|
Post by carookie on May 7, 2024 16:14:25 GMT -6
Lets say you have a player who wants to play a given position, receiver for example, and at which he will be the fourth WR in your rotation and see limited playing time. Conversely, if he switched to running back he would start and be a major contributor. You, as a coaching staff believe it makes your team better to have him at RB. He believes he has a better shot at going to college as a receiver (regardless of that being true, he believes it).
Who decides what position he plays?
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 7, 2024 16:31:28 GMT -6
I let players spend the summer at whatever position they wanted, but would tell them I thought they'd be better somewhere else. Usually, by the time 2 a days would start they'd go with the position I wanted them at because they knew they'd never play otherwise after they sat all summer.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on May 7, 2024 19:19:45 GMT -6
I let players spend the summer at whatever position they wanted, but would tell them I thought they'd be better somewhere else. Usually, by the time 2 a days would start they'd go with the position I wanted them at because they knew they'd never play otherwise after they sat all summer. What if the given player does play at the position THEY want to play at, just not that much & you feel the team would be better with them somewhere else?
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 7, 2024 19:46:40 GMT -6
I let players spend the summer at whatever position they wanted, but would tell them I thought they'd be better somewhere else. Usually, by the time 2 a days would start they'd go with the position I wanted them at because they knew they'd never play otherwise after they sat all summer. What if the given player does play at the position THEY want to play at, just not that much & you feel the team would be better with them somewhere else? For us the coaches decided but there's not much you can do if a kid is bound and determined to play somewhere else. We had a kid once who we asked to play fullback, where he would have started. He insisted on playing tailback. Problem was he was behind: 1. Our senior, who gained 2000 yds., was All State, and got a Power 5 schollie. 2. A junior who, the next year, gained 2000 yds, was All State, and got an FCS schollie. 3. A soph who, his senior year, gained 2000 yds, was All State, and got an FCS schollie. He could have played defense but half-assed it there and never played. Mostly, our guys were team players but sometimes they aren't and there's nothing you can do about it.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 7, 2024 20:28:23 GMT -6
I let players spend the summer at whatever position they wanted, but would tell them I thought they'd be better somewhere else. Usually, by the time 2 a days would start they'd go with the position I wanted them at because they knew they'd never play otherwise after they sat all summer. What if the given player does play at the position THEY want to play at, just not that much & you feel the team would be better with them somewhere else? If they choose to stay there, they stay there. If they don't want to move for the betterment of the team, we basically move on without them. A kid like that isn't going to contribute much if you make them do anything. I didn't have much use for kids like that. They usually got the message.
|
|
|
Post by agap on May 7, 2024 21:17:47 GMT -6
You can never physically make someone play a certain position. We’ve always let players decide. If we thought they were better someone else, we’d have that conversation. If they wanted to move, great. If they didn’t want to move, they were 2nd, 3rd, whatever on the depth chart and we moved on with our lives. That’s their fault if they don’t want to play.
|
|
|
Post by MICoach on May 8, 2024 5:53:11 GMT -6
I try to lay it out logically, and be blunt without being rude. I find this is hardest with getting kids to move to OL, which is unfortunate but either they're willing to do it or they're not. If you're asking a kid to make a move to get more playing time and help the team out, and he still says no, then he's probably not someone you can rely on...
|
|
lws55
Sophomore Member
Posts: 241
|
Post by lws55 on May 8, 2024 5:58:01 GMT -6
Dealing with this right now. Have a kid that is dead set on playing receiver, he is better suited body wise, to play our H. He will still get to catch the ball and still have a chance to score touchdown, but he would have to consistently block in our run game and he doesn't want to do that. He will probably spend another year on JV instead of getting meaningful reps on Varsity. But so be it.
|
|
|
Post by 44special on May 8, 2024 8:10:25 GMT -6
i find this to be strange.
the one thing i couldn't stand was being on the sideline (maybe that's the reason i never was?). wherever i could get on the field was ok with me.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 8, 2024 8:24:29 GMT -6
i find this to be strange. the one thing i couldn't stand was being on the sideline (maybe that's the reason i never was?). wherever i could get on the field was ok with me. I don't care what anyone says, and I don't want to derail this thread, but kids, overall, are drastically different than any other point in football history. Wins, losses, team success, none of that matters to a growing number of them. Stats and them "getting theirs" does. And if they can't get what they want, they'll "move".
|
|
|
Post by realdawg on May 8, 2024 8:51:55 GMT -6
I agree with about everything said. We let the kids go where they want during the spring and summer. Come Aug 1. We try to move them where we need them or they can help us most. Some kids. That is fighting a losing battle. One thing that is near impossible to do is make a kid an OL who doesn’t want to be one. A lot of coaches I’ve worked with-especially skill position coaches-say just move that kid to guard. Well. It doesn’t work like that. If he doesn’t want to be a guard. He’s gonna half butt it in my experience.
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on May 8, 2024 10:12:12 GMT -6
What was DCOhio's slogan?
You can lead a horse to water you can't make him drink, but I can drown his arse trying.
|
|
|
Post by 3rdandlong on May 8, 2024 11:19:20 GMT -6
On a football team, there are players and there are coaches. It's simple. Players play, coaches coach. Player goes where coach tells him to go. Coach knows more than Uncle Rico who is telling him where he should play. Coach doesn't give 2 chits about what player dreams about in the backyard.
I like to think of myself as a pretty progressive type of coach who allows kids to take ownership of the team, but it's pretty crazy to me to see that people are letting kids dictate what is going to happen on the football field. Coaches are in charge.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on May 8, 2024 11:39:27 GMT -6
This really only becomes an issue when trying to move a kid from one starting position to another. If the kids balks, it's difficult to be a hard-a$$ about the situation as we'd rather have that kid contributing at their original position. Versus digging their heels in or giving garbage effort at the other position.
|
|
|
Post by cwaltsmith on May 8, 2024 12:41:33 GMT -6
As said before coach decides... but there is a but... kid will play better if happy... I have had to explain to kids that they could play a lot here and help team more or play a little there and usually they play where I want. but I have had some quit and that helped no one. This also has a lot to do with where your success level is as a program. The more you win the easier it is.
|
|
|
Post by IronmanFootball on May 8, 2024 16:32:34 GMT -6
i find this to be strange. the one thing i couldn't stand was being on the sideline (maybe that's the reason i never was?). wherever i could get on the field was ok with me. I don't care what anyone says, and I don't want to derail this thread, but kids, overall, are drastically different than any other point in football history. Wins, losses, team success, none of that matters to a growing number of them. Stats and them "getting theirs" does. And if they can't get what they want, they'll "move". I played with a guy that wouldn't STFU about his 1,000 yard season after we lost by 28. Another guy that would pose for pix with his girl after we lost by 50. Guys that pushed good players away (even injuring a guy on purpose) so their boys could get PT. Guys who snitched on teammates so their boys could get PT. Guys who transferred back and forth to schools for PT, bc of arguing w/ the coach, etc. And that was in the 90's, in a small hick town in FL.
|
|
|
Post by planck on May 8, 2024 19:10:39 GMT -6
Kind of depends on the kid... basically, the coaches decide, but certain kids will be allowed to try a new position in the summer. Typically, after a week they realize they aren't good enough to crack the depth chart there and move where we thought they should go anyway.
Then there are the kids who don't have a clue and are trying to send their 10th grade third string OL clips to D1 programs. As long as they aren't a distraction, we kind of let them pick a position. Realistically they're not going to play no matter where they are, so it's irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by 44dlcoach on May 8, 2024 19:25:11 GMT -6
I usually sell it to the kids with two factors: 1. We wouldn't be asking you to move if we didn't think you were going to be our guy at this new position. And if it doesn't work out then I give them my word that they can move back to where they're "comfortable" or whatever. 2. Stroke the ego and tell them we're asking them to move because this "new" position is more valuable to our team success and they're the best guy from their position groups with the physical skills to make the move.
Done that moving corners to safety, safeties to corners, safeties to LB, etc. It is always harder to convince kids to move to the line, especially OL or Nose on defense.
If a kid projects to be a backup at both spots then we let him play where he wants.
|
|
|
Post by groundchuck on May 9, 2024 3:55:30 GMT -6
I always tell kids starting in grade school that before they can call themselves a quarterback or a runningback, or whatever they have to call themselves a football player first. Not a position, but a football player. A football player is willing to do whatever they need to to help the team.
In my opnion it should not be a shock to a kid if you ask him to move from say TE to tackle. I think most kids would like to start or play -vs- standing on the sideline. I think the most important thing here is team culture. If the kid is selfish it is going to be an issue. If he is all in and trust is high then usually they are willing. Parenttal influence here is important too. The only time I really had a problem with moving a player to a different position was when the player's mom got involved.
|
|
|
Post by blb on May 9, 2024 5:41:16 GMT -6
Since I was a varsity HC kids were pretty well slotted into positions by the time they got to me as juniors.
I told them that they could play any position they desired at summer camp because they were paying for it but once practice started coaches would put them where we thought they could help team most-have the best chance to play.
However things are different than when I played-broke into coaching. Now if a kid sees himself as a WR for ex. and you tell him he's got to play something else, he may just say "Screw it, I'll go play fall baseball (or go to basketball 'Open Gym,' wrestling workouts, or get a job)."
HS football is no longer the authoritarian sport it once was.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on May 9, 2024 6:55:10 GMT -6
I don't care what anyone says, and I don't want to derail this thread, but kids, overall, are drastically different than any other point in football history. Wins, losses, team success, none of that matters to a growing number of them. Stats and them "getting theirs" does. And if they can't get what they want, they'll "move". I played with a guy that wouldn't STFU about his 1,000 yard season after we lost by 28. Another guy that would pose for pix with his girl after we lost by 50. Guys that pushed good players away (even injuring a guy on purpose) so their boys could get PT. Guys who snitched on teammates so their boys could get PT. Guys who transferred back and forth to schools for PT, bc of arguing w/ the coach, etc. And that was in the 90's, in a small hick town in FL. We were good in HS, so I did not encounter people like this.
|
|
|
Post by IronmanFootball on May 9, 2024 7:24:15 GMT -6
I played with a guy that wouldn't STFU about his 1,000 yard season after we lost by 28. Another guy that would pose for pix with his girl after we lost by 50. Guys that pushed good players away (even injuring a guy on purpose) so their boys could get PT. Guys who snitched on teammates so their boys could get PT. Guys who transferred back and forth to schools for PT, bc of arguing w/ the coach, etc. And that was in the 90's, in a small hick town in FL. We were good in HS, so I did not encounter people like this. But with "these kids today" I had a guy willing to switch from LB to OT to provide depth in "this era" a couple of years ago. Parents have changed, school admin have changed.
|
|
|
Post by GuyinOhio on May 9, 2024 7:39:37 GMT -6
Can you motion him from the WR spot to a RB type position and just give him hand offs from there? Jet motion, orbit motion with toss etc. May be difficult if it is an inside run I understand, but could get creative.
|
|
|
Post by wolverine55 on May 9, 2024 8:24:36 GMT -6
We did give in to a kid who didn't want to play OL and wanted to be a TE/WR type. We made him our F...and he kicked out on power, reached on outside zone, and wrapped on counter all season long. Could count on one hand the number of in-game pass routes he ran!
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 9, 2024 8:41:31 GMT -6
Somewhat related story- Mid 90s. 3 schools in city- one a state power, one a decent school, one has .500 aspirations. Kid attending the third school- capable of starting as Freshman at TE in Wing T scheme. But no- he “is a FB”. Father is pain all year etc. Coach at the powerhouse puts it into the community that the kid “could play FB “ at his school. Nefariousness ensues- somehow the kid is at the power house school as a soph. Playing FB. In a one back offense where the FB lines up on the Hip of the TE or Tackle and blocks. Genius The kid ended up playing 3 tech in college
|
|
|
Post by MICoach on May 9, 2024 8:49:35 GMT -6
It is always harder to convince kids to move to the line, especially OL or Nose on defense. Man I've had some migraines over this... We had a kid a few years back who considered himself a middle linebacker from the time he came into high school. He played the part of the rah-rah guy, was passable on freshmen, worse on JV, and wasn't really a very good varsity player but he had nobody behind him to compete with so he got some playing time and was elected captain as a senior. I also told him as a freshman that he should consider playing OL because it was probably where he could best benefit the team, but he was more or less disgusted by the idea. By senior year we were super thin at OL and needed to move him from third string TE to guard. Kid about had a meltdown because he had to wear an ineligible number. That same class had another OLB type kid who ate his way into a DL role, and a decent nose who wouldn't been a monster on the OL but refused to try at all, dogging it in practice to avoid having to play offense. That class was an absolute nightmare.
|
|
|
Post by bulldogsdc on May 9, 2024 9:04:13 GMT -6
i find this to be strange. the one thing i couldn't stand was being on the sideline (maybe that's the reason i never was?). wherever i could get on the field was ok with me. I don't care what anyone says, and I don't want to derail this thread, but kids, overall, are drastically different than any other point in football history. Wins, losses, team success, none of that matters to a growing number of them. Stats and them "getting theirs" does. And if they can't get what they want, they'll "move". Every one of the white boys in Remember the Titans were worried about "THEIRS" when Coach Boone took over.
|
|
|
Post by 44dlcoach on May 9, 2024 9:52:58 GMT -6
It is always harder to convince kids to move to the line, especially OL or Nose on defense. Man I've had some migraines over this... We had a kid a few years back who considered himself a middle linebacker from the time he came into high school. He played the part of the rah-rah guy, was passable on freshmen, worse on JV, and wasn't really a very good varsity player but he had nobody behind him to compete with so he got some playing time and was elected captain as a senior. I also told him as a freshman that he should consider playing OL because it was probably where he could best benefit the team, but he was more or less disgusted by the idea. By senior year we were super thin at OL and needed to move him from third string TE to guard. Kid about had a meltdown because he had to wear an ineligible number. That same class had another OLB type kid who ate his way into a DL role, and a decent nose who wouldn't been a monster on the OL but refused to try at all, dogging it in practice to avoid having to play offense. That class was an absolute nightmare. Three years ago now we had a kid quit the team and transfer mid-season because he was starting at Nose and not LB. We had a conversation where I told him we had three starters at LB better than him, but we thought he was part of our best 11 so we wanted to get him on the field as a slanting Nose. He said "but that's not where I'm going to play in college." I thought we came to some common ground where he would start on DL and also be a backup LB. That week he started at Nose on Friday night and was at a new school the following Monday. There's a longer story to tell, but the football gods smited him and his dip$hit father from there
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 9, 2024 10:44:37 GMT -6
This stuff isn't really that new. Old-timers here may remember Hawke. He was one of my HS coaches. He told me that back in the '80's they "switched" from a 50 defense to a 3-4 because nobody wanted to play tackle. So, they went to the 3-4, DEs became OLBs and DTs became ends. Nothing actually changed except the terminology.
|
|
|
Post by MICoach on May 9, 2024 11:03:49 GMT -6
This stuff isn't really that new. Old-timers here may remember Hawke. He was one of my HS coaches. He told me that back in the '80's they "switched" from a 50 defense to a 3-4 because nobody wanted to play tackle. So, they went to the 3-4, DEs became OLBs and DTs became ends. Nothing actually changed except the terminology. This is the best part of running a 3-4! One of the kids I mentioned above, came in as a safety as a freshman and ate his way to OLB by sophomore year, then rush OLB but we let him call himself an OLB, then senior year he was an "outside linebacker" lining up in a 4i and 3
|
|