Post by pantherpride91 on Sept 14, 2007 10:21:54 GMT -6
I was watching College Football Live the other day and they brought up what I thought was a half way decent point. I thought I would throw it out there and see what everyone else has to think
They were having a discussion about which is better a pocket passer or a more run/pass guy.
One thing that caught my attention was that with a dual threat guy you do not need the detail you would with a pocket passer. If the first read is not there than the running qb is out of the pocket and does not even worry about the second or third progression. With a pocket passer you need to make sure they understand coverages more and the progression needs to be there.
I was wondering if you guys out there feel the same way?
I took a look at our dual qb and noticed that I did see that in him. If the his first choice is not there he is more likely to start to break the pocket and use his legs more.
In the HS level does it make it better to have a dual threat QB. With the time given you just might not have the time to put in all the progressions and have them develop a good understanding of coverages.
They were having a discussion about which is better a pocket passer or a more run/pass guy.
One thing that caught my attention was that with a dual threat guy you do not need the detail you would with a pocket passer. If the first read is not there than the running qb is out of the pocket and does not even worry about the second or third progression. With a pocket passer you need to make sure they understand coverages more and the progression needs to be there.
I was wondering if you guys out there feel the same way?
I took a look at our dual qb and noticed that I did see that in him. If the his first choice is not there he is more likely to start to break the pocket and use his legs more.
In the HS level does it make it better to have a dual threat QB. With the time given you just might not have the time to put in all the progressions and have them develop a good understanding of coverages.
