|
Post by coache67 on Jan 9, 2011 22:15:19 GMT -6
Big debate here in Ohio regarding the separation of the playoffs and our state association stated that "no state association in modern history has a separated its tournaments into public-only and private-only." I thought California did this and maybe a state down south...Mississippi? I know you guys would be the ones to turn to for the answers b/c I trust these guys about as much as I trust the NCAA The guy who wrote this article has been on a crusade for three or four years now regarding the disparity between the public and privates and the state is responding with a ridiculous formula. Link to Bob Dyer's story: www.ohio.com/news/113155499.html
|
|
|
Post by k on Jan 9, 2011 22:24:41 GMT -6
We have the same private vs public problem here. My answer to the problem of what to do with the largest enrollment schools without a larger division to go into would be to expel them from the state association completely and place them with the prep school league (who may recruit openly and can have post-grads).
I'd like a 200% or 300% modifier personally.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jan 9, 2011 22:39:14 GMT -6
Big debate here in Ohio regarding the separation of the playoffs and our state association stated that "no state association in modern history has a separated its tournaments into public-only and private-only." I thought California did this and maybe a state down south...Mississippi? I know you guys would be the ones to turn to for the answers b/c I trust these guys about as much as I trust the NCAA The guy who wrote this article has been on a crusade for three or four years now regarding the disparity between the public and privates and the state is responding with a ridiculous formula. Link to Bob Dyer's story: www.ohio.com/news/113155499.htmlIn Virginia the private and public schools are completely separate. Not only different playoffs, different associations.
|
|
|
Post by coache67 on Jan 9, 2011 22:42:51 GMT -6
At the Division I state finals our commissioner was interviewed and he said that he would like to see a "Super Division" which would address the concern of the Upper enrollment schools like Mentor, St. Xavier, Fairfield and St. Ignatius, which all have over 1000 boys competing in the same division with schools like Twinsburg, Massillon, and Valley Forge which have half that number.
He's REALLY into this idea. However, purists here complain that schools like Massillon, Canton McKinley, Colerain and other traditional DI "powers" will no longer be in that upper echelon as they have been in the past and would be considered second rate.
|
|
|
Post by coache67 on Jan 9, 2011 22:44:18 GMT -6
Aaahhh - thanks, phantom. Do the schools from the separate associations play each other during the regular season at all?
|
|
|
Post by getbackcoach56 on Jan 9, 2011 23:37:27 GMT -6
In Texas, our private and public schools also have seperate playoff systems as well as seperate associations (there are actually two Prive associations in the state). In preseason, private and public schools do play each other. Here recently, there has been some integration talks but it seems to have calmed lately. There are two private schools in the public system (guinea pigs) but I highly doubt others will ever be let in. In private, they can recruit - in public you cannot. Unfair advatage in copetition.
|
|
|
Post by norcaldiaz on Jan 10, 2011 0:22:17 GMT -6
In CA we actually do not separate privates from publics (we're a public school but in De la Salle's playoff division). They have created an "Open" division for our state championship bowl (think BCS-like system) where the best school from Nor-Cal plays SoCal's best regardless of enrollment size, or public/private.
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Jan 10, 2011 1:29:08 GMT -6
norcaldiaz is right no seperate division in CA
but i whole heartedly believe their needs to be. The private schools here have such huge advantages, they really need seperate divisions. Maybe keep the open division, for overall best regardless of public/private, but for the other divisions I feel that seperate divisions would be best.
Norcaldiaz, where do you coach at in NCS?
|
|
|
Post by realdawg on Jan 10, 2011 5:52:55 GMT -6
North Carolina has a seperate playoff division for public/private. However, privates are allowed to play with publics if they pay an entrance fee to the public system and agree to abide by NCHSAA rules. Otherwise they have a seperate organization. Only one private that I know of chooses to play with the publics.
|
|
|
Post by buck42 on Jan 10, 2011 7:04:42 GMT -6
In North Carolina we have seperate public and private school championships. There are 4 (I think) private schools that play in the public school leagues. Only 1 has won a title (Charlotte Catholic and they have won a few) and Cardinal Gibbons has had a couple solid years but nothing earth shattering.
I think that do away with multipliers and all that stuff and just make them play up a classification. If they are a 3A enrollment, bump them to 4A if they want to play in Public School League...pretty easy
|
|
|
Post by John Knight on Jan 10, 2011 8:00:12 GMT -6
Coachdud, you and I see eye to eye on this one!
|
|
|
Post by bigdog2003 on Jan 10, 2011 8:41:10 GMT -6
SC is seperate but there are a few private schools that play with the public schools. We have the SCHSL, which is the public school association (with 3 or 4 private schools that pay), and SCISA, for private schools (do their own state games and season) One is a baseball powerhouse that makes the state final almost every year. The other 3 are small schools that are decent all around.
None of them make it far in football, so public school fans don't say much about it, but baseball is a big debate.
|
|
|
Post by John Knight on Jan 10, 2011 8:42:51 GMT -6
Now that is a Formula!
The OHSAA wants to start with the BADM . . . subtract the SF . . . add the BF . . . add the TF . . . and then apply the FAC.
|
|
|
Post by fballcoachg on Jan 10, 2011 8:45:57 GMT -6
In TN, the privates that allow students who recieve financial aid to play sports compete in a different playoff system, those that don't play with the publics but with a multiplier if I am not mistaken.
I grew up and played at a public in Ohio and the 2 years we made the playoffs we got bounced by St. Ignatius. I will say that from a players perspective we wanted to play the best teams, it wasn't that big of a deal to us. As a coach I am kind of split, privates down here are very blatant about recruiting kids and I know that privates in Ohio recruit as well but I don't think it is as big of a problem. I would be ok coaching their with a multiplier.
From experience, I know that St. Eds, Ignatius, Lake Catholic, etc. do recruit/offer some financial aid but I also know that, atleast around Cleveland, a decent amount of kids stay in their home schools and play. It is not that much different then families moving to tradition rich public schools during their kids high school years (massilon, stuebenville) or getting an apartment to play for a school (glenville).
I see the arguement for separate playoffs, especially in the lower classifications, but I prefer for all to compete in the same playoffs possibly with multipliers. Just my preference.
|
|
|
Post by fballcoachg on Jan 10, 2011 8:52:14 GMT -6
I know that privates in Ohio recruit as well but I don't think it is as big of a problem Read more: www.coachhuey.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=43219&page=1#ixzz1AdzqPzp0Before Ohio guys go nuts on this line, what I mean is the majority of recruiting I know of is from CYO leagues(kids already in the parochial system or associated with a church) and "inner ring" suburbs youth leagues, I think the farther out you go the less likely a kid is to be approached by a private. Here, we have a team in Nashville that hired a guy who lives in a big city 2 counties away and his job is to coach but he also conveniently drives a school purchased van and stops all along the way picking kids up.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jan 10, 2011 9:42:56 GMT -6
Aaahhh - thanks, phantom. Do the schools from the separate associations play each other during the regular season at all? It happens some but it's not the norm in football. In 32 years of coaching I've never coaches against a private school. The rules are set up to keep it that way. For example, for a game against a private school to count for playoff power points the private school has to schedule a majority of its games against public schools.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Jan 10, 2011 10:29:16 GMT -6
Like Norcaldiaz and Bdub said, CA more or less works around the issue with the idea of the "Open" division come playoff time. The theory is that those looking for real accomplishment/challenge/danger/whatever will opt for the open if they have the power points to do so. My uncle (public school) recently won a section title because his team managed to avoid the open division and having to play against Palo Alto (CA D-1 state champs), Bellarmine (CA D-I state runner-up '09), and Valley Christian (loaded private school with 2 ex-49ers on staff).
There was an incident a few years ago where Valley Christian qualified for playoffs, but without the points needed to get into the Open, so they played at their enrollment, which was the second smallest. They averaged 65 points a game all the way through to tournament. Quite a joke, really.
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Jan 10, 2011 12:14:04 GMT -6
Like Norcaldiaz and Bdub said, CA more or less works around the issue with the idea of the "Open" division come playoff time. The theory is that those looking for real accomplishment/challenge/danger/whatever will opt for the open if they have the power points to do so. My uncle (public school) recently won a section title because his team managed to avoid the open division and having to play against Palo Alto (CA D-1 state champs), Bellarmine (CA D-I state runner-up '09), and Valley Christian (loaded private school with 2 ex-49ers on staff). There was an incident a few years ago where Valley Christian qualified for playoffs, but without the points needed to get into the Open, so they played at their enrollment, which was the second smallest. They averaged 65 points a game all the way through to tournament. Quite a joke, really. The open division only comes in to play for the state game Maybe im misunderstanding you... but for all of the section playoffs those are completely controlled by each teams individual division, there is no avoiding teams, you are either in their division or you are not. You can petition up to a higher division, so maybe those other teams petitioned up to D-1 while your uncle's team stayed in a lower division??
|
|
|
Post by norcaldiaz on Jan 10, 2011 14:10:43 GMT -6
I believe mariner must be a CCS guy, where their sectional playoffs actually have an open division too. Our playoff divisions in NCS are purely (with a couple exceptions) enrollment based.
If we're having this much trouble I can only imagine how confusing it is for a non-CA person to figure out our playoff system...
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on Jan 10, 2011 14:20:04 GMT -6
All I know is, we played some private schools this year, and I think they had more money than god, or maybe he was a booster of theirs. They built two half-size practice fields side-by-side next to the game field, where the obvious thing would have been to make two fields. No biggie, they have two spare game fields, behind the (private) hockey rink.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Jan 10, 2011 14:35:09 GMT -6
I believe mariner must be a CCS guy, where their sectional playoffs actually have an open division too. Our playoff divisions in NCS are purely (with a couple exceptions) enrollment based. If we're having this much trouble I can only imagine how confusing it is for a non-CA person to figure out our playoff system... Guilty. Yeah, I forgot that most sections don't do like we do. I really like the open division option for sectional playoffs because it's much more reasonable for the large-school publics. I tried explaining it all to my roommate from Ohio and it took at least half an hour.
|
|
|
Post by pmeisel on Jan 10, 2011 18:46:15 GMT -6
Mississippi is separate. Not sure how it came to be.
|
|
|
Post by sandstorm on Jan 10, 2011 21:41:20 GMT -6
In Texas, our private and public schools also have seperate playoff systems as well as seperate associations (there are actually two Prive associations in the state). In preseason, private and public schools do play each other. Here recently, there has been some integration talks but it seems to have calmed lately. There are two private schools in the public system (guinea pigs) but I highly doubt others will ever be let in. In private, they can recruit - in public you cannot. Unfair advatage in copetition. Not true. They are not recruiting, they are inviting quality applicants to come to their institution for a better education. ;D
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jan 10, 2011 21:43:36 GMT -6
PMEISEL---are you sure? I know there IS a private association...but not all the privates play in the league. Didnt st. Stanislaus compete in the MHSAA playoffs?
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Jan 10, 2011 21:54:14 GMT -6
I believe mariner must be a CCS guy, where their sectional playoffs actually have an open division too. Our playoff divisions in NCS are purely (with a couple exceptions) enrollment based. If we're having this much trouble I can only imagine how confusing it is for a non-CA person to figure out our playoff system... Guilty. Yeah, I forgot that most sections don't do like we do. I really like the open division option for sectional playoffs because it's much more reasonable for the large-school publics. I tried explaining it all to my roommate from Ohio and it took at least half an hour. I'm sorry for my ignorance, I thought all the sections were the same. That is interesting
|
|
sin86
Sophomore Member
Posts: 111
|
Post by sin86 on Jan 10, 2011 23:46:16 GMT -6
Recruiting in TN is pretty blatant for some schools both public and private, but after the lawsuit I don't see the TSSAA doing anything about it.
Privates do get a 1.8 multiplier but some 1As could play 6A playoff teams and be successful. The issue has been hotly debated in years past but most of the public/private split supporters have been told to shut-up, quit whining, and work harder. The reality of the situation in TN is that small rural schools cannot compete with their urban counter parts of equal size on a consistent basis.
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Jan 11, 2011 12:13:58 GMT -6
Recruiting in TN is pretty blatant for some schools both public and private, but after the lawsuit I don't see the TSSAA doing anything about it. Privates do get a 1.8 multiplier but some 1As could play 6A playoff teams and be successful. The issue has been hotly debated in years past but most of the public/private split supporters have been told to shut-up, quit whining, and work harder. The reality of the situation in TN is that small rural schools cannot compete with their urban counter parts of equal size on a consistent basis. Private schools here recruit as well... which is why I just do not think it is fair for them to compete against public schools. I have seen it first hand, lived my entire life (and still do) and coached for 4 years, in the same city as De La Salle... This is why I only want them to win when they play a team from so cal, or another state... only because they are representing all of northern California when they do this Any time they play a norcal team I root against them
|
|
|
Post by huskyskins on Jan 11, 2011 16:55:46 GMT -6
Washington State has been going through massive reform of division splits et al for a few years and the private vs. public debate has always been in the background. Most of the powerhouse private schools opt-up at least one division as a concession to keep the wolves at bay on the situation.
There are only a few private schools in the upper divisions that cause any noise (Gonzaga Prep, Bellarmine Prep, O'Dea, Eastside Catholic, Kennedy Catholic, Archbishop Murphy). All of them have opted up at least one division, Bellarmine opts up two divisons. The lower three divisions are populated by a pretty even split of privates and publics. Mostly rural publics playing against small urban and suburban private schools.
Divisions get re-allocated every two years, and the someone brings up a public/private split nearly every time that happens.
|
|
|
Post by John Knight on Jan 11, 2011 20:23:06 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by peacock1915 on Jan 13, 2011 13:49:16 GMT -6
In Mississippi there are 2 different associations completely. They can play each other during the regular season, but playoffs are separate. There are some privates that play in the public school portion (MHSAA) most are catholic schools. Some states add a multiplier during reclassification (alabama I think) so for a private school each students counts as 1.3 instead of 1 to make up for any recruiting done.
|
|