|
|
Post by paulsonj72 on Sept 24, 2011 3:32:43 GMT -6
For those of you who run offenses based on the passing game would you take these numbers for your QB in a game.
25-39-523-7-0. And all the TD passes and yards were needed as you won 56-49
|
|
|
|
Post by Defcord on Sept 24, 2011 6:52:24 GMT -6
I will take any numers that give us the win. We had one game this year where our starting QB was 1-19 with 2 pics and no touchdowns but we won and one game when he was 15 for 24 with 1 TD no pics and we lost. I want the first game.
|
|
|
|
Post by airraider on Sept 24, 2011 7:27:48 GMT -6
No, those are terrible numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by lochness on Sept 24, 2011 7:36:42 GMT -6
"Yay! My passing offense is awesome! Affirm it for me!"
|
|
|
|
Post by dsqa on Sept 24, 2011 9:33:56 GMT -6
Just coachin' thoughts here..congrats on the big night for sure...good win, but as the coach, I'm not sure why the bigger numbers matter...it simply highlights your need for more work on defense and running the ball...don't get me wrong, I love big numbers for the QB, but the bigger indicator is percentage of completions 64%...is good, not awesome. As this QBs coach, I would revisit the 14 misses...affirm his good fortune in the other team's horrific secondary play...and break down each completion decision on it's own merit... We gotta play next week:-)
|
|
|
|
Post by pvogel on Sept 24, 2011 11:13:07 GMT -6
stats dont matter. and dont always tell the tale.
maybe he threw to a receiver with 3 dbs on him. dbs fall on each other, wr catches it after it bounces off the defenders head for a 90 yd td. maybe they forgot to put their corners on the field. maybe you made a killing off of bubble screen or tunnel screen.
point is, the stats dont matter. those stats have some gaudy numbers but why do you need affirmation? it appears to most as if youre just showing off or seeking some sort of pat on the butt. like slack said- look at the decisions made. not the stats. sometimes you can have a qood qb nut poor wrs. sometimes its the other way around. but we cant tell you what the hells goin on just by seeing the stats.
|
|
|
|
Post by airman on Sept 24, 2011 12:22:17 GMT -6
all the matters is you have one more point then the other team when the buzzer sounds.
a 60 perecent completion percentage could be higher but yards per attempt is awesome. 13.5 yds per attempt is big time. my goal is 8.5 yds per attempt for a kid.
|
|
|
|
Post by airman on Sept 24, 2011 12:29:59 GMT -6
there as a kid in illinois named britt davis. he qb the noback offesne at riverside brookfield in 2003 he had two 500 yd passing games in a 3 week span. he got hurt and his backup came in an threw for 400 some yards. the next seson the backup had a 500 yd game.
riverside brookfield il has several of the top passing games in illinois. their best game was tim barsic at 589 vs joliet catholic. think the score was 54-51 and RB dropped a td pass in the end zone iwth a few seconds left to play.
|
|
|
|
Post by airman on Sept 24, 2011 12:34:57 GMT -6
in 2002 at a small school in the SW corner of Wi a kid was 44 of 70 for 612 yds and 5 tds.
|
|
|
|
Post by spreadattack on Sept 24, 2011 12:42:35 GMT -6
Kid in Kentucky who starts for Troy now (was a walk-on, had no offers), threw 91 TD passes his senior year. smartfootball.com/grab-bag/smart-notes-packaging-offensive-concepts-holgorsen-airraid-lineage-links-12202010But I agree. Who cares? The big passing stats in a close win mean that, while your passing offense isn't bad, as you have lots to work on on D and in the run game. If your guy throws for 500 yards and 5 TDs with no picks, I would think you'd win by 20+. Tough way to make a living, relying on a QB to put up those kinds of numbers every week. |
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Sept 27, 2011 18:54:09 GMT -6
I will take any numers that give us the win. We had one game this year where our starting QB was 1-19 with 2 pics and no touchdowns but we won WOW. 5.3% completion percentage and you won. That might be the lowest non 0% completion percentage for a victory ever. |
|
|
|
Post by coachschro on Sept 27, 2011 20:57:38 GMT -6
|
|
