|
Post by coachknight on Apr 24, 2010 7:33:01 GMT -6
There is a really interesting article and discussion about "whether it's possible to draft a guy with both talent and great character who needs to be molded into a better quarterback". Obviously, there are conflicting opinions on this, but it seems Tebow is knocked for delivery, being inaccurate (not sure how factual this is), having wide-open receivers, and playing in a non-NFL system. I thought Gruden had some excellent observations, and I was wondering what fellow coaches think of these criticisms, taking personal feelings about the kid out of it. Aren't some of these same criticisms valid in regards to Bradford, or past QB's? Did coming from a pro-style system help Quinn in his transition? Should a kid be penalized for the system he plays in, or the fact that his teammates are so much better than the competition in college?
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Apr 24, 2010 8:16:07 GMT -6
The biggest complaint that I've seen about this player is that he won't ne ready for a couple of years. Well, that's true of pretty much every QB that moves up to a higher level. Too many QBs play too soon in the NFL, IMO, and it's hurt a lot of careers. The best thing that happened to Aaron Rodgers was getting drafted bt Green Bay and having the luxury of learning the pro game without being under a ton of pressure.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Apr 24, 2010 8:26:45 GMT -6
The biggest complaint that I've seen about this player is that he won't ne ready for a couple of years. Well, that's true of pretty much every QB that moves up to a higher level. Too many QBs play too soon in the NFL, IMO, and it's hurt a lot of careers. The best thing that happened to Aaron Rodgers was getting drafted bt Green Bay and having the luxury of learning the pro game without being under a ton of pressure. I agree with you phantom, but after what Matt Flynn (Falcons) and Joe Flacco (Ravens) did in rookie seasons with their teams people are saying "Why not us? Why not our guy?" now. Two words: Ryan Leaf.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Apr 24, 2010 8:37:00 GMT -6
The biggest complaint that I've seen about this player is that he won't ne ready for a couple of years. Well, that's true of pretty much every QB that moves up to a higher level. Too many QBs play too soon in the NFL, IMO, and it's hurt a lot of careers. The best thing that happened to Aaron Rodgers was getting drafted bt Green Bay and having the luxury of learning the pro game without being under a ton of pressure. I agree with you phantom, but after what Matt Flynn (Falcons) and Joe Flacco (Ravens) did in rookie seasons with their teams people are saying "Why not us? Why not our guy?" now. Two words: Ryan Leaf. I find it ironic that Steve Young was among the most vocal in criticizing the Tebow pick because TT won't be ready to play immediately. Young's career was almost derailed when he played too early for a bad Tampa Bay team.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Apr 24, 2010 8:38:47 GMT -6
...and Young already had prior pro experience with LA Express of USFL.
|
|
|
Post by coachjmcs on Apr 24, 2010 9:10:46 GMT -6
The biggest complaint that I've seen about this player is that he won't ne ready for a couple of years. Well, that's true of pretty much every QB that moves up to a higher level. Too many QBs play too soon in the NFL, IMO, and it's hurt a lot of careers. The best thing that happened to Aaron Rodgers was getting drafted bt Green Bay and having the luxury of learning the pro game without being under a ton of pressure. I agree with you phantom, but after what Matt Flynn (Falcons) and Joe Flacco (Ravens) did in rookie seasons with their teams people are saying "Why not us? Why not our guy?" now. Two words: Ryan Leaf. Matt Ryan for the Falcons, I can't remember where Matt Flynn from LSU is playing now but I think he is still in the league. I just don't know how long it is going to take him to get good at reading a defense the way he is going to have to too be successful in the NFL. I think he has mostly been reading the DL in college and throwing when the numbers were in his favor bigtime. In college Tebow forced everyone on the defense to keep an eye on what was going on in the backfield, In the NFL I think the athletes are so much better that it will not take all eleven to contain him, so he will actually be throwing into defenses set up to stop the pass for the first time in his career. I am a little unsure if he can do it, He is basically going to start working on things that many of the other qbs have been doing since they started playing football. Its a hard road, I hear he is a hard worker (mostly from him), so maybe he can get it done. I find myself rooting for him, I just think it will be a project and he is going to have to buy in, and work harder than the other qbs (who are hard workers in thier own right) to get it done. Bottom line, he is going to have to relearn the game in my opinion. I hope he does it he seems to be a pretty good kid. And this is coming from a Georgia fan. A little off topic, but did you guys think his throwing motion looked tons better in just the couple of months since the season ended? Why didn't they work on that at UF? They couldn't get done in four years what he accomplished these last four months?
|
|
|
Post by blb on Apr 24, 2010 9:15:10 GMT -6
I agree with you phantom, but after what Matt Flynn (Falcons) and Joe Flacco (Ravens) did in rookie seasons with their teams people are saying "Why not us? Why not our guy?" now. Two words: Ryan Leaf. Matt Ryan for the Falcons, I can't remember where Matt Flynn from LSU is playing now but I think he is still in the league. Oops - thanks for the correction, jmcs.
|
|
|
Post by cc on Apr 24, 2010 9:24:54 GMT -6
Yeah I agree it's a rare QB that can be ready to play his rookie year. I don't think any of this year's drafts QBs are ready to lay fulltime. I think Tebow will be good as a change up to run some wildcat or smashmouth football. I would sub in Tebow for the QB Sneak on the goalline rather than expect / risk my starter.
|
|
|
Post by coachknight on Apr 24, 2010 10:22:00 GMT -6
coachjcms,
I wonder if the lack of time coaches are allowed to work with players had any influence on why the UF coaches did/did not address his throwing motion? I've read on this board that several coaches tried, that coaches were told not to mess with it, and that they did not work on it at all. I guess until Tebow or Meyer come right out and discuss it, we'll never know for sure. Also, do we know he wasn't reading coverages? I admit, I don't know the ins and outs of how the UF offense was called. To go back to an initial question, how sure are any of us that the other QB prospects, or previous prospects, were reading complex defenses? I guess I'm just tired of hearing Tebow get hammered. If I remember correctly, wasn't Drew Brees too short to play in the NFL? They all have their faults and things to work on, but it's a little unjustified to focus on one kid and give the rest a free pass. Seems like Tebow backlash.
Also, how accurate were the "experts" with Leaf, Harrington, Akili Smith, Couch, McNown, etc.?
|
|
|
Post by thakatalyst on Apr 24, 2010 10:47:07 GMT -6
We are talking reading coverages now? So those pass happy system QBs have something going for them then, right? Oh, nevermind, they've never been under center before. "Their success won't translate to the NFL." BTW, one of those pass happy system QBs won the Super Bowl this year. And they used 3, 4, 5 wide receiver sets. Out of gun! Drew Brees is a hard working SOB who found the right coach, the right system, and bam...there you have it. Someone will take advantage of Tebow's willingness to learn, his pride, work ethic, etc etc etc and he will do well. Unfortunately, they are in the division of my beloved Chargers.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Clement on Apr 24, 2010 12:59:55 GMT -6
I think a big problem is so many good QB's get drafted by awful organizations. Look at the list of quarterbacks the Browns have gone through since their re-birth, or the Bills post-Jim Kelly. These clubs are fundamentally unsound, causing them to have bad records, get high picks, draft very talented quarterbacks and waste them by having a terrible supporting cast, a revolving door in the coaching posts and an unwillingness to see the big picture. Just my thoughts, but I think the team a player goes to is one of the biggest factors in his future success.
|
|
|
Post by coachjmcs on Apr 24, 2010 14:22:45 GMT -6
coachjcms, I wonder if the lack of time coaches are allowed to work with players had any influence on why the UF coaches did/did not address his throwing motion? I've read on this board that several coaches tried, that coaches were told not to mess with it, and that they did not work on it at all. I guess until Tebow or Meyer come right out and discuss it, we'll never know for sure. Also, do we know he wasn't reading coverages? I admit, I don't know the ins and outs of how the UF offense was called. To go back to an initial question, how sure are any of us that the other QB prospects, or previous prospects, were reading complex defenses? I guess I'm just tired of hearing Tebow get hammered. If I remember correctly, wasn't Drew Brees too short to play in the NFL? They all have their faults and things to work on, but it's a little unjustified to focus on one kid and give the rest a free pass. Seems like Tebow backlash. Also, how accurate were the "experts" with Leaf, Harrington, Akili Smith, Couch, McNown, etc.? The nature off the offense that is run at Florida doesn't seem to me to be indicative of What Qb's are going to use in the NFL. Do you think Tommie Frazier would have been ready to play in the NFL as it is today straight out of college?
|
|
|
Post by coachjmcs on Apr 24, 2010 14:24:41 GMT -6
We are talking reading coverages now? So those pass happy system QBs have something going for them then, right? Oh, nevermind, they've never been under center before. "Their success won't translate to the NFL." BTW, one of those pass happy system QBs won the Super Bowl this year. And they used 3, 4, 5 wide receiver sets. Out of gun! Drew Brees is a hard working SOB who found the right coach, the right system, and bam...there you have it. Someone will take advantage of Tebow's willingness to learn, his pride, work ethic, etc etc etc and he will do well. Unfortunately, they are in the division of my beloved Chargers. I think Qbs in a pass happy system, have more going for them than the ones in a system like Tebow. And I don't claim to be any kind of expert, but it does suck that these guys take it both ways.
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Apr 24, 2010 18:20:08 GMT -6
I'm gonna guess McDaniels has a plan.......
|
|
|
Post by coachjmcs on Apr 24, 2010 20:12:54 GMT -6
coachjcms, I wonder if the lack of time coaches are allowed to work with players had any influence on why the UF coaches did/did not address his throwing motion? I've read on this board that several coaches tried, that coaches were told not to mess with it, and that they did not work on it at all. I guess until Tebow or Meyer come right out and discuss it, we'll never know for sure. Also, do we know he wasn't reading coverages? I admit, I don't know the ins and outs of how the UF offense was called. To go back to an initial question, how sure are any of us that the other QB prospects, or previous prospects, were reading complex defenses? I guess I'm just tired of hearing Tebow get hammered. If I remember correctly, wasn't Drew Brees too short to play in the NFL? They all have their faults and things to work on, but it's a little unjustified to focus on one kid and give the rest a free pass. Seems like Tebow backlash. Also, how accurate were the "experts" with Leaf, Harrington, Akili Smith, Couch, McNown, etc.? If the coaches there felt that during the four years at UF there were more important things to work on than his throwing motion that proves my point. Throwing wasn't the most important thing for the QB at the university of florida. For most Qbs the passing game is one of the most important things they do. I would like to repeat myself. I am rooting for this kid. I think all coaches are, we would all love for the kid with character to succeed. But my question is if he can make up the lost time from being in a run first offense. He has probably never had to pass into a defense where 7 guys are looking pass. Every other guy in the draft has seen that since they started throwing the football. I really don't see this as a tebow backlash. I feel that my argument is pretty grounded. If anything I feel like other people are following the prodigal son blindly if anything. As for the other QBs I don't have a ton of faith in them either, and the odds are against them, there are more qbs drafted than there are starting qbs some of them have to fail.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Apr 24, 2010 20:47:00 GMT -6
I suppose no ever seems to recall the reconstituted and improved (throwing technique of) Tebow v2 in 2008 spring.....followed by Tebow v3 in spring 2009 (But UF never coached/messed with his mechanics)
I don't recall LeFevour, McCoy, Cannfield, Pike, or even Claussen having hype surrounding them about concerted emphasis on correcting their delivery method during their career.
The issue is presented because it takes so long for him to get the ball out and the inefficient method contributes to an inconsistently thrown ball. That inconsistency is what will be exposed in the pros where the margin for error is nill. What contributes to a QB's failures? It is a multitude of issues; some personal, some mechanical, some intellectual, some is the rest of the team. To succeed as a pro, I would imagine eliminating as many of those liabilities would be the path of lesser risk.
I wish Tebow all the best - he is a heckuva ball player - but it is rather disengenuous to suggest that 'all QBs need to improve their throwing at the next level' is the same as what we're talking about here. He landed at a great spot to provide him the best possible environment to thrive.
|
|
|
Post by coachknight on Apr 25, 2010 5:19:00 GMT -6
I guess the next question, then, is, can he succeed? Is he too far behind the curve to ever make it up? Was it a bad draft pick to use a first round pick on what the Broncos hope is a future starter? With Orton and Quinn, it is thought that Tebow will have time to learn and develop. If he does, doesn't this then become a brilliant pick? If he is unsuccessful at making the conversion, is this a worse pick than any other bust (Leaf, Mandarich, McNown)?
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Apr 25, 2010 7:05:13 GMT -6
If Tebow would have been around for the Bronco's 2nd round pick (and no one had him projected as a 1st rounder), why would they need to trade up to get him?
They didn't just select him in the 1st round, but they used multiple picks (in a deep talent draft class) to get him
If anything, it proves how savvy a GM, Ozzie Newsome is
On some levels, Tebow may be AHEAD of the curve, if he has faced the rationale of why the throwing needs to change (as opposed to other quartebacks in the league), so that maturity (if there) may provide him even more of a foundation to improve/succeed
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Apr 25, 2010 7:33:08 GMT -6
Well I guess I am going to stick my neck out here...But really how many great NFL QB's are there out there ...Most qb's (Brady included) have taken some time to develop into a qb that could lead a team into the Super Bowl on his arm..You have to remember that the the WHOLE Patriots team was great not just Brady in the beginning..Don't Forget that McDaniels was Brady's coach w/ the Pat's...I think Coach McDaniels sees something in Tebow that is "Brady" like..I also find it interesting that between between Belichek and McDaniels they drafted 4 kids from UF ...that's 25% of all their picks....OK sticking my neck out a little further..I wonder how many NFL QB's are actually reading the WHOLE field..How many QB's actually get to the third or fourth read....every team disguises coverage....one of the biggest difference for an NFL qb is the amount of times he gets hit...so much more than in college...the one thing I think everyone can agree on is that Tebow is a tough SOB and a winner
|
|
|
Post by coachjmcs on Apr 25, 2010 7:44:58 GMT -6
Agreed, Tough SOB and a winner. That s what gives me hope.
|
|
|
Post by coachjmcs on Apr 25, 2010 7:56:13 GMT -6
I suppose no ever seems to recall the reconstituted and improved (throwing technique of) Tebow v2 in 2008 spring.....followed by Tebow v3 in spring 2009 (But UF never coached/messed with his mechanics) I may be misunderstanding this as sarcasm, but It looked like he had the same motion for the years at UF too me, with little too no change. I really don't remember any of this stuff.... And IF they worked with him and they didn't feel like him dropping the ball down to his waist was an issue that needed to be addressed I don't get it? You can't say that it took too much time or that it wasn't correctable because he fixed it in a few months since last season. Check out this Video of him at UF Practice. And then the one at Grudens QB School. IT toward the end, but he seems to have really made a good bit of progress.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Apr 25, 2010 10:43:22 GMT -6
1. The guy has nothing but a positive impact on college football. He has a great work ethic and is a leader. These are 'intangibles' that the idiots in the media minimize but they are a prerequisite for a successful NFL QB. Plus, he's a competitive, humble guy; he wants to win and isn't going to b-tch about his salary. He's a team player.
2. He's a workhorse on the field, in games, and in the gym; they call him 'Rambo' for a freakin reason. This will benefit the Broncos in the following ways: -He's big and physical: he won't be injury prone. -He does have a strong arm, the mechanics just need to be adjusted. -He will learn how to throw the ball and will rep it until it's almost reflexive. -He'll learn the offense;you can bet that he's going to spend the next three months pouring over the Bronco's PB.
3. He's playing in balanced offense, reasonably successful offense; he won't have to go out and win games on his own. PLUS, McDaniel is a GREAT QB coach; it'll all come together.
The media has just destroyed the guy over the past few months. But, it's good to see that Ozzie ignored the idiots and made a good pick.
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Apr 25, 2010 10:53:32 GMT -6
I had the fortunate opportunity last summer to watch Tebow work out in the weight room and in routes on air ....in the weighroom he was working out w/ the Pouncy twins and Troutwein..doing EVERYTHING they were doing ...just an animal...in his routes on air..all I can say that it was intense..never saw anything like it..especially during a summer workout....EVERONE was working hard..Tebow cussing out (well not cussing) recievers for running wrong routes..
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Apr 25, 2010 11:22:55 GMT -6
I may be misunderstanding this as sarcasm, but It looked like he had the same motion for the years at UF too me, with little too no change. it was a big deal in both years leading up to the seasons. ESPN did the motion-analysis thing and did numerous stories both times about how he improved his throwing motion. Spring 2009 was all about his throwing going as far to live in empty sets to showcase it (and keep him in the pocket) I'm not saying he won't be good - just that it is untrue to say it wasn't tried to coach him up at UF. it's good to see that Ozzie ignored the idiots and made a good pick. Ozzie Newsome is the GM of the Ravens, who pilfered Denver for their picks to trade up
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Apr 25, 2010 11:41:27 GMT -6
The media has just destroyed the guy over the past few months. But, it's good to see that Ozzie ignored the idiots and made a good pick. What pick? Ozzie Newsome traded AWAY this pick so that someone ELSE could draft Tebow. Brian Xanders is the GM for the Broncos. I dislike all the pontificating about the NFL DRAFT almost as much as I despised National Signing Day. Watching the Draft, and reading comments makes one think that there are only 32 organizations in the entire world that actually coach anybody. Everybody else has just been babysitting for the last 8-9 years apparently
|
|
|
Post by blb on Apr 25, 2010 12:00:52 GMT -6
I find it hard to believe that there wasn't a single guy on the staff at the University of Florida who didn't know how to coach passing a football.
In fact, Tebow's QB coach his senior seeason was Scott Loeffler, who was last with NFL Lions and before that tutored Tom Brady and Chad Henne at Michigan.
|
|
|
Post by coachknight on Apr 25, 2010 12:33:01 GMT -6
I don't know whether the UF coaches were worried about his motion or not. There was an earlier thread about Coach Slack and Tebow where I read everything from the UF coaches constantly tried to change his motion, they were told by Meyer to leave it alone, to they never addressed. I don't know the facts. I do know that college coaches are limited to the actual amount of time they can spend with their players, but there is no such rule in the NFL. If Tebow is truly dedicated to improving his mechanics, he will now have the time (its his job, after all) to devote almost exclusively to becoming a better QB, both physically and mentally, just like all the rest of his draft class. We will now see what kind of pupil he is, and what kind of coaches the Denver staff are. To offer up a definitive judgment of any kind, positive or negative, on any of these players right now is ridiculous (I'm looking at Kiper here). I do agree that some may have a step up because of a system or particular skill set, but to say the rest won't be successful because they don't is an insult to the players. How many QB's actually come in ready to play right away? Is this the exception or the rule? Also, do we hold other players under the microscope so severely? I don't remember anyone ever being this polarizing for anything other than "character/off-field issues". I'll admit, I'm a fan of Tebow's, and I hope he does well, but some of the things I hear on radio and tv from the "experts" sound absurd, especially when they don't have any coaching/playing experience.
I'm truly interested in the opinions of coaches when dealing with a player like Tebow (high character and talent, but needs to develop), rather than just the same old talking heads.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Apr 25, 2010 12:47:55 GMT -6
What makes some guys successful in the NFL and other guys failures?
What was the difference between guys like Peyton Manning and Ryan Leaf? I would assume that physically, both guys were probably pretty similar. Why is one guy one of the top players of all time and the other guy is a punchline?
Looking at a Tebow, he has the physical tools to be an above-average NFL QB. I don't think there are any questions about that. I think the questions in regards to Tebow are:
1) Does he recognize that there are currently limitations to his play?
2) Can those limitations be address?
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Apr 25, 2010 12:47:56 GMT -6
How much more 'high-character' is Tebow than other candidates? Is it his virginity or something?
Isn't Colt McCoy made up of the same 'high-character' (read religious) stuff? what is high character and how is it manifesting itself in athletic play/coaching (so much so that it becomes a tangible attribute)?
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Apr 25, 2010 12:51:35 GMT -6
How much more 'high-character' is Tebow than other candidates? Is it his virginity or something? Isn't Colt McCoy made up of the same 'high-character' (read religious) stuff? I agree. When it comes right down to it...the "character" crap is really overrated. H3ll...there's a guy in Pittsburgh with 2 Super Bowl rings who certainly does not pass the "character" test...
|
|