|
Post by jericho on Jan 10, 2008 11:07:24 GMT -6
My son will be 13 in April, and in 8th grade come next football season. He is hot for lifting weights and has even hi-jacked my dumbbells to his room. We have a family membership to a well equiped gym. Just wanted some advice from you all on what I should allow him to do.
Thanks, Jericho
|
|
|
Post by coachtabales on Jan 10, 2008 11:28:18 GMT -6
I have had this debate with many people in the past and even still now. I will throw in my 2 cents, but I can guarantee that I will be out-voted on this one. I am of the belief that if a teenager is not capable of giving you at least 200 pushups, that he should not be lifting weights. If he cannot handle his own body weight, he should not be lifting weights. However, that is just me. I am a big exercise junkie that does not believe in lifting weights as a means to get stronger. Need proof; ask most gymnasts.
|
|
|
Post by morris on Jan 10, 2008 20:10:36 GMT -6
At that age speed is more important. He will get the chance to get stronger n a year or so. Speed and footwork make the biggest difference at that level.
Now we do an off season training program but it is the SEAL workout. No true lifting except their own body weight
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 11, 2008 4:13:11 GMT -6
OK, I HAVE ALOT OF EXPERIENCE ON THIS!!!
As a middle school pe teacher and Jr high coach for 9 years...I have seen many 8th graders make terrific gains in the weight room with a simple progressive overload program.
weight lifting and resistance training are two different things. You need to have your son learn the basic exercises, the order in which to perform them, teach rest and recovery and proper nutrition for bodybuilding/strength training. we always denied the kids "maxing out" and instead let them train to failure for three sets in the rep range of 5-8 reps. Two exercises per body part and 3-4 body parts per day. we trained four days a week never hitting the same muscle group without at least two days rest in between for recovery. (i prefer to let them recover 3 days in between but its not always possible with the wt room schedule)
anyhow, its up to you but if your son is showing signs of increased testosterone/puberty than go ahead and put him on a resistance training program. teach him how to eat for gains.
|
|
trojan
Junior Member
[F4:wingtcoach.com] [F4:wingtcoachdon]
Posts: 494
|
Post by trojan on Jan 11, 2008 7:46:15 GMT -6
This isn't related to physiology or anything, but related to psychology. I'd bet we all agree that exercise is good for kids. If a kid loves to run, let him run. If a kid loves the weights, let him hit the weights. (I agree with Calande about not letting them max out, but good luck keeping an 8th grader from seeing how much he can bench. ) My point is that if a kid likes it, he's likely to stick with it. I can't argue about speed work, or push-ups and sit-ups, but I can tell you that kids (like adults) avoid what they don't like. A fat kid got fat somehow, and that is where he is. If you tell the fat kid that all that matters is push-ups, then how will he feel when he can't do five? Same thing with a weak kid. If you tell a fat kid that running and speed work are most important, then how will he feel when he can't come close to what is expected from him? Now you get the fat kid to bench, and he can put up more weight than his peers. He has something to be proud of now, and will be more likely to stick with it. Push nutrition, running, and push-ups/sit-ups. If the kid finds something else he likes that will make him more (put in your own word), then promote it.
|
|
|
Post by miami5 on Jan 11, 2008 8:23:19 GMT -6
good replies. Both are effective ways and i agree with coach coachcalande and Trojan. I have used a good mix of body weight and weight training. With weights i teach the basic lifts and strict form. As for weights and working out hurting kids in that age group, well that depends on their physical make up. Like coach said above, physical maturity will tell you what to do.
if a kid is not ready to squat with weight, have him drag sleds or tires ( kinda like working on a farm), these are great strength builders for anyone. i have my younger kids do a lot of strong man type training and they love it, with no injuries. tire flips ( small ones ),drags,farmers carry, etc. many ways to skin the cat
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 11, 2008 12:05:08 GMT -6
resistance is resistance, doesnt matter if its body weight or wt on a bar...an obese kid who can only do one pushup is akin to doing his max bench press.
|
|
|
Post by coachtabales on Jan 11, 2008 12:47:44 GMT -6
A kid who can only do one push up has far greater problems then whether or not he should be working out with weights.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 11, 2008 13:30:10 GMT -6
how so? weight training has been shown to speed the metabolism, improve bone density, improve core strength and the very sedentary show improvements in cardio vascular conditioning! An obese kid can change his self esteem with some muscle growth and improvement in strength an speed.
Bottom line for me, I am a believer in the benefits of resistance training regardless of where the resistance comes from. If its enough resistance to stimulate changes in the body then its a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by coachtabales on Jan 11, 2008 14:05:53 GMT -6
how so? weight training has been shown to speed the metabolism, improve bone density, improve core strength and the very sedentary show improvements in cardio vascular conditioning! An obese kid can change his self esteem with some muscle growth and improvement in strength an speed. And I am not arguing this point. However, if one push up is the maximum that a kid can do due to obesity, then I would like to think that perhaps there is a better solution for him other than weight training for the purposes of weight loss. Cardio (only) should be the order of the day for someone who is overweight, or at least until he can build the stamina for proper strength training. All I am saying is that before a 13 year old considers heavy weight training, someone should ask whether there will be a trainer involved? Perhaps also what is he looking to get out of this? More importantly, is he doing it for all the right reasons.
|
|
|
Post by jericho on Jan 11, 2008 14:59:37 GMT -6
You guys are giving me alot of good info. A little back ground: My son is lean and big, about 5'6", 140 lbs. @12 years old. He has always been good at football, physically, but only over the last year has "the bulb come on" mentally. He has really gotten the "I want to be great" attitude, which I think is great. I have watched the BFS dvd's and gotten some good info from them, even though they only briefly mention Jr. high schoolers, so here is what I am planning: I am going to allow him to do some weight training, but not with heavy weights. I am only gonna allow him to do the explosive, football related weight training (box squats, cleans, & bench press). Again, not with heavy weights. The remainder of his lifting regime will consist of push -ups, pull-ups, chin-ups, dips, and sit-ups. This will all be done only 3 days per week (M,W, &F). The other days (T, TH, SA), he will do speed/footwork stuff. Dots, stretching, jumprope, plyometrics, and good old fashioned jogging. Sunday is off day. Hell, this may actually help get my fat butt in shape to. Of coarse, we will only do this as long as he in interested, and until Lacrosse season starts. What do you all think
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 11, 2008 16:50:48 GMT -6
You asked what I think so here it is....
Mondays and Thursdays have the boy work on torso
chest- bench/inclines back- chins/rows shoulders- press/upright rows abs- situps
do 3 sets of 5-8 reps in each exercise, perfect form. when he can do 8 reps, go up 5 lbs next workout. be progressive. use the same wt for all three work sets after a warm up...
tuesdays and thursdays have the youngster work on the arms/legs/calves
squats/leg press/leg curls barbell curls/db curls pushdowns/skull crushers
run 40s on wednesdays
those explosive exercises take balance and coordination, develop a foundation of muscle thickness before worrying about power. strength first.
Eat 4-6 meals minimum, about every 3 hours.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 11, 2008 16:52:15 GMT -6
how so? weight training has been shown to speed the metabolism, improve bone density, improve core strength and the very sedentary show improvements in cardio vascular conditioning! An obese kid can change his self esteem with some muscle growth and improvement in strength an speed. And I am not arguing this point. However, if one push up is the maximum that a kid can do due to obesity, then I would like to think that perhaps there is a better solution for him other than weight training for the purposes of weight loss. Cardio (only) should be the order of the day for someone who is overweight, or at least until he can build the stamina for proper strength training. All I am saying is that before a 13 year old considers heavy weight training, someone should ask whether there will be a trainer involved? Perhaps also what is he looking to get out of this? More importantly, is he doing it for all the right reasons. well , I wont argue against cardio for sure, however building muscle at the same time is a good thing because more muscle means burning more cals at rest. That means fat loss. the goal is to lose fat, not necessarily wt.
|
|
|
Post by coach79 on Jan 11, 2008 23:03:55 GMT -6
An obese kid can change his self esteem with some muscle growth and improvement in strength an speed. Cardio (only) should be the order of the day for someone who is overweight, or at least until he can build the stamina for proper strength training. The first part is very, very true, Being the fat kid that started playing football and saw gains in my lifting it truly help with a kids self esteem. Now as for the 2nd part... So a fat kid (or adult) should only weight train if he can run a 7 minute mile? what is the proper stamina for weight lifting? Fat people shouldn't lift weights? -Brett
|
|
|
Post by coachtabales on Jan 12, 2008 5:41:26 GMT -6
Now as for the 2nd part... So a fat kid (or adult) should only weight train if he can run a 7 minute mile? Fat people shouldn't lift weights? You see, this is why I hate posting on boards sometimes. Did I say that? Did I say anything about anyone being "fat"? Did I say anything about running any distance with any kind of a time limit? Did I even mention anything about adults? Please don't try to make your point by putting words into my mouth, and perhaps before arguing just for the sake of arguing, think about adding something constructive instead. Coach Calande, reading your post with the workout schedule I do have a few questions. What about crunches as oppose to sit ups? For the record, I favor the sit-ups, but that is a whole other argument. How do you feel about high number of reps for the purposes of endurance, say 12-15 with lighter weights, instead of the 5-8 you suggested? Or is there a down side to this? And exactly how many 40's on Wednesdays (and why only once a week on the sprints)?
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 12, 2008 7:05:28 GMT -6
I am not a fan of crunches, again its so technique oriented that to get anything out of it the kid has to be coordinated in the first place. Im old school and believe in the benefits of situps, heck I had GREAT ABS for years because of those old inclined situp boards! (remember, every YMCA had one...yeah, im that old) - training for endurance with weights? nope, not a fan of that either, might as well get in a pool and swim if its endurance you want in your muscles. Weight training for size and strength is something I believe in.
Try this...do one set to failure using a wt that allows you to fail between 12-15 reps as you suggested...now, there is no way you can do another set of 12-15 with that same wt..my guess, youll only do about 8-9... the toxins build up and you cant crank out those reps.
What you can do if youre interested in repping out is use a heavy wt, get your 6-8 reps, quickly, with no rest, drop the poundage some and crank out another 3-4, then drop wt again and get another 3-4...now you got the stimulus to increase strength but also got lots of reps and worked the muscle in "endurance"...
you asked why only once a week on sprints...well, I want to train legs heavy twice a week, squats and leg press...it would be very hard for a young athlete (or even a more mature one) to recover with more frequent intense workouts for the lower body. sprints, squats, leg press...all tax your recovery. recovery is the key...
heres the very most basic forumal for making progress...not sure why so many people try to complicate it (probably so they can put a fancy name on it and make a buck)
stimulus= response
the body will respond to the demand placed on it (s.a.i.d. principle) - ie, run sprints, your body will "learn" and you should get faster....lift heavy enough to stimulate growth? your body changes and gets stronger...
now, the missing links there are a) rest and recovery and b) nutrition and c) genetic potential.
One thing for sure, if you want to become athletic, running sprints, agility work and wt lifting are all part of the equation. endurance training oddly enough can actually decrease your vertical jump and max speed?! believe it, its true.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jan 12, 2008 8:51:06 GMT -6
Unfortunately...as well written as most of these plans/posts are...they are factually incorrect. The "strength" gains exhibited by prepubescent kids are not muscular strength gains, but rather changes/improvements in the motor skills and motor system units governing the activity. These "gains" wouldn't transfer to the field (ie, improving the motor system that governs the squat does not give you "stronger legs" on the youth football field.
That said there is still a TON to be gained..work ethic, habits, becoming goal oriented, self efficacy, ownership in ones success, and quite frankly a placebo effect that will probably increase aggressiveness on the field.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Jan 12, 2008 10:16:51 GMT -6
We used to do weights and plyos for our 13-14 year old kids. We found the added confidence the program built and any percieved gains by the player often translated into confidence and more aggression on the field.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 12, 2008 11:35:17 GMT -6
Unfortunately...as well written as most of these plans/posts are...they are factually incorrect. The "strength" gains exhibited by the young teen are not muscular strength gains, but rather changes/improvements in the motor skills and motor system units governing the activity. These "gains" wouldn't transfer to the field (ie, improving the motor system that governs the squat does not give you "stronger legs" on the youth football field. That said there is still a TON to be gained..work ethic, habits, becoming goal oriented, self efficacy, ownership in ones success, and quite frankly a placebo effect that will probably increase aggressiveness on the field. You have to be careful with blanket statements. I personally have trained hundreds of young teens in weight training and without any doubt there have been significant gains in STRENGTH that go well beyond nervous changes and coordination for example. I had one younger go from a thin 160 lb tight end to a thick 210 pounds and very strong. he is just one of many that made significant muscle mass and strength gains. I would say that many times these gains do indeed transfer to the field. That of course can come back to the coaches role in making that happen.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jan 12, 2008 12:37:25 GMT -6
calande--you have seen 12 and 13 year olds gain 50lbs of muscle mass and strength?
It is not a "blanket statement" (ask airraider, I am the authority on blanket statements..LOL). It is a statement regarding human physiology. The gains an 11,12,13 year old is making are neuromuscular, not muscular in nature.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 12, 2008 14:46:26 GMT -6
You cant be serious. Neuromuscular gains in the first few weeks maybe, but after a year of progressive training?
yes, I have seen 8th graders (13 to 14) put on significant muscle mass as they train thru the year and over the summer to become strong 9th graders.
I didnt have too many 6th graders involved in lifting (10-11) but any 7th graders that were going to play 8th grade ball most definitely lifted with us. They can build muscle mass. I dont know where you get your info from but Im guessing you were not an exercise physiology major?
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 12, 2008 14:47:50 GMT -6
Anyhow, for the person that asked the question, proper form, a reasonable training weight with close supervision is a good idea. Just my personal opinion.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jan 12, 2008 15:04:48 GMT -6
You cant be serious. Neuromuscular gains in the first few weeks maybe, but after a year of progressive training? Yes.. that is correct. The body will adapt, but until puberty, the strength gains will not be significant. Much of this depends on what you consider "youth" Someone who is just getting ready to turn 13---on the fence. Obviously each individual is a bit different, but prepubescents will not develop a significant amount of muscular strength until their body is ready As I clearly stated though, so many other valuable traits can be learned through training, so I do think it is a good idea, and it will have the boy ahead of the game once his body starts to really develop Correct, I did not major in Exercise physiology. I got my Masters in it. In this situation, we are both correct because we are talking different ages. I was referring to what I consider "youth" (13 and under) and you are talking about 13,14 and up.
|
|
|
Post by los on Jan 12, 2008 17:55:31 GMT -6
I'd tend to agree with coach-d on the 13 and under kids, (not being a real expert by any means but just thru years of observation)..... as long as they're active and not overweight, most are in pretty good youth football shape(as is). Once they got into 8th grade here, they started acclimating them into the schools weight training program. In our youth program, 3rd thru 7th graders(the right ages of course) we had no weight training and very little conditioning.... just wasn't necessary.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 13, 2008 6:53:17 GMT -6
Ok, the original poster was asking about a thirteen year old boy. I started lifting weights at 12 and made decent gains as a thirteen year old. Most of the football team lifted and gained size and strength too. Did it translate to the field? we were winners at that level and some of them went on to play for state title winners. (our school fed two different high schools)
In any case, Its personal choice and I imagine like any other topic there are going to be a wide range of opinions and experiences. I do agree, puberty is a factor in the actual visible gains and overall results.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 13, 2008 6:56:36 GMT -6
let me add, going back to my own posts here, the gains enjoyed by the boy have alot to do with the frequency, intensity and type of exercise routine he is placed on....and as I stated, rest and nutrition can not be neglected. If he isnt given a progressive overload program I wouldnt expect much mass or strength gain.
beyond puberty issues, some 13 year olds wont gain significant mass and strength simply because they wont sit still at all. They go play basketball for two hours, then ride their bikes for half an hour, then off to the skate board park, then soccer practice or whatever.
|
|
|
Post by los on Jan 13, 2008 18:40:03 GMT -6
I see what you're saying Steve, and it probably also has to do with the individual kid.... I've seen some 12-13 yr olds whose voices had already changed and who had more facial hair than I do now, lol... but these were exceptions. Like I said, they started acclimating them into the schools weight training program here in the 8th grade(thats like mostly 13 yr olds if they haven't stayed back any grades). Not sure how seriously they were into it then, but it kinda started for real in the 9th grade.
|
|
|
Post by coachcalande on Jan 16, 2008 12:59:30 GMT -6
btw, today one of the 8th graders told me he works out with 185 for "3 or 4 reps" in the bench...he also said he leg pressed 550. hes a solid looking kid. Will be one of the best offensive linemen this school has seen if he sticks with it. I understand he has a history of knee injuries and prefers baseball....so....
|
|
|
Post by blocker74 on Jan 16, 2008 18:14:55 GMT -6
I'll say up front that this is a very intriguing thread... I think the most valuable part of having younger athletes participate in weight training program is the SIGNIFICANT advantage they will have in terms of FLEXIBILITY and TECHNIQUE when the get older and are ready to handle real loads. So many of 9th graders I get cannot squat correctly because the have so little hip and ankle flexibility. Case in point... I have two children, my son is 8 (plays soccer and baseball) and my daughter is 11 (plays volleyball and soccer). I have begun taking the both to the weightroom a couple times a week. We spend a whole lot of time lifting 3/4" PVC pipe (best teaching tool in the history of the weight training), doing pushup variations, and working on core strength. We work on both strength movements AND explosive movements. They both can jump shrug and push press with great technique. They both know the difference between the snatch and clean width grip. My daughter is a far better squatter than my son, both in the overhead and front squat, because she is more flexible. My son's flexibility has gotten much better just from overhead squatting with PVC with his feet placed on other side of a door jam. He must keep his torso vertical and his heels down to avoid planting his nose into the wall. My daughter can overhead squat with fantastic technique lifting a 15lb barbell. We went from PVC to PVC filled with sand to PVC filled with rebar AND sand to this light barbell. My son will be able to move to something weighted soon. Last night we had my buddy's 13-year-old son with us. His a tall, thick kid for his age and has been a successful baseball and football player. He had terrible time overhead squatting even at 13. With PVC in his hands, he would fall backwards, bend over like he praying to Allah, try to squat on this tip-toes. I'm quite sure that had he LEARNED THE MOVEMENTS earlier, he would be able to handle weight now. He could not do 5 good pushups. Bottom line is that his strength and flexibility have not kept up with age and growth. My kids spend a lot of time doing pushup variations... "modified" push-ups from the knees, pushups with feet on the floor and hands on bench, and standard pushups. First step there is using the "Plank" position to build the core. The moment that position breaks down during a pushup, it's time to modify it. I feel VERY confident that if I stress range of motion and technique, stay in a 5-8 rep range, stay AWAY from any 1RM work, my kids will benefit tremendously from the work we do. Here some links to some interesting resources... Olympic Weigthlifting and the Young Athlete by Tim SwordsUSA Weightlifting Position Statement and Literature Review on Youth WeightliftingNSCA Position Statement Youth Lifting (pdf file)CrossfitKids web site
|
|
|
Post by coachdoug on Jan 30, 2008 1:11:29 GMT -6
Good stuff.
I'll just add what a HS coach told me once: "Lifting weights prior to puberty is like putting braces on baby teeth."
Also, I agree with Coach Calande that exercises like squats and cleans should probably be avoided at first - too much chance of injury. Focus on building a strong core first.
|
|