|
Post by phantom on Jul 2, 2010 14:46:08 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by bigdog2003 on Jul 2, 2010 15:22:05 GMT -6
We had a school here in SC put pads on a few days early 3 years ago. They were the defending state champs, but had a first year coach. They happened to do it on a day the state newspaper was coming to do their preseason report on them. Soon as the HSL saw the pictures, it was over. Postseason ban for a team that went 10-0.
|
|
|
Post by airman on Jul 2, 2010 15:38:45 GMT -6
in wisconsin you get caught violating out of season rules it is automatic termination of the coach. no probation, no suspension. you are done and good luck getting a job for a while.
|
|
|
Post by leighty on Jul 2, 2010 16:24:10 GMT -6
I'd like to know what exactly the team was doing.
|
|
coachriley
Junior Member
"Tough times don't last; Tough people do."
Posts: 406
|
Post by coachriley on Jul 2, 2010 16:51:39 GMT -6
I'd like to know what exactly the team was doing. Yeah I am with you here, what would they have had to do to get a ban like that. I understand rules are rules, but it must have been something pretty major.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 2, 2010 17:02:10 GMT -6
I'd like to know what exactly the team was doing. "Pulaski County High School's football program was penalized by the Virginia High School League on Thursday with a one-year postseason ban, a $1,000 fine and other sanctions for violating the VHSL's out-of-season practice rule." "Extensive coaching and sport-specific instruction were prevalent."" "Pulaski County's violations occurred more than once over an extended period of time." "coaches from at least three schools on Pulaski County's schedule -- Christiansburg, Hidden Valley and Northside -- said their schools received a DVD recording from an anonymous source which showed a Pulaski County football workout inside the school's field house." "violated Section 27-8-1 of the VHSL Handbook, which stipulates that "a member school is permitted to organize and supervise conditioning programs to include weight lifting, running and exercising as long as the program is general in nature and includes only exercises designed to promote physical fitness. No school may issue equipment designed for a specific sport for this type of program. These conditioning programs must be open to all members of the student body."" -------------------------------- Sounds like they were running practices, which apparently is against the rules.
|
|
|
Post by leighty on Jul 2, 2010 17:26:53 GMT -6
The article said the video was from inside the field house, so I don't know how much "practice" was going on. If they got hammered for doing football-specific agility drills or something of that nature, then not only is the penalty too harsh, but the coaches and ADs in Virginia need to look into getting the rules changed.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 2, 2010 17:51:39 GMT -6
The article said the video was from inside the field house, so I don't know how much "practice" was going on. If they got hammered for doing football-specific agility drills or something of that nature, then not only is the penalty too harsh, Disagree. The rules seem pretty clear. Agree here, but only because that is the culture from which I come (pretty open during summer here in Louisiana)
|
|
|
Post by lilbuck1103 on Jul 2, 2010 18:43:47 GMT -6
In response to airman... In Wisconsin that is not necessarily true. I remember a few instances where school districts have been penalized and the coach not terminated. It may be in a particular school's contract, but I do not believe it is mandated throughout the state.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 2, 2010 18:49:16 GMT -6
I don't know what they did but I've been coaching in Virginia for over 30 years and I've never seen a penalty that harsh. The coach has resigned, BTW.
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Jul 2, 2010 20:05:33 GMT -6
Amazing to read a story like that the day after we had our first summer workout with the team. In helmets and shoulder pads, our state just ok'ed shoulder pads for workouts we have been able to wear helmets in the summer for a number of years and no rules about contact with the players in the offseason.
|
|
|
Post by hsrose on Jul 3, 2010 8:22:39 GMT -6
One of the teams in our area is known for having "technique nights" (Jan- April) where the OL & DL are taught specific techniques as well as play assignments and adjustments. On Saturdays they would have gatherings in the gym and run through plays. By the time they got to the spring ball in May they had they offense and defense in, repped, depth chart pretty well set, and used spring ball to go over the details of the passing game.
I have not personally seen this but I have spoken with players, who are now coaches, that said this has gone on at the school as long as they can remember. A coach I know described the workouts they were doing this off-season and it was a practice - balls, receivers being thrown to, QB's taking drops, speed training, coaches working on footwork and technique.
The old-time coach that started all this is reported to have said "What are they (the league and section officials) going to do, put a letter in my folder at their office? I'm not going anywhere, what do I care?"
If cheating would't fly in the classroom, why would I do that with a sports team?
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Jul 3, 2010 9:05:02 GMT -6
I agree that this was a harsh punishment, but if you've got set rules, you need to follow them.
The problem I have seen is football programs basically forcing their kids to specialize if they want ti play. I have seen programs that try and run their spring ball after school, during track practices and then wonder why the community gets pissed off. They don't work with other schedules for their weight training either; they have summer conditioning times that take occur during baseball practice. And, again, it turns into a p-ssing match.
I have also been on the flip side of it; basketball coaches that only run their fall open gyms after school and try and force the kids to pick between football and basketball.
Here in MT, everything is pretty open; some teams don't have a football specific football period, but they have the option of setting it up. For what ever reason, they can't manage to get the administration or the PE department on board, even when it's an easy sell. We can do ALOT in the summer, as soon as the school year is over. During the school year, throwing sessions are totally kosher, anytime, you just can't throw pads on.
Now, this is the way I think that every state needs to be with football; you can run an athletic period, you can run stuff in the school year, as long as there are no pads on. And, when the school year is over, you can throw the pads on. The teams that can get the kids to buy into it without screwing around with other sports will be successful, as long as they don't over do it. The coaches that don't work with other coaches and sports will pay for it; people are going to be angry and the kids don't want to have to pick between football and the other sports.
Just have to pay attention to the 'voluntary workouts'; can't force the kids to come, but you don't have to play them either.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 3, 2010 9:28:39 GMT -6
Here's another story: www.southwesttimes.com/news.php?id=4884What I find interesting is that near the bottom of the story they say that the DVD of the illegal practice was confiscated out of the coaches' office and sent to other schools. So, they filmed themselves cheating?
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Jul 3, 2010 10:05:05 GMT -6
I have also been on the flip side of it; basketball coaches that only run their fall open gyms after school and try and force the kids to pick between football and basketball.
Our basketball coach does this, year round. If kids don't play summer "CLUB" ball on his team, then he'll cut them during the season. It's illegal here for coaches to do this but they do it anyway. It pi$$es me off but the AD won't do anything about it since they are buddies. We tell our Football players that we expect them to play 2 or 3 sports, all of the other programs in the school are on board with this except the basketball team. IMO specialization is another word for selfish coaches who don't care about their kids. We have about 7 kids on the basketball team who, if they came out for football and track, would boost the talent WAY up. There are two kids on the BB team that potentially could be DI defensive backs but as 5'10 basketball players, they won't sniff a college offer other than from a mediocre JUCO nearby. They have a couple of 6'5 kids that are good athletes but only average about 6ppg in Basketball which isn't going to take them anywhere. They'd make good WR's or High Jumpers but won't come out because they fear being cut from basketball. It's a bunch of BS.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Jul 3, 2010 10:09:06 GMT -6
I have also been on the flip side of it; basketball coaches that only run their fall open gyms after school and try and force the kids to pick between football and basketball. Our basketball coach does this, year round. If kids don't play summer "CLUB" ball on his team, then he'll cut them during the season. It's illegal here for coaches to do this but they do it anyway. It pi$$es me off but the AD won't do anything about it since they are buddies. We tell our Football players that we expect them to play 2 or 3 sports, all of the other programs in the school are on board with this except the basketball team. IMO specialization is another word for selfish coaches who don't care about their kids. We have about 7 kids on the basketball team who, if they came out for football and track, would boost the talent WAY up. There are two kids on the BB team that potentially could be DI defensive backs but as 5'10 basketball players, they won't sniff a college offer other than from a mediocre JUCO nearby. They have a couple of 6'5 kids that are good athletes but only average about 6ppg in Basketball which isn't going to take them anywhere. They'd make good WR's or High Jumpers but won't come out because they fear being cut from basketball. It's a bunch of BS. Yup; it's always funny how football is always under the microscope. Nine times out of ten, football takes the hit for things that other sports get away with. If, we as football coaches, ever told a kid that he had to come to weight training after school and ditch another sport, our a--es would be in a sling.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 3, 2010 10:50:28 GMT -6
Here's another story: www.southwesttimes.com/news.php?id=4884What I find interesting is that near the bottom of the story they say that the DVD of the illegal practice was confiscated out of the coaches' office and sent to other schools. So, they filmed themselves cheating? This seems to point more towards the fact that the workout was not a general fitness workout for all students...which I believe is the underlying principle of the violation correct?
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 3, 2010 11:07:37 GMT -6
Here's another story: www.southwesttimes.com/news.php?id=4884What I find interesting is that near the bottom of the story they say that the DVD of the illegal practice was confiscated out of the coaches' office and sent to other schools. So, they filmed themselves cheating? This seems to point more towards the fact that the workout was not a general fitness workout for all students...which I believe is the underlying principle of the violation correct? Correct. To get this kind of penalty it would have needed to be pretty over the top by Virginia standards. I can't believe that they filmed it. Didn't they learn anything from Nixon? See what happens when you don't pay attention in History? It also probably means that whoever turned them in was from their school. My knee-jerk reaction would be to suspect the basketball coach.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jul 3, 2010 11:15:48 GMT -6
This seems to point more towards the fact that the workout was not a general fitness workout for all students...which I believe is the underlying principle of the violation correct? Correct. To get this kind of penalty it would have needed to be pretty over the top by Virginia standards. I can't believe that they filmed it. Didn't they learn anything from Nixon? See what happens when you don't pay attention in History? It also probably means that whoever turned them in was from their school. My knee-jerk reaction would be to suspect the basketball coach. Do you know anything about the layout of the building? Is it possible to have an actual skell or team session?
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 3, 2010 11:20:06 GMT -6
Correct. To get this kind of penalty it would have needed to be pretty over the top by Virginia standards. I can't believe that they filmed it. Didn't they learn anything from Nixon? See what happens when you don't pay attention in History? It also probably means that whoever turned them in was from their school. My knee-jerk reaction would be to suspect the basketball coach. Do you know anything about the layout of the building? Is it possible to have an actual skell or team session? I haven't seen the place but we've run full practices (in-season due to bad weather) in the gym before so it can be done.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Jul 3, 2010 11:23:15 GMT -6
Here's another story: www.southwesttimes.com/news.php?id=4884What I find interesting is that near the bottom of the story they say that the DVD of the illegal practice was confiscated out of the coaches' office and sent to other schools. So, they filmed themselves cheating? This seems to point more towards the fact that the workout was not a general fitness workout for all students...which I believe is the underlying principle of the violation correct? Exactly, if the state rules stipulate that the workouts need to consistent of specific conditioning, not football related activities, then that's what you need to follow. If you've gotten nailed for it before, then you'd better learn from it and not do it again. There is a program in our conference that has broken the one simple rule several times; NO PADS UNTIL AFTER SCHOOL ENDS. Their HC's job is on the line because of it. You can't blame anyone but yourself for putting your head on the chopping block and being surprised when someone take it off.
|
|
|
Post by champ93 on Jul 3, 2010 11:26:45 GMT -6
This seems to point more towards the fact that the workout was not a general fitness workout for all students...which I believe is the underlying principle of the violation correct? Correct. To get this kind of penalty it would have needed to be pretty over the top by Virginia standards. I can't believe that they filmed it. Didn't they learn anything from Nixon? See what happens when you don't pay attention in History? It also probably means that whoever turned them in was from their school. My knee-jerk reaction would be to suspect the basketball coach. Or the soccer coach/jealous soccer parent, as I've seen in my area.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 3, 2010 11:55:12 GMT -6
Correct. To get this kind of penalty it would have needed to be pretty over the top by Virginia standards. I can't believe that they filmed it. Didn't they learn anything from Nixon? See what happens when you don't pay attention in History? It also probably means that whoever turned them in was from their school. My knee-jerk reaction would be to suspect the basketball coach. Or the soccer coach/jealous soccer parent, as I've seen in my area. Soccer's a spring sport here so there isn't much conflict between the two sports.
|
|
|
Post by cnunley on Jul 3, 2010 12:05:54 GMT -6
I am located near Pulaski County and have heard plenty of rumors that typically sprout up after a situation like this.
The odd part that I read about it all (which I can not find the article to post) was the VHSL had ruled on the matter several days ago and aloud PCHS to appeal the ruling to the powers that be. After their sit down the punishment was RAISED. One noted raise was the $1,000 fine was orginially $200.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jul 3, 2010 12:28:24 GMT -6
I am located near Pulaski County and have heard plenty of rumors that typically sprout up after a situation like this. The odd part that I read about it all (which I can not find the article to post) was the VHSL had ruled on the matter several days ago and aloud PCHS to appeal the ruling to the powers that be. After their sit down the punishment was RAISED. One noted raise was the $1,000 fine was orginially $200. Yeah, losing scrimmages and five practice days was a pretty serious boot in the butt too.
|
|