. It's a rare Adult activity foist upon children, You really believe that? That it's some bit of exotica that parents have somehow gotten their children to perform, rather than something children beg their parents to be allowed to do? Children have engaged in full contact sports since before there were human beings. Now Now, You're not That old, Bob. But kudos for the trolling, usually that is for the younger set. You've avoided making sense in two replies, now, so let's leave it at that. Scaling aspects of gameplay with age progression and retention trends will appear certain ways depending on how you skew your logic on the topic. Kids aping adults is hardly exotica, though adults not scaling the activity appropriately is retardica.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Jan 30, 2018 8:37:20 GMT -6
Now, not every case is going to be 6'4" 250... but just heard a clip about a Coach, Jody Cwik, from Dwayne Johnson, that shines some perspective on this. Easy work isn't work.
|
|
|
Post by coachdirt on Jan 29, 2018 21:37:08 GMT -6
My point about HC is that as a National Body it proactively instituted these rules as opposed to having to be made to via Legislation. Something about taking responsibility or some such thing. Probably some antiquated notion. Useless to some, even. So we kinda ARE talking about HAVING to Legislate something that IS CONFLICTED and INCONSISTENT. Up here we have Football Canada as the umbrella for that sport just like Hockey...no player anywhere avoids registration and gets to participate...certainly with population & geography, it might be easier up here...though if every Province dug in with differing stances, there'd be similar issues, no doubt. But I guarantee you that if Football Canada stopped sanctioning tackle football for U14s, U12s, or whatever, the teams would not stop operating. It's a tough one to sort, it being a Minor hockey level comparison, while Midget & Junior (HS ages) apparently do contend with a few 'Outlaw' leagues (AAU) and use sanctions to keep them in check. northlondonhockey.ca/Articles/10861/IMPORTANT_INFORMATION_REGARDING_OUTLAW_LEAGUES/ That said, there have been age limits on body checking for over 30 years...conversely, the worst NHL teams at the moment are the ones that hit the most...but speed is killing it. Fighting is really declining (an adult element that children aren't allowed to engage in, imagine that!) overall, but it's still called Hockey and it continues to grow.
|
|