|
Post by throwahitch on Oct 24, 2017 11:32:36 GMT -6
Looking into next season. What goes into killing the idea that the players can miss practice. That effort isn’t important. To get parents to stop scheduling appointments during practice times. To get kids to summer workouts/ 7on7. What is your advice to getting these problems fixed in the best way possible in a place where two things have happened
1st Head Coach (school was built in the 80s or 90s). Good coach.... but extremely old school. Like to the point he didn’t believe in summer workouts. It finally caught up with the guy in like 2011. Principal was anti sports hires a guy who was a JR high coach somewhere and that guy has been operating the program like a JR high program for the last 5 years. Things have went really down hill. Lost kids to the point they lowered the classification. Still have crazy speed and size. New principle has come in. She wants things to be fixed. Very pro sports. Husband was a coach. She was a coach. So what’s your ideas on fixing this situation going forward when it’s all the program has known.
|
|
|
Post by bigmoot on Oct 24, 2017 11:54:59 GMT -6
put policy in place...be prepared to go 0-10 with a low number of guys. may take a few years for the "lost" classes to filter out of the program.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Oct 24, 2017 12:17:00 GMT -6
We had an issue with kids missing for various reasons at the beginning of the year. We went with the policy that if you missed practice-regardless of reason- you ran a mile to make up conditioning. Had one mom bitch about, and both her kids ended quitting, but you won’t miss those kind of kids.
For us, it drastically cut down on kids missing.
|
|
|
Post by chidesta on Oct 24, 2017 12:29:07 GMT -6
What kills the idea that players can miss a practice or weights is competition at their spot, plane and simple.
If you have numbers, problem solved, if you don't have numbers that is were you earn your pay check. You have two choices:
1. Put a policy in place that is unilateral and all inclusive for every single player, lose your 3 or 4 best Seniors who don't want to change and you have to stand on principle and only play football with a bunch of Freshman and Sophomores. Plus you get to go 0-10 for the year, YEAH!!!
2. Have a general policy, were you can determine playing time on an individual bases and determine penalties based upon the individual. For example, "BEST PLAYER - PLAYS, PERIOD." So if a kid misses a practice and during that practice his replacement shows you he is better then that kid plays.
Now the second option is unfair and not all inclusive and favors slack-ass Seniors who don't show up for everything, but you can slowly ratchet up your policy as you build numbers for the future. And again I recognize that this policy is unfair to the ass-kissing Freshman and Sophomore who is at every practice, doing everything right, but it also protects that kid from playing Varsity too soon and getting his Butt handed to him on every play. Plus you get to win a few games and develop your young kids while letting the Seniors and Juniors finish out their high school careers.
Me I don't like losing, but we are at a smaller school where we don't have massive amounts of kids to choose from. So when I took over a struggling small school program and this is what we did and it has worked out pretty well for us. If we had a kid that missed practice and we had a replacement for him then we wouldn't start the kid that missed practice, but if we didn't well that kid got away with something and we just had to live with it until we built up numbers over time.
|
|
|
Post by gccwolverine on Oct 24, 2017 12:51:54 GMT -6
What kills the idea that players can miss a practice or weights is competition at their spot, plane and simple. If you have numbers, problem solved, if you don't have numbers that is were you earn your pay check. You have two choices: 1. Put a policy in place that is unilateral and all inclusive for every single player, lose your 3 or 4 best Seniors who don't want to change and you have to stand on principle and only play football with a bunch of Freshman and Sophomores. Plus you get to go 0-10 for the year, YEAH!!! 2. Have a general policy, were you can determine playing time on an individual bases and determine penalties based upon the individual. For example, "BEST PLAYER - PLAYS, PERIOD." So if a kid misses a practice and during that practice his replacement shows you he is better then that kid plays. Now the second option is unfair and not all inclusive and favors slack-ass Seniors who don't show up for everything, but you can slowly ratchet up your policy as you build numbers for the future. And again I recognize that this policy is unfair to the ass-kissing Freshman and Sophomore who is at every practice, doing everything right, but it also protects that kid from playing Varsity too soon and getting his Butt handed to him on every play. Plus you get to win a few games and develop your young kids while letting the Seniors and Juniors finish out their high school careers. Me I don't like losing, but we are at a smaller school where we don't have massive amounts of kids to choose from. So when I took over a struggling small school program and this is what we did and it has worked out pretty well for us. If we had a kid that missed practice and we had a replacement for him then we wouldn't start the kid that missed practice, but if we didn't well that kid got away with something and we just had to live with it until we built up numbers over time. The longer I've been at this, as a fairly young assistant coach and coordinator, I firmly believe that the best approach is "no half measures." Crack down and if you lose some you lose some but half measures only result in headaches and not really allowing you to build the culture the way you want it. For me when it's my program and my policy there will be 1 standard and it will be met or there will be consequences and if those consequences aren't enough and the standards are continually being broken then you'll turn your {censored} in. For instance in my current stop, we've had a kid miss 23 days from the beginning of summer till now. HC still lets him be apart because "we'll he needs us more than we need him, and he is a junior that has talent if he gets it together he could play as a senior" He gets to play JV and he is the best player on the field every week as he should be. Would have been a varsity starter for us if he would simply show up and do whats asked. I'm of the belief that keeping him around actually does more program harm than good for him or us. It allows mediocrity and noncomittedness to fest and brew + he takes reps from others who are younger but not as good yet.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Oct 24, 2017 13:07:30 GMT -6
1. Establish a policy for missing practices and defining what are excused and unexcused absences. Just make sure you use the "coaches' discretion" when defining those absences so that you're not painted into a corner.
2. Emphasize effort over talent. Reward effort with playing time and punish laziness by putting them on the bench. The programs I have been involved in that struggled the most were the most were those that would play lazy "studs" over the rest of the kids. It sent a bad message, kids quit and the program fell apart.
|
|
|
Post by groundchuck on Oct 24, 2017 13:46:28 GMT -6
Make sure to include the feeder school or junior high. I think it is easier to start with younger kids and indoctrinate them.
|
|
|
Post by throwahitch on Oct 24, 2017 13:48:15 GMT -6
Make sure to include the feeder school or junior high. I think it is easier to start with younger kids and indoctrinate them. K-12th school
|
|
|
Post by sweep26 on Oct 24, 2017 15:08:49 GMT -6
Whatever policy that you decide upon...put it in writing, and clear it with your Administration. Sooner or later, you will need their support.
Make sure that everyone in your program (players, parents and staff) are CLEARLY informed of all aspects of your rules...including the consequences for breaking the rules. Hand out written copies of your rules, and if at all possible, take the time to personally explain your rules.
Be prepared to fairly enforce any, and all of the rules that you decide upon.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Oct 24, 2017 15:43:49 GMT -6
lowered the classification. Still have crazy speed and size. New principal has come in. She wants things to be fixed. Very pro sports. Husband was a coach. She was a coach. You literally have hit the trifecta jackpot. Just get your tail to work. Don’t put up with those who don’t work. In two years (or less), you will be competitive. After that, the sky is the limit.
|
|
|
Post by chidesta on Oct 24, 2017 16:39:17 GMT -6
What kills the idea that players can miss a practice or weights is competition at their spot, plane and simple. If you have numbers, problem solved, if you don't have numbers that is were you earn your pay check. You have two choices: 1. Put a policy in place that is unilateral and all inclusive for every single player, lose your 3 or 4 best Seniors who don't want to change and you have to stand on principle and only play football with a bunch of Freshman and Sophomores. Plus you get to go 0-10 for the year, YEAH!!! 2. Have a general policy, were you can determine playing time on an individual bases and determine penalties based upon the individual. For example, "BEST PLAYER - PLAYS, PERIOD." So if a kid misses a practice and during that practice his replacement shows you he is better then that kid plays. Now the second option is unfair and not all inclusive and favors slack-ass Seniors who don't show up for everything, but you can slowly ratchet up your policy as you build numbers for the future. And again I recognize that this policy is unfair to the ass-kissing Freshman and Sophomore who is at every practice, doing everything right, but it also protects that kid from playing Varsity too soon and getting his Butt handed to him on every play. Plus you get to win a few games and develop your young kids while letting the Seniors and Juniors finish out their high school careers. Me I don't like losing, but we are at a smaller school where we don't have massive amounts of kids to choose from. So when I took over a struggling small school program and this is what we did and it has worked out pretty well for us. If we had a kid that missed practice and we had a replacement for him then we wouldn't start the kid that missed practice, but if we didn't well that kid got away with something and we just had to live with it until we built up numbers over time. The longer I've been at this, as a fairly young assistant coach and coordinator, I firmly believe that the best approach is "no half measures." Crack down and if you lose some you lose some but half measures only result in headaches and not really allowing you to build the culture the way you want it. For me when it's my program and my policy there will be 1 standard and it will be met or there will be consequences and if those consequences aren't enough and the standards are continually being broken then you'll turn your {censored} in. For instance in my current stop, we've had a kid miss 23 days from the beginning of summer till now. HC still lets him be apart because "we'll he needs us more than we need him, and he is a junior that has talent if he gets it together he could play as a senior" He gets to play JV and he is the best player on the field every week as he should be. Would have been a varsity starter for us if he would simply show up and do whats asked. I'm of the belief that keeping him around actually does more program harm than good for him or us. It allows mediocrity and noncomittedness to fest and brew + he takes reps from others who are younger but not as good yet. I understand your point and when I was an assistant coach I always wondered why the HC kept those guys around, and for the same reasons. However after having become a HC who has been through this twice now, meaning gone to an underachieving school and established a culture and won I have changed my opinion, not to say you can't keep with your thought process. For me I agree with you HC, and think that he has the best interest of that kid in mind, keep the kid in your program and keep preaching to him correct principles, effort and teamwork because you never know when they are going to put it all together. Sometimes we as coaches and the adults in these kids lives have to be the ones who want it for them more than they want it for themselves until they pull their heads out. Keeping kids that are talented, but are immature and lazy or uncommitted in your program doesn't all for noncommittedness to fester, I mean you said it yourself he doesn't play Varsity because he won't show up and completely commit, well that's exactly how you should treat a player like that. You guys are doing right by that kid, If he ever pulls his head out then you get a great commited player.
|
|
|
Post by Defcord on Oct 24, 2017 18:35:47 GMT -6
First I am tired of the term culture. I love coaching and coaches but if you didn’t use that term 5+ years ago don’t grab it now.
Second standards and accountability have always been important. Tell kids what you want from them. When they do it reward them, when they don’t reprimand them.
Coach them up everyday. Tell them if they don’t show up you can’t coach them, if you can’t coach them they can’t be prepared, and if they aren’t prepared they can’t play. We love you just as much on the sideline as we do on the field but you will stay on that sideline until you practice.
|
|
|
Post by bartimus58 on Oct 24, 2017 19:10:10 GMT -6
Looking into next season. What goes into killing the idea that the players can miss practice. That effort isn’t important. To get parents to stop scheduling appointments during practice times. To get kids to summer workouts/ 7on7. What is your advice to getting these problems fixed in the best way possible in a place where two things have happened 1st Head Coach (school was built in the 80s or 90s). Good coach.... but extremely old school. Like to the point he didn’t believe in summer workouts. It finally caught up with the guy in like 2011. Principal was anti sports hires a guy who was a JR high coach somewhere and that guy has been operating the program like a JR high program for the last 5 years. Things have went really down hill. Lost kids to the point they lowered the classification. Still have crazy speed and size. New principle has come in. She wants things to be fixed. Very pro sports. Husband was a coach. She was a coach. So what’s your ideas on fixing this situation going forward when it’s all the program has known. I felt like I was reading about my program. We have a similar situation right now. We had a giant mess when I was hired. The previous coach was all about recruiting kids and being their friend. He allowed kids to do whatever they wanted. They would never go to class or practice, but on game day they would definitely be playing. When he was fired by the new principal, 10+ starters left the program. When I came in, they didn't have a lifting program and the "football weights" class had 32 kids (we have 1,700 kids in the building). A few more dropped out when they found out they would have to lift. I started summer with 50 kids, by fall camp had 60 and finished the season with 45. I didn't have the option to fully commit to booting the trouble makers because I was already only dressing 35 kids (10+ 9th and 10th graders). Needless to say it was a miserable 0-10 season, but I held strong to my rule of you don't come to practice you don't play. Sub varsity kids missed a half and varsity kids didn't dress for the game if they missed. I made it real clear that I was willing to go 0-10 with inferior talent if needs be. I have an amazing administration that has supported me the whole way. Looking forward to getting more bodies into the program and building on the core group of guys that bought in this year.
|
|
|
Post by cqmiller on Oct 25, 2017 8:36:28 GMT -6
We'll get it bartimus58Gotta flush a stick of dynamite down the toilet and blow that $h!t up... I still think power is a pretty good play!
|
|
|
Post by ahall005 on Oct 25, 2017 12:00:47 GMT -6
We had an issue with kids missing for various reasons at the beginning of the year. We went with the policy that if you missed practice-regardless of reason- you ran a mile to make up conditioning. Had one mom bitch about, and both her kids ended quitting, but you won’t miss those kind of kids. For us, it drastically cut down on kids missing. We did the same thing this year and it seemed to help quite a bit
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Oct 25, 2017 12:41:11 GMT -6
Also, in conjunction with running a mile, if you were a varsity starter that missed a Tuesday you didn’t play defense. Miss Wednesday? No offense. Thursday? You just end up not playing anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by joker31 on Oct 25, 2017 13:12:41 GMT -6
Lots of good ideas above, I will only add 2 things.
1) Implement what you're willing to administer. 2) Just like most teachers have class rules, be extremely firm at the start (make sure they get the picture early) then you can loosen the chain a little bit later on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 13:29:31 GMT -6
Looking into next season. What goes into killing the idea that the players can miss practice. That effort isn’t important. To get parents to stop scheduling appointments during practice times. To get kids to summer workouts/ 7on7. What is your advice to getting these problems fixed in the best way possible in a place where two things have happened 1st Head Coach (school was built in the 80s or 90s). Good coach.... but extremely old school. Like to the point he didn’t believe in summer workouts. It finally caught up with the guy in like 2011. Principal was anti sports hires a guy who was a JR high coach somewhere and that guy has been operating the program like a JR high program for the last 5 years. Things have went really down hill. Lost kids to the point they lowered the classification. Still have crazy speed and size. New principle has come in. She wants things to be fixed. Very pro sports. Husband was a coach. She was a coach. So what’s your ideas on fixing this situation going forward when it’s all the program has known. Honestly, the number one thing is to build relationships with the kids. Get to know them and make sure they get to know you. Go to the feeder school games, be seen at the youth leagues, etc. Relationships will be #1 before talent and policies matter. Then make practice fun and meaningful to the kids. Make the weightroom the place to be. Make practice fun and briskly paced. Keep the kids moving and working throughout. Do a ton of fundraising to buy new swag. Remodel (or at least paint) the locker room and weightroom. Get kids involved in the offseason that way so you get some investment--give the good new gear to the kids who worked hardest to earn it. Make it clear that this is a new era. The other thing is to tighten the screws slowly, since they aren't used to this stuff. If you come in and do your best Bear Bryant impression to show what a hard@$$ you are, you're going to ruffle too many feathers and the backlash will put you in a bad spot from the beginning. Instill discipline and accountability, obviously, but be reasonable and pick the battles that really matter to focus on: getting kids in the weightroom, getting them to practice, getting them to give effort and keep their grades up, etc. I once worked under a HC who took over the team when they'd been used to skipping workouts and would wait until summer or even after school had started to come out, so he instituted a policy that kids had to "make up" every single workout or practice they'd missed since they'd enrolled in school or the day he took over as coach if they wanted to play. For a lot of kids who were on the fence about playing but came out in the summer, this meant they wouldn't get to play until midseason or maybe even the next year. Needless to say, that flopped with the kids. His first year, he got as low as 14 healthy bodies and finished with 18 on the team. Then he couldn't enforce his own rules on riding the bench if you missed practice because it would have meant forfeiting games... but he stuck to this policy for new kids who wanted to play. Some of the schools' best athletes came out to play, but he turned them away with this policy before they ever played a down. That guy won 2 games in 3 years.
|
|
|
Post by s73 on Oct 25, 2017 14:04:32 GMT -6
Looking into next season. What goes into killing the idea that the players can miss practice. That effort isn’t important. To get parents to stop scheduling appointments during practice times. To get kids to summer workouts/ 7on7. What is your advice to getting these problems fixed in the best way possible in a place where two things have happened 1st Head Coach (school was built in the 80s or 90s). Good coach.... but extremely old school. Like to the point he didn’t believe in summer workouts. It finally caught up with the guy in like 2011. Principal was anti sports hires a guy who was a JR high coach somewhere and that guy has been operating the program like a JR high program for the last 5 years. Things have went really down hill. Lost kids to the point they lowered the classification. Still have crazy speed and size. New principle has come in. She wants things to be fixed. Very pro sports. Husband was a coach. She was a coach. So what’s your ideas on fixing this situation going forward when it’s all the program has known. i would have never said this even LAST YEAR let alone at any other time in my career but honestly, I think the principal can have more effect on this than any coach can. Our principal is in her 2nd year here & after watching athletics at our school her 1st year she addressed the whole school including parents & said that she feels our kids are "too nice" on the game fields. She said, in the hallways it's great but we need way more GRIT during competition. Then she told the coaches to hold kids more accountable. Our program has always been pretty decent but I do feel some of the "practice ain't that important" mentality was started to seep into a football a bit. Well, her talk along with several initiatives to improve school spirit has definitely led to improvement in our athletic community in both practcie attendnace as well as results. PS - Please understand that I am not suggesting one talk was the key, but her addressing the subject, pushing the AD to address it again, building up our pep club, having an additonal assembly, recognizing athletes more in the announcements, etc has all been a big asset to us. I am lucky to have the support. I think if your principal is unwilling to do so, some of these initiatives can be started on your own. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by coachdawhip on Oct 25, 2017 18:24:26 GMT -6
we have clearly defined standards for missing practice and loafing.
Define it and hold everyone accountable.
|
|
|
Post by coachdawhip on Oct 25, 2017 18:24:48 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Oct 25, 2017 20:29:59 GMT -6
We had an issue with kids missing for various reasons at the beginning of the year. We went with the policy that if you missed practice-regardless of reason- you ran a mile to make up conditioning. Had one mom bitch about, and both her kids ended quitting, but you won’t miss those kind of kids. For us, it drastically cut down on kids missing. "Motivation is simple. You eliminate those who aren't motivated." --Lou Holtz
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Oct 25, 2017 20:37:52 GMT -6
The longer I've been at this, as a fairly young assistant coach and coordinator, I firmly believe that the best approach is "no half measures." Crack down and if you lose some you lose some but half measures only result in headaches and not really allowing you to build the culture the way you want it. For me when it's my program and my policy there will be 1 standard and it will be met or there will be consequences and if those consequences aren't enough and the standards are continually being broken then you'll turn your {censored} in. For instance in my current stop, we've had a kid miss 23 days from the beginning of summer till now. HC still lets him be apart because "we'll he needs us more than we need him, and he is a junior that has talent if he gets it together he could play as a senior" He gets to play JV and he is the best player on the field every week as he should be. Would have been a varsity starter for us if he would simply show up and do whats asked. I'm of the belief that keeping him around actually does more program harm than good for him or us. It allows mediocrity and noncomittedness to fest and brew + he takes reps from others who are younger but not as good yet. I understand your point and when I was an assistant coach I always wondered why the HC kept those guys around, and for the same reasons. However after having become a HC who has been through this twice now, meaning gone to an underachieving school and established a culture and won I have changed my opinion, not to say you can't keep with your thought process. For me I agree with you HC, and think that he has the best interest of that kid in mind, keep the kid in your program and keep preaching to him correct principles, effort and teamwork because you never know when they are going to put it all together. Sometimes we as coaches and the adults in these kids lives have to be the ones who want it for them more than they want it for themselves until they pull their heads out. Keeping kids that are talented, but are immature and lazy or uncommitted in your program doesn't all for noncommittedness to fester, I mean you said it yourself he doesn't play Varsity because he won't show up and completely commit, well that's exactly how you should treat a player like that. You guys are doing right by that kid, If he ever pulls his head out then you get a great commited player. Generally speaking, you can't just cut kids from the football team for being lazy or unmotivated. At least you can't cut kids for those reasons at the numerous places I have coached. But you CAN control playing time and that is really all that motivates the kids we are talking about in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Oct 25, 2017 20:40:02 GMT -6
Looking into next season. What goes into killing the idea that the players can miss practice. That effort isn’t important. To get parents to stop scheduling appointments during practice times. To get kids to summer workouts/ 7on7. What is your advice to getting these problems fixed in the best way possible in a place where two things have happened 1st Head Coach (school was built in the 80s or 90s). Good coach.... but extremely old school. Like to the point he didn’t believe in summer workouts. It finally caught up with the guy in like 2011. Principal was anti sports hires a guy who was a JR high coach somewhere and that guy has been operating the program like a JR high program for the last 5 years. Things have went really down hill. Lost kids to the point they lowered the classification. Still have crazy speed and size. New principle has come in. She wants things to be fixed. Very pro sports. Husband was a coach. She was a coach. So what’s your ideas on fixing this situation going forward when it’s all the program has known. I felt like I was reading about my program. We have a similar situation right now. We had a giant mess when I was hired. The previous coach was all about recruiting kids and being their friend. He allowed kids to do whatever they wanted. They would never go to class or practice, but on game day they would definitely be playing. When he was fired by the new principal, 10+ starters left the program. When I came in, they didn't have a lifting program and the "football weights" class had 32 kids (we have 1,700 kids in the building). A few more dropped out when they found out they would have to lift. I started summer with 50 kids, by fall camp had 60 and finished the season with 45. I didn't have the option to fully commit to booting the trouble makers because I was already only dressing 35 kids (10+ 9th and 10th graders). Needless to say it was a miserable 0-10 season, but I held strong to my rule of you don't come to practice you don't play. Sub varsity kids missed a half and varsity kids didn't dress for the game if they missed. I made it real clear that I was willing to go 0-10 with inferior talent if needs be. I have an amazing administration that has supported me the whole way. Looking forward to getting more bodies into the program and building on the core group of guys that bought in this year. Nice job, Coach. Way to stick to your guns. Good luck and I hope you get things moving in the right direction this offseason.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Oct 25, 2017 20:45:11 GMT -6
Also, in conjunction with running a mile, if you were a varsity starter that missed a Tuesday you didn’t play defense. Miss Wednesday? No offense. Thursday? You just end up not playing anywhere. larrymoe I know you had a rough season this year (that you probably saw coming). But you had a nice run at your previous school. Do you think that, given your prior success, you have some "street cred" and that is why you didn't get more pushback from parents? Would it have been harder for you to implement something like this if you were a younger guy without an established record?
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Oct 25, 2017 20:56:12 GMT -6
We had a decent amount of pushback from one parent in particular. She called a meeting with our AD, he backed me and we didn't hear much, if anything, the rest of the season about such things. Despite the horror stories, I think most parents, deep down, realize you have to be at practice to have any understanding of what's going on in that week's game.
|
|
|
Post by StraightFlexin on Oct 26, 2017 8:47:38 GMT -6
I think modeling is key. You can't ask kids to do things that you are not willing to do yourself. This also goes for assistant coaches. I have let go several coaches that could not display the attributes that I thought were important. I can not hold a kid accountable for being late, if his position group coach doesn't care about time.
Surround kids with great people and great things happen. Finding great people is a struggle
|
|
|
Post by aceback76 on Oct 26, 2017 9:11:06 GMT -6
I once wrote a 3-4 page article entitlted "SELLING OUR PROGRAM TO THE PUBLIC", that was published in the old "Scholastic Coach" magazine (when Herman Masin was the Editor). I'll look & see if I still have it. It was all about the following:
1. Relationship with the parents. 2. Cooperation with the Administration 3. Relationship with Faculty Members 4. Relationship with the Press 5. Selling the Community on Yourself
There were suggestions under each heading. Don't KNOW if I can locate it, but those headings may give someone a thought!
|
|
|
Post by bartimus58 on Oct 26, 2017 9:11:56 GMT -6
We'll get it bartimus58 Gotta flush a stick of dynamite down the toilet and blow that $h!t up... I still think power is a pretty good play! Power is pretty legit. We should run it more...
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Oct 26, 2017 9:42:30 GMT -6
We had a decent amount of pushback from one parent in particular. She called a meeting with our AD, he backed me and we didn't hear much, if anything, the rest of the season about such things. Despite the horror stories, I think most parents, deep down, realize you have to be at practice to have any understanding of what's going on in that week's game. What were the parent's objections? Just wondering how she framed her argument and why she was resistant to what you and your staff are trying to do.
|
|