|
Post by wingtol on Jun 10, 2023 7:42:26 GMT -6
Our summer scheduled use to be M, T, TH 4-5 Lift 5-7 on field starting July. Wasn't too bad. We didn't do any 7-7 tournaments or that non-sense. We might have had a like minded school to do a 7-7 with during our normal schedule. Pretty common for most schools around here to do the same. Some of course more and some less.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 10, 2023 8:15:16 GMT -6
Our summer scheduled use to be M, T, TH 4-5 Lift 5-7 on field starting July. Wasn't too bad. We didn't do any 7-7 tournaments or that non-sense. We might have had a like minded school to do a 7-7 with during our normal schedule. Pretty common for most schools around here to do the same. Some of course more and some less. what did you do on the field for those 2 hours?
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Jun 10, 2023 13:50:39 GMT -6
Run a normal practice basically. Basically like NFL OTAs. It was always changing with our state association but we could wear helmets. Some years we were allowed shoulder pads as well. Could hit bags most years, some years there were stipulations with "contact" not that we ever approached anything close to full contact in summer work outs.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 10, 2023 15:00:30 GMT -6
It just shocks me a bit that it seems like so many essentially start full blown practices (but without contact) before NFL and NCAA teams do.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jun 10, 2023 16:54:26 GMT -6
It just shocks me a bit that it seems like so many essentially start full blown practices (but without contact) before NFL and NCAA teams do. Until someone with authority has the guts to rein them in, then what will stop them. Remember, a lot of the coaches who are doing this believe that 20+ hours a week throughout summer is not surpassing the point of negative returns. I imagine most of them would argue that 20 hours (or whatever they do) is the sweet spot, but I imagine that stems from their background, and coming from a situation where having done less at one point was attached to a losing season. Which leads me to wonder, what will the next generation of coaches do? Maybe a decade from now 30 hours a week in the summer will become the norm? I wonder if we were to isolate coaches in a natural state, and they were to look at the information from the outside vantage point with no biases, what would they view as the optimal amount of practice time?
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 17:39:31 GMT -6
It just shocks me a bit that it seems like so many essentially start full blown practices (but without contact) before NFL and NCAA teams do. Until someone with authority has the guts to rein them in, then what will stop them. Remember, a lot of the coaches who are doing this believe that 20+ hours a week throughout summer is not surpassing the point of negative returns. I imagine most of them would argue that 20 hours (or whatever they do) is the sweet spot, but I imagine that stems from their background, and coming from a situation where having done less at one point was attached to a losing season. Which leads me to wonder, what will the next generation of coaches do? Maybe a decade from now 30 hours a week in the summer will become the norm? I wonder if we were to isolate coaches in a natural state, and they were to look at the information from the outside vantage point with no biases, what would they view as the optimal amount of practice time? RE: The 30 hours a week thing in the future, to play the opposite side of this, why not? College and pro players spend all day in either teaching/install/meeting time, practicing, or lifting. If an 18 year old college player can be expected to do that, why cant a HS coach expect that from a 17 or 18 year old HS player, [EDIT] assuming they have a group of players who care and are bought in to the program? Bring them in at 7 or 8 in the morning, and have them doing something football related for 6 hours a day, M-T or M-F during the summer. If 18 year old college players supposedly don't get burned out on that and have the attention span to be in meetings all day to memorize and retain 500+ page offensive/defensive install packets, don't see why a 17 or 18 year old HS player would get burned out? (Again, playing the other side of this, and being at least slightly facetious...)
|
|
|
Post by CS on Jun 10, 2023 17:47:57 GMT -6
Until someone with authority has the guts to rein them in, then what will stop them. Remember, a lot of the coaches who are doing this believe that 20+ hours a week throughout summer is not surpassing the point of negative returns. I imagine most of them would argue that 20 hours (or whatever they do) is the sweet spot, but I imagine that stems from their background, and coming from a situation where having done less at one point was attached to a losing season. Which leads me to wonder, what will the next generation of coaches do? Maybe a decade from now 30 hours a week in the summer will become the norm? I wonder if we were to isolate coaches in a natural state, and they were to look at the information from the outside vantage point with no biases, what would they view as the optimal amount of practice time? RE: The 30 hours a week thing in the future, to play the opposite side of this, why not? College and pro players spend all day in either teaching/install/meeting time, practicing, or lifting. If an 18 year old college player can be expected to do that, why cant a HS coach expect that from a 17 or 18 year old HS player? Bring them in at 7 or 8 in the morning, and have them doing something football related for 6 hours a day, M-T or M-F during the summer. If 18 year old college players supposedly don't get burned out on that and have the attention span to be in meetings all day to memorize and retain 500+ page offensive/defensive install packets, don't see why a 17 or 18 year old HS player would get burned out? (Again, playing the other side of this, and being at least slightly facetious...) You’re comparing apples to oranges. I find it difficult to understand how you could make that argument. Ncaa has time restrictions for practicing and nfl players are being paid a lot of money
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 18:01:17 GMT -6
RE: The 30 hours a week thing in the future, to play the opposite side of this, why not? College and pro players spend all day in either teaching/install/meeting time, practicing, or lifting. If an 18 year old college player can be expected to do that, why cant a HS coach expect that from a 17 or 18 year old HS player? Bring them in at 7 or 8 in the morning, and have them doing something football related for 6 hours a day, M-T or M-F during the summer. If 18 year old college players supposedly don't get burned out on that and have the attention span to be in meetings all day to memorize and retain 500+ page offensive/defensive install packets, don't see why a 17 or 18 year old HS player would get burned out? (Again, playing the other side of this, and being at least slightly facetious...) You’re comparing apples to oranges. I find it difficult to understand how you could make that argument. Ncaa has time restrictions for practicing Then just how exactly are those 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and rehashed/revisited until they become second nature for the players? What are the weekly time restrictions in the summer on teaching meeting time, lifting, and on-field practice (contact and limited/non-contact)? Why does that mean HS players can't come in for 6 hours a day M-Thu or M-F during the summer, assuming the HS players are bought in and willing to? If the players aren't willing to, then sure, but if they are willing to, why not? If people don't have the attention span in HS to spend all day in meetings, practice, and lifting, they wont magically develop the attention span to do so by the time they are 21, 22, or 23 and in the pros. Are we now getting into territory of saying you have to have an off the charts attention span to make it in the pros in addition to being in an already extremely small segment of the population athletically? I love football man, I get into the weeds, but my brain gets cooked after a while...I think even if you put millions of dollars on the table, i couldn't force myself to have a rare level of focus to get that money.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 10, 2023 18:35:25 GMT -6
You’re comparing apples to oranges. I find it difficult to understand how you could make that argument. Ncaa has time restrictions for practicing Then just how exactly are those 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and rehashed/revisited until they become second nature for the players? What are the weekly time restrictions in the summer on teaching meeting time, lifting, and on-field practice (contact and limited/non-contact)? Why does that mean HS players can't come in for 6 hours a day M-Thu or M-F during the summer, assuming the HS players are bought in and willing to? If the players aren't willing to, then sure, but if they are willing to, why not? If people don't have the attention span in HS to spend all day in meetings, practice, and lifting, they wont magically develop the attention span to do so by the time they are 21, 22, or 23 and in the pros. Are we now getting into territory of saying you have to have an off the charts attention span to make it in the pros in addition to being in an already extremely small segment of the population athletically? I love football man, I get into the weeds, but my brain gets cooked after a while...I think even if you put millions of dollars on the table, i couldn't force myself to have a rare level of focus to get that money. I will be honest- I can't tell if you are seriously typing this, or are being facetious. And to answer your question about summer contact in NCAA.. it is ZERO. They can not have meeting time, on field practice etc in college with the football coaches. That is why the strength guys are at a premium. College athletes spend more time with S&C coaches than they they do their sport coaches throughout their careers.
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 18:38:58 GMT -6
Then just how exactly are those 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and rehashed/revisited until they become second nature for the players? What are the weekly time restrictions in the summer on teaching meeting time, lifting, and on-field practice (contact and limited/non-contact)? Why does that mean HS players can't come in for 6 hours a day M-Thu or M-F during the summer, assuming the HS players are bought in and willing to? If the players aren't willing to, then sure, but if they are willing to, why not? If people don't have the attention span in HS to spend all day in meetings, practice, and lifting, they wont magically develop the attention span to do so by the time they are 21, 22, or 23 and in the pros. Are we now getting into territory of saying you have to have an off the charts attention span to make it in the pros in addition to being in an already extremely small segment of the population athletically? I love football man, I get into the weeds, but my brain gets cooked after a while...I think even if you put millions of dollars on the table, i couldn't force myself to have a rare level of focus to get that money. I will be honest- I can't tell if you are seriously typing this, or are being facetious. Like I said above, playing the other side of what coach said above about 30 hour weeks in the future for HS. I want to explore "Why not?" even when the players are willing to?
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jun 10, 2023 19:15:13 GMT -6
Until someone with authority has the guts to rein them in, then what will stop them. Remember, a lot of the coaches who are doing this believe that 20+ hours a week throughout summer is not surpassing the point of negative returns. I imagine most of them would argue that 20 hours (or whatever they do) is the sweet spot, but I imagine that stems from their background, and coming from a situation where having done less at one point was attached to a losing season. Which leads me to wonder, what will the next generation of coaches do? Maybe a decade from now 30 hours a week in the summer will become the norm? I wonder if we were to isolate coaches in a natural state, and they were to look at the information from the outside vantage point with no biases, what would they view as the optimal amount of practice time? RE: The 30 hours a week thing in the future, to play the opposite side of this, why not? College and pro players spend all day in either teaching/install/meeting time, practicing, or lifting. If an 18 year old college player can be expected to do that, why cant a HS coach expect that from a 17 or 18 year old HS player, [EDIT] assuming they have a group of players who care and are bought in to the program? Bring them in at 7 or 8 in the morning, and have them doing something football related for 6 hours a day, M-T or M-F during the summer. If 18 year old college players supposedly don't get burned out on that and have the attention span to be in meetings all day to memorize and retain 500+ page offensive/defensive install packets, don't see why a 17 or 18 year old HS player would get burned out? (Again, playing the other side of this, and being at least slightly facetious...) I know you are playing the other side, but that is somewhat the crux of my post. What is the optimal (in general) amount of time to spend for in summer weekly practices? Lets isolate the variable here a bit; lets assume that family factors are not an issue. For NFL players, as you cited, this is their job. So if they want vacation time, time with the family, etc. it has to work around the team's schedule. For HS players, this is not paying the bills, their parents are; so if mom and dad want to take a vacation, or get some time for their son to enjoy the summer, then they win out. They don't have to fit around your schedule to provide for their family, or like a college athlete to maintain their scholarship. Lets assume, there is no risk of parent mutiny. Mom and dad are willing and wanting to wake up at 4 AM to get their kid to practice 7 days a week if called upon, and don't care if he gets a trip camping or to the beach. Additionally, lets assume a few other things: the primary goal is to win the state championship. Your players won't mutiny either, but they can burn out all the same (ditto for your coaches). The amount of time other coaches in the state varies across the board, but nobody is using your time spent against you to poach your players. You have 10 weeks of summer, then a scrimmage during your first week of school, followed by week one game. How many hours are your putting in, and why? Whats the reasoning (why not one more hour or one fewer)? Do you go light in the summer, then bring back a hell week? PS, as an aside, as far as I know colleges practice far less in the summer.
|
|
|
Post by CS on Jun 10, 2023 19:29:22 GMT -6
You’re comparing apples to oranges. I find it difficult to understand how you could make that argument. Ncaa has time restrictions for practicing Then just how exactly are those 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and rehashed/revisited until they become second nature for the players? What are the weekly time restrictions in the summer on teaching meeting time, lifting, and on-field practice (contact and limited/non-contact)? Why does that mean HS players can't come in for 6 hours a day M-Thu or M-F during the summer, assuming the HS players are bought in and willing to? If the players aren't willing to, then sure, but if they are willing to, why not? Cause they’re kids. Let them have the summer
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 21:08:21 GMT -6
RE: The 30 hours a week thing in the future, to play the opposite side of this, why not? College and pro players spend all day in either teaching/install/meeting time, practicing, or lifting. If an 18 year old college player can be expected to do that, why cant a HS coach expect that from a 17 or 18 year old HS player, [EDIT] assuming they have a group of players who care and are bought in to the program? Bring them in at 7 or 8 in the morning, and have them doing something football related for 6 hours a day, M-T or M-F during the summer. If 18 year old college players supposedly don't get burned out on that and have the attention span to be in meetings all day to memorize and retain 500+ page offensive/defensive install packets, don't see why a 17 or 18 year old HS player would get burned out? (Again, playing the other side of this, and being at least slightly facetious...) I know you are playing the other side, but that is somewhat the crux of my post. What is the optimal (in general) amount of time to spend for in summer weekly practices? Lets isolate the variable here a bit; lets assume that family factors are not an issue. For NFL players, as you cited, this is their job. So if they want vacation time, time with the family, etc. it has to work around the team's schedule. For HS players, this is not paying the bills, their parents are; so if mom and dad want to take a vacation, or get some time for their son to enjoy the summer, then they win out. Yes the parents will win out, but that's also true currently when players are coming in during the summer 2, 3 or even 4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri. If the parents and players are already committing to 2, 3 or 4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri, increasing the hours per day to 6 hours won't make it anymore tough to plan a vacation. If you commit to 2/3/4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri, you already can't go on vacation those weeks anyways? Lol. Increasing the hours per day from 2/3/4 will have absolutely zero effect on vacation planning. Absolutely, but again, this is assuming players are bought in and want to work hard, and players and parents are fine with them being there 6 hours a week mon-thu or mon-fri. If they don't want to do 6 hours a day, that's 100% fine. I'm totally fine with no summer football, at all. Why does it have to be that early? Ive seen plenty of people mention in this thread the players come in a lot later than they would with parents getting up at 4 AM. F*** 4 AM for HS football if im the parents in that situation. Lol Why do you mention 7 days here? I mentioned mon-thu or mon-fri. This is a bit of a hyperbolic reaction? It doesn't have to be this schedule every week of summer. You could do it several weeks with a few weeks off or a few half weeks... Is that not the goal too at Alabama, UGA, etc? That's why they put in the time and work (for the players it's of course to get a ticket to the next level too of course lol) Again, why are we suggesting HS players will get burned out working 6 hours a day, 4 or 5 days a week with the work split between meeting/teaching (and rehashing the teaching) time, lifting, and on field practice time, when college players just a year later as freshmen are somehow not getting burned out and losing their fkn minds having a 500+ page offensive or defensive install packet drilled into them in meetings all day...? I mean if the coaches aren't up for it, then that finishes it before it gets off the ground. Like I said, I'm completely fine with not having summer football at all and letting players have the whole summer to do whatever. Seriously Ok, but what about meeting time too?
|
|
|
Post by jstoss24 on Jun 10, 2023 21:11:05 GMT -6
It just shocks me a bit that it seems like so many essentially start full blown practices (but without contact) before NFL and NCAA teams do. Until someone with authority has the guts to rein them in, then what will stop them. Remember, a lot of the coaches who are doing this believe that 20+ hours a week throughout summer is not surpassing the point of negative returns. I imagine most of them would argue that 20 hours (or whatever they do) is the sweet spot, but I imagine that stems from their background, and coming from a situation where having done less at one point was attached to a losing season. Which leads me to wonder, what will the next generation of coaches do? Maybe a decade from now 30 hours a week in the summer will become the norm? I wonder if we were to isolate coaches in a natural state, and they were to look at the information from the outside vantage point with no biases, what would they view as the optimal amount of practice time? I know I, personally, am of the mindset that I want to break this cycle. When I was in high school, we lifted for an hour and spent an hour on the field 3 days a week during the summer and we were the most successful teams the school has ever had. My current school does 20+ hours a week, and while we had one of the most successful seasons in school history this last year, I don’t believe it was due to the time we spent in the summer. I believe summer practice/workouts/whatever you call them have their merits and can be valuable, but I also believe in letting kids be kids. Many of our kids have to work, do a college prep program, or spend time out of state in the summer because of their family dynamic or military status. I think my solution to the issue at hand is to have lifting and practice for 2-3 hours 3 days a week in the summer. If players have a reason to not be there, that’s fine, as long as they understand that the less they are there, the less they will know, and the less they know, the less they will play. Accountability for poor attendance is still important, but I believe that taking away playing time does more to change behavior than punishment conditioning does and I believe that missing for a legitimate reason that is communicated ahead of time is different than missing because you overslept or didn’t feel like going. As long as the expectations are made clear and are dealt with in a consistent manner, and the time we spend lifting and practicing is productive and not wasted, it will lead to increased success.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Jun 10, 2023 21:30:44 GMT -6
I can't believe some of the stuff that I'm reading. IT'S PHUKIN' HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL. Sure, it's good to teach a work ethic but they're kids. Football shouldn't take their and their family's lives over. Coaches have families and lives. No wonder I retired.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Jun 10, 2023 21:32:45 GMT -6
I can't believe some of the stuff that I'm reading. IT'S PHUKIN' HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL. Sure, it's good to teach a work ethic but they're kids. Football shouldn't take their and their family's lives over. Coaches have families and lives. No wonder I retired. Agreed wholeheartedly. I did 6-7 hours a week as a HC and I felt like that was too much.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 10, 2023 21:40:06 GMT -6
tripsclosed Bylaw 17.1.7.2.1.6.2 for football puts meeting time/onfield football based activities at 2 hours a week during out of academic year conditioning time. This is part of the 8 hour limit of strength/conditioning time. They can not wear any equipment, and no equipment other than footballs can be used. And that is only if the student is enrolled in a certain number of degree path classes. While rules change, I still say with some degree of confidence that what is being discussed in this thread are far greater demands on the HS kids than what was demanded of Div 1 athletes when I coached Div 1 football, and what is allowed to be demanded of Div 1 athletes today.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 10, 2023 21:41:04 GMT -6
I can't believe some of the stuff that I'm reading. IT'S PHUKIN' HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL. Sure, it's good to teach a work ethic but they're kids. Football shouldn't take their and their family's lives over. Coaches have families and lives. No wonder I retired. Agreed wholeheartedly. I did 6-7 hours a week as a HC and I felt like that was too much. We argue about a lot, but I think we both are 100% in agreement with regards to the proper importance of HS football and the lives of HS athletes.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jun 10, 2023 21:45:28 GMT -6
I know you are playing the other side, but that is somewhat the crux of my post. What is the optimal (in general) amount of time to spend for in summer weekly practices? Lets isolate the variable here a bit; lets assume that family factors are not an issue. For NFL players, as you cited, this is their job. So if they want vacation time, time with the family, etc. it has to work around the team's schedule. For HS players, this is not paying the bills, their parents are; so if mom and dad want to take a vacation, or get some time for their son to enjoy the summer, then they win out. Yes the parents will win out, but that's also true currently when players are coming in during the summer 2, 3 or even 4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri. If the parents and players are already committing to 2, 3 or 4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri, increasing the hours per day to 6 hours won't make it anymore tough to plan a vacation. If you commit to 2/3/4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri, you already can't go on vacation those weeks anyways? Lol. Increasing the hours per day from 2/3/4 will have absolutely zero effect on vacation planning. Absolutely, but again, this is assuming players are bought in and want to work hard, and players and parents are fine with them being there 6 hours a week mon-thu or mon-fri. If they don't want to do 6 hours a day, that's 100% fine. I'm totally fine with no summer football, at all. Why does it have to be that early? Ive seen plenty of people mention in this thread the players come in a lot later than they would with parents getting up at 4 AM. F*** 4 AM for HS football if im the parents in that situation. Lol Why do you mention 7 days here? I mentioned mon-thu or mon-fri. This is a bit of a hyperbolic reaction? It doesn't have to be this schedule every week of summer. You could do it several weeks with a few weeks off or a few half weeks... Is that not the goal too at Alabama, UGA, etc? That's why they put in the time and work (for the players it's of course to get a ticket to the next level too of course lol) Again, why are we suggesting HS players will get burned out working 6 hours a day, 4 or 5 days a week with the work split between meeting/teaching (and rehashing the teaching) time, lifting, and on field practice time, when college players just a year later as freshmen are somehow not getting burned out and losing their fkn minds having a 500+ page offensive or defensive install packet drilled into them in meetings all day...? I mean if the coaches aren't up for it, then that finishes it before it gets off the ground. Like I said, I'm completely fine with not having summer football at all and letting players have the whole summer to do whatever. Seriously Ok, but what about meeting time too? My man, I think you are missing my point when you are parsing apart all the specific criteria. I am NOT writing that you should go 7 days a week starting at 4AM, I am writing that all parties (players, families, coaches) are willing to put forth that work without it being an issue (I just used those exaggerated examples). An I'm not trying to play gotcha, but posing a serious question; what is the optimal amount of practice time to best build a team to win a title, and why that much. I cited primary goal of winning state to, as stated, isolate the variable. As I know many coaches who have other primary goals- develop players for college, teach them to be better men, etc. Thats also why I standardized the summer length and schedule. So, if you had your druthers, how many hours a week? Not playing coy, just looking for a discussion.
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 22:04:23 GMT -6
Yes the parents will win out, but that's also true currently when players are coming in during the summer 2, 3 or even 4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri. If the parents and players are already committing to 2, 3 or 4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri, increasing the hours per day to 6 hours won't make it anymore tough to plan a vacation. If you commit to 2/3/4 hours a day mon-thu or mon-fri, you already can't go on vacation those weeks anyways? Lol. Increasing the hours per day from 2/3/4 will have absolutely zero effect on vacation planning. Absolutely, but again, this is assuming players are bought in and want to work hard, and players and parents are fine with them being there 6 hours a week mon-thu or mon-fri. If they don't want to do 6 hours a day, that's 100% fine. I'm totally fine with no summer football, at all. Why does it have to be that early? Ive seen plenty of people mention in this thread the players come in a lot later than they would with parents getting up at 4 AM. F*** 4 AM for HS football if im the parents in that situation. Lol Why do you mention 7 days here? I mentioned mon-thu or mon-fri. This is a bit of a hyperbolic reaction? It doesn't have to be this schedule every week of summer. You could do it several weeks with a few weeks off or a few half weeks... Is that not the goal too at Alabama, UGA, etc? That's why they put in the time and work (for the players it's of course to get a ticket to the next level too of course lol) Again, why are we suggesting HS players will get burned out working 6 hours a day, 4 or 5 days a week with the work split between meeting/teaching (and rehashing the teaching) time, lifting, and on field practice time, when college players just a year later as freshmen are somehow not getting burned out and losing their fkn minds having a 500+ page offensive or defensive install packet drilled into them in meetings all day...? I mean if the coaches aren't up for it, then that finishes it before it gets off the ground. Like I said, I'm completely fine with not having summer football at all and letting players have the whole summer to do whatever. Seriously Ok, but what about meeting time too? My man, I think you are missing my point when you are parsing apart all the specific criteria. I am NOT writing that you should go 7 days a week starting at 4AM, I am writing that all parties (players, families, coaches) are willing to put forth that work without it being an issue (I just used those exaggerated examples). An I'm not trying to play gotcha, but posing a serious question; what is the optimal amount of practice time to best build a team to win a title, and why that much. I cited primary goal of winning state to, as stated, isolate the variable. As I know many coaches who have other primary goals- develop players for college, teach them to be better men, etc. Thats also why I standardized the summer length and schedule. So, if you had your druthers, how many hours a week? Not playing coy, just looking for a discussion. 2.5 hours I think is reasonable if you are including lift and teaching time in that...What about you?
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 22:06:17 GMT -6
tripsclosed Bylaw 17.1.7.2.1.6.2 for football puts meeting time/onfield football based activities at 2 hours a week during out of academic year conditioning time. This is part of the 8 hour limit of strength/conditioning time. They can not wear any equipment, and no equipment other than footballs can be used. And that is only if the student is enrolled in a certain number of degree path classes. While rules change, I still say with some degree of confidence that what is being discussed in this thread are far greater demands on the HS kids than what was demanded of Div 1 athletes when I coached Div 1 football, and what is allowed to be demanded of Div 1 athletes today. So, then how are 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and solidified with such a strain on time?
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 22:07:10 GMT -6
I can't believe some of the stuff that I'm reading. IT'S PHUKIN' HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL. Sure, it's good to teach a work ethic but they're kids. Football shouldn't take their and their family's lives over. Coaches have families and lives. No wonder I retired. Coach, as I mentioned, I would be fine with zero summer football. Zero. Lol
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 10, 2023 22:23:01 GMT -6
tripsclosed Bylaw 17.1.7.2.1.6.2 for football puts meeting time/onfield football based activities at 2 hours a week during out of academic year conditioning time. This is part of the 8 hour limit of strength/conditioning time. They can not wear any equipment, and no equipment other than footballs can be used. And that is only if the student is enrolled in a certain number of degree path classes. While rules change, I still say with some degree of confidence that what is being discussed in this thread are far greater demands on the HS kids than what was demanded of Div 1 athletes when I coached Div 1 football, and what is allowed to be demanded of Div 1 athletes today. So, then how are 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and solidified with such a strain on time? Keep in mind that some of those pages are fluff. Philosophies, mottos, etc. Many pages are just the same thing drawn up against multiple variations.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jun 10, 2023 22:46:36 GMT -6
My man, I think you are missing my point when you are parsing apart all the specific criteria. I am NOT writing that you should go 7 days a week starting at 4AM, I am writing that all parties (players, families, coaches) are willing to put forth that work without it being an issue (I just used those exaggerated examples). An I'm not trying to play gotcha, but posing a serious question; what is the optimal amount of practice time to best build a team to win a title, and why that much. I cited primary goal of winning state to, as stated, isolate the variable. As I know many coaches who have other primary goals- develop players for college, teach them to be better men, etc. Thats also why I standardized the summer length and schedule. So, if you had your druthers, how many hours a week? Not playing coy, just looking for a discussion. 2.5 hours I think is reasonable if you are including lift and teaching time in that...What about you? M-Th, 2.5-3 hours a day for the most part of the summer, with an occasional 7 on 7 on a Tuesday nights. I also include a dead period week off around 4th of July. I love giving Friday's off for summers and thinks this keeps kids fresh and allows for kids to get "a Summer" This is up to the final week, then a more in depth camp of M-F 4 hours a day.
|
|
|
Post by tripsclosed on Jun 10, 2023 23:12:11 GMT -6
So, then how are 500+ page offensive or defensive install packets getting taught and solidified with such a strain on time? Keep in mind that some of those pages are fluff. Philosophies, mottos, etc. Many pages are just the same thing drawn up against multiple variations. Even cutting out the fluff, that's still a lot of chit, man. And to some extent that's true on the variations, but it's still gotta be learned and re-taught/rehashed until it becomes second nature if you want the players to be good at it...
|
|
|
Post by CS on Jun 11, 2023 6:44:49 GMT -6
Keep in mind that some of those pages are fluff. Philosophies, mottos, etc. Many pages are just the same thing drawn up against multiple variations. Even cutting out the fluff, that's still a lot of chit, man. And to some extent that's true on the variations, but it's still gotta be learned and re-taught/rehashed until it becomes second nature if you want the players to be good at it... Because that 2:30 hour practice you have to split with the offense and sp teams in high school gets cut down to just having to split it with sp teams and you get a full 2 hrs to teach your defense to the players If I had 2 hrs and a meeting to teach we could do a ton more on defense Also if you can hold a scholly over someone’s head they will study the playbook
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on Jun 11, 2023 7:43:36 GMT -6
I would highly discourage Friday workouts during the summer, especially in the evening and especially in June. Give people long weekends to get their beach trips, golf outings, river trips, fishing trips, family visits, etc., out of the way because there won’t be time for much of that once the season starts.
I think players and assistants need just enough time to get a little bored with all of the above by the end of the summer and ready for football to start.
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Jun 11, 2023 17:17:16 GMT -6
I can't believe some of the stuff that I'm reading. IT'S PHUKIN' HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL. Sure, it's good to teach a work ethic but they're kids. Football shouldn't take their and their family's lives over. Coaches have families and lives. No wonder I retired. Agreed wholeheartedly. I did 6-7 hours a week as a HC and I felt like that was too much. About what we did for on the field stuff. 3x's a week for 2 hours or less. Weight room was open an hour before if they wanted to lift. Did that for July and usually first week in Aug. Week off before official start date which has now become "heat acclimization" week where the state mandates you do a week in helmets before going full pads the next week. Those are the only two weeks you get now for pre-season in PA with one scrimmage. I am all for less is more but the one scrimmage makes it hard to get ready for a season if you ask me.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 11, 2023 17:44:27 GMT -6
Agreed wholeheartedly. I did 6-7 hours a week as a HC and I felt like that was too much. About what we did for on the field stuff. 3x's a week for 2 hours or less. Weight room was open an hour before if they wanted to lift. Did that for July and usually first week in Aug. Week off before official start date which has now become "heat acclimization" week where the state mandates you do a week in helmets before going full pads the next week. Those are the only two weeks you get now for pre-season in PA with one scrimmage. I am all for less is more but the one scrimmage makes it hard to get ready for a season if you ask me. 6 hours a week- 5 weeks before the official start of practice? Coach you essentially had 15 practices...before the start of practices. Or am I misreading it? I absolutely understand the S&C aspect of summer. Particularly the Strength part. All for it. And I can absolutely see why some S&C hours might be long- small weight room, having to limit numbers at a time etc. But it really just surprises me the amount of people who essentially start practices around Independence day if not before. Maybe I am interpreting what they are typing incorrectly
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Jun 11, 2023 18:19:57 GMT -6
Agreed wholeheartedly. I did 6-7 hours a week as a HC and I felt like that was too much. About what we did for on the field stuff. 3x's a week for 2 hours or less. Weight room was open an hour before if they wanted to lift. Did that for July and usually first week in Aug. Week off before official start date which has now become "heat acclimization" week where the state mandates you do a week in helmets before going full pads the next week. Those are the only two weeks you get now for pre-season in PA with one scrimmage. I am all for less is more but the one scrimmage makes it hard to get ready for a season if you ask me. The 6-7 hours was 4 to 4 1/2 hours of weights.
|
|