|
Post by bobgoodman on Dec 22, 2010 21:48:30 GMT -6
In another thread, I followed hound's link to the Central Cal. Coast Youth Football regs. They're strikingly badly written, including this whopper: The Bantam, Junior, Intermediate, and Senior divisions shall play four (4) ten (10) minute quarters with a maximum of ten (10) minutes allowed between halves, including a compulsory three (3) minute warm up. The clock will be a stopped clock. Guess that game's going to take a while, huh? The only guess I have as to what they really meant was the opposite of a stopped clock, i.e. a running clock. I could bring up more, but enough with the yuks, this is what I really wanted to discuss: No player may have player-to-player contact until he has participated in pre-season conditioning practice a minimum of five (5) practices. (10 hours of conditioning) Is this common? What is the rationale for barring contact drills until the player has completed a certain amount of conditioning practice?
|
|
|
Post by los on Dec 22, 2010 22:30:43 GMT -6
Never heard of this one Bob....I could only guess it has something to do with their insurance? Maybe during this conditioning week, they learn some of the safety rules and how to safely "make contact", before the actual hitting starts?.....which is actually a great idea....just written a little hard to understand.....but heck, you should have seen the registration form we had.....one of the coach's was a local lawyer and he wrote it up.......it was some serious legalese, complete with all the forthwith's......whereas's.....party of the 1st and 2nd parts....I had 3 sons play in the league over the years and when I read it ,I was like.....DUH!!!....WHAT?....I can't imagine what the other parents thought about it or if they even understood it.....I think they probably did like me....looked at the cost per kid and signed it, lol.
|
|
tate
Freshmen Member
Posts: 43
|
Post by tate on Dec 22, 2010 23:51:03 GMT -6
Bob in our federation the conditioning rule is worse than the one you posted, the crybabies(lawyers) have even added some BS about if a kid misses so many days (hours) of full contact practice he has to go back and redo his conditioning hours all over before you can let him back in a practice with contact, our rules are so dumb that a kid can not even have contact with a dummy or do sled work without his conditioning hours, this is what happens when lawyers rule the world along with insurance co. Jon
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Dec 23, 2010 11:24:59 GMT -6
It's very common here in Arizona at the youth and high school levels. It has to do with heat acclimation, its a lot hotter inside pads than without. Kids are used to being inside in the AC, their bodies need to adjust to being outside in the heat. Our first 2 practices are helmets only, then uppers & helmets 3 days, the following week we can go full pads with contact. In half pads, its a good time to teach thud form tackling so kids aren't tempted to dive through legs, also a good time to get work in on special teams. IMO its no big deal since there are plenty of things to go over before we get to the full contact stuff, heck, most of the kids we get don't even know how to put their pads in their pants on the first day anyway.
|
|
|
Post by mahonz on Dec 23, 2010 14:22:37 GMT -6
Bob
I think what they meant is take 7 minutes for your halftime regiment and then 3 minutes of warm up prior to the second half KO. Not sure why they addressed the clock?
Most youth orgs write their own rules so some read as if written by a Kindergartner.
Mandatory conditioning periods are fairly common. Typically it has nothing to do with insurance. I checked. Ours mirror the HS format, which is two practice sessions out of pads after August 1st. Don’t know why that is the way it is but that’s what our youth league follows. Maybe insurance?
I too coached in Phoenix about 10 years ago. Its all about the heat for sure and something you don’t mess around with.
Coach Mike
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Dec 23, 2010 15:01:03 GMT -6
"Insurance" is the big excuse many use for almost anything Rarely is that the case Ive used insurance from 3 different large companies in youth football- NONE of them have mandated conditioning as a requirements Blame it on the Ins company rather than explain why
We arent in Arizona- but we do see 90+ degree days often with humidity above 60% We havent conditioned in the last 15 seasons- dont beleive in it- wont waste the time on it We "condition" as part of the pace of learning how to play football We may "hide" a little conditioning into some of the football things we do- but havent done a wind sprint or even agility drill for last 15 seasons- and weve done really well- dont run out of gas, retain a lot of kids, win a lot of games etc
Boystown- yes that Boystown in second largest class in state- always in State title hunt- doesnt condition either
Maybe if you are in the middle of he desert, but not sure it's a must anywhere else
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Dec 23, 2010 18:12:57 GMT -6
Central Calif. coast shouldn't be too steamy, but that's not the point. You can't condition yourself effectively in that short a time anyway. Those 5 practices could occur over as little as a week, from what I've read by one Calif. youth football coach. Reminds me of The Forever War by Joe Haldeman, in which "typical Army half logic" was illustrated by having soldiers sent to the Arctic to condition themselves for maneuvers on a moon of Pluto, where they'd be comfortable in space suits and instantly dead outside them.
You can get a little short term conditioning as an adult if you spend half an hour to an hour a day on it 5-6 days a week with sprints and other runs for 6 weeks. I know because I did it 20+ yrs. ago. If you could do this with children and the time for it were absolutely free, i.e. taking nothing away from the rest of practice, I predict it would improve your team's performance in their opening game less than the improvement you'd get by practicing a few minutes a couple of times holding a stance to avoid a false start or illegal motion or shift. And then to maintain that conditioning, they'd have to keep up those sprints on that schedule until 2 or maybe 3 weeks before their final game. And that's only if children would benefit physiologically from it as much as an adult, which I have some doubt about.
Not only that, but you can do some contact work -- dare I mention it -- without pads. If your practice starts before the players obtain gear, you can still do sumo drills, and you can walk thru steps that end in contact to show them what body parts are to be aimed at which other body parts. So there goes that excuse for keeping them from contact before conditioning.
|
|
|
Post by los on Dec 23, 2010 20:33:42 GMT -6
Hadn't thought about that JH......like Dave said, we're used to humid type heat, not 115 degree heat,lol.....most of the kids that played youth football here had just finished baseball in July sometime, so they weren't exactly chillin in the AC all summer, lol.....plus, we did the same kinda thing.........first couple days were just shorts/tee shirts......not even a helmet.....we didn't call it "conditioning" though.....that was our "county fair" or "stations" drills week, part of it without equipment, part of it with full equipment.
|
|
hounds
Freshmen Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by hounds on Dec 25, 2010 10:35:05 GMT -6
The mandatory 3 min warm up after half time is right out of the NFHS 2010 rulebook,page 39,rule 3-2,table 3-1...Didn't know you guys were into laughing at High School rules...As for the heat, Aug.in Atascadero/Paso Robles area is normally in the 90's to low 100's,everyday...We do put them in helmets from the 1st day,but it's true we require 10 hrs of conditioning,(helmet only), before giving players the rest of their equipment...We do a lot of clinic type stuff,not just conditioning...I use some stuff from Coach Cisar,(Towel drill,and Deer Hunter),and from Coach Wyatt's,"Practice Without Pads",It's 5 days...It has nothing to do with Insurance,it's what we've always done...I also checked the CIF Southern Section rules and they require 3 days in helmets only before the 1st fall practice...Our games are usually about 2 hrs...All youth rulebooks are different,heck,I've seen leagues with weight limits as low as 165lbs for 8th graders,now there's something to laugh at...If you guys want,you can post the links to your youth league rules,so I can compare...Maybe I can find something to help in ours...Rule changes are in January... Kurt
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Dec 25, 2010 11:11:44 GMT -6
The mandatory 3 min warm up after half time is right out of the NFHS 2010 rulebook,page 39,rule 3-2,table 3-1...Didn't know you guys were into laughing at High School rules. Does Fed say "The clock will be a stopped clock"? That's what we were making fun of -- and that I was puzzling over.
|
|
hounds
Freshmen Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by hounds on Dec 25, 2010 11:29:41 GMT -6
No it says,"a three minute warm-up period posted on the clock and the clock will be started for use by the coaches immediately after the halftime intermission expires",what we mean by "stopped clock" goes back to the 1st part about 10 min qtrs meaning no running clock like some youth leagues have due to time constraints...
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Dec 25, 2010 11:51:06 GMT -6
No it says,"a three minute warm-up period posted on the clock and the clock will be started for use by the coaches immediately after the halftime intermission expires",what we mean by "stopped clock" goes back to the 1st part about 10 min qtrs meaning no running clock like some youth leagues have due to time constraints... Then it's even worse writing than I thought! First of all, it's pretty dumb to call that "a stopped clock", because obviously you can't time anything with a stopped clock; it would take literally forever. Second, they already had a place in the regs that said they played by Federation rules except where otherwise specified, so there's no reason to refer to the timing method at all; all they could do would be to confuse the issue because it looks like they're specifying a deviation from Fed rules, when what they meant to say is that they're not deviating from them in the case of timing. That's not the only place the regs had unnecessary language. They had a terminology section that went into quite a bit of detail as to what constituted a practice session, but then in the rules regulating practice time they repeated things that were already in that definition, plus some. I've seen that sort of mistake in rules writing by other organiz'ns, so it's not like you're alone there. But reaching for the word "exponent" -- that was committee writing genius. I was afraid it was going to be some complicated math formula!
|
|
hounds
Freshmen Member
Posts: 17
|
Post by hounds on Dec 25, 2010 15:33:25 GMT -6
I agree there is a lot that is not necessary in our rules,I think it's due to changes in board members,and rules being added without taking out old ones that don't apply...CCYFL goes back to 1971,I've been involved since 1999,and when I submit a rule change proposal I go through the book to eliminate any repeats or confusing language pertaining to that subject...Does your organization have a rulebook? I'd like to see it,maybe get some ideas from it...
|
|
|
Post by 33coach on Dec 25, 2010 16:38:53 GMT -6
No it says,"a three minute warm-up period posted on the clock and the clock will be started for use by the coaches immediately after the halftime intermission expires",what we mean by "stopped clock" goes back to the 1st part about 10 min qtrs meaning no running clock like some youth leagues have due to time constraints... Then it's even worse writing than I thought! First of all, it's pretty dumb to call that "a stopped clock", because obviously you can't time anything with a stopped clock; it would take literally forever. Second, they already had a place in the regs that said they played by Federation rules except where otherwise specified, so there's no reason to refer to the timing method at all; all they could do would be to confuse the issue because it looks like they're specifying a deviation from Fed rules, when what they meant to say is that they're not deviating from them in the case of timing. That's not the only place the regs had unnecessary language. They had a terminology section that went into quite a bit of detail as to what constituted a practice session, but then in the rules regulating practice time they repeated things that were already in that definition, plus some. I've seen that sort of mistake in rules writing by other organiz'ns, so it's not like you're alone there. But reaching for the word "exponent" -- that was committee writing genius. I was afraid it was going to be some complicated math formula! coach, i noticed you have not produced a rulebook or shown a system for splitting kids...what do you do? also, the definition of exponent: in mathematics, a number or symbol that indicates the number of times an expression is used as a factor. IE. X^2, x is used twice as a factor.... notice the divisions and the max number: bantams < 12 juniors < 24 intermediates < 36 seniors > 36. is that not exponentialgrowth??? it seems that is the perfect word to use...though if any mathematics professor wants to debate that...im all ears. im not partial to the subject, i just see inconsistencies in logic and argument.
|
|
|
Post by los on Dec 25, 2010 19:15:08 GMT -6
I'm not sure what you just said 33coach.......but I feel like I just learned "something", lol
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on Dec 25, 2010 20:50:18 GMT -6
12, 24, 36, 36 isn't exponential growth, not so far as I'm aware. Anyhow, are rules are the opposite of legalese. We have no limits on conditioning or practice time or contact, and I have no idea how long our games are supposed to be (we have 3 different rules covering it, all contradict) I'm sure if someone were being a twit we'd sort it out quickly, it's a small league and we handle things pretty informally.
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Dec 25, 2010 21:50:28 GMT -6
Does your organization have a rulebook? I'd like to see it,maybe get some ideas from it... If it does, I haven't seen it. I think somebody said they used to have some material online that was taken offline when they moved to eteamz. It seems few people these days know how to convey factual material in writing. I struggled reading my college students' papers, and they were mostly adults returning to school. I put this up -- users.bestweb.net/~robgood/teach/term paper tips.html -- to help them. Don't laugh at how "duh" some of the instructions are; I frequently got homeworks, tests, even term papers with no student's name on them, for instance. But even over the years I was teaching, writing deteriorated to the point students completely lost confidence in their ability to write, and plagiarism took over. So I stopped assigning such writings and switched to oral presentations. When it comes to football, the worst technical writing I ever saw was the first rule book the Independent Women's Football League wrote. Most minor leagues don't write their own rules but just refer to those of a major governing body and specify certain exceptions; the IWFL did likewise until, apparently as a prestige thing (maybe competition with the WPFL, who got the USFA to write rules for them), they decided to produce their own rule book. Nobody could possibly officiate based on it. Anything you could imagine that would make it bad was there. I heard the second one they produced was a lot better. It should be relatively easy to come up with rules & regulations (although maybe not bylaws) for an organiz'n like the Warriors, because our competition was very controlled. All practice sessions in a division (class) were held in the same place at the same time, with no outside practices allowed, so rules weren't necessary to control them. I guess even there some rulings were needed, as when we were allowed another practice session on weeks when we had a bye. Players were drafted, so the administrators could be flexible about division eligibility. Even there, though, there were rules about retention of players and other exceptions drafting them as individuals, and this year one team lost their 1st round draft pick as a penalty for having a ringer the year before. The rules must give the administrators a lot of leeway, because they have to decide on the basis of registration and eligibility how many teams to form that season, which can result, as it did this year in our division, in a team's being disbanded. Plus, the administrators assign the assistant coaches to teams. Dictating a lot like that from on high wouldn't work for, say, the Big Apple Youth Football League (AYF affiliate), which was a circuit the club where I coached in 2007 had entries in. OTOH, the club where I abortively coached in 2008 was going to form their own league, so maybe they could get away with that sort of thing -- for a while!
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Dec 25, 2010 21:54:31 GMT -6
i noticed you have not produced a rulebook or shown a system for splitting kids...what do you do? You mean dividing them between teams? Well, if it's just 2 teams, a mid-saggital section by a saw-toothed blade ought to do it. 3 or more teams, then it gets complicated to parcel out the choice cuts.
|
|