|
Post by irishdog on Jul 26, 2023 8:18:52 GMT -6
Senators Tommy Tuberville and Joe Manchin have introduced a bipartisan bill in Congress aimed at addressing NIL and the Transfer Portal. Some provisions (among others) outlined in the bill are:
Requiring agents and collectives to register with a regulating body.
Establishing a public-facing website to publish anonymized NIL data.
Requiring all NIL contracts to be disclosed with 30 days.
Require athletes to complete three years of residency at a given institution before being eligible to transfer without penalty.
I have never supported NIL or the transfer portal for the very reasons that have created the mess we are in today. But if both are going to become the standard for college sports BOTH will need much stricter guidelines and regulations.
Your thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Down 'n Out on Jul 26, 2023 8:46:31 GMT -6
Its a mess for college football, thats a fact, but its hard for me to be able to justify the state regulating what people do with their Names, Images, or Likenesses. Especially when whats derived from that is in no way dangerous. An Electrician should be regulated to some extent because his work matters to peoples homes/businesses/lives and could literally be life or death if done improperly, but a 20 year old appearing in commercials or on billboards? I dont see how that is any of the governments business.
|
|
|
Post by chi5hi on Jul 26, 2023 8:49:11 GMT -6
Requiring agents to register with a "regulating body"...
Just what the world needs. Another "regulating body"! Persons running this regulating body will have authority to make more rules and when they begin doing that...The Sky's the Limit!
|
|
|
Post by irishdog on Jul 26, 2023 9:00:56 GMT -6
Requiring agents to register with a "regulating body"... Just what the world needs. Another "regulating body"! Persons running this regulating body will have authority to make more rules and when they begin doing that...The Sky's the Limit! Agents. Which agents? Dads? Moms? Never mind... those two terms are redundant.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Jul 26, 2023 11:34:32 GMT -6
My thought is the toothpaste is already out of the tube.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Jul 26, 2023 11:59:22 GMT -6
Requiring agents to register with a "regulating body"... Just what the world needs. Another "regulating body"! Persons running this regulating body will have authority to make more rules and when they begin doing that...The Sky's the Limit! Don't disagree, but isn't there already some regulating bodies for professional sports agents? Just use the same regulating bodies. Not an expert here.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Jul 26, 2023 12:01:08 GMT -6
Requiring agents to register with a "regulating body"... Just what the world needs. Another "regulating body"! Persons running this regulating body will have authority to make more rules and when they begin doing that...The Sky's the Limit! Don't disagree, but isn't there already some regulating bodies for professional sports agents? Just use the same regulating bodies. Not an expert here. I think agents for pro athletes have to register with players' unions (NFLPA for ex.)
|
|
|
Post by irishdog on Jul 26, 2023 12:03:35 GMT -6
My thought is the toothpaste is already out of the tube. It is. So what do we do now with the toothpaste that's out of the tube? Just can't leave it sitting in the sink! Or on the counter top! Or on the toothbrush! Has to be a way to deal with it. Again, my only fear is that if it becomes a FEDERAL issue than there will be a lot of folks in the government, and in the states, who want to get their hands in the pie...including unions.
|
|
|
Post by sweep26 on Jul 26, 2023 13:08:23 GMT -6
Both the NIL and the Transfer Portal are a mess, but...please do not allow the D.C. politicians to attempt to fix this mess!!
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Jul 26, 2023 14:27:16 GMT -6
Both the NIL and the Transfer Portal are a mess, but...please do not allow the D.C. politicians to attempt to fix this mess!! Again, don't disagree, but at least Tommy Tuberville has some real experience and knowledge on this subject.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Jul 26, 2023 15:13:09 GMT -6
Tax dollars at work.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 26, 2023 15:33:05 GMT -6
My thought is the toothpaste is already out of the tube. It is. So what do we do now with the toothpaste that's out of the tube? Just can't leave it sitting in the sink! Or on the counter top! Or on the toothbrush! Has to be a way to deal with it. Deal with what exactly though coach. From a 30,000 foot view, all that has happened is that now individuals who happened to be athletes and chose to attend UCLA and participate in intercollegiate athletics can choose to leave and transfer to Iowa (just like any other student) and participate in athletics without sitting out a year. I may be mistaken, but I think the vast majority of people confuse transfer rules and the "transfer portal" I think the transfer portal is a GREAT thing. Eliminates the need for all the backchannel stuff that happened before. Maybe some of you on the board were actually a part of that...sniffing around for one of your ex players who wasn't happy at his first school. The "portal" is just a fairly transparent database that lets everyone see who has opened up their recruitment. Now, the new transfer rules as to eligibility...a bit less sure about. I have wondered if change in eligibility clocks would help mitigate the amount of turnover. Hey, you can transfer...but you have to sit out. However, sitting out won't cost you a year. But I am sure there are unforeseen issues with that. NIL-- College athletics did this to themselves. Coaches and administrators turned school athletic programs into professional athletic organizations (with very low wage essentially free labor). I have said for a long time that the current landscape and issues would not exist if Nick Saban made $160,000, Ohio State didn't have an athletic directory of well over 400 people (I stopped counting at that point) with 47 under Football, and LSU didn't have combination lockers/beds/imax theater. Regarding the NIL-- someone like Natalie Portman was getting paid for her Name, Image, and Likeness in advertisements while she was at Harvard. In 2019, there were a LOT of #9 Burreaux Jerseys, T-Shirts etc. in the LSU bookstore, or licsensed by the NCAA/LSU. Why shouldn't Joe Burrow get a taste? College athletics did this to themselves. I get it. The landscape is different. It isn't one that we are familiar with, and therefore not comfortable with. It has changed on us... but everything changes.
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on Jul 26, 2023 17:55:12 GMT -6
Agreed.
And now you have the social media crowd. How many high school and college age girls are making bank on a platform that was inconceivable when most of were that age? The Dunne girl at LSU would be anonymous if she had been a gymnast 20 years ago. It’s way too easy for these guys to make money now to limit them.
The 19 year old USC freshman smokeshow can make money dancing on TikTok but the Heisman QB can’t cash in? Nonsense.
I’m all for the players getting paid and having some leverage while hypocrite coaches making 7-8 figures working an extracurricular activity complain about it. It’s a two way street now.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jul 26, 2023 21:10:26 GMT -6
Agreed. And now you have the social media crowd. How many high school and college age girls are making bank on a platform that was inconceivable when most of were that age? The Dunne girl at LSU would be anonymous if she had been a gymnast 20 years ago. It’s way too easy for these guys to make money now to limit them. The 19 year old USC freshman smokeshow can make money dancing on TikTok but the Heisman QB can’t cash in? Nonsense. I’m all for the players getting paid and having some leverage while hypocrite coaches making 7-8 figures working an extracurricular activity complain about it. It’s a two way street now. Yeah I don't really see anyone being against NIL, especially since the money isnt coming from the school. But the transfer portal as it is now should be changed, that is something the NCAA shouldve done a while back.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 26, 2023 22:03:58 GMT -6
Agreed. And now you have the social media crowd. How many high school and college age girls are making bank on a platform that was inconceivable when most of were that age? The Dunne girl at LSU would be anonymous if she had been a gymnast 20 years ago. It’s way too easy for these guys to make money now to limit them. The 19 year old USC freshman smokeshow can make money dancing on TikTok but the Heisman QB can’t cash in? Nonsense. I’m all for the players getting paid and having some leverage while hypocrite coaches making 7-8 figures working an extracurricular activity complain about it. It’s a two way street now. Yeah I don't really see anyone being against NIL, especially since the money isnt coming from the school. But the transfer portal as it is now should be changed, that is something the NCAA shouldve done a while back. The transfer portal is just fine. It is simply a reopening of a students recruitment. If you want to say that students should not be able to have immediate eligibility, one could make an argument. Probably not a good one, but at least one could be made. But as far as the portal? I don't see what kind of problem people can have with it. Willing to listen of course.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Jul 26, 2023 22:08:08 GMT -6
Both the NIL and the Transfer Portal are a mess, but...please do not allow the D.C. politicians to attempt to fix this mess!! Again, don't disagree, but at least Tommy Tuberville has some real experience and knowledge on this subject. Because we all trust Tubs to do the right and ethical thing.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jul 26, 2023 22:17:17 GMT -6
Yeah I don't really see anyone being against NIL, especially since the money isnt coming from the school. But the transfer portal as it is now should be changed, that is something the NCAA shouldve done a while back. The transfer portal is just fine. It is simply a reopening of a students recruitment. If you want to say that students should not be able to have immediate eligibility, one could make an argument. Probably not a good one, but at least one could be made. But as far as the portal? I don't see what kind of problem people can have with it. Willing to listen of course. That was my specific beef, I think that is the big problem. But I also think scholarships should be guaranteed for at minimum a full five years.
|
|
|
Post by irishdog on Jul 27, 2023 10:10:43 GMT -6
It is. So what do we do now with the toothpaste that's out of the tube? Just can't leave it sitting in the sink! Or on the counter top! Or on the toothbrush! Has to be a way to deal with it. Deal with what exactly though coach. From a 30,000 foot view, all that has happened is that now individuals who happened to be athletes and chose to attend UCLA and participate in intercollegiate athletics can choose to leave and transfer to Iowa (just like any other student) and participate in athletics without sitting out a year. I may be mistaken, but I think the vast majority of people confuse transfer rules and the "transfer portal" I think the transfer portal is a GREAT thing. Eliminates the need for all the backchannel stuff that happened before. Maybe some of you on the board were actually a part of that...sniffing around for one of your ex players who wasn't happy at his first school. The "portal" is just a fairly transparent database that lets everyone see who has opened up their recruitment. Now, the new transfer rules as to eligibility...a bit less sure about. I have wondered if change in eligibility clocks would help mitigate the amount of turnover. Hey, you can transfer...but you have to sit out. However, sitting out won't cost you a year. But I am sure there are unforeseen issues with that. NIL-- College athletics did this to themselves. Coaches and administrators turned school athletic programs into professional athletic organizations (with very low wage essentially free labor). I have said for a long time that the current landscape and issues would not exist if Nick Saban made $160,000, Ohio State didn't have an athletic directory of well over 400 people (I stopped counting at that point) with 47 under Football, and LSU didn't have combination lockers/beds/imax theater. Regarding the NIL-- someone like Natalie Portman was getting paid for her Name, Image, and Likeness in advertisements while she was at Harvard. In 2019, there were a LOT of #9 Burreaux Jerseys, T-Shirts etc. in the LSU bookstore, or licsensed by the NCAA/LSU. Why shouldn't Joe Burrow get a taste? College athletics did this to themselves. I get it. The landscape is different. It isn't one that we are familiar with, and therefore not comfortable with. It has changed on us... but everything changes. Yes. The landscape HAS changed, and it IS different. Glad I'm not part of it anymore. FORE!!
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Jul 27, 2023 10:53:52 GMT -6
One thing that initially bothered me about the new transfer rules was that, as I expected, lower level schools became recruiting grounds for FBS programs. FCS or D2 schools (Even lower level FBS schools) recruit a kid that big schools didn't want, he'd turn out to be a stud, then off he'd go to greener pastures. Happened to a local FCS that lost three kids to FBS schools. That seemed unfair.
Then I thought it over- Why not? Coaches do it all the time.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 27, 2023 11:04:41 GMT -6
One thing that initially bothered me about the new transfer rules was that, as I expected, lower level schools became recruiting grounds for FBS programs. FCS or D2 schools (Even lower level FBS schools) recruit a kid that big schools didn't want, he'd turn out to be a stud, then off he'd go to greener pastures. Happened to a local FCS that lost three kids to FBS schools. That seemed unfair. Then I thought it over- Why not? Coaches do it all the time. That is the rationalization that I fall into all the time too. It does kind of suck for that FCS coach, but conversely, if VT or UVA turned to that guy and said "Hey, we want to offer you 6 years $4 million a year" does the coach actually turn out the lights in the office on his way out? Almost all of the points of contention from every faction--current college coaches, fan bases, etc. would not exist if the coaches and administrators didn't turn it into a professional sports entity (reaping the benefits for themselves) over the past 40-60 years.
|
|
CoachK
Sophomore Member
Posts: 185
|
Post by CoachK on Jul 27, 2023 11:23:33 GMT -6
I just like that it's all out in the open now. Kids and their families didn't just start asking for money 2 years ago. It's not where it needs to be but, usually, transparency is a good thing in the long run.
|
|
|
Post by spreadattack on Jul 27, 2023 11:26:36 GMT -6
There's a broader trend in the world at large about worker mobility, and in a way the transfer stuff is part of it. If you're the best software engineer at Joe Schmo Technologies, and Google comes and offers you a big pile of money to go there, you take the money and go. In the past at times there may have been non-competes and things like that, but those seem to be on the way out (with some exceptions).
In the example of an FCS kid who turns out to be a stud and promptly goes to a P5 school, and it being "unfair". In a way it is unfair I suppose - the coach discovered the kid, recruited them, gave them a chance, and then loses them 1-2 years in... but for the kid if he has the opportunity to go play P5 and he wants to, wouldn't it be unfair to him to not give him that opportunity? Certainly compared to other kids who were recruited out of high school who maybe turn out to not be as good, hard working, or motivated.
As someone said above, if these were just club teams and sports was just fun recreation, then sure I guess - impose more rules to limit transfers (in part to protect kids so they don't mess up their academic careers by transferring around), and the option is always just don't play. But in a world where there is that much money, it seem hard to effectively limit opportunities. Keep in mind too that much of what we call "recruiting" is there because you can't (directly) recruit the way every other job in the country does: by offering more money and benefits. So it's all this other stuff. Don't have to like it, but it's kind of hard to argue against it.
On the NIL stuff, I think some of it just needs time -- in 10 years we'll know a lot more about it and it will mature. I do think some kind of truly fair minded NCAA or similar board that actually was set up to help student athletes would be great, but not a bunch of narrow federal rules designed to limit things (and which probably would have the effect of just entrenching the top dogs). I worry less about a kid making money from NIL deals than kids getting scammed for fake ones, or that promise a little bit up front and then don't materialize or have unfortunate terms on the back end. We're in this very funny place because the NCAA - at the direction of schools - wanted it all or nothing, and now we have still nothing direct with the schools but a shadow NIL operating in some instances as the wild west.
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Jul 28, 2023 7:12:23 GMT -6
Agreed. And now you have the social media crowd. How many high school and college age girls are making bank on a platform that was inconceivable when most of were that age? The Dunne girl at LSU would be anonymous if she had been a gymnast 20 years ago. It’s way too easy for these guys to make money now to limit them. The 19 year old USC freshman smokeshow can make money dancing on TikTok but the Heisman QB can’t cash in? Nonsense. I’m all for the players getting paid and having some leverage while hypocrite coaches making 7-8 figures working an extracurricular activity complain about it. It’s a two way street now. Yeah I don't really see anyone being against NIL, especially since the money isnt coming from the school. But the transfer portal as it is now should be changed, that is something the NCAA shouldve done a while back. What I'm against is antitrust law, which is what this whole issue is based on.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jul 28, 2023 8:00:13 GMT -6
Yeah I don't really see anyone being against NIL, especially since the money isnt coming from the school. But the transfer portal as it is now should be changed, that is something the NCAA shouldve done a while back. What I'm against is antitrust law, which is what this whole issue is based on. How does NIL violate anti trust laws? I could see transfer portal being viewed as such, but nobody is saying you cant switch schools- just if you do, and you compete in this organized league, there is a minimum period to sit out.
|
|
|
Post by CS on Jul 28, 2023 8:33:40 GMT -6
If the argument is that college athletics are like pro sport then we will start seeing contracts with guaranteed scholarships and possible NIL deals attached.
The coaches will find a way to keep studs from leaving their program so they won’t be able to enter the portal without being let out of their contract. The good thing is that if they aren’t going to play the coaches can’t just leave them high and dry without scholarship money.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 28, 2023 8:48:45 GMT -6
If the argument is that college athletics are like pro sport then we will start seeing contracts with guaranteed scholarships and possible NIL deals attached. The coaches will find a way to keep studs from leaving their program so they won’t be able to enter the portal without being let out of their contract. The good thing is that if they aren’t going to play the coaches can’t just leave them high and dry without scholarship money. That's the issue. Colleges have spent over 70 years propagating an amateur model and keeping athletes from being considered university employees. A contract such as you suggest, 100% sure fire "employee" status.
|
|
|
Post by CS on Jul 28, 2023 8:52:22 GMT -6
If the argument is that college athletics are like pro sport then we will start seeing contracts with guaranteed scholarships and possible NIL deals attached. The coaches will find a way to keep studs from leaving their program so they won’t be able to enter the portal without being let out of their contract. The good thing is that if they aren’t going to play the coaches can’t just leave them high and dry without scholarship money. That's the issue. Colleges have spent over 70 years propagating an amateur model and keeping athletes from being considered university employees. A contract such as you suggest, 100% sure fire "employee" status. I feel that it’s time to do that. It’s no longer amateur if you have players making millions in NIL deals
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 28, 2023 9:10:58 GMT -6
That's the issue. Colleges have spent over 70 years propagating an amateur model and keeping athletes from being considered university employees. A contract such as you suggest, 100% sure fire "employee" status. I feel that it’s time to do that. It’s no longer amateur if you have players making millions in NIL deals Well, remember that they are "not" (wink wink) getting paid to play. They are getting paid by sponsors for the use of their name, their image, and their likeness as Spokesperson/representatives. That avoids a lot of issues such as Title 9, Equal pay act etc. College athletics is not just college football, mens basketball, and a handful of women's basketball/mens baseball and a smattering of other inviduals. So if we just give them employment contracts, explain to me the process of handling the women's field hockey team. It is much more complex, as are all things when they start to serve purposes other than what was originally intended. A prime example--as public education continues to shift from academic institution to childhood social safety net (and political lightning rod) it becomes a much more complicated beast. I think there would be some severe unintended and unknown consequences if schools decided to just abandon the idea of being a college activity all together, and just became true professional sports teams. Is the team that plays in Death Valley, Baton Rouge really a college football team if guys are signing employment contracts? Or is it just a professional football team that is wearing purple and gold and playing in a stadium that was build on the Louisiana State University Campus?
|
|
|
Post by CS on Jul 28, 2023 9:43:00 GMT -6
I feel that it’s time to do that. It’s no longer amateur if you have players making millions in NIL deals Well, remember that they are "not" (wink wink) getting paid to play. They are getting paid by sponsors for the use of their name, their image, and their likeness as Spokesperson/representatives. That avoids a lot of issues such as Title 9, Equal pay act etc. College athletics is not just college football, mens basketball, and a handful of women's basketball/mens baseball and a smattering of other inviduals. So if we just give them employment contracts, explain to me the process of handling the women's field hockey team. It is much more complex, as are all things when they start to serve purposes other than what was originally intended. A prime example--as public education continues to shift from academic institution to childhood social safety net (and political lightning rod) it becomes a much more complicated beast. I think there would be some severe unintended and unknown consequences if schools decided to just abandon the idea of being a college activity all together, and just became true professional sports teams. Is the team that plays in Death Valley, Baton Rouge really a college football team if guys are signing employment contracts? Or is it just a professional football team that is wearing purple and gold and playing in a stadium that was build on the Louisiana State University Campus? I think all sports would benefit from guaranteed scholarships in contracts don’t you? Probably not allow NIL deals to be distributed by the schools but you know the conversation will be had. It works for both parties. Coaches know they can keep who they want and players know they can’t just have their scholarships taken from them if they get hurt or just don’t pan out
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 28, 2023 9:56:21 GMT -6
Well, remember that they are "not" (wink wink) getting paid to play. They are getting paid by sponsors for the use of their name, their image, and their likeness as Spokesperson/representatives. That avoids a lot of issues such as Title 9, Equal pay act etc. College athletics is not just college football, mens basketball, and a handful of women's basketball/mens baseball and a smattering of other inviduals. So if we just give them employment contracts, explain to me the process of handling the women's field hockey team. It is much more complex, as are all things when they start to serve purposes other than what was originally intended. A prime example--as public education continues to shift from academic institution to childhood social safety net (and political lightning rod) it becomes a much more complicated beast. I think there would be some severe unintended and unknown consequences if schools decided to just abandon the idea of being a college activity all together, and just became true professional sports teams. Is the team that plays in Death Valley, Baton Rouge really a college football team if guys are signing employment contracts? Or is it just a professional football team that is wearing purple and gold and playing in a stadium that was build on the Louisiana State University Campus? I think all sports would benefit from guaranteed scholarships in contracts don’t you? Probably not allow NIL deals to be distributed by the schools but you know the conversation will be had. It works for both parties. Coaches know they can keep who they want and players know they can’t just have their scholarships taken from them if they get hurt or just don’t pan out Are these the same type of guaranteed contracts that Lincoln Riley, Bryan Kelly etc had with their schools? Colorado aside, pulling a kids scholarship for performance is pretty rare. Also, I believe some conferences already have 4 year guaranteed scholarships. I am pretty sure the Pac 12 does- although whether the Pac 12 will be an existing conference by the time I hit "create post" remains to be seen. As far as benefits..I am betting that the vast majority of multi-year binding agreements would benefit the schools much more than the athletes in the current landscape.
|
|