|
burnout
Dec 22, 2007 11:54:01 GMT -6
Post by bigballsincowtown on Dec 22, 2007 11:54:01 GMT -6
went in as a 22 yr old thinking that findings would be tied to different job tasks (cleaning field house, marking fields, laundry, etc.) at the 1a, 2a, 3a levels and more pressure to win at 4a, 5a levels. of course these things were part of it, but what it all boiled down to was those that were winning and in succesful programs were not "burning out" as quick or often as those in losing programs.
|
|
|
burnout
Dec 22, 2007 19:43:18 GMT -6
Post by sls on Dec 22, 2007 19:43:18 GMT -6
bigball,
I might be missing the point, but I don't understand what you are saying in this post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
burnout
Dec 22, 2007 20:15:14 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2007 20:15:14 GMT -6
Is there sufficient proof to say the losing led to the burnout? Or did the coaches get "burnt out" and that led to apathy/lack of enthusiasm and that in turn led to the losing?
|
|
ex-centralcoach
Junior Member
[F4:@marcmarinelli ] [F4:marcmarinelli]
Posts: 384
|
burnout
Dec 22, 2007 21:38:19 GMT -6
Post by ex-centralcoach on Dec 22, 2007 21:38:19 GMT -6
|
|
|
burnout
Dec 23, 2007 10:47:20 GMT -6
Post by bigballsincowtown on Dec 23, 2007 10:47:20 GMT -6
sls...its in response to the "football research" thread.
|
|
|
burnout
Dec 23, 2007 10:50:45 GMT -6
Post by bigballsincowtown on Dec 23, 2007 10:50:45 GMT -6
wolverine....sufficient proof? no there was no proof either way. just that those that showed more symptoms/signs of burnout were on staffs that had lower winning percentages than the no signs/higher win %. this was a low scale(low budget) deal.
|
|
|
burnout
Dec 23, 2007 14:27:23 GMT -6
Post by sls on Dec 23, 2007 14:27:23 GMT -6
sls...its in response to the "football research" thread. That helps clear it up, thanks!
|
|