|
|
Post by nltdiego on Apr 16, 2016 10:07:02 GMT -6
Anybody pay for this? If so, worth it?
|
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 16, 2016 10:09:20 GMT -6
Yes. and YES.
|
|
|
|
Post by newt21 on Apr 16, 2016 11:01:37 GMT -6
I love their articles, straight to the point, very detailed, and they have TONS of information on many different things.
|
|
|
|
Post by **** on Apr 16, 2016 11:04:07 GMT -6
Yes and yes
|
|
collier
Junior Member
[F4:@kbcollier32]
Posts: 270
|
Post by collier on Apr 16, 2016 12:09:21 GMT -6
We have an account that we use as a staff. Very worth it.
|
|
|
|
Post by coacha65 on Apr 16, 2016 14:35:44 GMT -6
yes and yes
|
|
jets79
Probationary Member
Posts: 9 
|
Post by jets79 on Apr 16, 2016 14:47:37 GMT -6
A lot of good information and they seem to add content pretty regularly.
|
|
|
|
Post by raymul313 on Apr 16, 2016 14:54:59 GMT -6
It's practically robbery the amount of info they give your for the price you pay
|
|
|
|
Post by groundchuck on Apr 16, 2016 15:51:30 GMT -6
We have a membership and have found it useful. But nobody writes about what we do on offense. It's all RPO right now. Lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by lochness on Apr 16, 2016 15:55:06 GMT -6
We have a membership and have found it useful. But nobody writes about what we do on offense. It's all RPO right now. Lol. That's why I don't sign up. If you're not running the latest and greatest smack, it's not going to be too helpful. |
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 16, 2016 17:14:19 GMT -6
Their defensive and special team articles always seem to be relevant. I agree that offense can get a little "flavorful of the month" from time to time. But, I still think it's well worth it
|
|
olc55
Sophomore Member
Posts: 106
|
Post by olc55 on Apr 17, 2016 5:20:54 GMT -6
We have a membership and have found it useful. But nobody writes about what we do on offense. It's all RPO right now. Lol. That's why I don't sign up. If you're not running the latest and greatest smack, it's not going to be too helpful. Lots of great stuff, but right now it could very easily be called "rpo labs". There is a lot of great information though. Plenty to dig through. |
|
|
|
Post by raymul313 on Apr 17, 2016 6:07:42 GMT -6
We have a membership and have found it useful. But nobody writes about what we do on offense. It's all RPO right now. Lol. That's why I don't sign up. If you're not running the latest and greatest smack, it's not going to be too helpful. Yeah they haven't seemed to cover much else outside of Spread RPOs and TCU-esque coverage schemes neither of which I'm too interested in but bc I coach both sides of the ball I read through some of them anyhow |
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Apr 17, 2016 8:19:48 GMT -6
I honestly never found their stuff too mind blowing, I dunno.
I agree with others that the emails I get from them are always "101 ways to RPO your cat" or some such silliness.
|
|
|
|
Post by coachdawhip on Apr 17, 2016 8:32:04 GMT -6
I guess to me that's not true. Yes they have doen reports on RPO and 4-2-5.
But also on the 3-4, cover 4, defending the wing-t, how to attack with the wing-t, etc..
To each it's on.
|
|
|
|
Post by coachpech on Apr 17, 2016 20:09:46 GMT -6
What's the advantage of X and O Lab's over Glazier?
|
|
|
|
Post by runitupthemiddle on Apr 17, 2016 20:45:00 GMT -6
Cheaper, IMO , and more reports to read , glazier u get film access to videos some that are hard to find.
But in this day and age of YouTube and Twitter. You can find just about anything, and details on it too !
|
|
|
|
Post by jtimmerman53 on Apr 18, 2016 5:36:39 GMT -6
I have a subscription and I absolutely love it. It gives me tons of stuff to read while my students are working on an assignment or taking a test. Yes, there is a ton of RPO stuff being published now but all you need to do is search the site for older articles for things like flexbone, traditional power, etc. I also really like how in depth many articles will go with their discussion on actual technique and just scheme ideas.
|
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Apr 18, 2016 7:20:40 GMT -6
Also, their 'reports' never really did much for me, maybe I was reading them wrong or something. It wasn't useful to read "32% of coaches use a double humdinger technique on this play" when I'm not necessarily sure that 32% of coaches aren't a bunch of slappies who just like wearing whistles.
|
|
|
|
Post by runitupthemiddle on Apr 18, 2016 9:02:49 GMT -6
Lol^
|
|
|
|
Post by powerfootball71 on Apr 18, 2016 9:32:53 GMT -6
I had free access thru a account on my old staff. Some of the stuff was ok. But after I saw a article on defense by a guy with 12 wins in the last 6 years and his teams d gave up just under 35 a game last year kind of take it with a grain of salt.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Apr 18, 2016 10:24:20 GMT -6
Worth the price....I like all the videos they include. as far as the RPO's go, I do read them not because we run them but I know that we will face a couple of jackwagons who think they are Baylor and it helps to know what they are trying to do
|
|
|
|
Post by CoachBravo on Apr 18, 2016 10:34:27 GMT -6
Well worth the price. Great website!
|
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 18, 2016 10:38:04 GMT -6
Worth the price....I like all the videos they include. as far as the RPO's go, I do read them not because we run them but I know that we will face a couple of jackwagons who think they are Baylor and it helps to know what they are trying to do THIS. . . . a thousand times over! |
|
|
|
Post by Coach Vint on Apr 19, 2016 12:06:17 GMT -6
Well worth the price. There is a lot of great information and they are always putting out new stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 19, 2016 13:41:00 GMT -6
I can't say much now. . . an article I wrote last year was published this morning.
|
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Apr 19, 2016 13:47:42 GMT -6
I can't say much now. . . an article I wrote last year was published this morning. was it the RPO article? |
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Apr 19, 2016 13:52:39 GMT -6
i have something that is going to get published in a month or two
|
|
|
|
Post by gibbs72 on Apr 19, 2016 15:02:22 GMT -6
I can't say much now. . . an article I wrote last year was published this morning. was it the RPO article? Nope. Split coverage vs trips |
|
|
|
Post by ahall005 on Apr 19, 2016 17:00:07 GMT -6
Do they have much on the wing T?
|
|
