|
Post by bigmoot on Apr 6, 2016 17:43:04 GMT -6
Outside of official sprin footbalk, how much do your kids do?
All of ours (35+) lift in school. How much after school don't ou require/encourage?
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 6, 2016 17:48:00 GMT -6
Not much. Ours get to do it in class. No reason to over-saturate
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Apr 6, 2016 18:30:37 GMT -6
Not counting spring ball, I would hope no more than 1 hr a day of lifting or running, for those not in other sports. To be honest though I would say about 75-80% of our kids are in other sports; which I applaud and hope other coaches realize the importance of developing athletic ability and not just specific skills.
Other than that I see most of them in class or just saying "Hi" in the hallways
|
|
|
Post by lochness on Apr 6, 2016 18:45:17 GMT -6
85-90% of our guys are in lacrosse, baseball or track. We lift 3 days per week. Starting in late April, we do QB workouts for one hour per week. It's mostly mechanics and arm strengthening. We do Trench Warrior Wednesday after lifting every week where we have special workouts for just our linemen that last maybe 40 minutes (skill work, whiteboard, and/or film).
We don't have spring football.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith627 on Apr 6, 2016 18:55:39 GMT -6
Ours lift in football class or after school. They have player organized 7 on 7 twice a week, and that's all we do. In Michigan we don't have spring football though.
|
|
|
Post by rosey65 on Apr 7, 2016 7:06:30 GMT -6
Football is year-round in FL. We have a month of full pad practice and a live game in May.
We start workouts at the end of January, 4 days/week. That includes study hall, lifting, running/agility, and indy/team install. We have 7-on-7 starting in march, going all the way through April. Kids who do other sports fit football in around their in-season practices, and then join once their season is done. We get 40-60 kids each day. Regular attendance is one of the teachable moments in accountability that we preach.
Yes, it's a lot, and a GRIND, especially this time of year. However, it's necessary for 2 reasons. 1- it's FL, we need to do this to stay competitive. and 2- we are an inner-city school. We'd lose (and we do lose) a majority of our kids if they would be allowed to roam the streets once school ends. Our school day runs from 7-1:30, so our kids are still home by 5:30 every day.
|
|
|
Post by **** on Apr 7, 2016 7:09:31 GMT -6
All our football kids have weights during the school day. The dedicated kids that aren't in a spring sport lift after school with the football coaches.
We don't have spring ball. We do 6 days in April and start camp in June. Summer = 20 contact days in MO
|
|
|
Post by PSS on Apr 7, 2016 7:22:37 GMT -6
Ours are required to lift 4 times a week. We get 2 lifts before school and to lifts during school. During school on non lift days we do mat and agility drills.
If they are a FB / Bsb player they lift with the FB players, modified somewhat depending on whether they are a pitcher or not. FB/Track players do the FB workout.. FB/BB players will lift with BB until the season is over. FB players in other sports will lift with FB.
|
|
|
Post by bigmoot on Apr 7, 2016 8:50:28 GMT -6
1st...I hate typing on my phone...sorry for the errors.
2nd...in GA we are limited. Out of season during the school year, we can only work with 2 players per coach doing football drills. Lifting and conditioning has no restrictions. We can do as much as we want during summer.
|
|
|
Post by pvogel on Apr 7, 2016 9:00:09 GMT -6
Ya Florida standard model in lifting starts once you get back from Christmas break. Most places i've seen go 4x a week. 5th day is usually some kind of player 7on7 deal. Spring ball starts the last week in April. Baseball is done by then unless you make it to the regions. Full padded practice for a month and then a full spring game against another team (if youre interested you can find the games here). Its real nice. Good for college recruiters too. So much turnover though that its always kind of hectic anyways. Serious advantage for the programs with stability.
|
|
|
Post by bigmoot on Apr 7, 2016 9:59:32 GMT -6
In GA, we get 10 days for spring and no spring scrimmage. If you elect to not do spring, you can do 2 fall scrimmages instead of 1.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Apr 7, 2016 9:59:58 GMT -6
Football is year-round in FL. We have a month of full pad practice and a live game in May. We start workouts at the end of January, 4 days/week. That includes study hall, lifting, running/agility, and indy/team install. We have 7-on-7 starting in march, going all the way through April. Kids who do other sports fit football in around their in-season practices, and then join once their season is done. We get 40-60 kids each day. Regular attendance is one of the teachable moments in accountability that we preach. Yes, it's a lot, and a GRIND, especially this time of year. However, it's necessary for 2 reasons . 1- it's FL, we need to do this to stay competitive. and 2- we are an inner-city school. We'd lose (and we do lose) a majority of our kids if they would be allowed to roam the streets once school ends. Our school day runs from 7-1:30, so our kids are still home by 5:30 every day. There has been a lot of talk around here of "less being more", could a team not do this and still win come season? Are there any examples of a coach choosing to do less and not wearing down the kids yet still winning? Or would it be seen as blasphemous for a coach not to do this (gotta keep up with the Joneses) and no program ever given it a try? By remaining competitive, do you also mean that if you didnt do this other coaches would come in a poach your players?
|
|
|
Post by bigmoot on Apr 7, 2016 10:25:07 GMT -6
Football is year-round in FL. We have a month of full pad practice and a live game in May. We start workouts at the end of January, 4 days/week. That includes study hall, lifting, running/agility, and indy/team install. We have 7-on-7 starting in march, going all the way through April. Kids who do other sports fit football in around their in-season practices, and then join once their season is done. We get 40-60 kids each day. Regular attendance is one of the teachable moments in accountability that we preach. Yes, it's a lot, and a GRIND, especially this time of year. However, it's necessary for 2 reasons . 1- it's FL, we need to do this to stay competitive. and 2- we are an inner-city school. We'd lose (and we do lose) a majority of our kids if they would be allowed to roam the streets once school ends. Our school day runs from 7-1:30, so our kids are still home by 5:30 every day. There has been a lot of talk around here of "less being more", could a team not do this and still win come season? Are there any examples of a coach choosing to do less and not wearing down the kids yet still winning? Or would it be seen as blasphemous for a coach not to do this (gotta keep up with the Joneses) and no program ever given it a try? By remaining competitive, do you also mean that if you didnt do this other coaches would come in a poach your players? The less is more idea is what got me thinking. Another thread was about simplifying your program. I am curious what others do. I've seen great kids burn out. Not just fb players, baseball and basketball guys. This year round stuff gets old.
|
|
|
Post by rosey65 on Apr 7, 2016 10:25:13 GMT -6
Football is year-round in FL. We have a month of full pad practice and a live game in May. We start workouts at the end of January, 4 days/week. That includes study hall, lifting, running/agility, and indy/team install. We have 7-on-7 starting in march, going all the way through April. Kids who do other sports fit football in around their in-season practices, and then join once their season is done. We get 40-60 kids each day. Regular attendance is one of the teachable moments in accountability that we preach. Yes, it's a lot, and a GRIND, especially this time of year. However, it's necessary for 2 reasons . 1- it's FL, we need to do this to stay competitive. and 2- we are an inner-city school. We'd lose (and we do lose) a majority of our kids if they would be allowed to roam the streets once school ends. Our school day runs from 7-1:30, so our kids are still home by 5:30 every day. There has been a lot of talk around here of "less being more", could a team not do this and still win come season? Are there any examples of a coach choosing to do less and not wearing down the kids yet still winning? Or would it be seen as blasphemous for a coach not to do this (gotta keep up with the Joneses) and no program ever given it a try? By remaining competitive, do you also mean that if you didnt do this other coaches would come in a poach your players? Good questions, I'll try and answer.. -YES, poaching is alive and well. 2014 6A Championship game was 2 teams under investigation for recruiting, both had all wins removed 2 months after the game. To go with umpteen smaller issues, 1 team had a kid from 90 minutes away, who's parents ended up legally separating during the investigation to try and prove they had moved, and to keep the kid eligible. Other school had a starting QB who's address was a hotel on the edge of their school zone, a teacher swung by and picked up the kid every day after a parent drove him to the hotel. A private school in our county had 23 kids transfer to their school last spring. And then that whole IMG debacle going on an hour south of us. -Less can definitely be more, but again, we are an inner-city school. The draw of the streets, coupled with our odd school hours, means we have a similar duty as an after school rec program, or a PAL. We have to give our kids something to do. -As far as the workouts, the things we do are to build up our kids, and not wear them down physically. We work hard, as coaches, to change, adapt and improve our off-season workouts, to maximize the benefits we see during the season. 2 lower body days, 2 upper body days, 2 days of agility, 1 day of 7-on-7, 1 day of competitive games, some sort of team/install every day. Wednesdays off. We do more than a lot of other schools in our area, and it shows, no more so than during the post-game handshake line. Our opponents limp through, nothing but ice, crutches, and no shoulder pads. Our kids, while sore, end games looking about like they did at the start. We go through great pains to ensure our kids are built up, strong, and peaking in time for the season, so we dont show up for game 1 looking like the Junction Boys. There is some measure of keeping up with the jonses, but there is also a big need to play year-round. Playing a full, live game in May means that we have to be prepared to play, both mentally and physically. We can receive a big off-season boost with a win, which can encourage underclassmen to come out. A bad loss does nothing but makes us a running joke on social media during the summer. I love what we are able to do, both physically and scheme-wise, by playing year-round. Bad programs dont receive an advantage with extra time, but we usually win 2-3 games each year based solely on our off-season preparation. And thats not to say I dont think 15 times a day about how nice a few months off would be.
|
|
|
Post by CoachMikeJudy on Apr 7, 2016 10:36:52 GMT -6
No spring ball here. Here's our schedule:
3 days/week- lifting 2:55pm-4:15pm 1x/week individual position skill development after lifting (rotate the group who has skill work) We stay on top of lifting and nutrition with the kids.
Once it actually warms up (typically late April) we'll shorten the weight room time and get outside for running/agility etc.
I hung my hat on putting in "more" time than your opponent may set you up for success, but working harder and smarter during the "same" time is what wins us championship. I take pride that our kids are recognized by other coaches like "holy chit coach, what the hell are you feeding them?" and "do you guys lift 4-5 days a week?" I love it. The kids love it...give me 3-4 hours a week, and bust your nuts during that time, and then go home and chill with your family and watch you food intake closely.
|
|
|
Post by coachgutz on Apr 7, 2016 10:49:28 GMT -6
We do not have a class for our football kids to lift in, so our multi sport athletes lift 3 day a week before school. Those not in a sport lift 4 days a week after school. Each position coach usually takes a group out for 30-45 min after lifting once a week (for those not in a sport).
|
|
|
Post by 3rdandlong on Apr 7, 2016 10:54:13 GMT -6
In California people are already doing 7 on 7 with other schools. There's pretty much no restrictions.
|
|
|
Post by cqmiller on Apr 7, 2016 11:19:51 GMT -6
No spring football here in Utah. Kids are lifting during powerlifting with the head coach. Other than that, QB's have 2 meetings a week starting beginning of 4th quarter (today was our 2nd meeting), OL meet once a week, RB & WR will meet once a week starting next month.
All playbook install and information. No actual football work. Just rules for things in the system. 45 minute maximum per meeting. Hope is that by the time we can actually have coaches on the field with kids (June) they can already know the scheme and we can focus on executing the scheme.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Apr 7, 2016 13:22:21 GMT -6
There has been a lot of talk around here of "less being more", could a team not do this and still win come season? Are there any examples of a coach choosing to do less and not wearing down the kids yet still winning? Or would it be seen as blasphemous for a coach not to do this (gotta keep up with the Joneses) and no program ever given it a try? By remaining competitive, do you also mean that if you didnt do this other coaches would come in a poach your players? Good questions, I'll try and answer.. -YES, poaching is alive and well. 2014 6A Championship game was 2 teams under investigation for recruiting, both had all wins removed 2 months after the game. To go with umpteen smaller issues, 1 team had a kid from 90 minutes away, who's parents ended up legally separating during the investigation to try and prove they had moved, and to keep the kid eligible. Other school had a starting QB who's address was a hotel on the edge of their school zone, a teacher swung by and picked up the kid every day after a parent drove him to the hotel. A private school in our county had 23 kids transfer to their school last spring. And then that whole IMG debacle going on an hour south of us. -Less can definitely be more, but again, we are an inner-city school. The draw of the streets, coupled with our odd school hours, means we have a similar duty as an after school rec program, or a PAL. We have to give our kids something to do. -As far as the workouts, the things we do are to build up our kids, and not wear them down physically. We work hard, as coaches, to change, adapt and improve our off-season workouts, to maximize the benefits we see during the season. 2 lower body days, 2 upper body days, 2 days of agility, 1 day of 7-on-7, 1 day of competitive games, some sort of team/install every day. Wednesdays off. We do more than a lot of other schools in our area, and it shows, no more so than during the post-game handshake line. Our opponents limp through, nothing but ice, crutches, and no shoulder pads. Our kids, while sore, end games looking about like they did at the start. We go through great pains to ensure our kids are built up, strong, and peaking in time for the season, so we dont show up for game 1 looking like the Junction Boys. There is some measure of keeping up with the jonses, but there is also a big need to play year-round. Playing a full, live game in May means that we have to be prepared to play, both mentally and physically. We can receive a big off-season boost with a win, which can encourage underclassmen to come out. A bad loss does nothing but makes us a running joke on social media during the summer. I love what we are able to do, both physically and scheme-wise, by playing year-round. Bad programs dont receive an advantage with extra time, but we usually win 2-3 games each year based solely on our off-season preparation. And thats not to say I dont think 15 times a day about how nice a few months off would be. I respect the inner city aspect, and trying to keep kids occupied with something positive; and completely understand the poaching issue- I am in SoCal and drive past a top 20 school on my way to work with the #2 team in the nation just up the road (both of which have "talked" to the dad of our next year's Frosh QB). I guess from my perspective I see so many teams put in a ton of work and think they are getting something out of it (in regards to on the field success) yet feel their success level would be the same if they reduced the hours spent. Heck, we are putting in a 30 hour spring ball this month (not counting wt room), and will go 24-28 hours a week in the summer. But there are only so many plays a player can effectively run, only so many techniques they can master, before you have done too much and you see negative returns when implementing (the more you do the worse you will do it). I feel that number is reached with less hours than either of us are having our players put out. Maybe you get those 2-3 extra wins even by reducing the amount of time the kids are doing football specific work by 15-20%. Of course as you wrote there are other variables to take into account, I have seen a lot of college coaches who like the idea of HS kids coming in that are accustomed to this type of schedule; but wonder if anyone in your region is successful despite not going year round?
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on Apr 7, 2016 13:25:36 GMT -6
We do like most; what the Jones are doing. Lift in school, pick up this not able to afterwards. Make use of the off season rules as our association allows. We do 10 days is of spring ball, throw twice a week in the summer, lift 3 days a week in summer, use our 10 days of competitive 7-7, etc....
I'd love to do something less, but you have to meet the perception as reality full on. As soon as you take the minimalist approach, their will be somebody tearing you down.
By the way, regardless of what we do spring wise we get 5 scrimmages/jamborees in the fall.
|
|
|
Post by rosey65 on Apr 8, 2016 5:20:30 GMT -6
Good questions, I'll try and answer.. -YES, poaching is alive and well. 2014 6A Championship game was 2 teams under investigation for recruiting, both had all wins removed 2 months after the game. To go with umpteen smaller issues, 1 team had a kid from 90 minutes away, who's parents ended up legally separating during the investigation to try and prove they had moved, and to keep the kid eligible. Other school had a starting QB who's address was a hotel on the edge of their school zone, a teacher swung by and picked up the kid every day after a parent drove him to the hotel. A private school in our county had 23 kids transfer to their school last spring. And then that whole IMG debacle going on an hour south of us. -Less can definitely be more, but again, we are an inner-city school. The draw of the streets, coupled with our odd school hours, means we have a similar duty as an after school rec program, or a PAL. We have to give our kids something to do. -As far as the workouts, the things we do are to build up our kids, and not wear them down physically. We work hard, as coaches, to change, adapt and improve our off-season workouts, to maximize the benefits we see during the season. 2 lower body days, 2 upper body days, 2 days of agility, 1 day of 7-on-7, 1 day of competitive games, some sort of team/install every day. Wednesdays off. We do more than a lot of other schools in our area, and it shows, no more so than during the post-game handshake line. Our opponents limp through, nothing but ice, crutches, and no shoulder pads. Our kids, while sore, end games looking about like they did at the start. We go through great pains to ensure our kids are built up, strong, and peaking in time for the season, so we dont show up for game 1 looking like the Junction Boys. There is some measure of keeping up with the jonses, but there is also a big need to play year-round. Playing a full, live game in May means that we have to be prepared to play, both mentally and physically. We can receive a big off-season boost with a win, which can encourage underclassmen to come out. A bad loss does nothing but makes us a running joke on social media during the summer. I love what we are able to do, both physically and scheme-wise, by playing year-round. Bad programs dont receive an advantage with extra time, but we usually win 2-3 games each year based solely on our off-season preparation. And thats not to say I dont think 15 times a day about how nice a few months off would be. I respect the inner city aspect, and trying to keep kids occupied with something positive; and completely understand the poaching issue- I am in SoCal and drive past a top 20 school on my way to work with the #2 team in the nation just up the road (both of which have "talked" to the dad of our next year's Frosh QB). I guess from my perspective I see so many teams put in a ton of work and think they are getting something out of it (in regards to on the field success) yet feel their success level would be the same if they reduced the hours spent. Heck, we are putting in a 30 hour spring ball this month (not counting wt room), and will go 24-28 hours a week in the summer. But there are only so many plays a player can effectively run, only so many techniques they can master, before you have done too much and you see negative returns when implementing (the more you do the worse you will do it). I feel that number is reached with less hours than either of us are having our players put out. Maybe you get those 2-3 extra wins even by reducing the amount of time the kids are doing football specific work by 15-20%. Of course as you wrote there are other variables to take into account, I have seen a lot of college coaches who like the idea of HS kids coming in that are accustomed to this type of schedule; but wonder if anyone in your region is successful despite not going year round? Definitely understand the max reps a kid can handle. While we go year-round, we dont long. We get our work in and go home. We go MAX 12 hours/week in the spring, 15 hours during the month of spring ball. 9 hours/week in the summer. Work hard. Work smart. Work efficiently. #DoLess
|
|
|
Post by syphrit7 on Apr 8, 2016 5:42:24 GMT -6
I amazes how many schools have "in school" lifting class. How much of a benefit do you think it is?
We lift 3 days a week: Monday-Total Body, Wednesday-Upper, and Thursday-Lower
We encourage guys in a sport to come from 6:30-7:20 in the morning and guys not in a sport come from 2:50-4:15 after school.
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on Apr 8, 2016 6:32:50 GMT -6
I amazes how many schools have "in school" lifting class. How much of a benefit do you think it is? We lift 3 days a week: Monday-Total Body, Wednesday-Upper, and Thursday-Lower We encourage guys in a sport to come from 6:30-7:20 in the morning and guys not in a sport come from 2:50-4:15 after school. It's huge. Dont have to fight other sports in season. Every one is on the same schedule when the bell rings, the kids go home Since it is a class during the day, there is no 'closed season' rules
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on Apr 8, 2016 6:36:24 GMT -6
And if you're on the block schedule you have all the time you need.
I know a school that has 'freshman PE" class that has all the football players in class during the fall. They practice then leave when school dismisses.
|
|
|
Post by pvogel on Apr 8, 2016 6:55:42 GMT -6
I amazes how many schools have "in school" lifting class. How much of a benefit do you think it is? We lift 3 days a week: Monday-Total Body, Wednesday-Upper, and Thursday-Lower We encourage guys in a sport to come from 6:30-7:20 in the morning and guys not in a sport come from 2:50-4:15 after school. Ya its a huge deal. Allows you to work year round. Allows you to use that time for meetings or anything else like that. And the kids are putting in the work. Why not give them credit for it? No sense in making them take an extra BS PE class. It allows you to get that work done at school. Get them home and get them taking care of their homework and whatnot. Also eliminates BS excuses (I have to go home because......) since they are already at school. Honestly, I wouldnt take a HC job without it.
|
|
|
Post by syphrit7 on Apr 8, 2016 8:58:11 GMT -6
At how many schools is the football coach in charge of the in school lift (what percent%)?
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 8, 2016 9:08:48 GMT -6
I would say the further south you go, the higher the % goes.
|
|
|
Post by cfoott on Apr 10, 2016 10:06:11 GMT -6
In California people are already doing 7 on 7 with other schools. There's pretty much no restrictions. I'm curious if you're in NorCal or SoCal? In the NCS, I know that they have laid out an entire season for what is and what is not allowed and at what times of the year. They are big on offseason remaining the offseason with no sport specific activities, other than training.
|
|
|
Post by 3rdandlong on Apr 10, 2016 10:44:09 GMT -6
So Cal. And the main reason why teams are already doing 7 on 7 is because they feel the need to keep their kids away from the leaches that are the 7 on 7 all-star tournaments.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Apr 10, 2016 12:35:06 GMT -6
So Cal. And the main reason why teams are already doing 7 on 7 is because they feel the need to keep their kids away from the leaches that are the 7 on 7 all-star tournaments. Yeah, I am in Socal and our HC has tried to justify 7-on-7 right now under that premise; although he clearly wants to do it because he feel that more is better. Although it is crazy that what you can get away with down here. We basically are free to put forth as many hours as we want except for in season.
|
|