|
Post by CanyonCoach on Dec 12, 2013 17:01:15 GMT -6
Anyone have any thoughts on these helmets? Met with the rep yesterday and was very impressed with the fit. I always have a couple of kids try on the helmets if they are available and their feed back was positive as well. Any one had them long enough to have gone through reconditioning process? Thanks for any insight.
|
|
|
Post by coachjimd on Dec 12, 2013 18:38:17 GMT -6
We are almost exclusively zenith. Kids seem to like them. They are kind of tricky to fix during the game. Also because chinstrap is connected, if something happens to that you basically need to change out the entire helmet
|
|
|
Post by veerman on Dec 12, 2013 18:52:37 GMT -6
We bought 60 this year, some kids liked them others did not. 2 biggest complaints were the ear piece cuts their ears ( had a bunch that cut theirs), other was kids don't like to have to have chin strap SO Tight, I know that should be how they be worn but they are not going to do that.
|
|
|
Post by coachdennis on Dec 13, 2013 11:22:55 GMT -6
They seemed to work well for our younger players (12 and under), but were a bit of a flop for our older kids (13 and up). As mentioned above, that broken chinstrap issue is a real pain with Xeniths, especially in game...
|
|
|
Post by daytrain56 on Dec 13, 2013 11:32:37 GMT -6
I have heard through various sources that Xenith Helmets use an old rejected or passed over Riddell design. I would investigate them thoroughly.
|
|
|
Post by holmesbend on Dec 13, 2013 11:57:47 GMT -6
The X2 is one of the 5 star rated helmets.
Our entire youth league has them. I ordered 120 of them last year. Parents really love them b/c they just fit better, especially the odd shaped heads.
I have about 10 of them being used at the HS level and our MS is half speed, half X2.
No complaints.
As far as the chinstrap goes, you just need to have the extra chin cups on hand and they are fixed easily. We've only had one of those happen and the kid was taken off on a stretcher (bad stinger, so they cut his chin strap off).
My Riddell Rep who I also used for reconditioning wouldn't even say anything bad about them. Of course, he's not telling me to go buy them, but when he saw that I had bought some, he couldn't say anything negative---gave a couple of the "negatives" that he hears, but no helmet companies are flawless.
|
|
|
Post by CanyonCoach on Dec 13, 2013 13:25:35 GMT -6
I have a much longer list of cons in regard to schutt and riddell. The other brand we are looking at are Rawlings but they look like you get what you pay for (cheap).
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Dec 13, 2013 16:38:52 GMT -6
We are Ridell (speeds) , schutt & some Rawlings. This year we did an impact study we had impact sensors in all helmets . Ridell was the worst those things went off like Christmas tree lights when kids engaged in contact. We had 14 concusions out of 14 the bull of those were wearing Ridell.. Schutt was our best in terms of registering impact.
Just some insight from what we tried this year
|
|
|
Post by jlenwood on Dec 14, 2013 6:18:00 GMT -6
Check out SG Helmets. Saw them at a conference the other day and these are some very interesting pieces of equipment. Could not believe how light they were.
I have bought 2 Xenith helmets for my own sons, but this year went with a new Revo to replace my youngest sons Xenith. He liked it better as far as the fit and feel.
|
|
|
Post by jackedup on Dec 14, 2013 7:57:00 GMT -6
I personally don't like xenith. I've been told they are being taken over or brought into Riddell. I bought 50 Rawlings quantum and impulse. They both are 4 star helmets. The kids really liked the feel.
|
|
|
Post by dwbish67 on Dec 14, 2013 8:47:25 GMT -6
A good number of our kids' parents purchased the Xenith and we had great results with them. Every one of them had prior concussions with other helmets, not one had another while wearing the Xenith. Two years ago, we had 17 concussions.
If you understand the technology behind the Xenith, it makes sense. It is one of the top rated helmets on the market, fixing can be tough during the game, get someone during the offseason to learn how to work on them, it will limit the down time.
|
|
|
Post by coachfurn on Dec 14, 2013 9:17:54 GMT -6
We have 25 of them. We use in junior high. They fit really well. Kids that wear them seem to like them. My only concern is the chinstrap issue like some others stated. If it breaks or pops in the game, you have to have another helmet to replace it. Don't like that part of it, but certainly seems like a good helmet.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Dec 14, 2013 11:24:46 GMT -6
A good number of our kids' parents purchased the Xenith and we had great results with them. Every one of them had prior concussions with other helmets, not one had another while wearing the Xenith. Two years ago, we had 17 concussions. If you understand the technology behind the Xenith, it makes sense. It is one of the top rated helmets on the market, fixing can be tough during the game, get someone during the offseason to learn how to work on them, it will limit the down time. 17 concussions in one season? My teams have had just a few in twenty years!
|
|
|
Post by coachjd on Dec 14, 2013 12:23:20 GMT -6
In my experience with Xenith, kids either love them or hate them, there seems to be no in between. I like how easy it is to fit a kid in the helmet, but kids say they are uncomfortable and dont like to wear them.
We have mostly Riddell Speeds and a few Schutts. We had 2 bad concussions this year, 1 in a speed and 1 in a Schutt Vengeance. Its a horse a piece. A lot of it fit, kids maintaining proper fit with air management, and strength in neck and upper shoulders and traps. Its not just the helmet.
|
|
|
Post by groundchuck on Dec 14, 2013 12:47:18 GMT -6
In my experience with Xenith, kids either love them or hate them, there seems to be no in between. I like how easy it is to fit a kid in the helmet, but kids say they are uncomfortable and dont like to wear them. We have mostly Riddell Speeds and a few Schutts. We had 2 bad concussions this year, 1 in a speed and 1 in a Schutt Vengeance. Its a horse a piece. A lot of it fit, kids maintaining proper fit with air management, and strength in neck and upper shoulders and traps. Its not just the helmet. Totally agree with that Jay. We tell the kids to make sure the helmet is fitting properly and we will adjust it at any time. We put a premium on development of traps and neck work. All that being said we are mostly Speeds and DNAs with a few Vengeance helmets.
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Dec 14, 2013 15:11:42 GMT -6
A good number of our kids' parents purchased the Xenith and we had great results with them. Every one of them had prior concussions with other helmets, not one had another while wearing the Xenith. Two years ago, we had 17 concussions. If you understand the technology behind the Xenith, it makes sense. It is one of the top rated helmets on the market, fixing can be tough during the game, get someone during the offseason to learn how to work on them, it will limit the down time. 17 concussions in one season? My teams have had just a few in twenty years! Coach I would have said the same thing till this past year..... We learned a lot with the sensors and program we ran... My guess is you have 10% of your kids with head trauma each year it's just you have no way of assessing / knowing when to assess.
|
|
|
Post by dwbish67 on Dec 15, 2013 11:44:43 GMT -6
Yeah, now that is 17 "diagnosed". In 2010, there was an emphasis placed on TBI during play and our county implemented "impact" testing, which is designed to determine a baseline vs secondary post trauma test. If your post trauma test is below your baseline test, YOU HAVE A CONCUSSION. We have had zero in the last two years that I remember.
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Dec 15, 2013 14:36:42 GMT -6
Yeah, now that is 17 "diagnosed". In 2010, there was an emphasis placed on TBI during play and our county implemented "impact" testing, which is designed to determine a baseline vs secondary post trauma test. If your post trauma test is below your baseline test, YOU HAVE A CONCUSSION. We have had zero in the last two years that I remember. When you say impact testing you are measuring impact using a sensor in the helmet that registers each hit & you have no concussions? I ask bc we use sensors in each helmet and I'd be interested to see how other schools use the technology
|
|
|
Post by tmtfootball on Dec 15, 2013 19:04:54 GMT -6
No he is talking about a computer test that the kids take before the season and then after a suspected concussion.
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Dec 15, 2013 20:02:53 GMT -6
Ahhh that makes sense. In our sensor program we have a certified athletic therapist on site & each time a sensor goes off with a reading over a certain amount of G forces a player automatically is run through a scat test on field. Then the concusion protocol is initiated.
I know the OP was about zenith hats vs others I can only comment on our hats we use and the data we have. I'd love to see some liked data on zenith hats
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Dec 15, 2013 21:41:40 GMT -6
Ahhh that makes sense. In our sensor program we have a certified athletic therapist on site & each time a sensor goes off with a reading over a certain amount of G forces a player automatically is run through a scat test on field. Then the concusion protocol is initiated. I know the OP was about zenith hats vs others I can only comment on our hats we use and the data we have. I'd love to see some liked data on zenith hats Is there any testing on kids who haven't had certain amount of G forces? Any testing on players that didn't even get in the game? What I am asking is how do we know that those tests are vaild? How do we know whether or not some kids just can't do well on them tired, or stressed, or with their heart rate up, or with sweat in their eyes, or with good looking cheerleaders looking at them, or the band platying, or just with all the distractions of the game. I have zero problem with holding a kid out. Zero. But it is not a concussion until a doctor says it is. Just because you fail a test in the middle of the game does not mean it is a concussion. It should be a reason to hold him out, but it doesn't make it a concussion for sure. And don't jump on me about player safety. I am not about to put a player out there that I even suspect has a concussion. As a matter of fact, it is out of my hands and I am glad. Our trainer and team doctor handle that. I just have a problem with these test when a kid isn't even showing symptoms. Should we put sensors on their arms and legs and force them to have an xray if the sensors go off?
|
|
|
Post by Scott Bronkema on Dec 15, 2013 22:01:09 GMT -6
As someone who worked fitting them this year with other brands of helmets through a local sporting good stores. The X2 has some good benefits, I would have numerous brands of helmets because kids have different size heads. I prefer Riddell its what I played in. I love SG but they are more expensive than other brands. X2 in the youth helmets have a crown adjustor under by the forehead no idea about the adult helmets. Its the inner black pads that are Velcroed on. They also have interchangeable ear pieces. The coaches that talked about the ears digging check the helmets for the crown adjustors that will help the fit.
|
|
|
Post by Scott Bronkema on Dec 15, 2013 22:02:07 GMT -6
Also the only non biased study I've seen is the VA tech study. Any other numbers are trying to sell you something.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Dec 15, 2013 22:10:56 GMT -6
But it is not a concussion until a doctor says it is. The only issue here is that according to those making brain injury/brain trauma their life's work (like those at the CSTE at Boston U) most doctors are WOEFULLY behind on this particular medical issue.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Dec 15, 2013 23:06:11 GMT -6
But it is not a concussion until a doctor says it is. The only issue here is that according to those making brain injury/brain trauma their life's work (like those at the CSTE at Boston U) most doctors are WOEFULLY behind on this particular medical issue. We have been through this on other threads. There are MILLIONS of players who played the game with incredibly worse helmets, taught to tackle with their head, and kept playing with repeated with concussions and while they concussions that are completely fine and are 60, 70, 80 years old. They are our fathers, uncles, former coaches, people we go to church with. I am not saying that CSTE is not real, but I really think we are now at a point in time that we have effectively eliminated it except for rare cases. I am talking about todays 18 year olds. I just don't think that a kid that plays now and then college and then in the NFL is really at high risk for CSTE anymore. Why? Because we have tremendously better helmets. We don't teach tackling with our head anymore. And we are not stupid enough to play someone who really has a concussion. Players know it, coaches know it, trainers know it, doctors know it, and most importantly parents know it. And we will pull out players who have symptoms and get them checked. But we have swung this thing so far the other way it is getting stupid. 17 concussions in one year? Really? Really?
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Dec 15, 2013 23:06:22 GMT -6
double post
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Dec 15, 2013 23:08:15 GMT -6
Ahhh that makes sense. In our sensor program we have a certified athletic therapist on site & each time a sensor goes off with a reading over a certain amount of G forces a player automatically is run through a scat test on field. Then the concusion protocol is initiated. I know the OP was about zenith hats vs others I can only comment on our hats we use and the data we have. I'd love to see some liked data on zenith hats Is there any testing on kids who haven't had certain amount of G forces? Any testing on players that didn't even get in the game? What I am asking is how do we know that those tests are vaild? How do we know whether or not some kids just can't do well on them tired, or stressed, or with their heart rate up, or with sweat in their eyes, or with good looking cheerleaders looking at them, or the band platying, or just with all the distractions of the game. I have zero problem with holding a kid out. Zero. But it is not a concussion until a doctor says it is. Just because you fail a test in the middle of the game does not mean it is a concussion. It should be a reason to hold him out, but it doesn't make it a concussion for sure. And don't jump on me about player safety. I am not about to put a player out there that I even suspect has a concussion. As a matter of fact, it is out of my hands and I am glad. Our trainer and team doctor handle that. I just have a problem with these test when a kid isn't even showing symptoms. Should we put sensors on their arms and legs and force them to have an xray if the sensors go off? Wow... OK this has been a touchy topic even in our staff... We have a sensor in all 100 of our kids helmets. It recorded each & every impact sustained regardless of magnitude or situation.. The process is simple : 1) sensor goes off 2) athlete is assessed by therapist 3) based on results compared to baseline data athlete is either back at play or on hold for 20min afterward another more elaborate assessment is performed if athlete was held out of play. This is done to relax the athlete allow heart rate to normalize. At that point if an athlete fails the baseline they sit. 4) the next day they do a full baseline & return to action protocol is initiated. Now it's a concusion 5) Each subsequent day an athlete completes an online symptom scale assessment Look I'm not on you about safety. But let's get real we have guys blowing their brains out related to CET & we are learning it's not just the blows that = symptoms here it's all of them . Coach I was shocked when it was taking close to 20 days to get a player back. So I checked with our specialists they showed me all the research on this stuff. The developing brain heals differently plain & simple. I'm all for an increase in safety if that means a different helmet great if it means sensors on every limb go for it. Because in the future if we are not doing these things we won't have football. In lawsuit happy USA imagine what level liability coaches / schools / school districts have on their shoulders should someone sue over CET or even hey my kid had a 90 average played football and now can't get into Yale .. Look this is about safety plain and simple . My guess is you use a computer not a typewriter? The advancements in tech make our work lives easier it's going to make our game safer to, but first we need to drop the dinosaur mentality...
|
|
|
Post by dwbish67 on Dec 18, 2013 5:07:37 GMT -6
Impact Testing for our county is a computer program that kids take on a computer. It is a battery of tests and reactions to determine how they answer things, react to things and a baseline is determined according to their reaction time and answers.
|
|
|
Post by coachbw on Dec 19, 2013 8:27:20 GMT -6
We have typically had Riddell, Rawlings, and a few X2s. Our kids didn't like the X2s as much, although we found that they were great helmets to bring to games as extras. Since all of the padding is built in, we felt it was much quicker to get a good safe fit, than searching for the right size helmet, jaw pad thickness, etc.
|
|
dq
Sophomore Member

Posts: 156
|
Post by dq on Dec 21, 2013 23:40:01 GMT -6
I have a much longer list of cons in regard to schutt and riddell. The other brand we are looking at are Rawlings but they look like you get what you pay for (cheap). The Rawlings helmets were great for the 4A football program I was at last year . Forced some of my studs to use them early. told them if they didn't like it Id give'em their old helmet back. not one asked for the old helmet back. Really good helmet. They also have some great incentives for going with the. I think it was Buy 10 get 2 free or maybe 8 get 2 free.
|
|