|
Post by hsrose on Apr 19, 2007 12:19:24 GMT -6
We're currently planning for spring practice and the summer workouts, going through the roster, who's lifting, who's playing other sports, all that good stuff. HC gets a call yesterday from the mother of our "stud" LB/FB (very real stud as a freshmen, but missed soph with a blown knee, courtesy of baseball, yet to be proven a stud at the JV/varsity level) saying that he will be playing on a traveling baseball team and will only have "5-6 days" all summer where he can participate in the football program. The kid is a good kid, no problems, no school issues, etc.
If this team is what I think it is, the HC of the baseball team is also the HC of the school varsity baseball team, and is the HC of the freshmen football team. Last year we missed 2 players from our opening football scrimmage because they were at a baseball tournament in LA. He is also the ex-father-in-law of the (new) HC of the football team. Makes the relationship between the HC and the coach a bit strange. I wouldn’t want to be in that rowboat.
Normally I would say "Have fun, enjoy the experience, glad you made the decision", honestly tell the kid “good luck”, and start planning on having a different FB. The HC feels the same way. But, this baseball thing has not yet come to pass.
The Problem: I can see a situation where the stud plays baseball and makes a cursory effort with the football workouts. He then shows up in the double-days in August. I know that even after missing the summer workouts he will be better than any other FB (and probably every other LB) we currently have in front of us. So the decision the HC will have to make is to keep and/or play this guy. From a football standpoint, I could really use a 6’2”, 210 lb. FB in my option offense/playing LB on defense. From a team standpoint, he won’t be there with everyone else and won’t know what is going on, how do we get everyone to buy in if obvious exceptions are made, etc.
Comments, suggestions? What have you done in this situation in the past?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2007 12:35:44 GMT -6
You know, this happens a lot. I really don't think you can punish a kid in-season for not attending what amounts to "volunteer" workout stuff in the off-season. But we give incentives for them (better gear, #, etc.). On top of that, we always tell them that all positions are up for grabs and it's just an opportunity for someone else to get those turns and have a chance to earn the position.
But i'm a bit spoiled because we have a school of 2,300 and 130+ players in grades 10-12. So in our case, there really may be another kid who can do the job. Smaller schools have different issues.
All I can say is that the kid needs to feel that he can only control how ready HE is for the next football season--the other guys at his spot aren't going to shed a tear because he misses and they're going to try to capitalize on it.
|
|
|
Post by senatorblutarsky on Apr 19, 2007 12:49:02 GMT -6
Well... what we do is have them "make up" missed workouts/practices, etc. before they can play. We can not make summer "mandatory". So we do not. Everyone has to do the 12 min. run (so many laps needed- by position), IF they are at 80% of the workouts, they can bypass the run. No one plays until they complete the run/number of laps. We had a case last year where our best CB went to his sister's wedding... for 9 days. I do not want to bring up that ordeal again... but in order to play, he had to do make up conditioning for each practice (not day) missed. He had 10 days to make up 14 practices... and he made them up, didn't start, but ended up playing. I didn't really like the situation... but our captains and players thought it was fair and reasonable... and he busted his butt to make it up (more of dad's doing than the kids), and earned his way back. You've got to have rules... but you also need an escape route to let kids (and coaches) keep from painting themselves in a corner. By the way- we no longer have a "baseball" issue here... but if our guys are gone for a baseball game (not practice), basketball camp out of town, (or anything related to competing in athletics...), we count it toward conditioning. We now go in the AM, so we have no conflicts (except for camps away from home) I may have a similar situation... our best OL seems to think he needs to work in Missouri this summer... We are trying to reach an agreement on that one. I may be asking for advice too soon.
|
|
|
Post by CoachMikeJudy on Apr 19, 2007 12:51:10 GMT -6
Don't punish the kid...he is obviously getting lots of pressure from parents and BB coach. As long as he is there in August and if he falls into line, then he should be as much a part of the team as anyone else.
It's not like he is doing nothing all summer...I mean look at Smarjidza (spell), WR from Notre Dame. I'm sure a $10 million stud like him was playing some travel team BB in his hay-day. And he was as dedicated to football as possible.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Apr 19, 2007 12:51:54 GMT -6
he gets minimal reps. period
If he is as good as you say he is.....he will beat out the starters, anyway.
Give the majority of the reps to the guys that put in work......again, if he is the stud you say he is he'll get it and it will be clear WHO should be starting.
What are your guidelines to a starting position,though? Do you grade the players in camp / scrimmages? Do those grades determine who isn't a liability on the field (deserves to start)?
It may not be 'fair' to this kid, but it sure isn't "fair" to the rest of the team to hand this kid the keys to the kingdom.
Day One of camp; everybody should be getting the same reps...working on fundamentals...
set the depth chart with the guys that put in work
Day Two of camp same thing - equal reps Those that are "getting it" get more playing time
Day Three of camp equal reps, coach up the lagging ones START the ones that GET IT.
It doesn't take long for the cream to rise to the top, but don't give up on the ones that need more time.
It would APPEAR that you gave those guys that put in work an opportunity, but then THEY lost their spot.
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Apr 19, 2007 13:02:00 GMT -6
Why is mommy calling and not him? As far as off season stuff, as long as he's doing something active I think its a good thing, of course it is debatable if baseball qualifies as active. I'm a advocate of kids playing two or three sports and staying active everyday doing something productive, even if it isn't specifically football related. I'd much rather see him playing basketball and being an athlete instead of killing grass in baseball though. When it boils down to it, if he comes in to August and earns the job, then I wouldn't have an issue with it. What should happen is that the other kids should get ahead of him in the offseason and not allow that to happen, but if he earns it, no problem. Now in season, different story, and the baseball coach should know it.
|
|
|
Post by tothehouse on Apr 19, 2007 13:54:53 GMT -6
I agree and disagree JH. I agree with you that mommy calling is ridiculous. Calling is ridiculous. Sit down with the HC and talk with him.
Our situation is like Irishblitzer, having a lot of students and competition for spots, but it comes down to what is in front of you. Football season is in front of this young man in the fall. We have baseball and basketball campers and they get to go. Our workouts in the summer start at 5:45am. This time is picked by the players. It is picked by them because it is the time where everyone can be there. Anyone with summer school can be there. Anybody who has to work can be there. Anyone who plays another sport can be there. WE DON'T DO ANYTHING WITHOUT EVERYONE THERE.
So, this guy should be told that since he isn't there he has to work his way back into the starting lineup. He isn't a starter. He can be (and probably will), but not right away. We will have a situation this summer where a TE and his dad (a coach on our staff) are going to Europe for a month. He already knows the expectations of the program and he knows that he has to work back into any playing time he gets.
Just my $.02
|
|
|
Post by fbdoc on Apr 19, 2007 17:13:38 GMT -6
All good points... Another factor for us (we get this with travel basketball and baseball) is the attitude of the kid. If he comes across to his team-mates and the coaches as "I don't have to do the workouts! Nah Nah Nah!" then his return is more problematical. If, on the other hand, he is a "Good Kid" and his team-mates want him, then we welcome him back and start getting him in shape. Does he start at first? NO, but as Brophy said, the cream will rise to the top.
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Apr 19, 2007 19:55:25 GMT -6
We got a kid from Texas who is a stud (thanks for the slotback longhorns!!!) Anyway, he goes back there for two months during the summer to be with the other half of his family. We'll send him with a work-out packet and a playbook, call him a couple times a week, and tell him we expect him to be ready to go when he gets back.
Our philosophy: Unless they just brush off weights and their responsibilities, we choose the best players. Kids have a ton of stuff to do, but if they make the effort and are the best, they play.
We don't play slackers though.......if you can't count on them for weights, you can't count on them in crunch time.
I like what SenatorBlutarsky said, but I'd modify it. When the kid gets back, they should do some make-up conditioning after practice. So, if they missed 4 days, they should do 4 days of make up conditioning after practice. They can still win their spot, while simultaneously earning their way onto the team. I'm going to suggest this.
Great post.......tough subject to deal with
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Apr 19, 2007 20:37:52 GMT -6
You miss spring training - you miss a game. You miss too many summer workouts - you miss a game. You miss the first week of summer practice because of baseball world series or whatever - you miss a game.
They also need to make up all the running or workouts before they can play. This is an easy escape route that gives a coach some wiggle room, but still gives a kid a chance back. It also lets the other kids know that spring, summer, and practice is important.
This allows a kid to make a mistake, but still come back. So for your situation, I would suggest that he makes up the running or workouts or whatever and sits the first the game, and I wouldn't start him the second game if there is some friction on the team. If he is good, it will be obvious that he has outperformed the other player to win his spot back by the third game.
By the way, I said don't start him the second game, not not play him the majority of the time. Missing games and not starting does matter to kids.
I have done this formula numerous times in my career and it has worked well every time.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Apr 19, 2007 20:47:50 GMT -6
If the system works for you, fine. I agree with starting him lower on the depth chart but, if he wins the job, he wins the job. Sitting the kid three out of ten games seems to me to be a little harsh.
|
|
|
Post by CVBears on Apr 19, 2007 21:00:11 GMT -6
Is the kid in-season? Isn't it a summer league rather than an actual season? Obviously it's not football season. So, I would expect that the kid split time between baseball and football. There are many ways to do this. Like Bluto said, maybe have make-ups or something. Lots of ways...But, it is, not a decision for one or the other, but the kid needs to show the team that he has a commitment to the team. No commitment, no play.
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Apr 19, 2007 21:00:38 GMT -6
Sitting the kid three out of ten games seems to me to be a little harsh. And ultimately detrimental to your team.....IMO
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Apr 19, 2007 21:22:51 GMT -6
Sitting the kid three out of ten games seems to me to be a little harsh. And ultimately detrimental to your team.....IMO I agree.
|
|
|
Post by los on Apr 19, 2007 21:48:33 GMT -6
Coach, as we had no organized workouts to speak of in the summer while I played in HS, its never been a big deal to me! We were "expected" to show up in Aug. for 2 a days, in good shape and ready to play, which meant you had to lift some, do lots of calisthenics,agilitys, and run on your own or in small groups with your buddies. We all knew before hand, the penalty for being a lazy bum all summer was "to die like a dog" during the 1st week of 2 a day conditioning work lol! Tell the kid to work out on his own(between baseball stuff) and "be ready" come starting day! His performance "then" will demonstrate his dedication to you(the coaches) and his teamates. If hes been working= he'll still be dominant, If he's been slacking off= It'll show! Then decide what to do!
|
|
|
Post by lsrood on Apr 20, 2007 7:34:15 GMT -6
We run on a point total for our off-season workouts. Each workout is worth 10 points and players are expected to be present for at least 75% of our off-season workouts (Jan-July). We encourage our players to participate in other sports so if they are engaged in a school sponsored sport, they are given credit for the workouts missed while that sport is in season. We do ask them to lift on their own or if their inseason coach has a program, to lift with their team, but we want them to lift. Once they are no longer participating in a school-sponsored sport they are expected to be back at our workouts. When we get to the summer months we offer workouts at a couple of different times so if they have baseball or basketball conflicts, they can still get their workout in. Since we encourage them to play other sports, the only thing we ask is that in the summer we get equal time for our workouts.
Now if we reach the beginning of camp and they have not reached their point total, we have them do extra work prior to or after each practice until they have made up their points. We also start them out at the bottom of the depth chart, but make sure they know that where they end up on the final depth chart is up to them and their own work ethic and attitude.
This way we allow for those that might be involved in other sports and have a solution for those that decide to just plain miss our workouts. We also have a pre-camp conditioning test that they must pass in order to be issued equipment. If they fail that they have to do the pre & post practice workouts and practice in shorts until they can pass the physical test (safety factor to make sure they are physically able to participate).
It seems to work for us.
|
|
|
Post by realdawg on Apr 20, 2007 7:34:44 GMT -6
If he doesnt come to summer workouts, he doesnt get the rewards that go along with that. There is also no way he would or should be at the top of the depth chart when practice starts. He would really have to earn the position. I dont think you can not play him b/c he did not come to all your summer workouts. Also, maybe you could give him a workout plan, and have him workout some on his own.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Apr 20, 2007 8:40:34 GMT -6
And ultimately detrimental to your team.....IMO I agree. The only way the kid would sit three games would be if he missed spring, summer workouts, and the first week of summer practice. I have never had to make a kid miss more than one game. If there was a kid that missed all of those events he wouldn't be on the team. What I am talking about is a kid who doesn't do spring training for whatever reason (burnout, not sure, grades, etc.) and then decides that he really wants to play. He can come back on the team, but has to miss the first game. Or a kid who missed too many workouts for whatever reason. (Baseball, basketball, lazy, not sure that he wants to play), and then decides that he wants to play. He can come out, but has to sit the first game. Or a kid who has to miss the entire first week of practice because of baseball world series or whatever. For some reason the Dixie Youth world series is always the first week of summer practice. And we usually have a team make it every other year or so. If they want to go and play, fine with me, but there has to be some kind of reward for the players who are there at practice. They practice to play the games. No practice, no play. I would agree that suspending a kid for the first three games is stupid. But hopefully we all agree that a kid that misses spring, summer workouts, and the first week of practice shouldn't even be on the team. This has been a very successful way of getting players to do spring, workouts, and practice. It also gives me an easy way to keep players that for whatever reason have missed, but want to and can help the team. By the way, the applies to all of our players. From the worst to the best and it has been applied the same to all. For instance, I had a kid whose dad made him miss spring training because of grades. He was the worst player on the team. His penalty was he had to sit the first game, but he was still allowed to be on the team. He also understood that he had to make summer workouts and practice or he was gone. One more by the way, please don't tell me that you think just letting a kid workout without the team (if he even really does it) is even close to the same as working out with the team.
|
|
|
Post by superpower on Apr 20, 2007 8:48:26 GMT -6
Unless you can require off-season participation, I don't think the kid should be punished. If he is the best player at his position once practice begins in the fall, then you have a responsibility to play him. While we may not like it, there are some kids who are just gifted athletes and they shouldn't be punished for it. I would like for all of our players to be in the weightroom all summer, but we can not require it according to the state association. Since summer workouts are voluntary, players should not be punished for not participating. I understand the desire to have him there and setting a good example, but I am not going to put him on the bench if he is the best player. That would be detrimental to the team. I tell our players at the beginning of the season that I have a responsibility to put the players on the field who will give us the best opportunity to be successful. I take that responsibility seriously.
Just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by oguru on Apr 20, 2007 9:35:19 GMT -6
I am with super poweer. You can make off season workouts mandatory. It's the OFF-SEASON. They are only mkids once so let them ahve some fun asnd play summer baseball, and basketball. At elast they are not sitting on their butts doing nothing. When i was in Higfh school I busted my ass going into my jayvee year,and went to camps the days I wasn't lifting three three day over night camps. Season comes and a kid who got hurt the year before decides to join the week after the first game. He didn't do crap all year and they end up playing him more then me. My parents are pissed b/c hey and all the other parents know the situation,and eventually get the head coach fired because of that and other {censored}. I was not the most talented kid in the world however I was told if I work hard in the off serason,and get better which i did I would be rewarded with playing time. They lied and it pissed soem people off.
|
|
|
Post by realdawg on Apr 20, 2007 10:57:21 GMT -6
Brings up a question-Is it the HC job to make people happy or to win? That is a question each district must answer.
Next question-When does a coaches responsibility change from the good of a kid who is not as talented but busted his but for you, to the good of the team, by playing the stud who is not as committed but can help the team win more?
|
|
|
Post by ajreaper on Apr 20, 2007 12:28:32 GMT -6
I see many posts seem to think missing all but a very small part of football off season workouts is fine because he's playing baseball or basketball instead but how in the heck can he not fit 6-8 hours in a week for football? I cannot possibley believe he's spending every waking hour involved with baseball- just no way in the world that's the case. And granted they are only kids once and all they also only have one shot at high school football as well. Other then being sure he's getting the sleep he needs no high school kid needs time to "relax", to sit and do nothing because he needs to unwind from a stressful day of "playing or practicing a game". My lord what will he do when it's kids need new shoes, car needs a new radiator and they just cut back your hours at work? Good god that's stress, that's I need some quiet time to shut out the day- I had to play basketball for 3 hours or I was shagging fly balls in 90 degree heat for an hour is not. My guess is he could easily work in a few hour and a half workouts into his week if it was important to him-and honestly those would help his baseball or basketball as much as his football.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Apr 22, 2007 16:23:30 GMT -6
oguru--i am a bit confused. Superpower believes that the best player should play come august, regardless of offseason work and you said you agreed with him. However, your next sentences speak about your parents (along with others) getting the coach fired for playing someone he felt was better than you, even though you worked hard in the offseason.
|
|
|
Post by ajreaper on Apr 22, 2007 17:14:00 GMT -6
LOL, that confuses me as well. In situations like this they never argue who's the better player only who did what in the summer/off season/pre-season. There is often a similar rant in that "I'm a senior I deserve to play before the junior/sophmore"- again no mention of who the better player is. If a kid can do nothing at all for months show up and beat out others, then the others cannot be very good at all.
I'll tell the seniors you've had 3 years in the program, 3 years practicing and playing, 3 years in the weight room if a sophmore can take your job after only a year in the program then you either did not work that hard, learn that well or you are simply not very good.
|
|
|
Post by jjkuenzel on Apr 22, 2007 17:41:20 GMT -6
So essentially you would be writing a kid off because he has made a commitment to another sport out of season? Just doesn't make a ton of sense to me. If he shows up in August and wins a starting spot because he hit the genetic lottery well then so be it. That is how the world works.
In the summer, every coach feels entitled to their athletes over other sports. Sometimes kids have to make a choice and sometimes they will not choose football. It doesn't make sense to penalize a kid for being a fantastic athlete who can commit to playing baseball in the summer and still have the opportunity to play football and help the team.
The summer before my sr year was the busiest summer I had ever had athletically. I played 3 sports and all three coaches expected myself and my teammates to be playing that sport in the summer. We had Legion baseball games 2 nights a week and practice one night a week, basketball league 30 miles away once a week, and a passing league one night a week. On top of that we played in a team camp and hosted our own tournament for basketball on the same weekend. We ended up playing 11 games in 3 days. I got pretty damn sick of basketball by the end of that summer and was glad I didn't have to see the coach for a while.
To say that kids can't get stressed or burned out over the summer is absolutely foolish. I've seen it happen and have experienced it myself. If the football and baseball coach had pushed us like the basketball coach did I am sure that some guys would have just hung it up.
Just because a kid doesn't make football his primary sport, does not mean that he can not or should not play. If he is a player then play him. Other kids deserve the first crack, but at the end of the day the best players should play.
FWIW, Joe Mauer (MN Twins) was an All American football and baseball player in HS as well as an all state basketball player. Basketball was not his primary sport at all, but do you think that the basketball coach penalized him because he didn't make it to every summer league game in the summer?
|
|