|
Post by dacoachmo on Jan 23, 2008 17:14:21 GMT -6
if you could swing it, would you have two O line coaches and 2 coaches to coach the skilled players...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2008 18:02:14 GMT -6
The staff my brother is a part of does this, but they run the Wing T. They groupt OL and TE's together and skill guys together.
|
|
|
Post by jjkuenzel on Jan 23, 2008 19:43:05 GMT -6
My thought is that it really depends upon how QB intensive your system is. If you ask a lot out of your QB in either the passing or running game, then I think you need to have a QB coach. If he is just a guy in your offense then I think you can get away with grouping one of the other skill positions together.
|
|
|
Post by coachbw on Jan 24, 2008 1:30:08 GMT -6
I think it also depends on how different guards and tackles are in your scheme. We are a zone team and all of our linemen have the same rules on every play. Basically they are interchangeable so we would probably benefit more from having the 2nd coaching with one of the skill groups. If your guards pull a lot and tackles don't I could see wanting 2 coaches with them.
|
|
|
Post by tripleoption61 on Jan 24, 2008 9:14:08 GMT -6
I like the way Paul Johnson does it. Coaches only coach a max of 3 starting positions
2-OL 1-WR 1-QB/FB 1-Slots
Each person only coachesno more than 3 starters
|
|
|
Post by dacoachmo on Jan 24, 2008 10:49:38 GMT -6
I guess the real question is if you could afford 2 OL coaches would you?
My feeling is the WRs should spend a great deal of time with the QBs. Or the RBs and QBs are together, time could be spent with the WR. So at times one coach to one position could be accomplished.
|
|