bgj
Sophomore Member
Posts: 154
|
Post by bgj on Feb 25, 2009 18:32:10 GMT -6
I am a coach at a school that just opened a few years ago. Our district built new high school and split into two. Our school historically is not very good. 1 playoff appearance (since 1945). 5 years ago 2 years before the split. Currently between the two school we have 3 wins in the last three years, against each other, they beat us twice, we beat them once. Our combined record is 1-26 theirs is 2-25.
Anyways, our policy is 22 start on the freshman, and 22 start at the sophomore level, and everyone plays (we tried to increase numbers) and we have been successful with that. 75 fr 50 soph. 75 Varsity.
Well the lower levels as a result do not win as many games because we play so many, (the admin is comparing us to the other school that "wins" on the lower level) but they don't have as many kids (and the still lose on varsity).
The admin just told us that we need to start winning on all levels. The quote was we need to "start seeing results" I can understand varsity, but the lower levels? Is the writing on the wall and they are going to fire us anyways? or do I Play 15 on the lower levels win at lower levels, not develop more. (we are two platooning, but may have to change this year)
Obviously we need to win on varsity, but the winning more on the lower levels really gets to me. I coached at three other successful programs (2 state champs, 2 2nds, 3 semi final appearances) between the three and that is what they have done in their programs. We have chance at 4 or 5 wins, but the others we have no chance yet. I rambled but is their any light at the end of the tunnel? What are some of the things that you do in your programs?
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Feb 25, 2009 18:49:31 GMT -6
That's a tough one. Winning at the varsity level usually takes care of all that stuff (and more). I would say the AD is with you win or tie. It might be time to brush up your resume. We also try to play everyone on our Frosh and JV but I don't think 22 starters is necessary.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Feb 25, 2009 18:51:39 GMT -6
Have you presented your philosophy with proof of the results at other programs?
I have to believe that if you were to approach the admins with a documented philosophy from successful programs (maybe a voucher from coaches at those programs) and demonstrable effort to accomplish the same thing at the lower levels, you'll accumulate more leeway.
Do so in a polite, informative, non-patronizing manner, should help you a good deal.
Personally, I like the philosophy a lot and think that it's a "stick to your guns" moment. With numbers comes wins, as long as you're developing talent in the offseason.
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Feb 25, 2009 19:10:55 GMT -6
I would agree that it's important to play a lot of kids at the lower levels, but to start 22 might be a bit extreme. I am sure you could still get kids some PT on the lower levels but you might have to have some guys going both ways. Not trying to be negative but...yes it seems to be working where you have the numbers BUT is doesn't sound like it's translating into any wins on the Varsity. It's a harsh reality but bottom line is coaches are expected to win. If you have been told you need to win, then I would examine every aspect of the program and find out why you aren't.
|
|
|
Post by touchdowng on Feb 25, 2009 20:22:55 GMT -6
bgj
I can totally appreciate what you are trying to do within your vertical program. We opened up a school 4 years ago and went with the same 22 starters at Frosh and JV.
Our first Freshman team was 0-9. As seniors this past year we still had 30 of the 35 who turned out their 9th grade season. I believe because the kids knew that we were developing all of them as freshmen. They finished 6-3 at the vars level in 08 but got knocked out in the first round of the playoffs.
Honestly? I believe the success they did have this past season had more to do with the fact that they "bought in" to our off season program. Over the next three off-seasons they literally turned themselves into FB players.
We've backed off of the 22 starters but we still try to stay close to that. We had over 40 frosh out this past season and all but 5 or 6 received significant playing time. Our criteria is making every practice, knowing their jobs, and playing with aggression. The 5 or 6 who did most of the watching were passive.
I'd say stick to your plan but don't be afraid to modify. Not to please the admin but to start having some success at your lower levels because success breeds success.
Our overall records the past 4 years went like this. '05 - freshmen 0-9, JV 2-7, Vars 2-8 '06 - freshmen 3-6, JV 4-5, Vars 2-8 '07 - freshmen 4-5, JV 5-4, Vars 7-4 made it to the 2nd round '08 - freshmen 6-3, JV 7-1-1, Vars 6-4 made it to 1st round
We're not there yet but kids need to see some tangible evidence that their efforts are paying off.
|
|
|
Post by airman on Feb 25, 2009 20:33:01 GMT -6
then they will not mind 3 to 4 hr practices and practices on saturday mornings.
|
|
|
Post by ajreaper on Feb 25, 2009 20:43:55 GMT -6
Why is it important to win at the lower levels? Your improving your numbers and helping develop depth and talent. I have to believe that over time having 30+ seniors every year will help turn the corner with the varsity.
I can guarentee this is driven by parents of lower level kids bitching about "other" less talented kids playing and losing games- I'd bet anything that's what driving the crap at the lower levels.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Feb 26, 2009 2:34:33 GMT -6
Just win. Put the best kids on the field at every level and win. You will still have numbers because the kids obviously like you guys to keep playing when losing. at the lower levels you can still play everyone when you get a big enough lead. You can also work in more kids for a series here or there - but win.
There is no doubt about it. You need to win based on what you were told. If the admin doesnt consider recitivism and participation "results" than give them what they want.
|
|
|
Post by red2slam on Feb 26, 2009 7:47:08 GMT -6
Making all the kids and their parents feel good is not going to win you many football games.
|
|
|
Post by red2slam on Feb 26, 2009 7:51:10 GMT -6
isnt playing on game night based on a couple of nights of practice? I hate to tell anybody this but the objective of playing a game is to win. Your message when playing the "play everybody" card is a losing one. The message you are sending to your good players who actually win you games, is the wrong one.
|
|
|
Post by justryn2 on Feb 26, 2009 8:01:13 GMT -6
I agree with jgordon1 and wingtol; you want to get starting positions for as many players as possible but that doesn't necessarily mean you have to have 22 starters. If you have 22 players that have earned starting positions then you 22 starters but otherwise give starting positions only to those that have earned them.
Having said that, I'm not certain that this one change is going to completely turn around your program. Unfortunately, loosing can become a habit and a hard one to break. Are your players and assistant coaches totally buying in to the program? Are you and your staff attending clinics, talking with other coaches, reading and studying and generally taking advantage of the football resources available to you? Its hard to get buy in from others if they don't feel you're doing everything possible to improve what you're doing.
I am sure you can turn things around and start seeing some success but, as Einstein said, continuing to do the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity. In order to get things going in the right direction you will need to do some serious soul searching and make some changes; some of which may be tough. Whether you have 22 starters or just 11 you have to have buy in from your players and assistant coaches, and buy in implies ownership. Once everyone feels some ownership things will start turning around and the wins will come.
Good luck coach.
|
|
|
Post by olinecoach61 on Feb 26, 2009 8:07:33 GMT -6
Clearly the administration is telling you need to win or else. I would put the best 11 on the field at all times. I understand your thought process in wanting to two platoon, but if your not winning games it may be time for a change in your program before you get axed.
|
|
|
Post by fatkicker on Feb 26, 2009 8:31:10 GMT -6
i like getting all kids p.t. at the lower levels......but every school has the 1 or 2 that should never leave the field.....
22 starters is nice.......but 22 starters getting the he77 beat outta them every week isn't going to improve numbers........on your sideline or in your bank account......
you gotta play to win a lil bit........even at the lower levels...
|
|
|
Post by lochness on Feb 26, 2009 8:39:22 GMT -6
In my experience, the MOMENT the administration steps in and starts interfering with how you run your program, you are already done. It's only a matter of how much time.
I know that sounds depressing and miserable...but I've never seen or heard any evidence to make me believe that it is not true.
|
|
|
Post by coachnorm on Feb 26, 2009 8:43:36 GMT -6
Coach When you're trying to turn a program around, one of your obstacles is that your kids are used to losing. They need to learn how to win. To me, that makes winning at the lower levels critical to building the future of your program. Those kids need to learn to expect to win they are going to be your varsity soon. I'm not saying your logic in getting as many in the games as possible is flawed, but you've got to break the losing tradition at some point and building from the bottom up is always best.
|
|
htownoc
Sophomore Member
GATA
Posts: 186
|
Post by htownoc on Feb 26, 2009 9:11:29 GMT -6
I agree with lochness. Once administration tries to dictate football policy- you're toast. We had a similar situation at my last school. Our varsity sucked because the previous coach had no weight program and no discipline. Our JV/Frosh team sucked because winning on that level was not a priority. Our priority was developing players, rewarding hard-workers, etc. Our administration viewed the win-loss record of the JV/Frosh team as a sign that we weren't improving. I viewed that fact that we retained every 9th grader and doubled the weightroom attendance as a sign that we were improving. Too many ADs are spineless and impatient. We can't recruit- sometimes we are going to suck. It's not our fault- it's genetics.
|
|
|
Post by knighter on Feb 26, 2009 9:27:58 GMT -6
in iowa there is no jv state championship game, there is no freshmen state championship game, nor is there a playoff for either level. until there is i will stick by my guns and play/develop/coach as many of those younger players as i can get my hands on. football needs to be an enjoyable experience for the lower level kids. wins are great, but not at the expense of losing potential players in the future.
case in point
in my last job the jh coaches rode a kid so hard about being so big/slow/passive that he did not go out in HS at all. this kid developed into one of the best athletes i have seen...6'6", 265, fast (placed 3rd in the 110 Highs at the Conference Track meet and had never practiced them EVER) school record holder and state champion in both the shotput and discus as a senior. High jumped 6'8" as a senior in his first ever meet (had practiced it for about a week). Had he had a good experience in JH he would have gone out in HS. I actually asked him why he never played football in HS (he graduated my 2nd year at the school) and he was very honest with me. The JH coaches made him HATE football, and even though he liked me, and enjoyed our time in track together, he never wanted to give me a chance to make football enjoyable for him. I had my AD and administration fire my JH coaches, and hired 2 guys I trusted to make FB a great experience for everyone. The number of wins decreased slightly at that level, but the number of kids going out and STAYING out went up. Those kids who stayed went on to never NOT make the playoffs, and were district champions 5 of the 7 years I was there....Tony Mason's video says it best...if 35 kids go out as freshmen the freshmen coaches have a duty to get the JV coaches 35 kids for the next year. JV coaches get 35 coaches to the Varsity guys.....that is my philosophy and I would stick to your guns on this.
|
|
|
Post by dcoach505 on Feb 26, 2009 9:45:10 GMT -6
Two years ago the administration told the head coach at our school we need to start winning.......... The next season we had a new head coach.
|
|
|
Post by lilbuck1103 on Feb 26, 2009 9:47:42 GMT -6
I believe you can and should do both. At lower levels it is very possible to get meaningful repititions for all individuals. The key is remembering that football is not an equal opportunity sport. Not everyone is going to play the same amount of time. Get everyone some quality reps, but play to win the game. Life is about competition and the kids will not be successful during their varsity years if they never learned how to win at a lower level. Learning how to win is a more difficult concept that teaching blocking and tackling.
Play everyone meaningful time, not the same amount of time. This allows you to teach and develop everyone and keep a winning attitude. It is fairly easy to accomplish both and keep your administration happy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2009 10:28:55 GMT -6
This actually deals with one of the first lessons I learned as coach. I was on a freshmen staff and coached OL and DL. I tried my darndest to start 10 different kids at those spots. We played an I formation offense and a four-man defensive front and the TE was my responsibility as well. I started ten different kids, but two of my dlineman weren't very good so after the first series or two, a couple of my olineman stayed and played DL as well. Well, the two kids I was "starting" by definition only saw right through this and didn't go out next year anyway. I feel on the lower levels you should start as many different kids as possible, but not necessarily 22 different kids.
Some may disagree, but it is still February--if the administration wanted you out, I think they would go ahead and do it now. I think you at least have to give them credit in letting you know those expectations up front.
|
|
|
Post by atalbert on Feb 26, 2009 10:37:09 GMT -6
I agree. When kids know there are 22 spots open and everyone plays, there isn't as much competitiveness IMO. Now, I'm at a small school, so there's a different problem set. But, the kids know that there are 35 of them competing for 11 spots - every day. I tell them I need 11 guys to go to battle with - and I don't care which 11 it is - that's up to them.
It sounds like there may have been a "losing" mentality already in place. Kids are used to losing and are OK with it. Why try and be great if you know your number is going to be called eventually because everyone will play.
When you lose that much, kids live to win. They like to win more than they hate to lose - and that's dangerous. When too many kids love to win, they only truly give full effort when a victory is in sight so they can celebrate, etc. Losses are expected and accepted. There are always 100 excuses they can use - pick your favorite that day and everyone is OK with it.
I'll take 11 kids who HATE TO LOSE against 75 who love to win every day. You have to find 10 kids who hate to lose and build around them. It has to be a mentality that spreads to all levels.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Feb 26, 2009 10:42:43 GMT -6
I think its fair for admin to tell you that the expectations are to win. Its a reality that we all have to deal with.
|
|
|
Post by gpoulin76 on Feb 26, 2009 11:06:21 GMT -6
UHHHHHHHH.......then you better win.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2009 11:23:36 GMT -6
UHHHHHHHH.......then you better win. That's cute! My question is, how the he!! can you win when you can't go buy your talent? The college football mentality is trickling into h.s. sports at an alarming rate and it is simply a fallacy. If we put it into perspective, coaching h.s. football and being asked to win like that would be like showing up to the Daytona 500 with an assortment of parts that you got at a junk yard. Even if everybody had to build their cars from junk yard parts, some junk yards are going to have better parts than others...right?! I've just never believed all this b.s. that at the h.s. level the coach is the major difference maker. In college, yes, but h.s. how can you be when you have play the hand your dealt? I do think you need to attempt to be competitive rather than having your kids just get run over, but there comes a point where the reality light needs to come on in these peoples heads! It was like that at my last job. They were as school that in 50 years of football had 1 state title appearance and lost, had only been in the state playoff series 6 times in 50 years. The best record any coach had was one back in the late 60's who in 5 years went 32-18, but never put a team in the playoffs. The coach before me was there 16 years and a 90-92 record over that time. I came in and in 6 years we were 28-34, but had 2 consecutive years in the playoffs! The last year I was there we went 4-6 and missed the playoffs by the width of the upright on the goalpost and I get fired...go figure! Now all of a sudden winning is paramount?! Ridiculous! I think in h.s. for the most part football is a character builder first and then score oriented second. I know a lot will eat me alive on here for saying that, but I don't see how it can be otherwise. Like Parcell's once said, if you want me to make a gourmet meal, you better let me shop for the groceries, and very few h.s. football coaches have that luxury. Duece
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Feb 26, 2009 12:01:52 GMT -6
IF you play in a league with teams similar to yours you had better find a way to win. what do you do to give your kids a chance to compete and win despite poor talent?
|
|
|
Post by gpoulin76 on Feb 26, 2009 12:52:06 GMT -6
UHHHHHHHH.......then you better win. That's cute! My question is, how the he!! can you win when you can't go buy your talent? The college football mentality is trickling into h.s. sports at an alarming rate and it is simply a fallacy. If we put it into perspective, coaching h.s. football and being asked to win like that would be like showing up to the Daytona 500 with an assortment of parts that you got at a junk yard. Even if everybody had to build their cars from junk yard parts, some junk yards are going to have better parts than others...right?! I've just never believed all this b.s. that at the h.s. level the coach is the major difference maker. In college, yes, but h.s. how can you be when you have play the hand your dealt? I do think you need to attempt to be competitive rather than having your kids just get run over, but there comes a point where the reality light needs to come on in these peoples heads! It was like that at my last job. They were as school that in 50 years of football had 1 state title appearance and lost, had only been in the state playoff series 6 times in 50 years. The best record any coach had was one back in the late 60's who in 5 years went 32-18, but never put a team in the playoffs. The coach before me was there 16 years and a 90-92 record over that time. I came in and in 6 years we were 28-34, but had 2 consecutive years in the playoffs! The last year I was there we went 4-6 and missed the playoffs by the width of the upright on the goalpost and I get fired...go figure! Now all of a sudden winning is paramount?! Ridiculous! I think in h.s. for the most part football is a character builder first and then score oriented second. I know a lot will eat me alive on here for saying that, but I don't see how it can be otherwise. Like Parcell's once said, if you want me to make a gourmet meal, you better let me shop for the groceries, and very few h.s. football coaches have that luxury. Duece The reality is that we get judged on wins and losses. Like it or not, fair or unfair. That is the way our society is. They want to see results. I know that football is more than wins and losses. But at the end of the day, parents and administrators want to win now. Nobody cares about the ills of the program. Nobody cares about the school's historical lack of success. Nobody cares how many wins you had at your previous school. Bottom line: You need to go out and win NOW...that is the light at the end of the tunnel. Those are the expectations. They have been made clear to you. Find a way. Bitchin about it ain't gonna help you achieve positive results. So get to work! If you don't like it, then you and the staff need to resign.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2009 13:19:42 GMT -6
Ok, then can I have the recipe on how to make chicken salad from chicken sh!t?! I do agree with the post above about if you are in a league of "similar" teams then you need to find a way to win. Exactly!!! That is why in college and pro football you win or go home, but in high school football that doesn't exactly equate, b/c how often are teams "similar". I know where we are now, we'd hope to be "similar"! He!! "close to", or "1/2 as good as" are words thrown around here. When you're bad your bad, there's just no other saying for it! And when you can make chicken salad from chicken sh!t you call me back b/c I want the first copy of the book you write!
Duece
|
|
|
Post by John Knight on Feb 26, 2009 13:23:28 GMT -6
recipe on how to make chicken salad from chicken sh!t
You have to CHEAT! You can't make chicken salad unless you get you some real chickens.
|
|
|
Post by knighter on Feb 26, 2009 13:31:19 GMT -6
So you go undefeated in freshmen ball and JV ball...who gives a $hit? No one in their right mind cares about that....development of the players at that level is critical. SO the 5'3" kid sits the bench all year and never plays, doesn't go out ever again. That is fine, until that 5'3" freshmen hits his growth spurt and is a 6'2" 225 beast as a senior who says F.U. to the coaches who never let him play as a freshmen. This is BS, if you coached for me and were undefeated at the freshmen or JV levels and ran kids off every year I would fire your a$$. If you went undefeated and used everyone "fairly" equally and all kids had a great experience and stayed out, I would give you a raise. If you lost more than you won, and kids stayed out and got better due to your coaching/development of them I would give you a raise as well. They do not play 9th grade playoff games or JV playoff games, so WHO CARES? Winning is ALWAYS a goal, but you can win and make it a great experience for everyone involved too. Can't believe there are actually good head coaches who give a rats a$$ what their JV and freshmen records are (if it as the expense of running kids off). Again I WANT my kids to win, but not at the expense of my program...get kids out and KEEP them out. Keeping them out involves them seeing MEANINGFUL playing time at the lower levels. Mop up time does not cut it.
|
|
|
Post by coachnorm on Feb 26, 2009 14:05:10 GMT -6
So you go undefeated in freshmen ball and JV ball...who gives a $hit? No one in their right mind cares about that....development of the players at that level is critical. SO the 5'3" kid sits the bench all year and never plays, doesn't go out ever again. That is fine, until that 5'3" freshmen hits his growth spurt and is a 6'2" 225 beast as a senior who says F.U. to the coaches who never let him play as a freshmen. This is BS, if you coached for me and were undefeated at the freshmen or JV levels and ran kids off every year I would fire your a$$. If you went undefeated and used everyone "fairly" equally and all kids had a great experience and stayed out, I would give you a raise. If you lost more than you won, and kids stayed out and got better due to your coaching/development of them I would give you a raise as well. They do not play 9th grade playoff games or JV playoff games, so WHO CARES? Winning is ALWAYS a goal, but you can win and make it a great experience for everyone involved too. Can't believe there are actually good head coaches who give a rats a$$ what their JV and freshmen records are (if it as the expense of running kids off). Again I WANT my kids to win, but not at the expense of my program...get kids out and KEEP them out. Keeping them out involves them seeing MEANINGFUL playing time at the lower levels. Mop up time does not cut it. Easy there Tiger, I don't think I saw a single coach say that you don't play everyone or that you don't develop talent or anything of the sort. What I said is that if your kids are accustomed to losing you've got to teach them to win at some point. You don't run kids off, you don't sacrifice player development but winning is more of a priority than making sure that everyone plays x number of minutes. I am aware that some kids get a growth spurt but the kid that turns from a zero to an animal is a rare critter. (although that has nothing to do with anything)
|
|