|
Post by coachdbs on Nov 10, 2008 11:33:56 GMT -6
What the heck? We played a team yesterday that had beat us 20-6 in the first meeting. Just played them again yesterday in playoffs and we won 13-6. After first series in which they scored, we caught the OC having QB check with him after our "D" had lined up. This is an 8-year old team so they are allowed to have 1 coach on the field. Once the offense breaks the huddle, there is no more coaching. However, most coaches and the refs are flexible if a kid is lined up incorrectly and will allow you to adjust. When we lost to them the first time...they kept getting big plays with QB running to our uncovered gaps....hmmmm. After the ref told him to stop verbally coaching QB...we caught the QB looking back for non-verbal cues (nod of head, etc.). Ref then told him he could not coach after huddle break. Guess what happened next?....yep...our defense shut them down. I cannot believe the level some coaches are willing to go to for a win...especially at this age. We caught an asst. coach this year watching our offensive warmup. Had a kid join our team from another team and parents told us they were practicing more then the allowed number of days per week. Sorry had to vent...I know we won (got to love football karma) but it frustrates me to think that I have to deal with this for the next 4-5 years.
|
|
|
Post by eickst on Nov 10, 2008 13:24:26 GMT -6
Teams in our league have off season "get together's" all of the time. It just part of youth football unfortunately, some coaches are willing to bend/break the rules in order to win.
If that coach had TAUGHT his QB how to read it on his own he wouldn't need to look back at the coach for signals.
Nothing wrong with watching another team warm up in my opinion. Spying on your practice is a little too much, but not game day warm ups.
|
|
|
Post by coachdbs on Nov 10, 2008 15:00:47 GMT -6
Yeah...guess the warm-up gripe is a little lame...we do the same during HS warmups but the difference is he had to walk all the way around the field to our side to do it. I am just amazed at what some coaches will do to gain an advantage...especially when the kids are 8. I see so many kids come to the HS level with a great youth winning percentage but sloppy technique/fundamentals. Just frustrating and again, I am venting.
|
|
|
Post by eickst on Nov 10, 2008 18:13:20 GMT -6
Get used to it. I coached a flag team one year (6 and 7 year olds) and one coach was caught cutting 2 inches off of the flags of his running backs.
You'd think these guys were getting paid to win or that their life depended on winning a youth football game the way some of them (and the parents) act.
|
|
|
Post by los on Nov 10, 2008 20:54:06 GMT -6
We had that same rule coachld, for our 8-10 age group.....1 coach on the field to call plays, help kids get lined up, if they needed it, etc......but before the snap, they had to back off out of play and keep their pie hole shut, lol......."I think" we had a league rule, that after a couple verbal warnings by the officials to the overly obnoxious coach's.....they could start passing out 15 yd. UC penalty's on the coach. We didn't absolutely have to be on the field, you could coach from the sidelines and scream, holler,run check with me's all you wanted.....but if you coached on the field....you had to follow the rules of invisibilty
|
|
|
Post by bigdog2003 on Nov 25, 2008 13:24:40 GMT -6
Get used to it. I coached a flag team one year (6 and 7 year olds) and one coach was caught cutting 2 inches off of the flags of his running backs. You'd think these guys were getting paid to win or that their life depended on winning a youth football game the way some of them (and the parents) act. I coached that same age group and had all the other coaches complain that the option should be outlawed so they did. We had scored 11 TD's one game, no score was kept, and pitched a shutout. The other coaches couldn't stop it and got it banned. Then they got mad that the Counter X, and the DW Wildcat formation were working. By the end of the season there wasn't much left that we could run other than dives and sweeps, the kids would ask me why can't we run option or another play we called moose 90 (Wildcat spin handoff). That is why I told the league I wouldn't coach again and now coach at the local Middle School.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 25, 2008 14:17:37 GMT -6
Get used to it. I coached a flag team one year (6 and 7 year olds) and one coach was caught cutting 2 inches off of the flags of his running backs. You'd think these guys were getting paid to win or that their life depended on winning a youth football game the way some of them (and the parents) act. I coached that same age group and had all the other coaches complain that the option should be outlawed so they did. We had scored 11 TD's one game, no score was kept, and pitched a shutout. The other coaches couldn't stop it and got it banned. Then they got mad that the Counter X, and the DW Wildcat formation were working. By the end of the season there wasn't much left that we could run other than dives and sweeps, the kids would ask me why can't we run option or another play we called moose 90 (Wildcat spin handoff). That is why I told the league I wouldn't coach again and now coach at the local Middle School. Unfortunately that is the case in many leagues. They try and "even" things out, usually in favor of the poorest coaches who are usually on the Board and getting creamed every week. Fortunately I dont coach in such a league and at age 8-10 we never had or needed coaches on the field or any of those silly extra rules with the exception of no rush on PAT kicks for the little guys. I have seen the rule book for one of these "weak coach" leagues that outlaw practically everything, I have no clue how the refs kept track of it all. It looked like some legal brief for a major court case
|
|
|
Post by eickst on Nov 25, 2008 15:28:49 GMT -6
Next they'll have a rule that the fastest kids on the team can't carry the ball.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 25, 2008 17:30:59 GMT -6
I will also add though even when they arent keeping score, if my team was scoring 11 TDs in a game at age 6-7 Id make darn sure the other team scored, no sane reason to shut anyone out at that age. Spreading it around and keeping "scores" reasonable at that age do a lot for making sure you dont get "special" rules put in to hurt your teams. In 2006-2007 my 3 teams scored 3 TDs in the first quarter of 19 games, yet we never went over 50 and only went over 40 twice ( defensive TDs), you have to do your part too. IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by los on Nov 25, 2008 22:14:14 GMT -6
So "letting" a bunch of 6 and 7 yr olds score a TD, after they've been totally embarrassed and humiliated by having been scored on eleven times, is a "good thing" .....gosh Dave, you're all heart, lol.....
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 26, 2008 13:25:10 GMT -6
So "letting" a bunch of 6 and 7 yr olds score a TD, after they've been totally embarrassed and humiliated by having been scored on eleven times, is a "good thing" .....gosh Dave, you're all heart, lol..... Nah be heartless and shut em out, that would be the sporting and compassionate thing to do We practice our "special play" just like any thing else we do. No one, not even the other teams coaches and parents have a clue theyve been given a TD when we run it,our kids dive and everything. But when youve never scored a bunch of points or had dominating teams LOS, from your admitted past experiences I guess you wouldnt know about having to think about doing that. Something Ive been doing with my last 11 teams. BTW while weve scored 3 TDs in the first quarter of probably 35 of our last 110 games, Ive never gone over 50 and only gone over 40 a handful of times and rarely recorded shut outs even when we easily could. Not the way to go in youth football, yes we are merciful to a fault and what I suggest others do. This isnt conjecture or theory. Ive coached the game and am coaching now, so can speak from hands on current real world experience.
|
|
|
Post by eickst on Nov 26, 2008 16:48:46 GMT -6
Actually for some programs scoring a TD at all in a game is a huge victory, so YES letting another team score a TD after they've been totally embarrassed and humiliated by being scored on 11 times can be good thing.
We were up on a team 34-0 at the end of the first quarter earlier this year. The final score was 36-22. We were never in a position to lose the game but the other team acted like they won the super bowl. Their coach approached it in a "we won the second half" kind of attitude. Good for him and good for them. They played their next game against a better team than us a hell of a lot tougher, and I think it was because they built on the success (or perceived success) that they had against us in the second half. If we had left all of our starters in and scored another 40 points and not given up any at all, that team would be totally deflated and probably not do so well the next week.
So yes, calling off the dogs can be a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by cyflcoach on Nov 26, 2008 16:51:45 GMT -6
Although 11 scores is certainly out of the ordinary and over the top no matter how you slice it, I agree 100% with Dave on not shutting out teams. Playing for shutouts at the youth level is unjustifiable in my opinion and does nothing but discourage kids from wanting to play the game that have the unfortunate luck of finding themselves on poor performing teams. Perhaps with something as lopsided as 60 or 70 to nothing, a single score might not mean anything, but I can guarantee you that a 28-7 or even 35-7 is much better in the kids eyes than being shutout. Not that there's anything wrong with letting a team get on the board more than once if you're up comfortably.
Nothing wrong with keeping score, being competitive and wanting to win in my opinion. The problem comes in when that's all any of us care about as coaches or as parents. I ask the coaches in our league every season to look at things this way; once your team has control of a game, turn your focus to making sure that all your non-starters receive as much time as possible and try your best to make sure that the kids on the opposing team get something positive out of the game they can feel good about. Scoring once or twice usually does wonders in that regard, as kids are usually much less concerned with a win or loss as we as coaches or parents are.
Just my two cents on a subject I feel very strongly about.
Dave Hartman CYFL Coach
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 26, 2008 17:11:57 GMT -6
Although 11 scores is certainly out of the ordinary and over the top no matter how you slice it, I agree 100% with Dave on not shutting out teams. Playing for shutouts at the youth level is unjustifiable in my opinion and does nothing but discourage kids from wanting to play the game that have the unfortunate luck of finding themselves on poor performing teams. Perhaps with something as lopsided as 60 or 70 to nothing, a single score might not mean anything, but I can guarantee you that a 28-7 or even 35-7 is much better in the kids eyes than being shutout. Not that there's anything wrong with letting a team get on the board more than once if you're up comfortably. Nothing wrong with keeping score, being competitive and wanting to win in my opinion. The problem comes in when that's all any of us care about as coaches or as parents. I ask the coaches in our league every season to look at things this way; once your team has control of a game, turn your focus to making sure that all your non-starters receive as much time as possible and try your best to make sure that the kids on the opposing team get something positive out of the game they can feel good about. Scoring once or twice usually does wonders in that regard, as kids are usually much less concerned with a win or loss as we as coaches or parents are. Just my two cents on a subject I feel very strongly about. Dave Hartman CYFL Coach Amen coach, glad to see that even in a place where football is important, Texas guys like you have it "right". I know about those feeling first hand. About 16 years ago I coached an expansion team in a fairly competitive youth league. The 3 previous expansion teams of 100% rookie players had lost every game. We played our very first game against the 4 time defending league champs, a well coached team with its top 3 guys being non-dad coaches. On our end, all rookie coaches as well. Pre-internet days. We were losing the game 34-0 and were driving for our first ever score with less than a minute to go in the game. You couild see and feel all of our kids getting very excited as we got down to the 10 yard line for an upcoming score. But no , the other team called timeout, reinserted their starters and got the shutout. Our kids were more crushed by that than anything else. This coach gave his kids doughnuts after the came for every shutout, so my kids got to feel bad about themselves so some coach could say he shut out a bunch of 8-10s. We came back and ended up winning 3 games that year and beat them 2 years later to win a league title. I didnt want to do it that way, didnt want to make our opponents feel like my kids did that day. First season we did "special play" we were playing a team in their next to last game of the season, they hadnt scored a TD ALL YEAR, not one. We practiced the play and in the 3rd quarter let them score, we were up 3-4 scores by then, They acted like they won the super bowl, their sidelines went nuts and they even tried an onsides kick after. THEY HAD NO CLUE we gave it to them. Thier parents , coaches and players were all smiles after that game, a game we won handily. We taught our kids a compassion lesson hopefully they can use later in life. This isnt life and death, make it a good deal for both sides after you take care of your kids.
|
|
|
Post by los on Nov 26, 2008 21:03:32 GMT -6
Ha Ha....to borrow Khalfie's line...Hill Larry....my point is....if you're truly in a "competitive" league(whatever rules you play by).....these lopsided games should be (rare)....and all this giving and recieving of "mercy".....totally unneccessary......thats how I define "competitive".....if my team has "every game" won by the end of the 1st qtr on a regular basis and is constantly beating up on opponents with 30/40/50 to single digit margins = I'm gonna try to find some "better opponents".......cause this is "no competition at all".......never a "good thing" for my team(makes them think they're waaay better than they actually are) and definitely not good for the kids on the losing end of these constant massacres(even the revenge factor gets squashed with enough severe a$$ whoopins, lol)....this might be where some of that 70% of kids that quit playing before they reach HS come from......"refugees of constant lopsided massacres", that finally come to the realization = I'm no good at football...... Have a Happy Thanksgiving all......los
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 27, 2008 6:09:02 GMT -6
Funny coming from a guy who had teams of 15 kids playing in a compeitive "league" where you played the same team 3 times and had a heck of a time even getting kids to show up for practice and hasnt coached in years. Almost all large competitive youth football leagues (ours has 89 teams, previous had 71 teams) are filled with well coached and poorly coached teams, the poorly coached ones are the ones getting beaten by those margins. We get Plenty of closer games versus the better coached teams, it also is a function of running a no-huddle offense and scheme that can score lots of points and of course execution. We did that in 4 different leagues, guess they were all " not competitive". We have played and won outstate tourneys and have played in the best Select league in the state against teams that have played and won national tourneys. Kids playing in the leagues Ive coached in include 2 Heisman Trophy winners and 2 Outland Winners along with countless DI kids. If youve never seen or coached in a league like that, it is much different than the YMCA Kumbaya leagues with 15 kids a team and all 12-6 scores like some are used to. Competitive football is a completely different dynamic of teams with sometimes 30-50 kids on them, try outs where over 250 kids are vying for 25 spots , cuts, team buses, playing in field turf stadiums, scouting etc etc
|
|
|
Post by los on Nov 27, 2008 11:16:17 GMT -6
Bottom line though Dave......"who cares".....its "youth football"......as long as they continue to play at the next level....get there with a good attitude.....and learned some generic football skills, along the way......I'd call that program a "success"....whether they played in the superdome or on a sandspur infested bahia grass field, lol.
|
|
|
Post by bigdog2003 on Nov 27, 2008 11:23:14 GMT -6
We didn't try to shut them out, but there coach had no idea what he was doing. We tried everything short of having our players fall down. The other team just was a vicitm of having a poor coach, as far as knowledge goes.
We also did not try to score 11 td's. The second half I called fb dive every play with lineman running the ball. They couldn't stop it in flag football. I would have never tried to beat a team this badly in 6 and 7 year old flag football, but my options were limited since they couldn't pull the flag off of the slowest kid on the team running right up the middle.
There was no score kept, everyone is a winner type of thing, and was seven on seven. I felt bad that the score was getting that bad, but if the other team can't pull the flags off the slowest kid running up the middle what do you do?
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 28, 2008 7:18:01 GMT -6
Bottom line though Dave......"who cares".....its "youth football"......as long as they continue to play at the next level....get there with a good attitude.....and learned some generic football skills, along the way......I'd call that program a "success"....whether they played in the superdome or on a sandspur infested bahia grass field, lol. Wasnt debating that point at all. Success is defined by of the kids come back LOL Was pointing out what "competitive" means in youth football. It certainly isnt teams that cant field numbers or struggle mightily to get kids to play or even come to practice. You dont find "competitive" teams in those kinds of environments. Youth football is important, thats where most football players get their start and unfortunately where many either discover the game or get turned off to it. 70% of Youth players never play HS football and the #1 reason is poor coaching, #2 reason our reserach found was playing on teams that were getting beaten and blown out regularly, so yeah it's important to the future of the game.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 28, 2008 7:23:11 GMT -6
We didn't try to shut them out, but there coach had no idea what he was doing. We tried everything short of having our players fall down. The other team just was a vicitm of having a poor coach, as far as knowledge goes. We also did not try to score 11 td's. The second half I called fb dive every play with lineman running the ball. They couldn't stop it in flag football. I would have never tried to beat a team this badly in 6 and 7 year old flag football, but my options were limited since they couldn't pull the flag off of the slowest kid on the team running right up the middle. There was no score kept, everyone is a winner type of thing, and was seven on seven. I felt bad that the score was getting that bad, but if the other team can't pull the flags off the slowest kid running up the middle what do you do? On defense you tell your kids to act like they are pulling the other teams flag but miss. Easy to get accross in a timeout, let em score.
|
|
|
Post by los on Nov 28, 2008 20:51:44 GMT -6
OK....I'll bite....one more time, lol.....since the thread is about "playing by the rules", and the "mercy" rules and running clock rules are things some leagues use to control an "uncompetitive game"......we can use this to stay on the topic and maybe keep the thread from being locked?.....FYI Dave.....all the teams in our tri-county league were very competitive("with each other"....key point here!)there was parity of coaching and player talent.....we had no need for giving or recieving "mercy", as most games were very close......occassionally someone would win big.....but very rare......so in my definition of competitive = this was a competitive league......Just kinda sounds like from reading your posts, blowout scores in most of the games, having to "let the other teams score", and all the other "mercy stuff".... that the "majority of teams" in your league are "no competition" for your team and maybe a couple others?....so from "their perspective" at least = yours is not a competitive league for "all the teams" in it.....but like a few big fish in a little pond, gobbling up all the minnows, lol
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 29, 2008 7:52:17 GMT -6
Big fish in little pond would mean when we go outside conference or to local and out state tourneys we would lose, which isnt the case, We usually play 3+ nonconference games each year. But now it is extrememely difficult to get anyone out of conference to agree to play even away games. Last year sent out over 120 emails, over 30 phone calls and got just 3 extra games. In the early years, always easy to get people to agree to play. Now we often have to aggree to play up an age group. Just the way it is and we are willing to travel 120 miles etc to play. Lots of close scores in the FOUR leagues my teams have played in, and we even have a few, but the scores are what they are, we have consistently been able to score a lot of points against pretty much all comers over 11 seasons. Ive even had my non-select teams play teams that have chosen from 150 kids, last year we played a select team that chose from about 75 kids. We cant even get those teams to play us most of the time. Weve gone from playing 12 games a year down to 9. If you look at the game scores on the site, those are the facts, its a shame. We are in a tiny town and the other local team wont even scrimmage us, let alone play us and weverbeen here 5 years now and they suit 35 kids per team to our 23-24. To give you an idea of how bad it is now: We are in a town of 1100 people and draw from the rural area around here. We play and beat select teams from Omaha population 500,000+ and Lincoln 220,000+. Those are some huge odds and now those teams wont even play us. The results werent much different than when I lived in and coached in Omaha and playing there every weekend. It is what it is.
|
|
|
Post by davecisar on Nov 29, 2008 16:38:01 GMT -6
Clarification, I got 3 extra games for the 3 teams I head coached, 1 extra game for each team.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Nov 29, 2008 18:01:48 GMT -6
Big fish in little pond would mean when we go outside conference or to local and out state tourneys we would lose, which isnt the case, We usually play 3+ nonconference games each year. But now it is extrememely difficult to get anyone out of conference to agree to play even away games. Last year sent out over 120 emails, over 30 phone calls and got just 3 extra games. In the early years, always easy to get people to agree to play. Now we often have to aggree to play up an age group. Just the way it is and we are willing to travel 120 miles etc to play. Lots of close scores in the FOUR leagues my teams have played in, and we even have a few, but the scores are what they are, we have consistently been able to score a lot of points against pretty much all comers over 11 seasons. Ive even had my non-select teams play teams that have chosen from 150 kids, last year we played a select team that chose from about 75 kids. We cant even get those teams to play us most of the time. Weve gone from playing 12 games a year down to 9. If you look at the game scores on the site, those are the facts, its a shame. We are in a tiny town and the other local team wont even scrimmage us, let alone play us and weverbeen here 5 years now and they suit 35 kids per team to our 23-24. To give you an idea of how bad it is now: We are in a town of 1100 people and draw from the rural area around here. We play and beat select teams from Omaha population 500,000+ and Lincoln 220,000+. Those are some huge odds and now those teams wont even play us. The results werent much different than when I lived in and coached in Omaha and playing there every weekend. It is what it is. good thing you haven't let it go to your head ...
|
|