|
Post by coachbigbri on Jan 31, 2012 10:35:51 GMT -6
Which brings me to my point, how is the 10-1 scheme modified for the youth? Good point and question. In my opinion the main difference between youth and high school, no matter the defense you are playing, is that in youth football you need to stop the sweeps, reverses, fake reverses, bootlegs, HB pass, etc more than the inside running game and off-tackle plays. You will find teams that will kill you with the off-tackle or blast/isolation and you will need to adjust, but predominately the speed to the outside is what kills in youth.....especially lower youth levels. In high school it seems that the off-tackle play and a better passing game are the things you need to defend against most. Thus the in-effectiveness of the box technique by your contain men in high school, for the most part. This is just my opinion and others may have differing opinions, but I've seen a lot of success pointing your defensive philosophies to those traits for youth and high school. In conclusion, I think boxing the contain men is better at the youth level unless they start running the off-tackle over and over again. Passes are less sophisticated and usually have only 2-3 receivers at the most, making it easier to have your free safety become a middle linebacker and then have him drop in zone coverage on passing plays because his man is less likely to come out for a pass.
|
|
|
Post by vince148 on Jan 31, 2012 11:28:37 GMT -6
THeir DEs were certainly not boxing and unfortunately, from the angle of the video, it was hard to determine if they were lined up as 6 or 9 technique. But they did hit the TE before going into the backfield.
Against a straight T/wishbone with double tight, this was their base... .................H......F......H .........................Q .............E..T..G..C..G..T..E ....C......E.....T....N.....T.....E.....C .....................B.........B
..........................$
...........................F
This is what it looked like with an I. .........................T .........................F ........W..............Q .............E..T..G..C..G..T..E ............E.....T....N.....T.....E.....C ...C................B.........B
..........$
...........................F
F was about 10 yards back. $ seemed like a rover. Against the 3 back look, it looked like he sometimes moved to the wide side of the field. With WRs, the corners seemed to play about the level of the LBers or deeper.
Anyway, I'd be interested in finding out more detail of their youth version.
|
|
|
Post by celinadefense on Feb 1, 2012 11:38:52 GMT -6
You guys need to realize that there is more to the 10-1 than just 10-1 and 10-1/Special. There is the 4 man front and 3 man front stuff where you simply blitz back into the special or 10-1.
|
|
|
Post by vince148 on Dec 29, 2012 19:58:24 GMT -6
The GAM defense is basically the 10-1 defense, but uses different terminology. The other main difference is that the GAM mirrors the offensive formation, so in an unbalanced line you don't stay in a true 10-1 formation. GA Moore invented the 10-1. Kent State used the 10-1 back in the day in college and had a lot of success with it. Jack Reed formed his GAP-8 from the 10-1 and it is pretty similar, but designed for the lower youth levels. He later changed the GAP-8 to be called the Gap-Air-Mirror, but it was just a terminology change. The actual defense stayed the same. I know this is an old thread, but any idea who the Kent State coach was who ran this?
|
|
|
Post by jackz on Feb 18, 2013 1:46:19 GMT -6
Trevor Rees.
|
|
|
Post by coachschro on Feb 19, 2013 21:23:30 GMT -6
I went to the Glazier clinic this weekend in Texas and listened to a coach from Celina speak. He did a good job and talked some 10-1 defense...
|
|