|
Post by coachfd on Mar 23, 2012 19:42:46 GMT -6
Just wondering what people's thoughts were about "bounty" type of incentives... i.e. - "hit sticks," big-hit awards, etc.
I don't condone what happened with the Saints. Nor do I believe that everyone should drastically over-react and completely de-physicalize the game of football.
I do think, however, that the whole situation should make us take the time to think about some of the things we do, to think about why we do some of the things we do, and to think about the impact on our young men of some of the things that we do.
Sometimes, there are "barbaric" things that we do as coaches, simply because that's what our coaches did when we were playing.
I think we can keep the beautiful intensity (& aggresiveness) of the game in-tact... But I think we also need to assess the aspects of the game that injure the integrity of the game, the spirit of the sport, and the welfare (both physical and psychological) of the young men who play the game.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 23, 2012 20:35:54 GMT -6
I don't think that bounties, paid for injuring somebody, are anything like "big hit" awards.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Mar 23, 2012 20:57:24 GMT -6
I don't think that bounties, paid for injuring somebody, are anything like "big hit" awards. Like I posted in the defensive section-- Is it really a big difference? I am not sure. Some factors: 1- The pay was a VERY small percentage of the weekly game check, and only a 10th or so of any fine they would receive if the hit was ruled illegal or was subsequently fined. These doesn't really sound like motivation to take a cheap shot, and the general consensus by FOOTBALL people discussing this is that the "ooh and ahhh" hits garnering all the prospective bounty attention were all legal, or as you state "good, hard clean hits." 2- Is the intent REALLY relevant to the actual outcome? Hitting people as hard as you can increases the likelyhood that the player will be removed from the game. Is the OUTCOME affected by the intent as long as #1 is adhered to? Legal or good, hard clean hits? Is there a huge difference between : "I want to knock him out the game" (and to do this I will hit him as hard as I can) "I want to hit him as hard as I can, as often as I can" (Knowing this will increase the chances of him being knocked out of the game) So essentially, in the NFL universe...the "bounty" was really nothing more than a trophy.... The real question I guess comes with the whole intent. So when arguing that... is there a huge divide between wanting to decrease performance (intimidation, discombobulation etc) by HIT as hard as you can to and wanting to decrease performance by having the player not perform?
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 23, 2012 21:28:59 GMT -6
There may not be that big of a difference if things go right. My sense is that the Vikings' game is where things didn't go right and may have led to this whole mess. It seems that that in that game they went over and beyond and crossed the line between physical to dirty.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Mar 24, 2012 0:02:27 GMT -6
CoachD, so if I get your point right is that if you remove the reward system, and the illegal hits then it is just a matter of semantics?
"I want him knocked out the game" (and to do this I will hit him as hard as I can)-BAD
"I want to him hit hard as often as you can" (Knowing this will increase the chances of him being knocked out of the game)-GOOD
to some extent I agree with that assertation, but I think the difference is if you reward and aim to knock an opponent out you are allowing for dirty, cheap , late hits. While if you reward hard clean hits, then you are encouraging the physical play (and thus an opponent injury is a lag meassure or side consequence).
|
|
|
Post by groundchuck on Mar 24, 2012 7:32:31 GMT -6
There is a huge difference between being violenty physical and being dirty and trying to hurt somebody.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Mar 24, 2012 9:30:05 GMT -6
There is a huge difference between being violenty physical and being dirty and trying to hurt somebody. Absolutely agree. I am simply stating that the "bounty" system orchestrated by Greg Williams (as well as by various other coaches/teams throughout the history of the league apparently) did not seem to result in "dirty" play (this according to numerous NFL players, not me) ..which would have been penalized to a much greater cost than any bounty profits.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 24, 2012 9:48:04 GMT -6
Two scenarios:
1. "We'll give a helmet sticker to the player who has the best hit of the game".
2. "We'll give a helmet sticker to the player who hits #4 the hardest".
Any difference?
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Mar 24, 2012 10:12:22 GMT -6
Two scenarios: 1. "We'll give a helmet sticker to the player who has the best hit of the game". 2. "We'll give a helmet sticker to the player who hits #4 the hardest". Any difference? So its the targeting? I can buy that. Of course, since we are arguing some tangents here, can't we state that the natural conclusion to this difference is that the bounty program is actually "less violent" because it is promoting violence directed at less people where a "hit of the week" is promoting everyone getting blasted? ;D And just for disclosure, I am not being a Saints apologist... I have taken a lot of grief at school suggesting that the coaches involved should be FIRED (I can not tolerate lying).
|
|
|
Post by outlawjoseywales on Mar 24, 2012 10:46:52 GMT -6
Very well put by 5085, as usual. You SURE you're not a lawyer? The O.P. was connecting the bounty issure to high school. While I have no experience with pro players, I do know a few jerks in the high school ranks. I personally know a coach who sent out a player to "get" a kid on the other team because this "kid" tackled the coach's son, resulting in a broken ankle to that coach's son. Didn't help the coach's son was "THE" star QB. As was witnessed by the assistant coaches and a few families, this guy "lost his cool." He later physically assaulted the "hit man" because he didn't hit "the kid" hard enough when he got the chance. Mental health might be involved here too, substitute "jerk" with "nuts." This coach was suspended the day after the game and after a investigation-was fired. I think this jerk was lucky he didn't get sued by any list of people. This would not be considered a "bounty" actually, but more of a personal vendetta. Not quit the same, but it's my only story. The world is changing, the game is changing too. We will be wise to realize that it is. How we communicate our ideas might be misunderstood by a jury. I remember, and took to heart, a 1/2 page ad. I saw in a coaching magazine from the Federation. In this ad they advised coaches to NOT use certain common coaching phrases when communicating with the media. The one phrase that I remember they said not to use was "smash mouth." While I am usually careful what I say and write, this caused me to reflect and instruct my staff on what would be wise to do. We can all go out and "howl at the moon" if we want, but what Is-Is. Things have changed, best to be smart about it. It's obvious these NFL "bounty" coaches were NOT smart, when it came to this. OJW
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 24, 2012 11:07:11 GMT -6
All of this is why our staff discussed whether to keep awarding a Hammer. We decided to keep it. It wouldn't surprise me, though, if the HC got a directive from the AD, principal, or super that told us to stop giving such "big hit" awards. If that happens we'll privately bitch in the coaches office then stop giving the sward.
If the Saints had stopped when the NFL told them to we wouldn't be having this concersation.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Mar 24, 2012 11:07:24 GMT -6
How we communicate our ideas might be misunderstood by a jury. I remember, and took to heart, a 1/2 page ad. I saw in a coaching magazine from the Federation. In this ad they advised coaches to NOT use certain common coaching phrases when communicating with the media. The one phrase that I remember they said not to use was "smash mouth." While I am usually careful what I say and write, this caused me to reflect and instruct my staff on what would be wise to do. We can all go out and "howl at the moon" if we want, but what Is-Is. Things have changed, best to be smart about it. OJW I agree 100%. I remember the AFCA as well pushing to eliminate those types of terms. OJW, I believe you are very accurate in painting the picture of how the game is viewed from the outside, and your thoughts have been supported by the evidence in this recent NFL bounty scandal. Those involved directly with the game (players, coaches, etc...) have almost universally been unfazed by this revelation, presumably for reasons already mentioned here. Those outside of the game seem to think this concept is worse than the plague, yet ironically those are the same calling for blood on Sunday afternoons.
|
|
|
Post by reddevils13 on Mar 24, 2012 14:44:41 GMT -6
I also agree. In todays world we all need to be more cognitive of the message we are sending or how it could be possibly viewed.
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Mar 24, 2012 18:42:26 GMT -6
I guess I should stop telling guys on the defense that if they knock a helmet off someone we'll buy them a milkshake, if they bring it back with a head in it that will be $50.00.....
|
|
|
Post by JVD on Mar 24, 2012 19:34:17 GMT -6
We don't give helmet stickers.... I tell my D-Line and LB's to... "Hit them so hard it makes their mom cry!" ??Is that okay? ?? ??Over the line? ? Stuff that worries us.....wierd.....
|
|
|
Post by reddevils13 on Mar 24, 2012 19:43:27 GMT -6
I would not say I "worry" about it...but am very much aware that what I say and do when it comes to safety for all players are always being evaluated and what we say, what we mean, and how it is taken can be very different.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Mar 24, 2012 20:11:13 GMT -6
We don't give helmet stickers.... I tell my D-Line and LB's to... "Hit them so hard it makes their mom cry!" ??Is that okay? ?? ??Over the line? ? Stuff that worries us.....wierd..... For now, I still think its okay to encourage hard hits. The issue is when your primary goal is to force an opponent off the field. Even if in your mind you only mean to encourage clean physical play, a player can take that to mean take him out by any means (clean or not). Its all in how you say it. Of course, with studies on concussions growing and shining new lights on things it all may change
|
|
|
Post by Coach Bennett on Mar 24, 2012 23:51:34 GMT -6
Nothing wrong with hard hits...just be sure that your practice plan clearly shows you teach proper tackling.
|
|
|
Post by dc207 on Mar 24, 2012 23:53:42 GMT -6
The day they tell us as coaches that we can't award hit of the week, or give out stickers for two sacks in a game OR four QB knockdowns, or for making 10 tackles in a game, or put big hits and collisions on our highlight reel ... etc. ... is the day I stop coaching. When it gets to that point, I'll move on.
|
|
|
Post by Wingtman on Mar 26, 2012 9:39:31 GMT -6
Why dont we just hand out flags and be done with it already?
Please understand, I say that in jest, as I am very concerned about the health of my players and yours, but thats kind of where we are headed.
We give a big hit award, and always say its for the "hardest LEGAL hit". We emphesis the LEGAL part.
How many of us in speeches, drills, or other talk about being violent? Being aggressive? This game isnt for everyone. If youve ever played, you know that day 1 your first day of pads is the healthist youre going to be all season. This is a violent game, played by violent people and when we have to stop coaching this way, teaching this way, I also will return to the world of competitve speed skating where I can coach a physical game.
|
|
|
Post by ajreaper on Mar 26, 2012 11:06:30 GMT -6
My problem is the NFL, while never stating it publically, absolutely loves the big hits because that sells tickets and gets folks to turn on their TV sets and watch. Otherwise lets just make the NFL a flag football league and see how long it lasts. Football is a physically violent game and the more physical a player is or they more punishment he can take then the better he is thought to be all else being equal. The NFL apparently does not want anyone to say or do anything that says hard phyiscal play is a virtue in the game.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Mar 26, 2012 11:16:31 GMT -6
I can see both sides of the fence here but I will always dish out "hardest hit" awards; this year's was a Tomahawk sticker.
I will always tell the kids to lay sticks on people until they don't want to carry the ball anymore. I will use the term "smash-mouth" and I will use the phrase "this game needs to be played with violence."
But, throughout all of this, the kids will be taught the proper fundamentals of tackling, shedding, blocking, etc.. They'll learn to do those things right or they won't play. They will be taught the difference between playing the game clean and being dirty.
|
|
|
Post by airman on Mar 26, 2012 18:08:02 GMT -6
I find the NFL to be joke. For instance they talk, talk about player safety but they do not require their players to wear any knee,hip,butt and thigh pads.
Imagine how much slower and how much more able the players would be to absorb hits if they wore the correct pads.
I can cut in half the number of concussions in the nfl just by making the refs throw spearing penalty flags. while I appreciate James Harrison's aggressiveness he leads with the crown of his helmet on just about every tackle. that is spearing.
another pet peeve I have is the nfl not forcing players to wear their football pants over their knees. high school kids then pull them up because they think it looks cool. My team last year got multiple penalties for this. I cured this simply by forcing them to run the bleachers after the game.
lets be honest, there r coaches who have no problem encouraging a player to hurt another player at all levels.
the masses also love violence. go back to the days of the romans and the coliseum
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 26, 2012 18:16:21 GMT -6
I find the NFL to be joke. For instance they talk, talk about player safety but they do not require their players to wear any knee,hip,butt and thigh pads. Imagine how much slower and how much more able the players would be to absorb hits if they wore the correct pads. I can cut in half the number of concussions in the nfl just by making the refs throw spearing penalty flags. while I appreciate James Harrison's aggressiveness he leads with the crown of his helmet on just about every tackle. that is spearing. another pet peeve I have is the nfl not forcing players to wear their football pants over their knees. high school kids then pull them up because they think it looks cool. My team last year got multiple penalties for this. I cured this simply by forcing them to run the bleachers after the game. lets be honest, there r coaches who have no problem encouraging a player to hurt another player at all levels. the masses also love violence. go back to the days of the romans and the coliseum I couldn't believe that Harrison complained about being fined about the hit on McCoy. I also find it almost amusing that pro players complaining that the new rules make them learn how to tackle again. {censored}! We don't teach anybody to lower his head when he tackles. Nobody in his right mind does.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Mar 26, 2012 18:18:01 GMT -6
We don't give out stickers for "hard hit" ... we give out stickers/awards for "tackles"
Tackling the ball carrier for no gain and knocking the crap out of him (while tackling him for no gain) garner the same 'award'....
Our kids hit, but it's not something we really stress, hype or anything ... we stress tackle, tackle, tackle....
just our way. more power to those that put much stock in "hardest hit" "bring the wood" awards .... we prefer to focus energies a little differently.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Mar 26, 2012 18:26:12 GMT -6
I like watching Pro Football but even as a part-owner of the Packers - it has been (as has CFB to a lesser degree) a negative influence filtering down to HS Football for decades.
I make a point to explain to parents at every opportunity that the game they see on Sundays is not the one their kids are playing.
And I never use NFL players as examples of how to play the game, even the great ones with sound techniques or fundamentals, because that would validate all the other stuff that goes on.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 26, 2012 18:29:26 GMT -6
I like watching Pro Football but even as a part-owner of the Packers - it has been (as has CFB to a lesser degree) a negative influence filtering down to HS Football for decades. I make a point to explain to parents at every opportunity that the game they see on Sundays is not the one their kids are playing. And I never use NFL players as examples of how to play the game, even the great ones with sound techniques or fundamentals, because that would validate all the other stuff that goes on. You can go back and show them old Butkus. Just good form tackles.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Mar 26, 2012 19:57:52 GMT -6
Personally I prefer Nitschke.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 26, 2012 20:15:59 GMT -6
Personally I prefer Nitschke. Me too actually.
|
|
|
Post by teachcoach on Mar 26, 2012 22:07:25 GMT -6
Most annoying phrase to me is "hit somebody". I only use the terms of blocking (I coach o-line). I explain exactly how the players need to position themselves to make the play. I talk technique until I am blue in the face. The result is hopefully kids who play hard with good technique and make great plays, that lead to wins. No need to emphasize specific individual hits.
|
|