|
Post by coachdawhip on Jan 27, 2008 12:20:18 GMT -6
Sigler III returns to MISigler said he is looking forward to a different routine. While football in Michigan can be time-consuming, particularly in the late summer and fall months, it doesn't hold a candle to what Georgia high school football involves. With spring, summer and fall duties, Sigler said it often meant many hours away from home. Those that have coached in both locations, North and South thoughts? Plus, will the program is not funded by the school the school that he was at did have a 6 figure football budget.
|
|
|
Post by spos21ram on Jan 27, 2008 12:56:08 GMT -6
Well from the games that are televised nationwide most of then are from the southern states. They try to keep it even with a northern game occasionally, but as a whole the south seems to put their sports above everything. The big time schools play out of state non-conference games which is amazing. The #2 ranked CT school from up here (very very wealthy town) flew down to FLA to play Naples this year. Great experience for the team but not many schools can afford to do that.
|
|
trojan
Junior Member
[F4:wingtcoach.com] [F4:wingtcoachdon]
Posts: 494
|
Post by trojan on Jan 27, 2008 13:15:33 GMT -6
A friend of mine in Florida grew up in Pennsylvania. He explained to me that there was a lot of emphasis on playing a single sport, and playing it all year.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jan 27, 2008 15:22:46 GMT -6
I coached college ball both down south (LA) and up North (NY)...and the college environment was DEFINITELY different...but that is more a NY thing vs a LA thing as far as in season. Hey, Saturdays in Ann Arbor is probably just as frenetic as Saturday's in Baton Rouge (well, except down here, they play at night, meaning 8 hours of tailgaiting first...) I definitely think that the south is different when it comes to recruiting season and spring seasons. Not sure how many guys follow that up north, but that stuff is just as followed down here as in season activities.
High School wise, I dont know. YOu hear about it being different, but I think that is more due to human development issues (warm weather meaning better athletes because they are outside more playing when they are younger... etc) meaning more athletically gifted teams..not necessarily having a higher degree of ability, just more teams with that high level. Also, there is a great deal of importance on it down here, so that probably leads to some good things. I remember when I was coaching in NY, you could look at a film and instantly tell it was from Long Island vs New Jersey..based on the quality of play.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Jan 27, 2008 15:25:20 GMT -6
If you want to seriously coach football, then coach below the Mason Dixon line. This is just one Yankee's opinion, but coming from the MidWest to the Gulf South, it is a completely different world. Not taking sides on either,but as previously stated it is a culture thing. That is that.
|
|
yoda1
Sophomore Member
Posts: 216
|
Post by yoda1 on Jan 27, 2008 19:17:44 GMT -6
Having coached in Texas and now in the mid-west it is totally different. Texas is live and die high school football, simply put if you coach a loosing program you will be fired in short order. If you win everything is great. Coaching money is totally different too, they pay everyone more down there from the middle school all the way up to the head coach.
In Texas you are hired as a Coach/Teacher in the Mid-West or north of the line you are hired as a Teacher/Coach.
Man I miss Texas high school football
|
|
|
Post by spos21ram on Jan 27, 2008 20:21:06 GMT -6
It must be alot different everywhere. I've rarely seen someone get hired as a teacher and a coach at the same time. No school around here offeres both as 1 package.
|
|
|
Post by morris on Jan 27, 2008 20:25:08 GMT -6
It must be alot different everywhere. I've rarely seen someone get hired as a teacher and a coach at the same time. No school around here offeres both as 1 package. So you have people apply/hired for a coaching job even if they do not work in the building or offered a teaching job in the building? Here it is offered in one. The coaching job and here is a list of teaching spots we have open. If they do not have the teaching job then they find something else like Homebound.
|
|
|
Post by spos21ram on Jan 27, 2008 20:32:30 GMT -6
Yea if there is a coaching job open, that's all they offer. You don't have to be a part of the school district to coach here.
|
|
|
Post by spos21ram on Jan 27, 2008 20:33:40 GMT -6
At places where they offer both how do they just create a teaching job opening?
|
|
|
Post by tog on Jan 27, 2008 20:56:46 GMT -6
Texas teacher/coaches are on dual contracts. If you are fired as a coach, you can stay on as a teacher, but it rarely happens. Most coaches in Texas will just go to a new school because they want to still coach.
|
|
|
Post by morris on Jan 27, 2008 21:25:41 GMT -6
We (KY) are the same as tog. 2 different contracts but most schools find a job for you. that is one reason coaches here teach high demand positions (Science/Math/Spec Ed.) and positions tend to open when I coach gets fired. KY is still a very rural state so it is not to easy to work for one district and coach in another. We also have few para-pro HCs. HC are the only coaching jobs that are advertised. All others are placed on a list serves, word of mouth and such.
|
|
ramsoc
Junior Member
Posts: 431
|
Post by ramsoc on Jan 27, 2008 22:33:53 GMT -6
So you have people apply/hired for a coaching job even if they do not work in the building or offered a teaching job in the building? Here it is offered in one. The coaching job and here is a list of teaching spots we have open. If they do not have the teaching job then they find something else like Homebound. Hell, here in CA, at least in our district, I don't even have to be a teacher to get a head job.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Jan 27, 2008 22:53:18 GMT -6
is the level of play really different? probably not, at least not at the elite level among each of the state's top teams. where i see it being "different" in this respect is the number of teams that could be considered "elite" or top tier.
is the level of coaching different? probably not. however, some states do have a stronger coaching association than others and do a better job of preparing coaches and offering development opportunities for their members. while this may not make them "better" it does seem to bond them and lead to a greater chance of idea sharing. some of the southern states also have other stipulations or requirements for individuals to be coaches within a public school. while this may not make for "better" coaches, it can lend itself to people furthering their development on a professional level to "move up", so to speak
no doubt, the interest level of both the public and the student-athlete may be higher... probably due to weather and the "history" of football in the south. i.e. boys grow up wanting to play football like their dad, etc. this increase in numbers can tend to create a stronger pool from which a team can be chosen. also, leads to competition which can drive a student-athlete's motivation and ultimately a communities desire to booster their athletic programs.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jan 27, 2008 22:54:10 GMT -6
Ive thought about this a lot in the past. I was born and raised in SoCal, and have done all my coaching out here. I always took pride in the fact that, at least in my mind, that nowhere in the nation plays better football (I'm not saying its always the best, but I don't think year in and year out anywhere is better).
That being said I wouldnt say there is the same mentality here as in the South/Texas; at least based on what I hear here. There are plenty of schools and communities out here that will accept mediocrity year in and year out. So I think it goes to what you are asking; is it different based on quality of play, or different based on atmosphere.
I think that something could be said for weather related to success, I know here there are no restrictions weather wise to when we can be on the field doing work. I've coached with guys from states up north that say they have to be done with their playoffs by early november because after that it gets too rough to continue; thats at least 4 mos. lost.
|
|
|
Post by coachdawhip on Jan 28, 2008 5:41:38 GMT -6
in GA you must be a certified teacher to be a HC.
|
|
|
Post by morris on Jan 28, 2008 6:22:29 GMT -6
Now there is no state rule sayign you have to be a teacher to be a HC. I know further south some coaches pull in large amounts of money just to coach. I know we have lost a few coaches in the state the last few years to go further south. For a very long time basketball was king in KY and I am sure most can understand why.
Part of the reason for football to be the way it is has to do with tradition and part of it has to do with how rural the areas are in some of these states. Our kids do not have much to do other than work and play sports. Now it is a little different with video games and the such but in more urban areas kids get a little more mobile. High School sports in general are the main form of entertainment in some of these areas. Past about 6 large areas in the state most of the population is spread and I use the term large very lightly. Lexington is not a large city. In Northern KY football is HUGE and in some ways the area acts as if there is no other football in the state. It goes back to when there were fewer schools and so it was very close community against very close community.
I am would bet this trend continues as you go further south.
|
|
|
Post by hemlock on Jan 28, 2008 6:33:07 GMT -6
It's culture. Brophy is 100% right. I'm a northerner by birth, but I've recruited in both the south and the north and the quality of coaching is much better in the Texas and in the Deep South. The level of athletic talent is not such a big deal; Jersey kids are athletes; however, southern kids when you get them to campus know a lot more football than northern kids for the most part. The football skills of southern kids are clearly superior. Also, the schemes that southern teams run generally are closer to those at the college level. As a rule, it is evident that their staffs put much more time into the game year round, which reflects the values of their respective communities. For the most part, when I recruited a kid from the north, I knew that I was getting an athlete, when I recruited a kid from the south I knew that I was getting both an athlete and a football player.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Jan 28, 2008 6:50:00 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by tog on Jan 28, 2008 7:04:21 GMT -6
Texas doesn't use the weenie FED rules
our kids get to cut and learn how to play the cut
|
|
|
Post by airman on Jan 28, 2008 17:14:05 GMT -6
you all know where the mason dixon line is? it is the line that separates Penn. from Maryland. it is not some way south thing. I had a friend who took a job in rural georgia right out of college. he lasted 1 year. the poverty in rural parts of the south is really bad. schools try but there is not much there. this is why I can see how they take such pride in their school sports program. it gives the town some thing to be proud of.
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on Jan 31, 2008 11:08:07 GMT -6
Our school has made a habit of playing schools from out of state for the past couple of years. We have played twice in Ohio, twice teams out of Fla, and one out of La. I would say that the game is a little different, but not better.
I think the main differnce is that weather plays a factor tremendously. The warmer weather allows for year around outside work. Also, the fact that the weather gets worse quicker up north, makes more teams focus on the run game.
Another major difference is the other sports that are played. There are only a handful of lacrosse teams in SC, and none prior to 10 years ago. No high school hockey. Swim teams are mostly at the big or country club schools. And another big one, kick ball is played as a spring sport down here, so it is no problem to get a couple of kickers out for the team. There just aren't as many sports offered. I have a buddy who works at a school that still doesn't offer girls volleyball, the only fall girls sport is cross country.
The teams we have played had great coaching and offered us some the best competition we have faced, in state or out. It has been a tremendous help to us to help us keep our edge. It think the major difference is that if you only play teams in your state/area, then you will tend to develop your team around stopping the schemes and talent you face. Facing those OH big boys really showed us how lacking we were the trenches.
|
|
|
Post by enzpville on Jan 31, 2008 21:53:20 GMT -6
I think this is an awesome post one that ties into culture, philsophy and social-psychology. I really have liked to see all the different view points from one region to the next. Here is my take.
I am not going to question the quality of football in one region vs. the other but I have always looked at this situation from a sociology standpoint. Do values or perceived values drive what a sport or education means to a community or state? In the midwest Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin rarely have many D1 athletes in comparison to other states. Even scholarships to population wouldn't compare from these states to others. But the states, school administrators and communities will stick out their chests because each state's ACT scores are always 1, 2 or 3 on average in the United States. I don't know if kids are any less or more interested in being football players when they are young but a school district may force the culture to be balanced in the very least and from experience may even curb support of athletics in comparison to academics. I have heard and seen many cases where administration will not look the other way with coaches not being teachers in the classroom. Interesting to see what others write.
|
|