|
Post by 19delta on Feb 28, 2009 19:49:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Feb 28, 2009 20:02:53 GMT -6
Delta-- I don't think they would, because someone else did it first. It is no longer INNOVATIVE. Although, I could see them doing something to create an entire OFFENSIVE SYSTEM around animal noises and such
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Feb 28, 2009 20:04:41 GMT -6
That's like the wrong ball play that has been run in the past.
I have a book coming out on it and the offense based around. Would share more but I have a clinic to give on it.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Feb 28, 2009 20:15:15 GMT -6
except that the wrong ball play is specifically marked as "illegal" in the officials case books.
When I was coaching JR. HIGH eons ago..I used to make my QB boot out, and then pirouette and dance at the end of the play. A defender always hesitated just a bit to watch what he was doing before pursuing.
|
|
|
Post by tog on Feb 28, 2009 20:16:17 GMT -6
barf
i think we have had enough a11 talk
|
|
|
Post by coachmoore42 on Feb 28, 2009 22:20:10 GMT -6
barf i think we have had enough a11 talk Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by Yash on Feb 28, 2009 23:14:37 GMT -6
|
|
tdtom
Sophomore Member
Posts: 208
|
Post by tdtom on Mar 1, 2009 0:03:01 GMT -6
BEST PICTURE EVER
|
|
|
Post by coachinghopeful on Mar 1, 2009 17:13:37 GMT -6
It's nice to see photographic evidence of the Piedmont HS head coach, athletic director, and principal demonstrating the revolutionary new A-11 offseason strength and conditioning program... I would comment more, but I have to re-arrange my sock drawer. More to come. JA
|
|
|
Post by k on Mar 1, 2009 18:54:31 GMT -6
Only thing worse than the A-11 is the people who spend what seems like the majority of their days attacking it.
|
|
|
Post by gdoggwr on Mar 2, 2009 12:49:50 GMT -6
Not that I am or ever was an A-11 supporter... but the A-11 was legal, and they didn't try to hide that they were running it. To me its completely different than the barking dog or wrong ball. Those are just cheap. IMO
I know, I know, a voice of reason in a post not created for reason....
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Mar 2, 2009 13:13:12 GMT -6
Maybe it's time for a separate A-11 area on the board. As much as I like to comment on it, I think it's time to move on. Let it die a nice quiet death. Just ignore them I am sure they just want more publicity, per the espn.com story today. Just let it go let it go...
|
|
|
Post by knight9299 on Mar 2, 2009 14:02:47 GMT -6
Not that I am or ever was an A-11 supporter... but the A-11 was legal, and they didn't try to hide that they were running it. To me its completely different than the barking dog or wrong ball. Those are just cheap. IMO I know, I know, a voice of reason in a post not created for reason.... WAS legal. Heck I used the scrimmage kick rule to protect my fill in center one game. I just never took it farther than that.
|
|
|
Post by gdoggwr on Mar 2, 2009 14:21:30 GMT -6
Not that I am or ever was an A-11 supporter... but the A-11 was legal, and they didn't try to hide that they were running it. To me its completely different than the barking dog or wrong ball. Those are just cheap. IMO I know, I know, a voice of reason in a post not created for reason.... WAS legal. Heck I used the scrimmage kick rule to protect my fill in center one game. I just never took it farther than that. Thats what I said. Was legal. for the record I wasn't defending it, I was just pointing out that too me it apples and oranges comparing it to the wrong ball/barking dog. Rotten apples and oranges yes, but still not really the same thing.
|
|