|
Post by tog on Jul 29, 2005 13:58:02 GMT -6
what system did you learn first as a player or a coach?
how have you evolved? what has changed your thinking on things?
|
|
fish
Junior Member
Posts: 485
|
Post by fish on Jul 29, 2005 17:09:04 GMT -6
i played in a split back veer system. i still love that system and love to learn as much about the veer as i can. now i coach in an i-formation offense where we run mostly pitch, lead, and different counters.
between the two offenses, what i've learned is how i really like to simplify things. i like how the veer is very repetitive, but effective. same thing with a one-back zone offense. i like how simple it seems to run and be effective with it.
when i become an oc i don't want to be one that has plays in the playbook just to have 'em there. i want the plays in there to be things that we use.
i'm just entering my fifth year, so i've still got much to learn and hopefully will continue to evolve.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Morgan on Jul 29, 2005 18:26:16 GMT -6
I played on a horrible high school team that ran Power I. So horrible, I opted to throw shot and disc in college instead of playing ball - I was a bit sour on team sports at that point. Years later I've returned to my first love.
We're three years in as a staff at small rural school - we field some nice athletes for being so small. Defensively we're going to a 3-5-3 this year due to a lack of decent big men and an abundance of kids who are nice athletes in the 5'10"-6'1" range at around 160-185 pounds. We feel it is the best system for them.
Offensively, we went from a Wyatt Double Wing system year one to more of an Pro-I last year with a little Double Wing. This year we are going back to our Double Wing roots (much more Markham, Murhpy, Valtoon in oriented now) with a small I and Bunch package. The Doulbe Wing really takes a leap of faith when you are accostomed to "traditional" football - but when you understand the system and realize what it can do you'll be sold. Just like any system it has pros and cons - it's easy to dismiss when you don't know much about it.
It's all revolved around putting these small school kids in the best possible postition to compete with the best in our league.
|
|
|
Post by coachjd on Jul 29, 2005 18:48:16 GMT -6
High School: Wishbone
College: Multiple I and split backs
Coaching:
2 yr. Multiple I and split backs (college) 3 yrs. WCO (college) 4 yrs. I backs and multiple 1back (college) 3 yrs. I backs (high school head coach) 5 yrs. Multiple 1 and NO backs (high school OC)
|
|
|
Post by ocinaz on Jul 29, 2005 19:22:08 GMT -6
Played in high school my first 2 years with a striclty power running coach, wedge, quick pitch, toss, maybe 2 passing plays, really old school, but he won 3 titles. Then played for a coach that liked to throw the ball around. In college played for a team that tried and believed in throwing the football, just didn't work out that way...Now as a coach, I have taken a few things from all of the coaches that I have played for, not just football, we had a great baseball coach, personally I love to throw the ball, but we will be a balanced team this year. I have evolved into being flexible, I used to have beliefs that I thought were etched in stone and that was what I was going to do. I have adapted to our players, and love where I am at, my alma matter. Our head coach was a first year assistant my senior year, we get along great, and he really lets assistants do what they beleive in. You just can't beat small town atmosphere, nothing like I see on TV, like Varsity Blues, etc., but wouldn't trade it for the world.
|
|
kakavian
Sophomore Member
Where's the ball, boy? Find the ball.
Posts: 175
|
Post by kakavian on Jul 29, 2005 19:37:30 GMT -6
Jeez- Thats a novel for my career Tog. All I can say is I lost more than I won, and I have seen every BAD thing that can happen to a team. I still love the game, I still love coaching, and I am learning from my players, and from other coaches. Each season that I lost, I still got better at SOMETHING be it management, play selection, or what NOT to do again. I have tried everything, but I keep coming home to the option. Flexbone, Wishbone, I, Power I, Spread, Gun, Near/Far, I have found a way to get it going. I have head coaches who loved me and taught me alot, others that just shunted me in a corner with my players and pretty much ignored me the rest of the time. When I started coaching I was 20 and knew one offense, and two defenses. I had great kids (45 of them and JUST ME), and a simple plan which worked well. We went 7-0 and out scored our opponents 159-40, and thirty of that was scored in one game. Now I am 35, and I know how to run at least ten different offenses, most with moderate effectiveness, (Though I do run some option out of each) and have a working knowledge of at least 6 different defenses, though the ubiquitous 4-3 is still what I am most comfortable with, and have had the best sucess with. I went 17-2 early in my career, My middle career went 2-25, and now in my later middle career am 10-14, so improving, but still not there yet. My teams have been in every game but two (63-0 and 55-0 fifteen fumbles between the two games). I started out terrified, then got cocky, then I learned humility. I am still a damn good coach, though I have had some rough years. THe kids that have left my hands have gone on to good years, and solid careers, both in High School and College, and not one of them, NOT ONE has been on a losing team after mine. Yes, I have learned humility. The biggest thing I have learned though, is not to take the losing too hard. So long as I teach well, and teach good fundamentals, those kids take it throughout their football careers, and they go on to become good men. My largest lesson from this came from watching one of my old QB's who had to dogfight for his position with another quality athlete, playing at a Div IAA School. As I watched, he did his handoffs, quick and sneaky, JUST like we taught him to, with a quick snap of the wrist and hiding the ball the whole way. Talked to him later, and he told me that His QB coach had said, "I haven't seen anyone hand off as nicely as you do, kid. I have nothing to teach you there." That kid whose record under me was 2-16, went on to lead the varsity to its first playoff berth in years, and got a full ride to a solid school. I have a better idea what I like, and dont like, but am still finding my feet as to an offensive system that I can call home. I love the 4-3, but am learning to appreciate the 3-5 as an alternative. I like to pass, but only to open up the run. I started out as a "read and react" defensive type, running the 5-2 alot. Now I run 4-3 and working up a 3-5, and believe that the "bend don't break defense" concept is a crock of syphilitic fecal matter. I want my defense to attack attack attack, screaming like banshees the whole way. When I started coaching I was a "score fast, score often" kind of a coach, not happy unless I was 3-4 touchdowns ahead. Now, I have learned patience and confidence and have changed my thinking to wanting to take away the ball, score quickly early, then take away the ball again, and keep it away as long as we can. I used to run straight at my opponents daring them to stop us. It was only after I got stopped so MUCH that I have learned to be sneaky. Now I hide the ball with the artfulness of a master thief, making the defense search it out, hopefully not until we have snuck it across the end line. I was a young, stupid kid, not much older than my players when I started. I was thrust into situations that were way over my head, but I swam as well as I could. Now a little more seasoned, a little more cautious, and in some ways a little more bold, I am ready to find a home. That answer your question Tog? Apologies for the novel, but you caught me in an introspective mood.
|
|
smd
Sophomore Member
Posts: 211
|
Post by smd on Jul 29, 2005 20:40:03 GMT -6
been coaching for about 15 years: offense: 2 years - wishbone, 1 year - split backs, 3 years - I, 1 year - wing t, 8 years - multiple I - one back. defense: 3 years - 425, 12 years - 43 (with a 425 or 50 look as the change up). one opinion about offense, you have to run some option no matter how simple it is or what type of personnel. something else i believe is that you have to be able to adjust within your scheme to fit the personnel each year on both sides of the ball. example, last year we play a 43 defense with just 2 DL type of kids. put LB at the DE positions. this year we will have 11 DL type kids on defense.LOL have always coached on the defense side of the ball, started off with a bend -don't break one front philosophy. that changed to an attack, attack philosophy either with the DL when we don't have speed in the secondary or LB blitzes when we can run like the wind. We do more stemming up front than when i started coaching.
|
|
|
Post by tog on Jul 29, 2005 21:15:17 GMT -6
great stuff guys makes you think
|
|
bucky
Freshmen Member
Posts: 67
|
Post by bucky on Jul 30, 2005 9:42:55 GMT -6
Started in 1976 as freshman coach while I was student teaching. We ran power out of wishbone. From 1977 to present we have run option. Started with pure wishbone, triple and double. Now we are flexbone with 13 running plays, 12 pass plays and 4 specials. That is probably too many plays being an option guy but that is where we are. We have made the playoffs around 18 of 28 years, 1 runner up and 2 championships. I love some other offenses through running scout team, but not as much as option. Our kids start doing the mesh at a camp I have for 3rd graders! My QB this year was at my 3rd grade camp. He has a 32 inch vertical jump and a 31 ACT score. He will do a nice job of running our offense. If there is a better way of running a program, let me know because we are always learning.
|
|
|
Post by tog on Jul 30, 2005 11:02:33 GMT -6
bucky, sounds like you're doing something right
getting those kids on the underlevels to know and run what you will run down the line is like building infrastructure
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Jul 30, 2005 12:51:08 GMT -6
always....ALWAYS....always ask the question "Why?". why do we do this? why do we believe in this? why do we practice like this?.....find out the "why" behind everything. this enables you to completely understand and will give you your own ability to "evolve" as things progress. you will understand why you do it and, therefore, what or why a defense is making adjustments.....then, you can evolve. i tell all coaches that i'm on staff with that i will ask them "why" not because i'm disagreeing or questioning their ability but, because i truly want to know. knowing the why allows me to look for ways to "build a better mouse trap" so to speak. likewise, i tell them to ask me WHY about the way i'm doing things. i want them to know so that we can all be on the same page and each coach can then be in a position to better our team/staff in evolving to become more efficient and effective.
"MY EVOLUTION" played high school ball in the wishbone offense. mostly double tight but would split out and end and/or break the bone. triple option stuff. learned some valuable insight into power running game, misdirection, and how to "option" one defender (give him 2 choices and always "make him wrong"). however, began to see how we were getting defenders jammed into the box and the passing game was limited to playaction for the most part. hard to get vertical or get good spacing (in both passing game & running game)
started coaching the wing-t. really learned how to teach techniques down to an exact science...how executing a minimal amount of plays can be successful. how 1 blocking scheme could actually be several plays based solely on backfield actions. still, spacing out defenders for attacking vs crowded fronts was tough.
went to oneback/3 wide with a TE. fell in love with the simplicity of the zone play. began to see how spacing out defenders created an "option" in the passing game. still, that TE created many front & stunt possiblities for the defense.
spent some time in the I. learned some good "power" running plays and play-action. began to see understand some west coast principles in the passing game ... 2 receiver routes, 3 receiver routes, free release by one or both backs.
finally the spread. saw how average athletes could execute the thing. use spacing to your advantage. make defenders play in space and on islands. limit the fronts & stunts a defense can throw at you. still "option" based in that you can attack via 2 or 3 man route combos easily.
all these things have led me to my philosophy of being multiple in your attack. having "answers" for what the defense is doing. be efficient and effective in your teaching (wing-t based). be multiple in your formations (I & oneback) and utilize all available players as a weapon (oneback & spread)
|
|
|
Post by Split50 on Jul 30, 2005 14:18:04 GMT -6
I began my coaching career in 1971, at a school in the Corpus Christi area. We were AAAA (it was AAA before the UIL changed), but had football numbers that would embarass AA schools. I coached JV for 3 years. Offensively I learned that to be able to compete in that district we had to avoid turning the ball over and make the game as short as possible. We went through several different "offenses", since the varsity changed almost every year. We were wishbone, I, wing T, slot I, etc. Regardless of the offense, we (JV) were going to run the ball, work hard at not turning it over, be disciplined and avoid penalties. Our passing was mostly play action, short and controlled. Defensively, which is what I have coached most of my career, I realized that to compete, we had to be very aggressive, get up the field and make things happen. We were a Cuero, UofT, 43 (27) defense. Physically we could not hope to match up with Gregory-Portland, Calallen, etc. so we had to use pressure, pressure, pressure. Our JV never had a losing season and that defensive philosophy has stayed with me. I was very fortunate to coach with a man who ran the 059, that also had a very aggressive attidtude. I learned so much from him about the different things that could be done with the 50. It can be a very multiple defense. As time has passed and offenses have changed, I have tinkered with differnet defenses, but when I get in trouble , I always come back to the 50. I realize that as a coach you must be ready to adjust and grow, but that you also must have something, offensively and defensively, that you can hang your hat on. I have been fortunate to have been a part of some good programs and worked with some really outstanding coaches. Without fail, every time we have been successful, we have run the 50 and been aggressive as heck. I guess my evolution has actually taken me back to where I began. That is not always bad.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Jul 30, 2005 14:28:51 GMT -6
good point, split.....by now there probably isn't any evolution in football but "revolution" as things always seem to come full circle. don't think anything "new" has come into the game in quite some time but, rather, new "wrinkles" on old schemes. scary how similar the spread run game shows shades of the single wing, huh? amazing how many teams, regardless of formation or philosophy, use some wing-t blocking schemes or variations of them.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 30, 2005 20:45:10 GMT -6
I played my HS ball in PA, the first two at a very small school that was just awesomely smalltime. Before my junior year, my school was a part of a jointure so I got to play for a great coaching staff (Hawke was the DC). That was like coaching school: the importance of fundamentals: multiple defense; conditioning and the offseason program. Black Monday impressed on me the importance of attitude. In my four years in HS I was fortunate enough to have been on three championship teams. The last one, my senior year, was instructive because we played and beat a very talented team, one that had two guys who went to NFL camps. We beat them in a game in which we attempted three passes and completed a total of zero. That was a great lesson on the importance of a great game plan, the value of hunger, and how the offense and defense work together (my boss, the HC and OC was a teammate on that team). After HS, I went to a school that was commessurate with my talent- one of the worst D. 3 schools in the country (we made the national ABC scoreboard show as the lowest-scoring in the country). Most of my lessons there were negative: "Don't do this", etc. After college, I coached rec league for a year, where I learned to tone it down. Then I got a job in Virginia. Coached a number of systems before I got my present job. As the DC there, we started out in the shade 50. Eventually, we felt that the shade made it difficult to adjust to one-back formations so we switched to a 4-3. Wanting more multiplicity, we switched to an 8 man front. Ironically, the need for disguise has brought us back to what's mostly a 4-3.
|
|
|
Post by shortyardage on Aug 7, 2005 14:54:04 GMT -6
I'd have to say that I've evolved too. Not only in football but in dealing with people. Things seem to be cyclical in use as far as offensive and defensive schemes, but people are always people. I used to use the drill seargeant approach, until it just started to wear on me. No one on the team was actually preparing to go to war and no country was going to be subservient because of football.
I've been coaching football for 27 years now, and along the way I've learned that treating people decently gets more out of them than treating them any other way. I'd like to think that I learned this early on in my career, but only the players really know.
Where I am, there are thousands of other things that a kid can do besides play football. I want the kids to coem out, get hooked on the great game of football and then allow me to take them beyond their old limits. It's one thing to push people, it's another thing altogether to get them to follow as a leader.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Mar 1, 2006 7:45:47 GMT -6
played in a Pro I (power & option) offense and 34 read & react defense in college.....played nose and end...and totally HATED playing shades (when we eagled) or in a gap......then transfered to another college and learned how to play inside / outside in shades for gaps and loved it, now run a 42 that shifts into 34 fronts.
I've come from just seeing the option as the only way to move the ball to having equal love for wing t, bone, double wing, spread, ace, etc......man, it ALL works.
Defense, for me, never was about formations but how you PLAYED it.....33, 34, 53, 43, etc...just explained where you started from, but we all essentially are doing the same things.
|
|
|
Post by pegleg on Mar 1, 2006 8:16:06 GMT -6
played in a winged t
coached in a winged t first 3 years of my career
one back no huddle last 5 years.
for me the evolution came with job change. but now i'm a believer. spread em out to remove em from the box, and put athletes in space. also, no huddle increases the pressure on the defense and means we are not in a bad play very often ( in theory at least).
Holla
|
|
|
Post by coachseven on Mar 1, 2006 8:22:49 GMT -6
High School: Played 8-man (I-Option) and 3-2 Defense. College: Played JC 4-2-5 and I-Option, 4-Year 4-3 and spread.
Have coached in a: Defense 4-3, 46, 52, 44 Offense I-Option, Veer, Shotgun Wing-t
Now coach a multiple 4-2-5 and multiple spread.
|
|
|
Post by sls on Mar 1, 2006 8:43:22 GMT -6
H.S.- played in Power I and 52 defense
College- 2 years zone (i was an OL on the bench) (these were 4-3 teams I think) 2 years spread 1 year flexbone 1 year GA flexbone
H.s.-3 years split back veer 52 defnse 3 years flexbone 53 defense 1 year I option 3-5-3 Now Gun Spread- have moved to it as way to get kids to play, has worked very well. I will echo many of the other thoughts on the spread. we have gotten pretty good at it in a rural community with average athletes.
|
|
|
Post by seagull73 on Mar 1, 2006 8:49:51 GMT -6
Played in run and shoot offense in H.S. and loved it. We put up huge points and set state records. In college we were a 1 back zone team with a 70% - 30% passing to run ratio. We were not a great team but I likes the system.
When I started my coaching career it was wing-T and I couldn't stand it. Double wing stuff, foot to foot splits, it was just so boring. Once I was in a position of making decisions I installed a shotgun offense with an emphasis on the option. I love it! It gives me the opportunity to be creative and a lot of kids get to touch the ball.
The funny thing is I learned more from watching the bad coaches I have worked for in the past. It lets you know 1st hand what not to do!
|
|
smalls
Sophomore Member
Posts: 127
|
Post by smalls on Mar 1, 2006 9:42:58 GMT -6
I have played and coached in the same basic system since I was in 7th Grade, the Bob Reade Wing-T. It probably why I'm looking at changing some now that I'm a HC. I know there are those who are "Double Wing for Life!" or Spred Zone or Split Veer. I hope to end up that way. Because if you can find that system that makes you feel that way, it has to make coaching it that much easier.
|
|
|
Post by coachdawhip on Mar 1, 2006 9:53:58 GMT -6
H.S. played in a Option and Zone I and 3-4/52 defense IN College Played in the Spread/One-Back.
Coaching Wing-T and 3-4(52) love the Wing-T, but because we have been unable to get into the playoffs but once, can't say I love the bucksweep as much(under center) but love the other plays.
4-3 Cover 4 defense is now my thing.
|
|
rooster
Sophomore Member
Posts: 246
|
Post by rooster on Mar 1, 2006 9:58:47 GMT -6
Coached in a Wing T system that huddled for 12 years. Ran a version of it (double slots - jet stuff) my first year as head coach. After my first year as HC I switched to no-huddle one-back zone. One of the main reasons I made the switch to zone is because six teams in our conference run a version of the Wing T, thus making it easeir to prepare defensively on a weekly basis. Now we're the only team in our conference that runs the zone which gives us a big edge. Plus, kids absolutely love the no-huddle stuff.
As a staff we were very reluctant to change offenses because we were very comfortable and knowledgeable with the Wing T offense. However, since making the switch, we couldn't imagine life "outside the zone".
|
|
|
Post by knighter on Mar 1, 2006 13:51:16 GMT -6
HS- Played in Wishbone, triple option or die system (1st with Matt Dillon, and after he left with Keith Gurius..also ahd great assistants who truly cared about us as people first athletes second) 1st Year of college- also in a wishbone system (this is where i began to think about coaching as rb coach Mike Howard made me learn what everyone was doing) did not like the town, so transferred Rest of College- Played for 1 of the greatest player coaches out there (Terry Allen at UNI) learned a TON about how to treat athletes (all of them...not just the stars) also really became a film guy, and a student of the game there as I HAD TO BE...thanks to Bill Salmon (OC at UNI still) I learned about the weaknesses in a defense, and how to use an offesne to exploit them...he is a great guy, and he taught me a ton, which is good because besides special teams and spring ball at RB I rarely saw the field (and loved every minute of it) 1st year of coaching- Assistant while student teaching we ran wing t and 5-2 eagle defense (AP HS in Iowa is a top notch program with some of the best coaches at any level anywhere) Learned a ton about organization, coaching the minute details, etc. What an awakening. 2nd Year of coaching (head coach 9 man school in SD) THOUGHT I knew it all (hell I bet at that time I thought I invented the game) we made the playoffs for the first time in school histroy. We were a wishbone team and played a 3-3 stack Defense 3rd year made the playoffs again, same school, and beat the number 1 team in the state at the time in the first round. 4th year Found out I really did not know anything about the game. went 0-8 with a bunch of great kids who were not real good football players (they were young and small only had 1 senior starter, and 1 junior, rest were soph or freshmen) this was the year i switched to DW. Bone was not working, we could not man block my mother. The angles and doubles of the DW made us competitive (we had not scored in 1st 3 games, in 4th game against a good opponent we put 36 on the board and still lost...couldn't tackle my mother either) 5th year DW, 3-3 stack...made the playoffs again 6-10th year (new school 11 man in Iowa)...still DW(probably until death) and have run anywhere from 5-2 to 4-4 to 4-3 early on in Iowa, to a 5-2 eagle now. Love the eagle...puts people in conflict based solely upon alignment. Have gone 52-11 and been to the playoffs every year at GH and have been league champs 5 of the 6 years.
Have figured out in my short career it is about the kids, have lost my ego, and now I try to make FB a positive experience for anyone who chooses to be a member of our team. Treat them right, sell them on what "we do" and everything else will take care of itself with a little luck!
|
|
|
Post by saintrad on Mar 1, 2006 15:24:06 GMT -6
played in a split-back veer offense that was predicated on a dual-possession until either the QB (me) or the FB were tackled.
|
|
|
Post by cqmiller on Mar 1, 2006 15:30:20 GMT -6
Offense:
Freshman Year HS = Split backs Sophomore Year HS = Double Wing (IV, OV, ML) Junior Year HS = Wing-T Senior Year HS = Pro Style Offense 2 years of College = I backs ZONE offense (40 rushes a game)
Defense: High School = 5-2, 4-3
Coaching:
3 years Pro-Style (QB coach) 1 year Spread (lots of passing) (QB coach) 1 year Pro-Style (OC)
3 years 5-2, 4-3 (DB coach) 1 year 4-2-5 (DB coach) 1 year 4-4 (DB coach)
|
|