|
Post by phantom on Jun 18, 2010 9:49:16 GMT -6
Here's an article from the National Football Post: www.nationalfootballpost.com/Has-the-OTA-practice-gone-too-far-in-the-NFL.htmlIt's about the NFL teams that were penalized for overdoing their offseason practices (OTAs). The article led me to think of the things that we demand of our high school kids: expanded S&C programs; 7-on-7s; team camps; formal practices all summer (where it's legal and sometimes where it's not); fundraising; are examples. All of these are good things but I sometimes wonder if we don't sometimes overdo it. Is there a point of diminishing returns? I'm not interested in talking about the actual subject matter of the article. That's a pro issue and this is not a fan site. If it gets to the point where we're criticing the teams or players or NFL I will delete the post. That is NOT the point. I'm trying to relate the pro issue with HS football.
|
|
|
Post by leighty on Jun 18, 2010 10:07:07 GMT -6
I absolutely believe there's a point of diminishing returns. Where it is, I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Jun 18, 2010 10:20:42 GMT -6
one of the 'issues' becomes that if you don't do something, then (your kids) will do something else.
out of sight out of mind. I can totally see kids getting burned out, but we really don't let kids 'be kids' like it used to be, so if WE aren't doing something with them, then basketball, church groups, baseball, bowling, golf, wrestling, track, etc will be engaging them with something to do to stimulate them.
|
|
|
Post by culverqb12 on Jun 18, 2010 10:26:23 GMT -6
one of the 'issues' becomes that if you don't do something, then (your kids) will do something else. out of sight out of mind. I can totally see kids getting burned out, but we really don't let kids 'be kids' like it used to be, so if WE aren't doing something with them, then basketball, church groups, baseball, bowling, golf, wrestling, track, etc will be engaging them with something to do to stimulate them. Couldn't agree more. There are so many activities out there for kids these days that if you aren't doing something football-related nearly every day, you're going to lose football players to other things.
|
|
|
Post by mattharris75 on Jun 18, 2010 10:27:36 GMT -6
Certainly there is a point of diminishing returns. We don't do all of those things you mention. No team camp, maybe 1 or 2 7 on 7's over the summer at the most, no fundraising. However we do have summer practices (They are neither as formal or as intense as in-season practices) and we work out year round.
The most important of any of these outside of the season activities is the weight room. And I think that the weight room is important for a variety of reasons. It teaches the kids about delayed gratification, doing things they don't like in order to succeed at something they do like, etc, etc. So while all the other extraneous stuff may not be that important, at least some of it is necessary not only to win, but to teach kids lessons that most other sports don't. A school may be very successful in basketball or baseball without much of a weight program, but it's highly unlikely in football.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jun 18, 2010 10:36:51 GMT -6
Certainly there is a point of diminishing returns. We don't do all of those things you mention. No team camp, maybe 1 or 2 7 on 7's over the summer at the most, no fundraising. However we do have summer practices (They are neither as formal or as intense as in-season practices) and we work out year round. The most important of any of these outside of the season activities is the weight room. And I think that the weight room is important for a variety of reasons. It teaches the kids about delayed gratification, doing things they don't like in order to succeed at something they do like, etc, etc. So while all the other extraneous stuff may not be that important, at least some of it is necessary not only to win, but to teach kids lessons that most other sports don't. A school may be very successful in basketball or baseball without much of a weight program, but it's highly unlikely in football. This is one of my concerns- that we get so wrapped up in "frills" that the essentials like the weight room get left behind sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by leighty on Jun 18, 2010 10:37:21 GMT -6
one of the 'issues' becomes that if you don't do something, then (your kids) will do something else. I agree with this, and in our case, that something was robbing a Pizza Hut at gunpoint. Historically, we've had our kids lift, run and then do 7-on-7 for the skill guys and footwork, play install etc for the linemen. They're there 2.5 hours tops. We do that three days a week. We typically throw against one or two other teams once a week, and we're at some 7-on-7 tourney anywhere from 4-6 Saturdays during the summer. I never understood having your team there 4 hours a day to lift and run and then have a formal practice afterwards. Seems like a kid could get burnt out pretty quickly that way.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Jun 18, 2010 10:46:26 GMT -6
We have our kids three days a week. Lift for 45mins to an hour, and then 45 minutes of field work on 2 of the 3 days. Go to 5 7on7s. Two of which occur on lifting days after we lift. Run 2 camps- A 4 night for 2 hours one in the first week of June and a 6 night one the last couple weeks in July.
Kids are off every Tuesday, Friday, Sat & Sun save two Tues and two Sats. I try to give our kids as much down time as possible. Mostly because they won't get it in the season, plus I think kids should still have some "vacation" left in Summer Vacation.
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Jun 18, 2010 11:53:03 GMT -6
PA just approved the use of shoulder pads in the summer for this year, in years past we were allowed to have workouts in helmets. We have always had 3 nights of basically OTA's (indy work, 7-7, O/D install, team) for as long as I have coached. We open the weight room for an hour before and work out 2 hrs. on the field. We don't have to worry about team camps and all that also we do not do 7-7 tourn. (we will do 7-7 vs other teams but only during our scheduled workouts). So if 9 hours a week in summer is too much for a kid to handle then shoot me now.
|
|
|
Post by coachguy83 on Jun 18, 2010 11:54:53 GMT -6
We workout 4 days a week for anywhere from 20 minutes to an hour. 2 days are lifting and 2 days are more conditioning based so kids don't get burned out doing the same thing every day. We go out on he field for an hour every wednesday after work outs and every other Friday. The other Friday we either give them the day off or go out and do something fun like play softball or have competitions between or Challenge squads. We do three or four 7 on 7s in July, but we host the league so there is no traveling. This year we are going to a 7 on 7/lineman challenge tournament for the first time which should be a lot of fun and we are also having a weekend retreat/camp for the first time in addition to our two week camp in late July.
We do a lot with our guys and starting to more, but we think we are going to better for it. Having workouts every day forces guys to come in and hopefully it keeps them out of trouble. Most of our guys go to open gyms after weights anyway so it becomes a win win for us and the bball coach. I'm just happy that we are getting kids up off of the couch and out doing something and it is keeping them from robbing liquor stores.
|
|
|
Post by mitch on Jun 18, 2010 15:01:20 GMT -6
I would like for our state to end all summer activities in all sports, other than 3 hours a week of strength and conditioning. Every coach I've talked to about thinks it is a great idea. I think 99% of us do team camps, 7 on 7's, etc., mainly b/c other teams do it, so we think we have to.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jun 18, 2010 15:25:12 GMT -6
I would like for our state to end all summer activities in all sports, other than 3 hours a week of strength and conditioning. Every coach I've talked to about thinks it is a great idea. I think 99% of us do team camps, 7 on 7's, etc., mainly b/c other teams do it, so we think we have to. Every now and then I'll hear a guy in our state say something like, "Man, I wish we could practice all year like the basketball coaches do". I think, "No, you don't".
|
|
|
Post by bluboy on Jun 18, 2010 15:34:08 GMT -6
During the summer we work out for 2 hours. One hour has the skill players working on skills or agility while the linemen lift, then we switch. We have 7on7 one night a week during the month of July. That's it. Doing it this way has not prevented us from winning. There are some teams in the area that have padded practices two nights a week, lift three nights a week, and do 7on7. The coaches of these teams often comment on how their team is dragging in week three. Geee, I don't understand why. I really believe that we have to give our players space and time to be kids.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Jun 18, 2010 17:23:24 GMT -6
I get what everyone is saying here, and I agree kids need to be kids. But I remember when I was in HS (mid-late 90s) I went to lifting 4 mornings a week, speed training 2X a week, every passing league we had and camp when it came about; and still had plenty of time to get my chores done and screw around with my friends.
I know we don't want burnout, but 4 hours of lifting, 2 hours of speed training, an hour of install per week isn't all that much (even when you add in one or two nights a week for a passing league) that still leaves plenty of time during the week and weekend to get done anything they feel like without burnout setting in
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Jun 18, 2010 17:34:21 GMT -6
I would like for our state to end all summer activities in all sports, other than 3 hours a week of strength and conditioning. Every coach I've talked to about thinks it is a great idea.
I think 99% of us do team camps, 7 on 7's, etc., mainly b/c other teams do it, so we think we have to.
I'd say 99% of coaches here would disagree with your 99% LOL....
Is anybody forcing you to work out during the summer? Why would you want to make a rule to penalize programs that want to get better? If you don't want your program to work out or do 7-7's, then don't.
IMO, for somebody to believe that they can just show up in August and expect to compete is ridiculous. It might happen somewhere, I've just never seen it. I'm all for preventing "burnout" and having the kids get time off, but really, that needs to be something that the coach manages, not a legislative body. If coaches over do it then their kids and their parents should let them know. We do a lot of 7-7 in June, none in July. We will workout 3 times a week in July. We get a lot done but I don't think we over do it by any means.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jun 18, 2010 17:56:34 GMT -6
I would like for our state to end all summer activities in all sports, other than 3 hours a week of strength and conditioning. Every coach I've talked to about thinks it is a great idea.
I think 99% of us do team camps, 7 on 7's, etc., mainly b/c other teams do it, so we think we have to. I'd say 99% of coaches here would disagree with your 99% LOL.... Is anybody forcing you to work out during the summer? Why would you want to make a rule to penalize programs that want to get better? If you don't want your program to work out or do 7-7's, then don't. IMO, for somebody to believe that they can just show up in August and expect to compete is ridiculous. It might happen somewhere, I've just never seen it. I'm all for preventing "burnout" and having the kids get time off, but really, that needs to be something that the coach manages, not a legislative body. If coaches over do it then their kids and their parents should let them know. We do a lot of 7-7 in June, none in July. We will workout 3 times a week in July. We get a lot done but I don't think we over do it by any means. The legislative body is exactly who needs to regulate it. Do you know why there are dead periods in NCAA recruiting? Because college coaches wanted them. I feel the same way with the offseason stuff in HS. It's an arms race. They're doing it so we have to do it. Who said anything about doing nothing in the offseason?
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 18, 2010 19:24:58 GMT -6
Phantom---- is exactly right, AND used a GREAT word to describe it. ARMS RACE. That is exactly what it is, and he is EXACTLY right discussing the NCAA and quiet/dead periods. Those regulations are there because the coaches want them...BUT they don't want to risk someone else "getting an advantage". The most dominant programs in Louisana..National Powerhouses West Monroe rose to that point by instituting a holdback system (extra year of 8th grade) and making football a 24/7/365 thing. Evangel went from no program, to rival and tops in the state in 11 years doing the same thing. The holdback system has been outlawed, but there isn't much that can be done regarding importance and attitude teams put into football. Somebody is ALWAYS going to find a way to interpret the rules to their liking. 7-7 without a football for those places where conditioning only is the rule... No coaches on field...but watching from field house... and giving comments later... etc. etc. Unfortunately, I don't know if the genie can't be put back in the bottle. Jhanawa It is relative isn't it? If nobody else is doing it.... I would like for our state to end all summer activities in all sports, other than 3 hours a week of strength and conditioning. Every coach I've talked to about thinks it is a great idea. I think 99% of us do team camps, 7 on 7's, etc., mainly b/c other teams do it, so we think we have to. summer is summer, so you dont want two a days in august? and you say that wouldnt be included? summer is summer.to make such a rule and have "exceptions" to the rule would nullify the intent of the rule. Having said that you want to start football in SEPT or at best late august? In the north, football would run into VERY COLD months. And I seriously doubt the rule is for the benefit of the kids. Huh? Really? Thats going to be your input, arguing the semantics of the seasonal calender? Summer OBVIOUSLY..OBVIOUSLY .... OBVIOUSLY... means the time period between the end of one school year, and the start of another. Not the period of days between the summer solstice and the autumnal equinox. Come on man.....
|
|
|
Post by coachjm on Jun 19, 2010 7:10:09 GMT -6
Unfortunately, if there was procedure put in place to forbid summer activity other outside organizations would start programs to train athletes. These outside organizations would have less educated staff, priority on making money vs. the total development of the student-athlete, would feed children with unrealistic belief of individual abilities leading most to believe they are scholly athletes as long as their school coach doesn't screw them up, and a list of other issues. For examples of this see most AAU programs (although there are certainly positive examples as well) and continue to watch the money the combine companies are profitting despite no real data to support opportunities being created. I'm not sure this is the can of worms that would benefit our sport.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Jun 19, 2010 7:45:35 GMT -6
For a lot of reasons already put forth, we do the minimum amount in the summer we feel we can and still reach our potential-be competitive in the fall.
We do Conditioning (running and lifting) three days a week for an hour or so. We do 7-on-7 one night a week four times with another local school. We have a three-day camp (AMs only).
I don't feel bad if other guys are lifting four days a week or three and doing "Speed Training" other two, doing two nights a week of 7-on-7s or on Saturdays, going to Team Camps at colleges, etc.
Another consideration is I don't want to be ticked off at some kids before practice even starts because they miss a football activity due to any of the myriad possible reasons.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jun 19, 2010 7:48:08 GMT -6
Another consideration is I don't want to be ticked off at some kids before practice even starts because they miss a football activity due to any of the myriad possible reasons. I think that that's a huge consideration.
|
|
|
Post by dcsworstnightmare on Jun 19, 2010 13:15:33 GMT -6
It should be an arms race...The Coaches that don't want to put in the effort to recruit kids will have less talent and those coaches that do want to put in the effort will have the more talented guys...I've always looked at football with the attitude "Sure it might be time consuming and tiresome...But if it makes me a better player or coach...Then I'll have a better chance at winning...And if I have a better chance at winning then it's worth it" Simple as that...If someone is lazy and doesn't want to recruit or have summer workouts and such then that's fine by me...But don't punish me or anyone else who isn't lazy and does want to recruit or have summer workouts...I'll gladly put in the time and effort while that other guy doesn't...And I'll gladly enjoy tearing him apart...Whether that's on the field or in the pressbox!
|
|
|
Post by coachks on Jun 19, 2010 13:37:35 GMT -6
It should be an arms race...The Coaches that don't want to put in the effort to recruit kids will have less talent and those coaches that do want to put in the effort will have the more talented guys...I've always looked at football with the attitude "Sure it might be time consuming and tiresome...But if it makes me a better player or coach...Then I'll have a better chance at winning...And if I have a better chance at winning then it's worth it" Simple as that...If someone is lazy and doesn't want to recruit or have summer workouts and such then that's fine by me...But don't punish me or anyone else who isn't lazy and does want to recruit or have summer workouts...I'll gladly put in the time and effort while that other guy doesn't...And I'll gladly enjoy tearing him apart...Whether that's on the field or in the pressbox! Lots of "I" in that paragraph, not much about the kids.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Jun 19, 2010 13:38:15 GMT -6
It should be an arms race...The Coaches that don't want to put in the effort to recruit kids will have less talent and those coaches that do want to put in the effort will have the more talented guys...I've always looked at football with the attitude "Sure it might be time consuming and tiresome...But if it makes me a better player or coach...Then I'll have a better chance at winning...And if I have a better chance at winning then it's worth it" Simple as that...If someone is lazy and doesn't want to recruit or have summer workouts and such then that's fine by me...But don't punish me or anyone else who isn't lazy and does want to recruit or have summer workouts...I'll gladly put in the time and effort while that other guy doesn't...And I'll gladly enjoy tearing him apart...Whether that's on the field or in the pressbox! You have a lot to learn about the reasons why one should be a coach and what effective coaching is, young 'un. I suggest you pay closer attention to posts from more experienced coaches like phantom et al on here.
|
|
|
Post by leighty on Jun 19, 2010 13:43:48 GMT -6
Sweet Jesus... Here come the soapboxes...
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Jun 19, 2010 13:44:08 GMT -6
It should be an arms race...The Coaches that don't want to put in the effort to recruit kids will have less talent and those coaches that do want to put in the effort will have the more talented guys...I've always looked at football with the attitude "Sure it might be time consuming and tiresome...But if it makes me a better player or coach...Then I'll have a better chance at winning...And if I have a better chance at winning then it's worth it" Simple as that...If someone is lazy and doesn't want to recruit or have summer workouts and such then that's fine by me...But don't punish me or anyone else who isn't lazy and does want to recruit or have summer workouts...I'll gladly put in the time and effort while that other guy doesn't...And I'll gladly enjoy tearing him apart...Whether that's on the field or in the pressbox! YOU'RE COOL Whacha gonna do...when the dcsworstnightmare is coming after you .....Brutha
|
|
|
Post by coachks on Jun 19, 2010 13:45:24 GMT -6
We made a big mistake last year, I feel, by putting a 7 on 7 tourney on the same day as our team camp. We ended up with a lot of burnout that night, which hurt us the rest of our camp...which hurt us into lifting....and into two a days. Some kids lost a lot of enthusiasm. They likely would have lost it at some point (that type of kids), but we lost a little too much juice early on.
Our summer stuff has a very different tone than our regualr season. I think that helps with burnout. Summer is pretty light in terms of meetings/lecture and the pace is dialed down. We probably aren't going to drop the hammer (as hard) on a kid for goofing off.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Jun 19, 2010 13:55:31 GMT -6
Sweet Jesus... Here come the soapboxes... Every situation is different. Vast majority of high schools have a handful of football players, and then many kids who play football - unless they get turned off to it. There is a difference. We are not coaching scholarship players, and thus able to make demands of their time, like in college. HS football in most places is not as important to everyone as it is to some coaches. Nor should it be, if we really have their best intersts (and not just OUR won-loss record and EGO) at heart. And that's not all bad. Sorry for "soap box", leighty. You obviously can poo-poo this post.
|
|
|
Post by leighty on Jun 19, 2010 14:10:39 GMT -6
Are you done preaching?
|
|
|
Post by blb on Jun 19, 2010 14:32:59 GMT -6
Nope. But you are obviously done reading-listening; if you last as long as I have in this profession (and others on this website) you'll get it - I hope, for the the sake of the kids you coach. I will say when I first started out I was like you - everything was an absolute.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Jun 19, 2010 14:59:13 GMT -6
Are you done preaching?[/quote I'm kind of surprised to see you disagreeing with blb, who is agreeing with what you posted earlier.
|
|