|
|
Post by futureazcoach on Aug 3, 2008 19:07:29 GMT -6
I really wish we had a general offense section on here for all my boring questions. ANyways,
Who attacks the coverages they are using or attacks specific people on the defense. I have read a few times in articles about how coaches dont try to use certain plays against teams because they run cov 2 man or cov 3 out of the 3-3 stack. But they state they attack certain players that they play against.
Does anyone call there offense this way? Pos/Negs? For either way of calling plays.
|
|
|
|
Post by touchdowng on Aug 3, 2008 20:46:56 GMT -6
Yeah
Isn't this just creating mismatches?
If my A receiver is better than your C defender, I will find a way to get your C defender to have to cover my A receiver.
If we feel that you have a weaker side of your coverage vs. 2x2, we'll attack accordingly.
If you are adjusting your personnel to cover my A receiver, I will "plant" a B receiver in my backfield and motion him away towards your C defender and I still have a pretty good chance.
If all of your Jimmys are better than my Joes, you'll probably win but we would scout you to find out how your weakest coverage guys are just as we will try to find your weaker run stoppers.
|
|
|
|
Post by k on Aug 3, 2008 21:34:42 GMT -6
I think everyone falls into both groups.
I mean I focus on attacking what I see as the weak points in your scheme but if everytime I put my 6'6'' split on the right side he is matched up 1 on 1 against a 5'9'' corner I'm going to abuse that until you do something about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by futureazcoach on Aug 3, 2008 21:43:11 GMT -6
I thought everyone fell into this. I was just wondering because i have read the statement several times before. But i can see where they would attack people. As in the dend with the zone read, option, counter plays. So i see what they were saying just wondering if anyone actually called or ran an offense that specifically went after positions/players.
|
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Aug 3, 2008 21:49:16 GMT -6
Look players first.
Pick on the weak sisters.
Conflict the their stud players.
However, 4 verts ran well will put a huge strain on cover 3......
....it really is a balance, but I'd look players first.
|
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Aug 4, 2008 9:43:46 GMT -6
You need to do both. We look at both in breaking down film and also during a game. If we see an 8 yd cushion on a wr throw the hitch. If we see a kid wearing #56 at CB, well then we put our best wr out there and let him run by the CB (which happened this year right in front of our bench so our HC put our best HB/WR out there and told him to run a go- TD). So I think you need to know how to attack the coverage but also go right at their weak link if you see it.
|
|
ex-centralcoach
Junior Member
[F4:@marcmarinelli ] [F4:marcmarinelli]
Posts: 384
|
Post by ex-centralcoach on Aug 4, 2008 16:13:38 GMT -6
I tend to look at coverages first when preparing, then i will go back on sunday and look at personnel. I always want to feel confident that i have a grasp on what Im going to see, and what im going to focus on that week in practice. Chances are that coverage will be more consistent then looking at players.
Now that being said, if a team is just getting gashed by gap and pull running, the d-ends are getting kicked out or no wrong arm to spill for example. I know that coach should be drilling that stuff all week in practice, im still going to call power or counter.
|
|
