|
Post by austinator on Jan 3, 2013 22:27:54 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by davishfc on Jan 3, 2013 22:30:50 GMT -6
If you're on a staff, attend the sessions that will help you perform your role better within the scheme you run. If you're a defensive coach, it wouldn't hurt to attend the presentations of some offense that you know you'll have to defend. If you're not on a staff, go to whatever you want to learn about. No session could hurt you at that point.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Jan 3, 2013 22:58:31 GMT -6
decision on whether to go to nashville vs dallas vs atlanta?
or decision on which speakers to listen to?
on the first - what is your 'budget' for travel? distance, drive, gas money, etc.
on the second - what is your current role & who helps you better yourself within that role. and/or what is an area of weakness you wish to improve?
is there a scheme that you guys run that is being discussed? go there & pick up tips, drills, etc.
|
|
|
Post by austinator on Jan 3, 2013 23:17:19 GMT -6
I just finished my first season as a youth football coach but at some point in the future, I'd like to make the move to HS.Having never played organized football or coached before this season, I feel like attending many of the fundamental / technique clinics would benefit me the most with a couple of schematic ones thrown in to improve my X and O knowledge.
My decision is not necessarily which location to go to, but which speakers to listen to at the Nashville location.
I also plan to attend the Nike COY clinic in Louisville so there is an additional opportunity to hear about some schemes or techniques. I've also talked with a friend that coaches at a local college and he offered to let me come during spring practice.
|
|
|
Post by CoachDaniel on Jan 4, 2013 0:02:09 GMT -6
Glazier labels their clinics as basic/intermediate/advanced (B/I/A). If you've spent one season coaching, I'd avoid the advanced.
You might find value in sticking with one guy who's doing multiple sessions, building an entire offense or defense from the ground up for several hours. That way you'll get a concept of the whole deal, not just a few cool plays or one skill. I prefer that, if they're doing something I want to hear.
One clinic isn't enough to become an expert in everything. Consider picking a position or two. Offensive Line guys are notoriously detailed. Defensive Line guys are notoriously passionate.
Don't waste your time with the hottest coach in the clinic. Like if Nick Saban is speaking for an hour, that may be a big thrill for you, but that hour won't make you a significantly better coach. Although those guys are usually pretty motivating, so if you start hating football for some reason, stop in.
Don't feel bad about walking out. If you walk in, and find out the guy is A) completely over your head or B) completely un-preprared, walk out. You paid your money.
And you'll learn a whole lot more sitting down with your buddy at the local college. Go to practice, ask if you can sit in on meetings, watch them break down film. That's the real stuff. Glazier clinics are awesome, I'll go to several this year. But you have to learn to separate "Clinic Talk" from real football coaching.
PS I just glanced over the Nashville schedule... you can't go wrong with Pat Fox. That's my opinion, but I trust me.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on Jan 4, 2013 11:46:59 GMT -6
On deciding which speakers to see, I usually print out the schedule and go over it, scratching out anything that holds no interest to me. I really hate the fluffy ones, since I have a limited number of opportunities to go to clinics and they're a fair expense given how far I have to go, so I'm not going to spend an hour on "motivating your players." I tend to find them vacuous and I can get the same thing by buying a 50 cent Tony Robbins tape at Goodwill. I circle anything I really want to see, such as "kickout blocks by guards." I go in for the more specific talks.
Then I look at each session individually and start narrowing it down. It's a balance between going to stuff where you already know something or going to ones where it's a new experience for you. If you go to a speaker discussing something you already know a little about, go to the more specific talks, or you risk wasting your time being told what you already know. If you go to someone discussing something you are unfamiliar with, look for a broader topic, or you risk being over your head as they discuss the minutiae of something you've never seen.
If you're caught between two, go with the speaker who doesn't make sense, he's probably there for a reason.
If you plan to go see one of those multi-session speakers, which can be absolutely great, have a bail-out plan if the first session sucks. You can walk out of the session or tough it out, then find something else.
Many coaches may find I'm overthinking this, but clinics for me are far, expensive, and a pretty big hassle to get to, so I need to get something good out of it.
|
|
|
Post by davishfc on Jan 4, 2013 14:21:27 GMT -6
You might find value in sticking with one guy who's doing multiple sessions, building an entire offense or defense from the ground up for several hours. That way you'll get a concept of the whole deal, not just a few cool plays or one skill. I prefer that, if they're doing something I want to hear. I like to do this as well. The comprehensiveness of attending all three sessions is positive. Coming in after two sessions or even after the first one is not the best situation because you're behind. Don't feel bad about walking out. If you walk in, and find out the guy is A) completely over your head or B) completely un-preprared, walk out. You paid your money. True. Bail if you need to. Get to the one that will help you the most. That's my opinion, but I trust me. F-ing hilarious!
|
|
|
Post by joboo59 on Jan 4, 2013 21:31:01 GMT -6
When I was a young coach I found the most value in attending the dicussions that would provide drills. I tried to avoid speakers presenting schemes and focused on techniques. I didn't focus on the details (I would attend OLine Play in the Wing-t even though we ran I) I saw my position and went with it, there was always good stuff! This allowed me to build a series of drills I found most valuable.
That being said, scheme speakers will provide drills, however, probably not as much.
|
|
|
Post by davishfc on Jan 4, 2013 22:28:24 GMT -6
When I was a young coach I found the most value in attending the dicussions that would provide drills. I tried to avoid speakers presenting schemes and focused on techniques. I didn't focus on the details (I would attend OLine Play in the Wing-t even though we ran I) I saw my position and went with it, there was always good stuff! This allowed me to build a series of drills I found most valuable. In other words, you were trying to develop into the absolute best position group coach you could be FIRST and FOREMOST. Then you would progress from there.
|
|
|
Post by joboo59 on Jan 4, 2013 22:39:46 GMT -6
In other words, you were trying to develop into the absolute best position group coach you could be FIRST and FOREMOST. Then you would progress from there. Correct. I compiled a binder of clinic notes and quickly developed a base set of drills, most of which showed up in most every clinic speech.
|
|
|
Post by thehoodie on Jan 4, 2013 23:29:56 GMT -6
As a coach at a place where I have to do a little of everything, I try to make sure I get in some offense, defense, special teams, and S+C.
I'll also circle anything that is organization related (ie. practice planning, how to build programs, etc...)
It's always hit and miss though, you just never know until partway through whether or not it will be a good clinic talk or a bad one.
|
|
|
Post by Luther Van Dam on Jan 6, 2013 23:01:46 GMT -6
If you're caught between two, go with the speaker who doesn't make sense, he's probably there for a reason. Very interesting - never thought to do this, but makes a certain amount of sense
|
|