|
Post by phantom on May 6, 2010 9:30:33 GMT -6
The thread "Superiors won't let me coach my position" brought up a question. Since I don't want to hijack I'll ask it here.
The OP is a WR coach. His HC and OC are Wing-T guys. They're being forced by boosters and admin to run Tony Franklin. My first impression was that the OP needs to get out before they all get fired. Fired they will be, I think, because I've never seen a case where a coach is forced to run a system that goes against his personality and beliefs and succeeds.
Am I wrong? Does anybody have examples of this working out in the long run?
|
|
|
Post by leighty on May 6, 2010 9:31:52 GMT -6
I agree with everything you said.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on May 6, 2010 9:33:44 GMT -6
If the boosters are dictating the offense, that's a sure sign of the apocalypse
|
|
|
Post by sandstorm on May 6, 2010 10:03:00 GMT -6
If the boosters are dictating the offense, that's a sure sign of the apocalypse Dead on. OUT!
|
|
|
Post by Luther Van Dam on May 6, 2010 10:43:14 GMT -6
On top of the slap in the face that is forcing an OC to run a certain offense instead of him choosing what he runs, how about the liklihood that the OC will be much worse implementing an offense he does not know as well? That will be what gets him fired.
|
|
|
Post by cnunley on May 6, 2010 10:44:55 GMT -6
Seems like trouble waiting to happen.
You have to be able to run what you know, not what someone wants you to run.
Get out. It's not worth it
|
|
|
Post by davishfc on May 6, 2010 10:57:17 GMT -6
Fired they will be, I think, because I've never seen a case where a coach is forced to run a system that goes against his personality and beliefs and succeeds. Phantom, With the phrase "fired they will be", you sound alot like this guy: Anyway, back to the thread. I believe this has to be a huge red flag for everyone involved that the boosters feel so entitled to personally adopt the offensive system for the coaching staff. The fact that it's the TF system is beside the point. The boosters are saying "here, you will run this offense and you will win." That's not how it works and only the most disillusioned people would ever believe that is how programs are successful. That, to me, spells the beginning of the end. Anyone that thinks otherwise clearly does not understand the meaning of the word "undermine". The Header sets the direction of the program with input from the assistants who all buy in to form a united front. In conclusion...get out, bounce, abandon ship, eject, may day, SOS, whatever you want to call it. But get out right now before anybody gets fired because, in the words of Yoda, I mean Phantom, fired they will be ;D JMO
|
|
|
Post by dubber on May 6, 2010 11:02:13 GMT -6
We try to solve EVERY problem like this, and it NEVER works.
How do we fix X? Better add/delete a component.
Things get fixed when there is change in philosophy/application.
Offense ain't scoring? change schemes.........instead of better concept teaching, better off season conditioning, better drills, etc.
Economy ain't working, change interest rates, add this incentive (cash for clunkers), go after people making a profit, reform.........instead of investing in things that will actually drive our economy at the GUT level......like education.
It's the superfical versus the genuine change.
And the superfical fix has screwed up everything good we've ever had.......
|
|
tandn
Probationary Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by tandn on May 6, 2010 11:23:15 GMT -6
I can't think of a way you can be successful doing something you don't believe in. This doesn't just apply to football.
|
|
|
Post by airmale on May 6, 2010 11:23:52 GMT -6
Suuccessful OC's run offenses they know inside out. Sure you adapt to your kids but basically you keep the same philosophy. I have yet to see a staff "forced" to do anything by the boosters/administration and be successful.
Do not pass go. Do not collect your $200. Get the heck out!!!
|
|
|
Post by coachk13 on May 6, 2010 11:35:16 GMT -6
The thread "Superiors won't let me coach my position" brought up a question. Since I don't want to hijack I'll ask it here. The OP is a WR coach. His HC and OC are Wing-T guys. They're being forced by boosters and admin to run Tony Franklin. My first impression was that the OP needs to get out before they all get fired. Fired they will be, I think, because I've never seen a case where a coach is forced to run a system that goes against his personality and beliefs and succeeds. Am I wrong? Does anybody have examples of this working out in the long run? Just to clarify, it seems like the HC and the OC are from this town, born and raised, and they seem totally "sold" on the TFS. It's really a peculiar situation. Thanks for this thread though, Phantom. I think it will be enlightening for many.
|
|
tandn
Probationary Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by tandn on May 6, 2010 11:40:54 GMT -6
The thread "Superiors won't let me coach my position" brought up a question. Since I don't want to hijack I'll ask it here. The OP is a WR coach. His HC and OC are Wing-T guys. They're being forced by boosters and admin to run Tony Franklin. My first impression was that the OP needs to get out before they all get fired. Fired they will be, I think, because I've never seen a case where a coach is forced to run a system that goes against his personality and beliefs and succeeds. Am I wrong? Does anybody have examples of this working out in the long run? Just to clarify, it seems like the HC and the OC are from this town, born and raised, and they seem totally "sold" on the TFS. It's really a peculiar situation. Thanks for this thread though, Phantom. I think it will be enlightening for many. So for clarity, they have been Wing-T guys in the past (possibly even as far back as having played it in the same town) yet the boosters wanted a more exciting offense and they were "sold" on TFS?
|
|
|
Post by coachk13 on May 6, 2010 11:46:45 GMT -6
The coaches (OC and HC) seem to be totally sold on it.
|
|
smu92
Junior Member
Posts: 415
|
Post by smu92 on May 6, 2010 11:53:34 GMT -6
The coaches (OC and HC) seem to be totally sold on it. At least that's a step toward success. If they were running something that they were completely against, then there would definitely be some failure in the near future. As far as the whole situation is concerned, it sound like it could obviously be a bad gig. I can't imagine letting someone outside my program dictate what I would be running unless a couple of factors existed. 1) I love it there, and I would do almost anything to stay. 2) I have good enough kids to be successful running almost anything.
|
|
|
Post by coachk13 on May 6, 2010 12:06:58 GMT -6
Sorry, Phantom, for throwing the thread off a bit. If anyone has something to say about the the thread in question, say it on that thread. Let's keep them separated.
|
|
|
Post by IronmanFootball on May 6, 2010 12:16:30 GMT -6
"I can't think of a way you can be successful doing something you don't believe in. This doesn't just apply to football."
While it was just a year, I ran the wing-t for a year and think I had some success with it. We had some really accelerated talent for freshman but none the less, we made it work. I just bit the bullet and ran it and could appreciate it more than love it, I guess you could say.
Now defensively, I seem to have a problem not running a 44 base D. I've just always hated the 52/53 fronts. But on Offense I've ran Wing-T, I and spread and after thinking I was just a spread guy, I've become an I guy more than anything.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on May 6, 2010 12:28:41 GMT -6
"I can't think of a way you can be successful doing something you don't believe in. This doesn't just apply to football." While it was just a year, I ran the wing-t for a year and think I had some success with it. We had some really accelerated talent for freshman but none the less, we made it work. I just bit the bullet and ran it and could appreciate it more than love it, I guess you could say. Now defensively, I seem to have a problem not running a 44 base D. I've just always hated the 52/53 fronts. But on Offense I've ran Wing-T, I and spread and after thinking I was just a spread guy, I've become an I guy more than anything. It sounds like you're talking about being a sub-varsity coach being forced to run the varsity's system. If so, that's not what I'm talking about. That happens all the time. The question is more about a situation where outsiders (boosters, admin) force the team to run a system that they don't believe in.
|
|
|
Post by lochness on May 6, 2010 19:20:07 GMT -6
Not only were they "forced into running something"...but the reason given in the other thread is because the new offense is supposed to be "more exciting."
What a massive, steaming, stinking crock of shite.
|
|
|
Post by mitch on May 6, 2010 20:53:38 GMT -6
The thread "Superiors won't let me coach my position" brought up a question. Since I don't want to hijack I'll ask it here. The OP is a WR coach. His HC and OC are Wing-T guys. They're being forced by boosters and admin to run Tony Franklin. My first impression was that the OP needs to get out before they all get fired. Fired they will be, I think, because I've never seen a case where a coach is forced to run a system that goes against his personality and beliefs and succeeds. Am I wrong? Does anybody have examples of this working out in the long run? I posted almost the exact same thing in the other thread before I saw this one.
|
|
|
Post by tiger46 on May 7, 2010 8:20:48 GMT -6
The coaches (OC and HC) seem to be totally sold on it. I have to ask. What does "totally sold on it" means in actual terms of their commitment? Did they bring T.F. in to do a clinic? Did they attend some other type of clinic on the system? Did they buy some DVD's? Did they see some highlights & cut-ups and liked what they saw and, said, "F***, YEAH! That's what we're doing next season!" ?
|
|
|
Post by outlawjoseywales on May 7, 2010 21:54:11 GMT -6
Now Loch, I put a picture of an Iceburg on the other thread, I'm not about to put a picture of a...well, you know. Here's the ONLY way this could work, or could have worked, (because we already know it's not) But lets just say that WITHOUT pressure from the P.T.B., the coaches decided among themselves that they wanted to change what they have done all their lives. If they did it on their own, if they looked at their talent and said, "go for it," then I've seen that work. But I've never seen a coach from being under pressure from the boosters to "be more exciting" do anything but fail. And the reason? It's not his idea, that's why. When you're late in the 4th quarter, everybody is bleeding and only "full grown men" are standing, you are near the goal line going in to win that all important game and all you know is Wing-T, what are you going to run? Don't tell me it's going to be Black 85 F-Move Double Under X-Post OJW
|
|
|
Post by indian1 on May 8, 2010 7:05:10 GMT -6
Boosters deciding what offense to run?
Get out! Get out! Run like hell and don't look back!
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on May 8, 2010 9:45:00 GMT -6
1. Anytime a booster or administration is dictating the Xs and Os, it's time to move on. They obviously don't have as much knowledge about football as a coach does and they shouldn't be pushing ANYTHING. Secondly, it's an ego trip; a booster who provides money to the program but feels that they are entitled to pushing an offense or a defense isn't funding the program for the right reasons.
2. I have nothing against coaches that buy into a spread offense, but everyone else that does p-sses me off. The media is now the driving force behind a HS football program and sports writers are morons.
3. I know that every offense can succeed if they're well coached; Wing T, Air Raid, Super-Mongo-Power Z, whatever. But, if you and your staff don't agree with the philosophy than there will be problems. They might not coach to the best of their abilities because they disagree with the offense. If the offense is struggling, everyone on the staff is going to be p-ssed off because they're being forced to run something they don't like.
4. If the boosters are calling the shots, what's going to stop them from buying into the next popular offense? What happens if the Maryland I becomes to the new 'in offense' and you have an OL that averages 190lbs? Again, offenses that are well coached have the chance to be effective, but there are points that need to be taken into consideration. You don't want to be bouncing around between offenses based on personnel; but there are schemes that need a big, physical OL (or other personnel) to succeed.
5. If the 'spread' doesn't pan out, the boosters are going to be in everyone's ear and coaches will lose their jobs. Screw that; run as fast as you can.
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on May 8, 2010 12:43:45 GMT -6
Boosters deciding what offense to run? Get out! Get out! Run like hell and don't look back!
|
|