|
Post by brophy on Jan 30, 2010 11:24:43 GMT -6
Any relevance to the game of football? The legitimate expansion of the sport abroad... The devolopment of football coaching legends in non-US regions Wider recruiting base for NCAA
|
|
ozcoach
Sophomore Member
Posts: 132
|
Post by ozcoach on Jan 30, 2010 11:36:34 GMT -6
It is probably of most interest to those non-US participants and non-us markets. I am interested because one of my players is in the World team.
|
|
|
Post by illiniwek on Jan 30, 2010 12:06:29 GMT -6
I'm actually curious to see how this goes. I was on the USA football site and read about it. Good effort on USA football's part to spread American style football around the globe. Coach T www.chiefpigskin.com
|
|
|
Post by airtrafficcontrol on Jan 31, 2010 16:29:56 GMT -6
I was Ireland's delegate at the IFAF Technical Conderence(International Federation of American Football) up by UCF 2 weeks ago.Let me tell you both usafootball.com and IFAF are doing huge work to improve the sport and make it more international.Well done to Coach Meritt on the victory.Coach is actually a great guy and he both played and coached in Europe.It's an experience for those of you who havent considered playing or coaching outside of USA...most of our players are adults with jobs/kids etc who still dedicate themselves to the gridiron...that's real passion!
|
|
tedseay
Sophomore Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by tedseay on Feb 1, 2010 8:19:10 GMT -6
Any relevance to the game of football? The legitimate expansion of the sport abroad... The development of football coaching legends in non-US regions Wider recruiting base for NCAA Brophy: Yes to all of the above. I've seen the haphazard, random efforts of the last 2-3 decades (a fair bit in person), and can say without doubt that USA Football's systematic efforts can only have an even greater effect on the internationalization of our great code of football...
|
|
|
Post by julien on Feb 1, 2010 10:13:55 GMT -6
Any relevance to the game of football? The legitimate expansion of the sport abroad... The development of football coaching legends in non-US regions Wider recruiting base for NCAA Brophy: Yes to all of the above. I've seen the haphazard, random efforts of the last 2-3 decades (a fair bit in person), and can say without doubt that USA Football's systematic efforts can only have an even greater effect on the internationalization of our great code of football... That's right... I'm not as old as Mr. Seay ;-) but I've seen football developement here in France. When I started playing in the early 90's there were only 2 teams with tiny roster in my city. Sometimes we even did not have lockers and we put or pads on on the car park... It sounds crazy right? Now there are 3 teams with 40+ men roster, Under 18 and Under 16 teams. My team has too much kids asking to play right now... We simply don't have enough coaches to take care of them. Football is growing. This USA vs World game is going to be a great thing in the upcomming years. I know there are some German and Scandinavian in NCAA right now. One day or an other, one of them is going to be draft by an NFL Team. A french guy I play against in my Under 18 years has played LB in NFL Europa. He spend 2 years as a member of Washington and Carolina practice squad... An other French spend one year as a DB in practice squad for the St Louis Rams. Both of them have been "seen" for the first time during this game.
|
|
|
Post by airtrafficcontrol on Feb 1, 2010 12:34:25 GMT -6
As Coach Merritt has said football is the last american frontier for us international guys..both baseball and basketball are now on par in both areas.Boise have 3 dutch players,The Patriots have Sebastian Volmer,Europe is catching up.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Feb 1, 2010 12:47:57 GMT -6
the one thing that strikes me with the expansion through northern and southern Europe and Japan, is how much more could be done save for the language barrier.....
What has been the experience of those in the know of overcoming this obstacle?
Secondly, I wondered about how non-Americans view this sport through the lens of 'real' footballers....meaning, if your native sport is (what we call) soccer and/or rugby, how does one see "Football" because of the ever-changing nature of THIS game. Noteably, that I don't imagine soccer/rugby have changed much in the past 80 years, whereas, 'football' is near unrecognizable as to what it was even 20 years ago (with all the rule changes).
|
|
baraboo99
Sophomore Member
[F4:ryan.andersen33]
Posts: 205
|
Post by baraboo99 on Feb 1, 2010 13:14:19 GMT -6
As for the language barrier, I have never had a problem. I've been coaching in Europe since 2002 and to be honest most of my players speak better english the average American teenager...
|
|
|
Post by julien on Feb 1, 2010 13:59:32 GMT -6
As for the language barrier, I have never had a problem. I've been coaching in Europe since 2002 and to be honest most of my players speak better english the average American teenager... I think it depends on the area where you coach. You are in Denmark where English is a second language. In Southern Europe, language is more a concern... In my own team, some coaches are afraid to bring an US coach because of the language barrier...
|
|
|
Post by airtrafficcontrol on Feb 1, 2010 15:06:23 GMT -6
Most countries use english as their football language...japan really being the exception.This year germany moved to using english with coaches and players.Football is a minority sport.In Ireland I compete with Gaelic Football,Hurling(like Lacrosse on a football pitch I guess),Rugby and soccer,then basketball and then we'd be somewhere below that..so it's rare I'd get a top athlete against these,generally I get lesser athletes and have to coach them up.The other thing is linemen have been conditioned over here that they are never going to play sports,because they are too big for traditional sports..so there's a mental thing there and once you get into these kids they really buy football.But getting into them is the hard part.
|
|
|
Post by julien on Feb 2, 2010 0:49:09 GMT -6
The other thing is linemen have been conditioned over here that they are never going to play sports,because they are too big for traditional sports..so there's a mental thing there and once you get into these kids they really buy football.But getting into them is the hard part. Same here in France. As for language, we use English terms here too. Nevertheless, some teams still choose to go with French Canadian Coaches and terms.
|
|
|
Post by julien on Feb 2, 2010 0:58:33 GMT -6
I wondered about how non-Americans view this sport through the lens of 'real' footballers....meaning, if your native sport is (what we call) soccer and/or rugby, how does one see "Football" because of the ever-changing nature of THIS game. Noteably, that I don't imagine soccer/rugby have changed much in the past 80 years, whereas, 'football' is near unrecognizable as to what it was even 20 years ago (with all the rule changes). Brophy, most of people here in Europe do not know anything about football... The ever-changing nature of football is not a concern because football is not a concern!!! They do not understand the game: "too complicated" or -- this is the critique I hear the most -- "Why do they stop playing each 5 seconds?" In Soccer / Rugby (major sports where I live) the ball is "live" almost everytime.
|
|
ozcoach
Sophomore Member
Posts: 132
|
Post by ozcoach on Feb 2, 2010 2:12:41 GMT -6
Luckily for us, the language isn't an issue. Competition from other football codes, however, is huge. With the player development pathways in place for the other football codes - Rugby/Australian Rules/Soccer etc. to convince a promising athlete to forego the possibilities of elite level participation in those sports to pursue American Football is a tougher sell. It is noteworthy that now we are seeing far more young athletes considering american football as the primary focus and passion, training specifically for it in the weights room, studying the game and ignoring the ''traditional'' football played here. With a couple of young Aussies entering the D1 college arena (and not just as punters) only serves to help the profile of the sport here.
|
|
tedseay
Sophomore Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by tedseay on Feb 2, 2010 3:22:05 GMT -6
Hurling (like Lacrosse on a football pitch I guess) More like Irishmen with axe handles, if you ask me... ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by bouncingboredom on Feb 2, 2010 4:39:50 GMT -6
the one thing that strikes me with the expansion through northern and southern Europe and Japan, is how much more could be done save for the language barrier..... What has been the experience of those in the know of overcoming this obstacle? Secondly, I wondered about how non-Americans view this sport through the lens of 'real' footballers....meaning, if your native sport is (what we call) soccer and/or rugby, how does one see "Football" because of the ever-changing nature of THIS game. Noteably, that I don't imagine soccer/rugby have changed much in the past 80 years, whereas, 'football' is near unrecognizable as to what it was even 20 years ago (with all the rule changes). Trust me, soccer in this country (UK) has changed a huge amount over the last 80 years. It's much more of a non-contact sport now (there used to be a certain 'leeway' towards pushing and shoving). The paralell would be all the "pass interference" calls that you see now everytime a guy falls over. The introduction of foreign players may also interest you americans. It brought two things with it: 1) An increase in diving, play acting, and other such unsportsmanlike conduct & 2) Reduced opportunities for home grown players to make it in the big leagues, as more and more spots are being taken by foreign players. You have been warned......
|
|
crl
Junior Member
Pick me , pick me... I want to be on the RNC location scout team.
Posts: 476
|
Post by crl on Feb 2, 2010 6:08:36 GMT -6
I have been here forever in Europe , it seems and sometimes language can be a problem, but they the players pick it up quickly. I always tell them its like the French Foreign Legion , they say it once in French and if you don´t get it you will in another not so popular way. The use of this MFer and that MFer helps sometimes too.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Feb 2, 2010 7:25:36 GMT -6
.
|
|
|
Post by razorback47 on Feb 2, 2010 7:44:40 GMT -6
Interesting questions by brophy. Let me try to explain the perception of American Football in my country.
First of all I have to second julien. They don’t see any change in the nature of American football, because they don’t even understand the basic idea behind it.
Here in Germany, people are used to watching soccer. After a two minute introduction you can watch a soccer game and have some fun. The by far most difficult rule in soccer is “offsides”, a real joke compared to the complexity of football rules. Still, in my experience, 80% of the soccer fans can’t explain it correctly. 95% don’t have a clue about tactical variations. A soccer version of “NFL chalkboard” was unknown in soccer coverage until the 2006 World Cup. Now some get the idea behind the "Double 4 Chain". Then you start to teach football to these guys. When the uneducated sports fan sees a football game for the first time, he usually reacts like “It has something to do with rugby, doesn’t it?” (I have no idea where that comes from. Even water polo is more popular here than rugby. No comparison to UK, France or even Italy). I always tell them that historically the rugby comparison is correct, but football has two major elements unknown to rugby, one of them unknown to any other sport: the forward pass and the offense block. The result is a completely different, very unique game. That argument gets them interested, well, usually, somewhat.
In addition, the uneducated fan is deeply annoyed by the interruptions in a football game. In that case, I use the chess problem analogy: Football is like solving a long series of different chess problems. The teams come up with a possible solution, line up their “pieces”, the problem comes to life for a few seconds and the result can be very surprising. Imagine a football game to be like solving 120 consecutive chess problems. Much more dynamic than the typical chess match, where at a certain point you know that it will end in a draw 12 moves later. Mostly, they don’t believe me. They are simply annoyed by the three hour format. Others enjoy the "spend an afternoon with the family" atmosphere of football games (Quite a change from the violent fan culture in the soccer world), but refuse to learn any offense formations or plays. Very few understand defensive concepts. So much for the perception of football over here. People are not used to having to make a huge investment to follow a game. Still, football is the second most popular outdoor team sport in this country. Surprisingly, after number one there is a HUGE drop off. More popular than field hockey, though, which is pretty big here.
The language barrier has two sides. One the one hand, every available source about football above a level of “Basic Introduction to American Football” exists only in American. I write my playbooks in American, since writing them in German would be close to impossible. I would have to invent a new terminology. Some of my players don’t speak English very well and even those who do find it difficult to get used to the terminology. That’s part of the game. Our American players love it. Most German teams write their playbooks in some kind of “Germish”.
On the other hand, football helps to overcome the language barrier. As stated in “M.A.S.H” (the Altman movie, of course) football contributes to spreading American lifestyle. You can find some evidence here in Germany. Bavaria (part of the former American sector) offers the highest team density (teams/population). The US troops mostly left 20 years ago but a lot of teams they helped to build up still exist. A major part of my motivation to learn English was my interest in US Sports. I had to understand the sports news and game broadcasts on AFN radio. Today, you have ESPN America via pay TV but in the German media US sports still are hardly mentioned. Free TV shows only the Super Bowl but not even the conference championships.
I hope this gives you an idea.
|
|
|
Post by bouncingboredom on Feb 2, 2010 8:07:01 GMT -6
I find using the Rugby League code of rules as a good comparison. Tell people:
"It's a bit like Rugby League. Except with blocking. And forward passes. And helmets. And concussions."
|
|
|
Post by cc on Feb 2, 2010 8:59:22 GMT -6
Trust me BB rugby has its fair share of concussions. Rugby is more brutal than football. Head to head collisions without a helmet on!?!?! = bad news
|
|
|
Post by coachguy83 on Feb 2, 2010 9:19:40 GMT -6
I love to see the spread of the game outside of the US. I just wish that they would they would show more of the games on TV. It would be great for kids in the US to turn on the boob tube and see a kid from Ohio playing against a kid from Germany.
|
|
|
Post by coacheurope on Feb 2, 2010 15:36:27 GMT -6
One major issue about American Football getting popular in Germany is the so-called Nowitzki-factor as there is in Basketball. But it will take decades to get a "skill position" player in the US. As long as a German doesn't make touchdowns in the NFL, football is a side note in sports coverage. In Germany there are like three big team sports: soccer, handball and basketball. The latter even has a kind of low attraction in national sports coverage compared to the first two. Handball starts to become a national game but probably won't ever become as huge as soccer is. Soccer for example has 6 million people participating in clubs and associations, including coaches and passive members. Basketball has around 100,000 members I guess and Football around 30,000. Nevertheless the domestic GFL used to attract some 4,000 to 5,000 in the stadiums in the late 1990's.
So it pretty much depends on the grass roots, getting young kids to sign up for football. But as you know, this is not that easy. Especially when you look at the infrastructure a football team needs to provide good practice, leaving alone game days. Also, coaches are a huge factor. Football has to be taught as responsibly as almost no other sport. Finding people coaching without stipends and the proper teaching abilities is somewhat hard. But as time goes on, the first and second generation of players (at least in West-Germany) retires and can contribute its knowledge. In the former GDR, however, amateur players from 19 years up often have to coach youth teams. So, you see where I'm going. ;-) But the basis of football is growing bigger and stronger. Unfortunately, European players weren't as noticed in this "World" Team as they should have been.
|
|
|
Post by airtrafficcontrol on Feb 2, 2010 17:40:25 GMT -6
Politics and all know it...
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Feb 6, 2010 21:16:07 GMT -6
I don't imagine soccer/rugby have changed much in the past 80 years, whereas, 'football' is near unrecognizable as to what it was even 20 years ago (with all the rule changes). No, actually rugby has changed enormously in the past 15-30 years, more so than American football.
|
|