|
Post by poweriguy on Jun 10, 2006 23:53:46 GMT -6
My alma mater and the school I coach at don't have middle school football programs.
I feel that this is hurting both schools football programs. Years ago everybody played pop warner for 7th and 8th grades. Now all the top programs in our section have middle school programs.
Now I know for sure that these school boards would never approve of middle school fielding a program. They do have basketball, baseball etc. Also I do think the parents wouldn't be for it anyway either. They have become daddy ball real bad. Parents get involved just so junior can play every snap. It's sicking to see a squad of 35 players on the team and on game day seeing 11 or 12 kids going both ways and on special teams.
At my alma matter I have seen head coaches in the past trying to get involved, but the daddy coaches do what they want, since it is separate from the school. Much like little league. The current coach doesn't even attempt to get involved just from what happened in the past with other HC's.
Also another problem I have with pop warner is the weight limits. This is a personal one for me since I only got to play one year as a 5th grader, then had to wait until freshman year to play football.
So what do you guys think, I know I'm just venting, but man it's just sad to see my alma mater not be able to take the next step, because they are babied by daddy in pop warner.
|
|
|
Post by los on Jun 11, 2006 6:23:21 GMT -6
Guess you could look at it from two viewpoints poweriguy. You're right, youth foorball in the US is an assortment of different leagues with different rules, age limits, playing and ball carrier weights and coaching prowess(ranging from very good to not worth a s--t! On the other hand, at least the boys are playing football and developing an interest in the game. We were one of the lucky school systems that has a jr. high team and the head coach and I had a great arrangement about players. He preferred to have mostly experienced 8th graders and would send all his 6th, 7th graders that weren't already playing for me, down to our youth team for more training and experience(playing time) And to reciprocate, I would send any skill players with a lot of talent, but over our running/ball carrier weight up to the school team for a tryout. Since the school team was made up of mostly 8th graders, who could range in age from 13 to 15 at times, it behooved the 6th and 7th grade guys who were 11-12 to keep their butts down there with us as long as possible lol! It doesn't take much imagination to envision whats gonna happen in a 1 on 1 hitting situation between a 15 yr old(red shirt) 8th grader and an 11 -12 yr old! Arghhh, Ouchhh could be nasty! This arrangement worked well for us for many seasons and built a nice bridge between our youth league and the high school teams. I was fortunate though, in that the hc of the schools jr high team was also the AD and former HC of the varsity team, who had turned over the HS reins to his younger assts. and spent his last several seasons before retiring, coaching 7th and 8th grade football. The association i had with this good coach, who had nothing more to prove and no giant ego, was one of my best experiences in football and proved very beneficial to all the players, youth league and school team.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Jun 11, 2006 11:48:32 GMT -6
I have coached middle school age kids in a youth program and in an actual school setting. The youth program was terrible for a whole lot of reasons. The school setting was far superior, in terms of staff and maturity. There were dads staffing every level of the youth program and the kids really paid the price for it.
I was at it continually with them because they weren't playing all of the kids; they played 13 kids and thought they were going to sit the rest of them on the sideline. Needless to say, that didn't fly with me; I discussed it with them in private and they refused to play all of them. They spouted all kinds of idiotic {censored} about "bringing home the title" and "teaching the kids winning isn't always fair". So, I started subbing kids in during the games, thet got pissed off, got in my face and looked ridiculous. The head of the program saw what was happening stepped in and forced them to play everybody- he was at every one of our games keeping track.
If you can, make some waves with the youth program. I know its a pain in the ass, but they're only hurting the HS programs numbers by not playing everybody. Maybe suggest that they establish more teams, or another league-anything to get all of the kids involved. Write a letter to the editor or talk to the parents- there's got to be more than a few of them who are furious that all the kids aren't playing. There's only one time when the parents are always right- when coaches aren't playing all of the kids at the youth level.
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Jun 11, 2006 15:49:39 GMT -6
I'll get a little long on this subject.......lol
In AZ they don't have middle school programs unless they are private schools, so Pop Warner or another type of private league is about it. The players you get are limited by boundries where they live (ours is the smallest in the state) after that, you can have four out of draw waivers for players not living in your area (there are parts of the country with up to 10). Because of the program we run, we have parents from all over the valley wanting to put their kids on our team because they know that we are fair and teach kids football, plus were pretty good.....lol. The weight limits and age limits are in place for the safety of the kids but should be revised to fit a ever growing population, IMO at least. National Pop Warner has in place rules that all kids must play a minumum number of scrimmage plays, dependent on the total number of kids on a team, for example if there are 20 kids on a team, each kid must get at least 8 plays, if there are 30, each kid must get at least 10 (we play everyone on our team more than the minimums based on effort). In addition, there are other kinds of rules in place, a margin of win rule, etc that are specialized to this age group, other than that its federation HS rules. Your generalizations about daddy coaches sadly are sometimes true, what usually happens in those cases is that nobody wants to play on that team. IMO, daddy coached teams are usually the worst coached teams by guys who watch too much tv and think their kid is the greatest thing going. When we got involved with this association 6 years ago, we worked on getting rid of these kind of individuals and finding quality people to coach the lower levels, this has not been easy but we are almost there. For whatever reason, in AZ at the Midget level (7-8th graders) there is very good coaching on about half of the teams in this age division (aprox. 35 teams), guys that have been in it for years know what they are doing and field competitive teams. IMO, the competition at this level is as good or better than most freshmen teams here. I can only speak for our staff on how we do it, none of our core staff have kids on the team, we occasionally have a parent that wants to "help out" but their duties are assigned to them and we will not let their participation be a distraction. We take pride in the fact that we take kids that have never played before and develop them into solid football players, for example, last years starting offensive line had 4 out of 5 kids that had never played before, they finished 10-1 (lost in state championship) and were pulling on counter trey and trap and doing it damn well too. Our motto is you play based on your effort and kids buy into it, they enjoy learning football and I believe they relish the opportunity that we give them to play in a fair, fun and exciting program. CB, as far as HS numbers here, frosh football at most schools here get 80+ out in the fall and most of the frosh teams have 11 guys going both ways, so the problem of "not developing talent/numbers" isn't a sin reserved for youth coaches. IMO, too many HS coaches want kids to come in as studs and don't take the time to teach kids, if someone is polished they get the shot and the other guy is cannon fodder. The best HS programs have Frosh/JV coaches that teach football instead of just turning the key with studs coming up from feeders. If I was a varsity HC and had 80+frosh out, I'd fire the frosh coach if more than one kid went both ways. There is no excuse in the world for a team with numbers not to have separate offense/defense squads, again, just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Jun 11, 2006 16:48:25 GMT -6
I hear you when it comes to the frosh level JH, I was on a frosh staff last year and spent the entire season fighting with our OC because I tried to get as many kids as possible into the game. We had a "B-Squad" 5th and 6th quarter to fall back on each game, but I tried to get as many of them as possible in during the first four. Our OC, on the other hand, felt that we should play 11 kids in the first four the other 40 in the fifth and sixth......
I wouldn't split them into offensive and defensive units- they still need to learn and know both sets of skills. I think its better to split them into two equally matched squads or an A and B squad, and then set up two schedules. If you can't get two schedules then split between two even squads and let one squad play offense and one play defense in the first quarter and alternate between quarters.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Jun 18, 2006 9:07:53 GMT -6
Pop Warner is one of many Youth Leagues in the Country and in fact aggregated makes up less than 20% of the kids playing in the USA. My league is unlimited weight like most. My Prog does a self imposed minimum play rule and I limit team size to 25. They got rid of MS ball here 30 years ago because there were 50-60 kids on one team playing 4 games with 8 minute quarters, a waste. The best youth squads here travel to Florida to play for national titles and win.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Jun 18, 2006 11:07:49 GMT -6
I have seen bad coaches at all levels, hell,my first year I know I wasn't the best myself. But, the worst coaches in my mind are those that don't play all of the kids... I know several coaches that aren't the best in terms of teaching skills, but at least they understand that all of the kids that practice need to play.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Jun 18, 2006 12:14:19 GMT -6
I agree. When I moved to the rural area Im at now 2 years ago, there was a youth program in place. They won something like 5 games in 5 years and had squads sized 40-61 on one team. Supposedly becuase they played in a "tough" league. Most of the kids NEVER saw the field but in that 5th quarter thing. I got all the leftovers and castoffs, played everyone during the real games and went 11-0 year one. Year 2 with just 24 kids and no cuts we went 12-0 and beat the 2 best "select" teams in the state that chose from over 100 kids, big city suburban and ghetto teams. Needless to say the local guy wont play us and has all the excuses. Many youth coaches are just down right bad, but to be bad and NOT play the kids is just downright wrong.
|
|