|
Post by 19delta on May 13, 2012 0:17:13 GMT -6
arkansasmatters.com/fulltext?nxd_id=536702Now...before everyone starts in about the "wussification of America" and "whiny mom sues because Junior got his feelings hurt", I think there are some issues to be resolved. Here's the questions I have: 1) According to the mom's lawsuit, her son "made" the team after surviving 2 previous cut-downs. With that being said, did he know that there was going to be another cut-down once football season ended? 2) Why did the basketball coach hold tryouts so early (if that is indeed what happened)? Why hold tryouts for basketball in August when the football players won't be able to participate? Just seems like there is something fishy going on...does anyone have the inside scoop? What isn't being reported? Are Mom's allegations pretty accurate or is there a lot more to the story that we aren't hearing?
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on May 13, 2012 8:39:27 GMT -6
I don't understand why you'd set a team knowing you would replace 9 of them. 2 or 3 maybe, but the coach had to have known that some of those kids were not going to make it. Were they practicing through the fall?
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 13, 2012 8:58:40 GMT -6
I don't understand why you'd set a team knowing you would replace 9 of them. 2 or 3 maybe, but the coach had to have known that some of those kids were not going to make it. Were they practicing through the fall? Looking at the Arkansas HS sports calendar (http://www.ahsaa.org/events), I see that there's a serious overlap between the basketball and football seasons. The first basketball playing date is in mid-October while the last regular season football game is in November.
|
|
|
Post by cqmiller on May 13, 2012 9:09:05 GMT -6
We are not allowed to have "tryouts" until very specific dates around here...
The only way a football player would miss basketball tryouts is if the football team is in the 14th week of football (state championship) and I'm sure the bball coach would be okay with getting those athletes 1 week later for a "2nd tryout".
If Arkansas has bball and football overlapping then football kids can't play basketball and that is something the parents should be upset about. If I was the bball coach I'd go in screaming as well because I want those tall athletic WR's, QB's, and TE's playing basketball.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 13, 2012 9:45:50 GMT -6
I don't understand why you'd set a team knowing you would replace 9 of them. 2 or 3 maybe, but the coach had to have known that some of those kids were not going to make it. Were they practicing through the fall? Looking at the Arkansas HS sports calendar (http://www.ahsaa.org/events), I see that there's a serious overlap between the basketball and football seasons. The first basketball playing date is in mid-October while the last regular season football game is in November. Coach...that appears to be for NON FB playing schools. November 7th is the first date for FB schools..which coincides with the first football playoff weekend according to that site.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 13, 2012 10:04:06 GMT -6
Looking at the Arkansas HS sports calendar (http://www.ahsaa.org/events), I see that there's a serious overlap between the basketball and football seasons. The first basketball playing date is in mid-October while the last regular season football game is in November. Coach...that appears to be for NON FB playing schools. November 7th is the first date for FB schools..which coincides with the first football playoff weekend according to that site. OK. In Virginia our first official practice date is the week of the last regular season playing date for football. If a team makes a deep playoff run they'll be missing some football players for basketball games. Our league allows teams that make the football playoffs to postpone basketball games until the playoffs end. That would lead us to where this Arkansas team was. Of course the issue is that at a lot of schools basketball "tryouts" are a sham. They play and practice all year and the basketball coach knows his roster the day they have "tryouts".
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on May 13, 2012 11:36:40 GMT -6
So the probem, once again, is season creep.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 13, 2012 12:09:27 GMT -6
So the probem, once again, is season creep. Depends how you define "creep". Here in Virginia, as I said, basketball practice starts in early November. The playoffs start then and lasts until the second weekend of December. That's been true since I moved here in 1977, so that's nothing new. Since this is the playoffs every week half of the number of teams is affected. I looked up Maumelle. They played a football playoff game on Nov. 11 and their first basketball game was Nov. 10. I don't see how situations like this can be avoided unless they drastically change either/or basketball and football seasons or vastly shorten or eliminate the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on May 13, 2012 13:33:56 GMT -6
So the probem, once again, is season creep. Depends how you define "creep". Here in Virginia, as I said, basketball practice starts in early November. The playoffs start then and lasts until the second weekend of December. That's been true since I moved here in 1977, so that's nothing new. Since this is the playoffs every week half of the number of teams is affected. I looked up Maumelle. They played a football playoff game on Nov. 11 and their first basketball game was Nov. 10. I don't see how situations like this can be avoided unless they drastically change either/or basketball and football seasons or vastly shorten or eliminate the playoffs. So it is reasonable to assume that the kids who "made" the team knew in advance that once the football season ended, there was a chance that some of the football players would take their spots? That makes sense. If that is the case, I don't think this mom who filed the lawsuit has a leg to stand on.
|
|
|
Post by mrjvi on May 13, 2012 15:24:52 GMT -6
In NY basketball should start after Thanksgiving. It starts 2 weeks earlier than that and is affected by playoffs. If it was after Thanksgiving , states would be over. But basketball dictates football.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 13, 2012 18:03:49 GMT -6
19delta---since the mom seems to be making a constitutional claim, I don't think it really "matters" if the kid knew there was another round of tryouts or not.
My knee jerk reaction was of course "duh..stupid mom" However, after some deeper thinking, there may actually be a point somewhere in here. Not necessarily one I agree with, but I do see how someone could make an argument that public funds support the extra-curriculars. Activities that we as coaches LOVE to say benefit kids in so many ways... and yet they only get to reap those benefits if they are "good enough"?
Not saying I agree with it..only that I could see an argument.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 13, 2012 18:11:00 GMT -6
19delta---since the mom seems to be making a constitutional claim, I don't think it really "matters" if the kid knew there was another round of tryouts or not. My knee jerk reaction was of course "duh..stupid mom" However, after some deeper thinking, there may actually be a point somewhere in here. Not necessarily one I agree with, but I do see how someone could make an argument that public funds support the extra-curriculars. Activities that we as coaches LOVE to say benefit kids in so many ways... and yet they only get to reap those benefits if they are "good enough"? Not saying I agree with it..only that I could see an argument. So, everybody should get a part in the school play?
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on May 13, 2012 18:13:37 GMT -6
19delta---since the mom seems to be making a constitutional claim, I don't think it really "matters" if the kid knew there was another round of tryouts or not. My knee jerk reaction was of course "duh..stupid mom" However, after some deeper thinking, there may actually be a point somewhere in here. Not necessarily one I agree with, but I do see how someone could make an argument that public funds support the extra-curriculars. Activities that we as coaches LOVE to say benefit kids in so many ways... and yet they only get to reap those benefits if they are "good enough"? Not saying I agree with it..only that I could see an argument. So, everybody should get a part in the school play? Like I said, not an argument I agree with.. just an argument.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 13, 2012 18:26:21 GMT -6
So, everybody should get a part in the school play? Like I said, not an argument I agree with.. just an argument. And I'm not really arguing with you. There are classes that get to pick and choose who gets in. They may take everybody into the school band but not in the brass ensemble. I taught at a school that had an International Baccalaureate program. They don't take everybody. It's not only athletics that have tryouts.
|
|
|
Post by gschwender on May 13, 2012 19:18:05 GMT -6
So get them uniform, and sit the bench, next she will suing over playing time-then we're all screwed.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on May 14, 2012 4:11:47 GMT -6
19delta---since the mom seems to be making a constitutional claim, I don't think it really "matters" if the kid knew there was another round of tryouts or not. Yeah...I guess that I would like the answer just for my own thoughts. I think the Constitutional argument will be a real stretch...there have been previous lawsuits in which parents have claimed that cuts from athletic teams violate their child's rights to due process and none of those lawsuits have been successful. Yes. I think that is the claim she is making. And what she is going to run into is the simple fact that there are many things that we pay for as citizens through our taxes that don't directly benefit us. What bothers me is the fact that, for some reason, these boys thought they had "made" the team and then all lost their spots once the football season ended. Unless the boys who lost their spots knew that was a possibility from the beginning, I do think that it was pretty sneaky and underhanded to string these 9 boys along until "better" talent became available. Once these 9 boys lost their spots, did they at least get assigned to lower-level teams? The boy whose mom filed the suit was a freshman, I believe. So, did he at least get assigned to the freshman squad? Did that bump someone else off the team? Look...I understand that in a sport like basketball, cuts have to be made. I just think that the way this school went about was not handled very well. Often, we automatically want to blame the parents for being unreasonable but sometimes, school officials make stupid decisions, too.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on May 14, 2012 8:37:38 GMT -6
1. The overlapping schedules is really screwy and the administration that set it up need to be tested for some sort of brain damage/developmental disability. It's not fair to the kids that made the try-outs and got cut.
2. With respect to #1, 'Fair' isn't a word that can be tossed around here in any serious sense. The community knows that there is an overlap and that kids can be cut well into the season. Going out for basketball means that you can be cut. Going out for basketball here means you can be cut halfway into the season. Choices, choices.
3. These kids that were cut made the decision to 'specialize' in basketball. So, they either played pick-up games (open gym) all year or just did nothing. Some of them might have taken the off-season seriously and worked out hard. I kind of doubt it, but who knows.
4. Over 75% of the basketball team are football players. That tells me that either the best athletes in the school play multiple sports. Maybe it's because of involvement, maybe it's because the football off-season program is good or just a combination of factors. I doubt that 75% is abnormal so the kids should have seen it coming.
5. Mom can sue all she wants but she's going to lose. Playing high school basketball isn't a Constitutionally protected right. It's only gotten this far because some NAACP lawyer got their hands on it and turned it over to the media.
|
|
|
Post by newhope on May 14, 2012 10:41:48 GMT -6
In a court of law, she probably doesn't have a leg to stand on. However, this has to be one of the stupidest coaching moves ever. This isn't a matter for the courts, it's a matter for the school system. You don't have kids practice for 3 months and then cut them. Dumb coaches. Dumb administration.
|
|
|
Post by CoachCP on May 14, 2012 10:55:57 GMT -6
Though this is the fringe part of the issue...
Make sure your coaches get certified. I wonder what made them supposedly unqualified besides a certification document.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 14, 2012 11:00:48 GMT -6
In a court of law, she probably doesn't have a leg to stand on. However, this has to be one of the stupidest coaching moves ever. This isn't a matter for the courts, it's a matter for the school system. You don't have kids practice for 3 months and then cut them. Dumb coaches. Dumb administration. Why not? They had a bunch of guys finishing football. Somebody was going to have to go. The coaches should have warned the kids that this was coming (in fact, we don't know if they did or not) but obviously they couldn't keep nine extra players.
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on May 14, 2012 11:51:15 GMT -6
When I used to coach a cut sport, I always informed the players and parents that the final cut could take place on the last day of practice.
|
|
|
Post by newhope on May 14, 2012 12:07:50 GMT -6
If you can't see the harm in having kids practice for 3 months and then cutting them, then I certainly can't explain it to you. Open gym would be one thing. Required practice is entirely different. I'll bet if they had you conduct offseason workouts for 3 months as a coach and then told you your services weren't needed come August, you'd think you were done wrong. This is another example of the ills of year-round sports emphasis.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 14, 2012 12:10:00 GMT -6
If you can't see the harm in having kids practice for 3 months and then cutting them, then I certainly can't explain it to you. Open gym would be one thing. Required practice is entirely different. I'll bet if they had you conduct offseason workouts for 3 months as a coach and then told you your services weren't needed come August, you'd think you were done wrong. This is another example of the ills of year-round sports emphasis. So, what would the solution be? Cut the football players? It's easy to criticize. Solving the problem is a little trickier.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on May 14, 2012 12:39:02 GMT -6
If you can't see the harm in having kids practice for 3 months and then cutting them, then I certainly can't explain it to you. Open gym would be one thing. Required practice is entirely different. I'll bet if they had you conduct offseason workouts for 3 months as a coach and then told you your services weren't needed come August, you'd think you were done wrong. This is another example of the ills of year-round sports emphasis. The kids and parents knew that more cuts would take place in the middle of the season. They knew that they could still be cut but still made the choice to participate. But, take a look at the flip side. Would it be fair to tell those football players that they can't play basketball because the schedule is idiotic?
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on May 14, 2012 12:39:19 GMT -6
The easiest solution is to not have football run into December like it does in some places, and not have basketball starting in August.
As a sergeant once told me "Now carry on, like normal people."
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 14, 2012 12:43:09 GMT -6
The easiest solution is to not have football run into December like it does in some places, and not have basketball starting in August. As a sergeant once told me "Now carry on, like normal people." CoachD pointed out that the August start date is only for schools that don't have football. As I said, unless they shorten one or both seasons drastically it's hard to see how they could avoid an overlap.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on May 14, 2012 13:18:02 GMT -6
True, the league season only overlaps a little bit, though I still think both sports should work to fix that. Not just basketball, but having 14 weeks of football is also too much.
More relevantly, this coach stretched his own team's season back into August. That means they were practicing through August, September, October, and into November without any games. That's the kind of season creep I'm referring to.
|
|
|
Post by newhope on May 14, 2012 13:24:25 GMT -6
There is no need for a flip side. It shouldn't be an either-or situation. It's silly to require kids to practice for 3 months and then cut them and it would be silly not to let football players come out when their season is over. If you tell people in advance that you're going to do something that's wrong, it doesn't make it right just because you told them in advance. The lawsuit is frivolous, but the mom has a right to be upset. Our jobs as coaches and educators is to, as much as possible, do what is right for the young men we coach. There is no way you can defend this as being the right thing to do for these young people involved. Bottom line, these coaches screwed up. I don't think there's any recourse for this kid or this parent other than to make sure this doesn't happen again to other kids in that school.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 14, 2012 14:04:48 GMT -6
There is no need for a flip side. It shouldn't be an either-or situation. It's silly to require kids to practice for 3 months and then cut them and it would be silly not to let football players come out when their season is over. If you tell people in advance that you're going to do something that's wrong, it doesn't make it right just because you told them in advance. The lawsuit is frivolous, but the mom has a right to be upset. Our jobs as coaches and educators is to, as much as possible, do what is right for the young men we coach. There is no way you can defend this as being the right thing to do for these young people involved. Bottom line, these coaches screwed up. I don't think there's any recourse for this kid or this parent other than to make sure this doesn't happen again to other kids in that school. And your solution would be...?
|
|
|
Post by fantom on May 14, 2012 14:25:46 GMT -6
BTW, I don't know if anybody else scrolled down to the comments (I didn't until now) but this was one of the comments:
Playing sports is a priveledge, not a right. You have to earn it. If the kid is not good enough, then he does not have the right to be on the team. I am a close follower of Maumelle basketball and a fan of Coach Shook's, and he did a great job with the team this year. Their record was 21-4, that is pretty good for an unqualified, incompetent coach, huh??!!!! Sounds like he made the right choice in who should be on the team!!! I know, and it was public knowledge, that there would be three cuts. The first 2 were made as preliminary cuts, and the players were told, after football was done, there would be the final cut. If they made it through the first 2 cuts, they needed to use the time before the next cut to work on their skills for the final cut. They knew that the final cut was not until football players came over. Obviously, when a team goes 21-4, the coach is doing a heck of a job and the parents and school need to do nothing but support him and let him keep doing a great job!!!! I also know that the head senior high job is now open at Maumelle, and I think Coach Shook would hands down, be the best choice for that job!!
|
|