|
Post by hoptions on May 21, 2006 20:19:36 GMT -6
I have just returned from a NATS combine with some of our young HS athletes. I was disappointed with the set up. Why are they not using timing gates to time the speed drills!!!! My biggest problem is with the variability of different coaches timing athletes all over the nation, when they are supposed to be compared with each other. I understand that there is a lot of debate about these types of events and was wondering what you coaches thought about them…We are in a rural area that does not get much exposure for our athletes…I was worried about our prospects possibly hurting their chances of playing at the next level…It seems that by having a variety of different coaches timing athletes in different states in different locations that there would be no chance of comparing athletes!!! An example would be that we have an athlete that I have timed at under 4.6 in the 40 and today at the NATS combine he was timed at a 4.78! Both were hand timed with a stop watch…and I am told that I have a slow thumb!!! However I still know that it is still about weather or not they can play football...I hope... What are your opinions? Thanks Hoptions
|
|
|
Post by bigdaddyd on May 21, 2006 21:28:39 GMT -6
Last week I assisted with the JC combine in Northern Ca. All the participants were unsigned sophomores. Although it seemed like a meat market, it was ran very well. We tested them in the Forty, Shuttle run, Bench Press for reps 185/225, and the Vertical jump.
All the timed events were done electronically with the exception of the shuttle run.
Following the test, the participants went with there position coaches to do drills (During this time there were a hand full of 4 year coaches watching). After indo drills they worked on 1on1 drills (RBs did 1on1 with the LBs {pass routes},OL worked 1on1 with the DL etc...).
Just B4 the combine was done , we did a 7 on 7 Skelly for 40 minutes ( the defense and offense ran standard formations and coverages). This gave the players the opportunity to show what they could do besides the standard tests. At the conclusion of the combine some of the participants received scholarships to DI/DII and NAIA schools. I was really impressed with the overall organization.
If the NATS did this format, I'm sure you and your players would have been better served.
|
|
|
Post by sls on May 24, 2006 17:25:06 GMT -6
I liked the NATS combine, never been to another one, but I thought it was well run in Indianapolis.
|
|