|
Post by handsman on Aug 7, 2009 16:50:15 GMT -6
Need some ideas for O/D system for youth football. KISS principle. Coached a number of years MS to HS, but trying to get an idea for the little guys. Just got back on the website and was looking for the playbooks that used to be here. Can't seem to find them. Seem to remember Coach Bodie may have posted some youth football stuff, could be wrong. Any help at all would be appreciated. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by handsman on Aug 7, 2009 17:10:30 GMT -6
Let me clear up a couple of things I didn't mention. I've coached for 10 yrs. now, but not at this level. I've moved on from HS to spend some time with my boys (3). Some parents have come to me and asked me to form a team and coach'em up. I'm trying to get an idea of what others are doin' before I jump in cold turkey. I do elementary PE and really enjoy working with the kiddos, wished everyone on our staff was this way. I've had a basketball team the last couple of years (7-8 yr) and know what to expect from parents. I would be moving from HS Varsity ball and I am trying to get some ideas here.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 7, 2009 17:31:00 GMT -6
hey Coach, Ill suggest running the double wing fantastic five plus two play action passes.
you might do well with:
wedge power both ways counter both ways sweep both ways trap one way power pass one way boot pass other way
defensively any of the usuals, gam, 46, wide seven, 65 goal line
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Aug 7, 2009 23:31:55 GMT -6
hey Coach, Ill suggest running the double wing fantastic five plus two play action passes. you might do well with: wedge power both ways counter both ways sweep both ways trap one way power pass one way boot pass other way defensively any of the usuals, gam, 46, wide seven, 65 goal line The suggestion of double wing for the offense would be good but for two factors that may be telling at that age: 1. It leans heavily on the QB position if it's the usual under-center version. QB has to learn a good deal of footwork & handwork to get out of the way of pulling linemen and distribute the ball, let alone pulling thru the hole (although not everybody does that), plus learning the C-QB exhange, which depends a lot on feel between C & QB. 2. It relies a lot on pulling linemen. Even if you don't super-power it and pull only the guards (or only the tackles), that's still a couple of pulling positions in the formation at all times. So yes, it's simple for most positions, but getting good enough execution at these critical positions could require more coaching than there's time for. You could ameliorate most of problem 1 by moving the backs back in the style of Adam Wesoloski's Bulldogs in 2000: . However, if you really want simple on offense, nothing simpler than Beast.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 8, 2009 3:33:03 GMT -6
Eh, a million success stories for dwers in that age group, no need to hype it, the footwork is a breeze and pulling is just runnign from point a to point b. THEY CAN DO IT IF YOU CAN COACH IT. Coach has ten years of experience, my guess, hes a capable instructor.
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Aug 8, 2009 15:13:31 GMT -6
Eh, a million success stories for dwers in that age group, no need to hype it, the footwork is a breeze and pulling is just runnign from point a to point b. THEY CAN DO IT IF YOU CAN COACH IT. Coach has ten years of experience, my guess, hes a capable instructor. I've seen a very capable adult football coach go wrong by trying to install stuff that wasn't age appropriate for youngsters. You've got a great slogan there in caps, but unfortunately not true. Under-center DW is feasible, as proven by many examples, and it's far from the worst choice, but for KISS purposes it's far from best choice too. We can see the highlights from the success stories, but nobody puts up the lowlights from the failure stories. It's pretty much all-or-nothing, in that if you find you can't coach them up in the system with all its motion, pulls, handoffs and tosses, you have almost nothing to fall back on. If they've gotten good at the wedge, OK, there's that, and maybe you've put in a wedge pass to go with it, but otherwise if the season is fast approaching and you need to install simpler plays as an alternative because they're just not getting it in time for game 1, there isn't much else that works with the formation. OTOH if you start with the extreme of simplicity with beast, you can add more complex stuff if their progress is satisfactory. You don't have to go to that extreme to start, but it's the starkest example I can think of.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 9, 2009 4:18:00 GMT -6
actually, BEAST has its own set of challenges, if we are going to be purely negative and focus on potential problems, the beast and any other direct snap attack can give you snap issues, such as the center rolling the ball or snapping it over a backs head, the back can and does take his eyes off the ball and drops it.
I know you love direct snap stuff coach, and so do I however Ill stand by my suggestion of running the double wing system. I never claim it to be the easiest offense to coach, heck if you just want easy then put the kids in crunch and use man up blocking and let your qb just take the snap and run wherever he wants. do you want kiss or do you want to win?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2009 16:23:56 GMT -6
you're gonna get 50 different answers from 50 different coaches..but I go with SW
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Aug 9, 2009 17:40:29 GMT -6
actually, BEAST has its own set of challenges, if we are going to be purely negative and focus on potential problems, the beast and any other direct snap attack can give you snap issues, such as the center rolling the ball or snapping it over a backs head, the back can and does take his eyes off the ball and drops it. Of course, although I think on the whole the problems with a conventional hand-to-hand snap are greater than with a snap tossed a short distance. However, if under center were to turn out easier, there's always crunch, which is just like beast but has the ball snapped to a QB under C instead of to a FB. I was going by the original question, which said he wanted KISS. The Mighty Mites (8Us) where I coached in 2007 had the best or 2nd best team of the 6 the organiz'n had, and they used triple I with just 4 plays in each direction to start the season. More complicated than beast or crunch, but still much more forgiving than double wing.
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Aug 9, 2009 18:32:25 GMT -6
IMO, at that age, two TE's and Wishbone, running dive, power, sweep, counter, boot is a pretty simple 5 play offense and effective.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Aug 10, 2009 10:34:00 GMT -6
Need some ideas for O/D system for youth football. KISS principle. Coached a number of years MS to HS, but trying to get an idea for the little guys. Just got back on the website and was looking for the playbooks that used to be here. Can't seem to find them. Seem to remember Coach Bodie may have posted some youth football stuff, could be wrong. Any help at all would be appreciated. Thanks Answering the original question: Ive run the Single Wing with this age group many seasons and have had great success, scoring lots of points, getting everyone the ball and allowing my MMP kids on the field. The age groups we have overlap that group, combined we went 63-4 with 5 different teams. Real good retention etc Reason I like the SW for this age group: Simple and safe 2 yard low direct snap. Much safer and much easier to teach than traditional indirect snap that if fumbled ( happens alot at that age group, gets gobbled up by defense) Not a lot of handoffs and pitches which take a lot of time to teach and perfect and when they go wrong, you lose the football. Handoffs and pitches often slow a play down to a dead standstill, snap and go. No need for the ball to go through the hands of one playerm dont have to depend on the dexterity and mind of one 7 year old. We won our league title in 2005 starting our 4th team "QB". You just cant consisitently train 4 traditional QBs in youth football, with all the footwork etc and expect to still score 30 +ppg Get anyone the football. it is VERY rare at that age that we dont get every single player the ball. In 2007 and 2008 we had 24 different kids score TDs at that age group with every eligible player carrying the ball at least 1-2 times. We dont train them at all, waste practice time on it, In endzone at half when up by 3 TDs we just ask them to catch the ball and run behind #21 etc, No handoffs or motion or fancy footwork needed. Pulling just 1 player. In non select youth football, very difficult to get MMP kids to pull with consistent effectivness. But we can usually find and train 1 that is reasonably athletic and very consistent. That is why you see so many Double Wing teams flopping their lines and giving up where they are going, they cant find 4 effective pullers. By 95% of the "experts" on the DW , the don't consider it KISS, they consider it quite coaching intensive. If your team is like most, you can only spread yourself so thin, your assistants have to coach as well. The largest group of them go here: forums.delphiforums.com/dwingers/messages Im positive they will say the same thing. You can get the perspective of the biggest Single Wing group on the net here: forums.delphiforums.com/SingleWing/messagesIve run the DW and SW and have studied both extensively. We standardized on the SW many moons ago for the above reasons. The DW is a very good series based offense, but I feel we can do everything out of the DW in the SW, get there quicker and with less risk, while allowing me to get the ball to everyone. Later in the season if the kids are getting it, we can add what no other offense has, the full spinner series, considered by many including Ted Seay as the most deceptive series in all of football. Nearly all the "gurus" of the indirect snap offenses are addind direct snap components to their offenses, It isnt the other way around. You start with 6 basic plays plus 1. A power, Sweep, counter, trap, wedge, PA pass and Pop Pass 4 plays to the right and 3 to the left. QB already has depth, simple to thow out of You can snap the ball to 3 different players, the defense doesnt have a clue who you are snapping to 11 on 11 football at its finest Direct snap, I dont have to worry about my QB getting run over by my puller The only reason I would ever go under center again was if I was forced to and if I was forced to, I wouldnt coach there LOL> I know a lot of guys decide to go under center because it looks more palatable etc for me, that doesnt matter. Last season at 2008 and the previous at 2007 we had maybe 4-5 bad snaps total, and just 1 that resulted in a turnover at age 7-9. Several here on the forum have those complete season every snap DVDs etc. As Bob stated the very bluntest version of the SW would be the Fat or Yale formation that some refer to today as beast. Su[per simple, I prefer the ability and deception of snapping to 3 different players, so not a favorite of mine.
|
|
|
Post by bobgoodman on Aug 10, 2009 10:52:50 GMT -6
IMO, at that age, two TE's and Wishbone, running dive, power, sweep, counter, boot is a pretty simple 5 play offense and effective. And I'll second that one as well in terms of being more forgiving than double wing. This non-option Y formation is very commonly seen around here with Mighty Mite (8U) teams. There's no man in motion so the timing issues aren't there. The QB still has to learn the C-QB exchange and handing the ball off -- and in some versions a pitchout -- but it's still a more manageable load than the DW QB has. You can pull linemen on sweeps and powers, but if you wind up not being able to coach them up to it, there are non-pull schemes you can fall back on going in one or both directions in the power Y. OTOH if your QB is very proficient at ballhandling, you can add stuff like a double dive belly series (although best without a read at that age), end-around, and what-have-you. It has upward and downward flexibility compared to the DW. If you play the line tight, you can still wedge like the DW. If your QB is good enough, he can still toss and lead like the DW, although the bootleg is more commonly seen. It's not contrarian -- as I've said, very popular -- but that wasn't what was asked for. Of course I won't be coming out against the choice of single wing, and Coach Cisar has a version optimized and well tested at all pre-teen levels; I was just offering beast as an even KISSer version of single wing. But my main point is that double wing as usually practiced is the worst choice of those offered in this thread (although I can think of far worse, like spread or triple option) for players this young & inexperienced. True, if they get good at it, they can rack up plenty of offense -- although the same can be said of single wing. But the down side potential of standard DW is much greater than the other choices, no matter how good you are at coaching.
|
|
|
Post by tiger46 on Aug 10, 2009 12:56:00 GMT -6
I, too, like the SW for that age group. I used Dave's. As far as ease of coaching, the base plays were pretty much 'find the RG's (puller) tailpad and follow it'. You'll probably use different coaching terminology. But, in the end, it came down to following the tailpad. Almost every player on your team will be able to understand that. Once they understood that concept, I could bend the rules when needed (no pull, decoy pull, a couple of plays that I installed). But, it was rarely needed. I would use the Wide Tackle 6 on defense. Although, a simplified version of Calande's 46 Gambler defense could work as well.
|
|
|
Post by handsman on Aug 12, 2009 15:03:39 GMT -6
Thanks for the advice from all. I knew it was a general question and expected a lot of opinions. That's what makes this site so great. Simple and Safe is a great way to go with these guys and I like what Dave is doing. It doesn't look as if I'll have a lot of help. People want to get involved, just not any experience. Simple goes a long way. I'll have my hands full with making sure we get the most from our practices with such a shortage of help. I like the idea of spreading the ball around to a number of players and keeping the defense guessing. I had already narrrowed it down in the last few days and had started to dive into the SW. Like I said, my football experience with this age group is nil and I want them to enjoy the game. I like to win, but I really enjoy teaching the fundamentals and working with these kids.
|
|
|
Post by belebuch1 on Mar 16, 2010 17:11:16 GMT -6
The UBSW is a very good offense for the youth level. Not hard to coach and it is very effective. I got Coach dave's stuff last yr and i was very satisfied.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2010 17:50:36 GMT -6
coach pick something you like and go from there
DW or SW would be a very sound choice, if you go DW-look up Steve Callande/SW -Dave Cisar
|
|
|
Post by FBCoachMike on Mar 16, 2010 21:12:55 GMT -6
SINGLE WING! Check out Dave Cisar or Adam Wesloski at Directsnap.com. On Defense you can run anything you're comfortable with 44, 53, 62, 61, 7D...just have to stop the big play (sweep). Best wishes!
|
|
|
Post by catz1 on Mar 17, 2010 10:36:35 GMT -6
Here's what I would do...
Jet Sweep Jet Wedge Jet Iso Jet Counter (double handoff - FB kicks / QB leads) Jet Waggle
Run Wedge & Iso with no motion also.
That's it!
BTW... you have some other good suggestions here also. Every coach has his preferences.
Good luck.
|
|
|
Post by coachdoug on Mar 17, 2010 11:34:29 GMT -6
Like catz, I'm a big fan of the Jet/Fly series, but it is somewhat coaching intensive. Choose something you're comfortable with and go for it - just make sure you have the following components: - Series based. Have a package of plays (3-8) that look similar (at least in terms of backfield action) and attack different parts of the defense. Look for who is making the plays for your opponent's defense, and then call the appropriate complementary play to take advantage of that player's over-aggressiveness.
- Simple blocking rules. You can pull and do different things to make it interesting, but your players have to know their assignments. You can use OIL or GOD or GDB, etc. - just make sure your players know the rules for each play so they go to their assignments aggressively. At the youth level (especially the younger ages), most blocks don't get defeated because of poor technique as much as because the blocker either doesn't do his assignment or is unsure and goes so tentatively as to get in the way more than block.
- Don't ask the kids to do things they are not capable of - i.e. don't set them up to fail. Most 7-8 yr old kids can only throw the ball about 10-15 yards, so don't ask them to complete 25 yard throws. Most kids that age don't have the mental capacity or attention span to learn much more than the names of the positions and their assignments, so don't ask them to make complex reads or understand complex concept plays with multiple options.
- Be Minimum Play Player (MPP) friendly. Make sure your offense (and defense, for that matter) have places where you can put weaker players (unlike HS, in most youth leagues everyone MUST play - even if not by rule, that should be your policy). You don't want to just put Johnny out wide and tell him not to move - as Dave Cisar says, find a place and assignment where each player can legitimately add value on each snap.
- Focus on fundamentals. No one should be overly concerned with wins and losses at the 7-8 yr old level - just teach the kids the game, make it fun, and get them fundamentally sound and they will keep coming back and success will be a natural result.
Good luck to you, coach - let us know how it goes.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Mar 17, 2010 12:07:34 GMT -6
Im a huge fan of the Jet as well. We have been running Jet since 2006 with Jet Sweep, Jet Power, Jet counter, Jet wedge, Jet Trap, Jet PA pass and Jet Flood
We found it to be very expensice time wise- Anyone can do it, but to do it well with tight meshes and great perimiter blocking, that is another story. We dont run jet until our kids get 9+. We tried it with the younger kids- didnt execute it to my satisfaction. Not the most efficient use of time IMO
It also really tires your studs out, you HAVE to sub in and get other kids running the motion a lot. With our 5-6th graders and up we have run about 35% jet snaps out of our spread SW. But under the jet is just our base series, wedge, power, counter, trap, sweep, PA pass, nothing really changes.
Here are some 10-11s running 1 play from the series. From 2006, First year we ran it some plays better than others. The perimeter blocking is what takes all the time, varying the splits etc getting the snap tight to mesh takes some time also. JMO
Coach Doug is spot on as usual. Whatever you run just execute it perfectly- handful of complementery plays with great/perfect fundamentals. Making sure your MMPs get in and add value.
|
|