|
Post by tigercoach on Feb 18, 2009 20:17:51 GMT -6
Not wanting to hijack the other track/football thread, I branched out and humbly state and ask:
Just playing devils advocate here and I clearly agree that track is more beneficial golf/baseball (insert whatever) but my question is: [glow=red,2,300]Does track truly benefit football and if so how?[/glow] I have heard the typical rhetoric regarding sprint drills, running form etc. but I still have silently wondered what benefits our kids get in track (other than competition) that you can't do better in a well structured off-season program.
|
|
|
Post by eaglemountie on Feb 18, 2009 20:24:27 GMT -6
Being a throws coach I have experienced coaching big lineman that do not understand how to be explosive and flexible at the same time (which you have to be to get maximum explosion).
I believe it allows them to use their bodies differently than ever before and learn that explosion and speed can be built through perfect repetition, which is much like weightlifting but I believe the competition/motivation is more external than internal.
|
|
|
Post by bulldogoption on Feb 18, 2009 21:05:21 GMT -6
I think you can basically get the same amount of weight training with WAY MORE sprinting during a track season.............i.e. the kids will get nearly as strong and much more sprint work than an offseason program
|
|
|
Post by PSS on Feb 18, 2009 21:16:44 GMT -6
Are you kidding me? Track's benefits to flexibility, explosiveness, mental toughness, and more importantly COMPETIVENESS!!! I looked out on the track after school today while we were finishing up track workouts. There were well over 200 kids 7th through 12th grade going through workouts (handoffs, starts, hurdle drills, field events). You can say we push track to our football players. Every skill person runs track. You see, we run our sprint work out during off season athletic period 3x a week with the skills, lift 2x a week. So after school workout is working on those things mentioned above.
You may say that they are not getting stronger, however when their sprint workout includes pulling truck tires 400 meters 4x, you're not going to loose any lower body strength.
|
|
|
Post by tigercoach on Feb 18, 2009 21:51:51 GMT -6
Thanks for the answers but most of you missed the question... The question was what does track offer that a well stuctured offseason doesn't? I never said track wasn't good and I specificly mentioned the competivness factor being a huge difference in a positive manner. I have No problem with track other than I think a well ran football specific offseason program can be more benificial to football players.
|
|
|
Post by airraider on Feb 18, 2009 22:02:09 GMT -6
Thanks for the answers but most of you missed the question... The question was what does track offer that a well stuctured offseason doesn't? I never said track wasn't good and I specificly mentioned the competivness factor being a huge difference in a positive manner. I have No problem with track other than I think a well ran football specific offseason program can be more benificial to football players. Back in 05/06 our HC went out and purchased around 50 pair of track spikes.. EVERY football player in the off season program conditioned for track.. ran 50 second runs.. the 200's.. the 300's.. the 150's.. If you played football.. you did a track workout.. results? 13-1 that football season with a loss in the state semi's.. in 2003.. same team was 0-10.. Could be completely coincidence.. but I dont think so..
|
|
|
Post by PSS on Feb 18, 2009 22:19:28 GMT -6
Thanks for the answers but most of you missed the question... The question was what does track offer that a well stuctured offseason doesn't? I never said track wasn't good and I specificly mentioned the competivness factor being a huge difference in a positive manner. I have No problem with track other than I think a well ran football specific offseason program can be more benificial to football players. If you re-read my post you will see that our off-season is basically our track workout for the skill kids. When you already have speed why not make that speed faster through workouts. If you don't have speed why not develop speed (especially with the younger kids) with track workouts. We have a strong football program, basketball program, and track program. It's no coincidence that these kids run track, and are some of the fastest kids in the state of Texas (2nd in our classification last year). I'm with air raider on this one. If you are faster and in better shape than your competition than they can't catch you on the field. There is one more thing that you get from running all those sprint workouts and that carries over to the football field. That's mental toughness. You can't tell me that running timed sprints and pulling tires around a track doesn't develop mental toughness. Those kids won't quit on you.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Feb 18, 2009 22:25:04 GMT -6
tigercoach,
To answer your question: If you have a great strength and speed program in place, track is not that beneficial. Most of my players who do track come back no faster and some slower.
The first reason is that we do a great job in spreed training in football.
The second is there is only one event for speed training in all of track: the 100m. No other event is anything I care about as far as football is concerned. And most of your improvement there will be centered around getting out of the blocks and the finish. We all complain that the 40 is not that great a measure of football speed, then what is a 109 yard dash (100m)?
Plus, there seems to be a lot of pulled mucles with track.
All of this is just my experience.
Now, if you don't have a great speed program already, then track is the way to go.
Lastly, I don't mind them running track. In fact, I encourage it. Why? The same reason I encourage them to play any sport they want to play. Because they want to play it and you are only in high school once. That and competetion is good for you.
|
|
mib36
Sophomore Member
Being a male is a matter of birth. Being a man is a matter of choice.
Posts: 238
|
Post by mib36 on Feb 19, 2009 7:52:23 GMT -6
tigercoach, Most of my players who do track come back no faster and some slower. The second is there is only one event for speed training in all of track: the 100m. No other event is anything I care about as far as football is concerned. Plus, there seems to be a lot of pulled mucles with track. It appears as though your track coach doesn't know what he's doing if you're getting pulled muscles and slower kids. Or maybe it's that your stretching/speed program isn't what you think it is either. As far as football is concerned I'll take a dang 200/400 kid over a 100 any day. I've seen too many 100 burners who just can't get it done on a football field. But you you show me a kid who trains hard for a 400 and has the guts to do it, and I'll show you a football player.
|
|
|
Post by rcole on Feb 19, 2009 8:12:43 GMT -6
A lot of the track programs where I live are social events. Many athletes around here run track so they won't have to do much work and so they can socialize and meet girls. I coached track for several years in the area and the kids and parents expect it to be a leasure sport...come and go, miss practice, run what they want...it is just a casual thing...that is why I don't coach track anymore. Now, a well run track program would be great for many of the reasons listed above...however, anyone who studied the science of speed and agility training would know that max velocity linear speed is way overated for all sports except track. There was a great research article done a few years back. I have a review and the article if anyone wants me to email it to them. Basically they had a control group that did not train, a linear speed group that did track style workouts, and an agility group that did change of direction and acceleration workouts. All athletes were tested in the 40 and in a variety of agility drills. After several weeks of training they were retested. The linear speed group (track style) improved on the 40 but showed no statistically significant improvement in the agility tests. The agility group improved on all agility tests but showed minimal gains in the 40. The implication is that sprint/speed training is specific to the needs of the sport. Football is a zig/zag sport. A great off-season program will show more improvement of the needed athletic skills than a great track program will. However, as mentioned above there are other intangibles...a great track program will be competitive (although a great off-season program will too). They are in high school so why not let them enjoy it. Sometimes they need a break from seeing our face and hearing our voice. So, either way they are better off than sitting on the couch. I have consistently seen my athletes who trained show more improvement than those who ran track...but as I said, track is poorly run and not taken seriously in my area. It is seen by the athletes themselves as the easy way out.
|
|
|
Post by John Knight on Feb 19, 2009 8:13:46 GMT -6
It still comes down to competion. Learning to win is just as important as lifting or getting PRs in the weight room.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Feb 19, 2009 8:13:54 GMT -6
I'll second that, the 400 takes some stones.
Personally, I love hurdlers. I think just sprinting is good training for the game, but hurdling offers a bit more of a challenge to things.
|
|
|
Post by spreadattack on Feb 19, 2009 8:36:39 GMT -6
I'll second that, the 400 takes some stones. Personally, I love hurdlers. I think just sprinting is good training for the game, but hurdling offers a bit more of a challenge to things. I second that on the hurdles. Any hurdle event and the 400 takes guts to do (and do well). I think the upshot is how good is your track program and your offseason program. Some people described really intense, really good track programs, while maybe their offseason (due to rules, constraints, etc) are not as structured. If that's the case then okay. I think as silky said these kids are in high school, and the important thing is they are competing, getting better at something, and enjoying high school. But, as tiger indicates, if you have a great offseason program, then yes, you can probably gear the whole thing more towards football and get the same or better results, especially if your track program is run as a "leisure sport." Just have to figure out what works. When I was in HS, I did football and ran track (100/200/400). Since then I've been at schools where track was encouraged and where it was not. Just have to evaluate it case by case. If the alternative is them getting a job at Mickey D's, then track is definitely the way to go. Otherwise there's no clear cut answer.
|
|
|
Post by kcbazooka on Feb 19, 2009 8:45:48 GMT -6
Our track program is definately not a leisure activity -- the kids that are not tough enough to run track do baseball or with the girls softball. Most baseball players in our school couldn't make it through our track workouts.
Many benefits to track - competition, achieving personal bests, getting in shape, learning how to run, learning how to run when tired.. those kids that run hurdles can carry over their balance, flexiblity and speed skills to the football field. Same with triple jumpers -- takes a lot of skill to do those correctly. Agree with the thrower coaches - teaches how to explode. The track team still does weightlifting.
did I mention competition... how about representing the school -- we talk about reperesenting good old city high every friday - well, its ok to represent city high in the spring too...
|
|
|
Post by rcole on Feb 19, 2009 8:46:35 GMT -6
I agree about the 400. One of the hardes things in sport, if run properly. What is funny in my area is that we don't have many sprinters that run the 400. The sprinters think it is a distance event. I have seen many more milers and 800 meter specialists run the forty for the track team because the sprinters don't have the guts...after all many of them ran track so they wouldn't have to do anything hard or uncomfortable. Really a sad statement about how a wonderful sport is playing out in my area. And I was a track athlete in college, not a football player.
|
|
|
Post by tye2021 on Feb 19, 2009 12:13:33 GMT -6
Thanks for the answers but most of you missed the question... The question was what does track offer that a well stuctured offseason doesn't? I never said track wasn't good and I specificly mentioned the competivness factor being a huge difference in a positive manner. I have No problem with track other than I think a well ran football specific offseason program can be more benificial to football players. I ran track in highschool specifically to get faster for football. I went from a 4.5 40 to a 4.3. So, I'm a believer based on MY personal experience. The point you are missing is this. Why are the 2 seperate? Just because your kids are runniong track doesn't mean they can't do any agility/weight training as well. This of course depends on what area you coach in. We had weightlifting in highschool so in the offseason we lifted Mon Weds, and Fri, and we did agility/speed training Tues and Thurs. And i had track practice after school.
|
|
kwallis
Sophomore Member
[F4:CoachWallis] [F4:CoachWallis]
Posts: 198
|
Post by kwallis on Feb 19, 2009 12:24:16 GMT -6
dont know how many of y'all have this event out there. but if you want to talk about what an "athlete" should be this is the event that will improve all that we are looking for as fb coaches: speed, strength, agility, coordination, flexibility, power, hand eye coordination and courage. The pole vault is the most athletic movement than anyone will ever do associated with track.....for any sport.
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Feb 19, 2009 12:29:47 GMT -6
every one of our RB's and WR's is doing track. They come back every year faster so i cant complain, and this year it has been raining a lot so they are lifting more which is good. Only problem i have is that the track coach, the few rare times they do squats has them only go half way and explode up. He tells the kids going all the way down makes you slower... i wont even comment on the reasons why that is wrong
My best returning lineman is throwing shot and discus. I dont mind because one of my good friends is coaching it this year and although he is lifting with him for track instead of me i dont care because we lift at same time so i can keep my eye on him, and i know he is doing same lifts and everything we are.
|
|
|
Post by eaglemountie on Feb 19, 2009 12:47:05 GMT -6
Everyone on here is talking about just the running aspect of track and FIELD. Remember those same muscles that all football athletes use over and over in a game to help them triple extend (ankle, knee, hip) into a block or tackle are trained in the jumps and throws as well.
I have seen lineman gain so much in the way of hip explosion because of throwing the shotput and discus that it would be a shame to not mention these other events that set track apart from other sports. Same goes for skill guys than perform the jumps. Triple extension, weight transfer and proper leverage is what I (as a throws coach) teach and preach on a daily basis. Last time I checked if you can get a lineman to gain leverage, transfer his weight and extend on a consistant basis, then you've got a pretty good lineman!
|
|
|
Post by raiderpirates on Feb 19, 2009 14:43:45 GMT -6
Pro scouts love to find that interior linemen have backgrounds in field events.
There are several track varieties here. One school(my old HS) has a very soft track, porous, almost clay like. Very low impact for running on, a different type of resistance. It creates very little strain for distance running. The other school track, next to the house here, has a hard surface. When it was new poured it was the best in the state, surpassing some colleges. In time the surface(sprayed over another surface, both over concrete) has worn in parts. Pieces of it are coming off the track now, especially where other sports had coaches park trucks in doing our league games there.
Hard surface is great for pure sprints as well, but needs to be redone. Records were set upon it for a time....
Take into consideration such factors for people who were a strain or injury threat.
As for other sports, wrestling does wonders for quickness but players will sweat down a lot of weight. It is the ultimate in competition IMO but overlaps portions of football should your team be competitive into post season.
Speed and quickness are better measures of power than is strength. Control of speed and quickness are better measures of those traits(balance, etc.) than is straight line speed as well.
Track is extremely competitive here, teams who would go to great lengths in not meeting but once a year in football or basketball will usually find ways of being at the same track meets. It might be the one time you can really hone the competitive edge for the annual rivalry week matchups.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Feb 19, 2009 16:36:26 GMT -6
One of the reasons our throws program is down is because we haven't been getting the same number of lineman that we used to. They're all mostly doing lacrosse now, which is the 'in' sport for the spring these days, at least around here.
I do feel that there's an event for everyone on the track team that can and will help them as football players. OL/DL can throw, DBs/RBs/WRs can sprint, jump, and hurdle, LBs/TEs can do them all. The real studs will pole vault.
Also, I think every athlete should know what it's like to run the 400 as a race event. It really does come down to determination, will to win, and cojones. I wanna see who can man up and kick at the 300 mark, that's the guy who I'm going to in the 4th. The 400 produces mental toughness like nothing else.
|
|
|
Post by rooks19 on Feb 19, 2009 19:47:06 GMT -6
I ran track in highschool specifically to get faster for football. I went from a 4.5 40 to a 4.3. So, I'm a believer based on MY personal experience. Deion?
|
|
|
Post by tye2021 on Feb 20, 2009 16:38:26 GMT -6
I ran track in highschool specifically to get faster for football. I went from a 4.5 40 to a 4.3. So, I'm a believer based on MY personal experience. Deion? uummmm..... NO! I'm alot shorter than he is in hieght and in the pockets! I did where #21 because of him though!
|
|