|
Post by coachnichols on Aug 14, 2008 19:06:03 GMT -6
I'm looking for ideas on how to establish expectations in a program without running off players. I don't want to coddle kids or be passive about bad habits and negative behaviors, but at the same time, I also don't want to just kick kids off the team the first time they screw up. Any thoughts on ways to instill positive reinforcement?
Backstory...we had a staff meeting today and we discussed/brainstormed our philosophies on discipline. There were two sides basically: 1) iron-fisted, my-way-or-the-highway, you screwed up you're gone, get on board or get out, here are our expecations so you'll do it or you're off the team, etc. and 2) yes we need expectations and consistency, but we also shouldn't punish the whole team for one kid's actions and these kids have gone 2-3 years with these behaviors so it's impossible to change them overnight, we don't want to go 0-9 because we're kicking off all the upperclassmen, etc.
I believe in #1. I'm sure it can and does work for some programs. However, we're not going to do that where we are at (for various reasons). I want ideas that align more with #2. High expectations and reinforcement to follow or get in line with those expectations. Anything you have will be great for the next debate, um I mean discussion. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Aug 14, 2008 19:30:21 GMT -6
I think you need to be yourself. anything else is just a show and eventually the kids will figure it out. Like Wooden says: kids get the treatment they earn. we don't treat everyone the same. right now you are in a GREAT position where everyone starts with a clean slate IMO, the more rules you have the more they will be broken, sure you have to have some baseline rules being on time, respect for yourself and teammates etc. My motto: firm, yet fair
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Aug 14, 2008 19:47:18 GMT -6
Sometimes you have to shoot some hostages...
You are rebuilding for the future, not for this season. Keep that in mind. Set high expectations NOW. Most of the kids will rise to the standard. The ones who don't...you weren't going to win with them anyway.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Aug 14, 2008 20:06:43 GMT -6
I'm looking for ideas on how to establish expectations in a program without running off players. I don't want to coddle kids or be passive about bad habits and negative behaviors, but at the same time, I also don't want to just kick kids off the team the first time they screw up. Any thoughts on ways to instill positive reinforcement? Backstory...we had a staff meeting today and we discussed/brainstormed our philosophies on discipline. There were two sides basically: 1) iron-fisted, my-way-or-the-highway, you screwed up you're gone, get on board or get out, here are our expecations so you'll do it or you're off the team, etc. and 2) yes we need expectations and consistency, but we also shouldn't punish the whole team for one kid's actions and these kids have gone 2-3 years with these behaviors so it's impossible to change them overnight, we don't want to go 0-9 because we're kicking off all the upperclassmen, etc. I believe in #1. I'm sure it can and does work for some programs. However, we're not going to do that where we are at (for various reasons). I want ideas that align more with #2. High expectations and reinforcement to follow or get in line with those expectations. Anything you have will be great for the next debate, um I mean discussion. Thanks! Define "screw up". When you say "you screwed up, you're gone" what do you mean?
|
|
kr7263
Sophomore Member
Posts: 228
|
Post by kr7263 on Aug 14, 2008 20:20:07 GMT -6
Ive been in this situation 3 times and have done it 3 different ways. IMO the ONLY way that works is to define what you will not tolerate and hold the kids accountable. It is a down program for a reason. Unless you set the expectations high right now. Just like classroom management, if you define your expectations - communicate, hold the kids accountable - consistency and show the kids the end results. Being a coach is not a popularity contest but it is also not a tough man competition either. The first year is the most challenging but if you start out the right way it sets the tone.
|
|
|
Post by coachnichols on Aug 14, 2008 20:22:17 GMT -6
Define "screw up". When you say "you screwed up, you're gone" what do you mean? One of our freshmen coaches has coached at the school in the past (not last year) and is a teacher in the building. He described a consistent problem of players being late to practice. Every year (according to him) there has always been a lot of players who will ramble in late. 10-15 minutes. Practice started at 3:30 last year, but many would show up around 3:45 or so. Once this example came up, I got the distinct feeling (from what was being said and the reaction) that some of the coaches in the room think we should kick them off the team for this action. Like what 19delta said, "shooting some hostages". Nothing wrong with this mind you, but... I use this analogy when talking about our justice system...if you did something wrong in my class (I usually say something like you pop your gum) and I shoot you in the head, then I promise it won't take long for the others to get the point. There will be no gum popping. Now that sounds good in theory, but I just don't think that will work at this school unless we are willing to lose a ton of kids this year and lose a lot of games. I'm not totally opposed to taking that stand, but from what I've been told, this FB staff is on a short leash if you know what I mean. The admin expects large numbers out and some sort of progress on the field. They want to see a lot of kids playing football. So like I said, I'm sure some will be "sacrificed" at some point, but the mantra of just cut their a** loose isn't going to work for the situation.
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Aug 14, 2008 21:06:14 GMT -6
Define "screw up". When you say "you screwed up, you're gone" what do you mean? One of our freshmen coaches has coached at the school in the past (not last year) and is a teacher in the building. He described a consistent problem of players being late to practice. Every year (according to him) there has always been a lot of players who will ramble in late. 10-15 minutes. Practice started at 3:30 last year, but many would show up around 3:45 or so. Once this example came up, I got the distinct feeling (from what was being said and the reaction) that some of the coaches in the room think we should kick them off the team for this action. Like what 19delta said, "shooting some hostages". Nothing wrong with this mind you, but... I use this analogy when talking about our justice system...if you did something wrong in my class (I usually say something like you pop your gum) and I shoot you in the head, then I promise it won't take long for the others to get the point. There will be no gum popping. Now that sounds good in theory, but I just don't think that will work at this school unless we are willing to lose a ton of kids this year and lose a lot of games. I'm not totally opposed to taking that stand, but from what I've been told, this FB staff is on a short leash if you know what I mean. The admin expects large numbers out and some sort of progress on the field. They want to see a lot of kids playing football. So like I said, I'm sure some will be "sacrificed" at some point, but the mantra of just cut their a** loose isn't going to work for the situation. How many tardies does it take to boot them? One? Three? Six? What's the magic number? For us being late for practice gets you up-downs (unless there's a good excuse). If it's a recurring problem there will be a discussion (translation: a$$-chewing). I can't recall the last time that we busted a kid out strictly for tardies. Obviously, if a kid does it day after day you will have to to do something (translation: dump his sorry a$$). Pick the hill that you're you're willing to die on. Establishing discipline early is important. Get after the important things first, though. Disrespect, missing practice, lack of effort, being a jack-off in the classroom. Those are reasons for dumping a kid. Being late needs to be handled but it's not a hanging offense IMO.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Aug 15, 2008 5:00:28 GMT -6
Now that sounds good in theory, but I just don't think that will work at this school unless we are willing to lose a ton of kids this year and lose a lot of games. I'm not totally opposed to taking that stand, but from what I've been told, this FB staff is on a short leash if you know what I mean. The admin expects large numbers out and some sort of progress on the field. They want to see a lot of kids playing football. So like I said, I'm sure some will be "sacrificed" at some point, but the mantra of just cut their a** loose isn't going to work for the situation. Well, you don't have to "cut' anyone...the thing is, if you have CLEAR expectations and you and your coaches communicate and enforce those expectations, the kids who don't measure up will essentially cut themselves. Record EVERYTHING...take attendance, write down when kids are late, etc, etc. Then, you have a paper trail to show administrators and parents WHY certain kids aren't getting playing time...it will because the KID has not measured up, not because the coach is a jerk. As far as your other issue with the administration, they are clearly being unrealistic. They simply do not understand what it is going to take to rebuild a program that has crumbled. Often, you will have to hit rock bottom and things will get worse before they get better. If they don't understand that, someone needs to explain that to them. If they don't "get" it, you need to move on because this is an administration that is going to demand results but is unwilling to give you the support you need to attain those results.
|
|
|
Post by coachnichols on Aug 15, 2008 6:38:16 GMT -6
I get what you're saying. I'm not in favor of cutting kids except of course for serious violations of rules or repeated violations of rules, etc. I guess I'm all about second chances and third chances in some cases...that's just me. I know not everyone is like that, but I want to try and avoid "leaving a child behind" (sorry, couldn't help the dig at the current educational mantra). Clear expectations with consistentency is key IMO, and the head coach believes the same thing. My issue I guess or my wish is that we can do more than this. We can increase our chances or speed up the turnaround if we have some sort of positive reinforcement. I know everyone has examples to counter this statement, but psychology tells us that punishment doesn't work. Reinforcement (positive or not) is the best thing to change human behavior. I'm all for consequences, but in addition to that...that's what I'm searching for right now in my career. I spoke with my HC last night about this matter and during the discussion we talked of players showing up late. Everyday they'll be set conditioning work and we'll add to that conditioning work as needed. Example...we start with 10 40's. His plan is to start practice at 3:30, regardless of who's there. We're not stopping practice, we're not changing anything for kids that show up late. They will just jump in and keep going. At the end of practice, say if we had 10 kids late, we'll add 10 40's on to the conditioning. Everyone pays the price and the idea is that peer pressure will take care of the late problem or the late problems will take care of themselves. I'm not necessarily against this but my worry is we have no leaders. Our players (hell our staff) is not a "team". We're not bought in to anything. So I'm worried about morale. I'm worried about the overall attitude just getting worse and kids will quit because of the conditioning. I have never been accused of being kind-hearted or mushy mushy, but I know this sounds that way. But like I said, we're not a team. We'll have 80-100 players on Monday and 8 coaches. After the head coach, I've been around the team/school/program more than anyone else, and I only know about 25 different kids or so (off-season attendance was terrible) and I'm only close to the HC. My thought is if I'm a player in this day and age and I've known nothing but losing in so many facets of my life especially in football, why am I going to do extra because this other guy that I don't know and don't care about shows up late? Why should I do anything for him? I don't know him and don't care about him. I don't hardly know this coach who's yelling at me for being late. Forget this! Please don't get on me for being to touchy-feely. I agree with what you're thinking! IT'S FOOTBALL!!! I know, I know, I agree. However, I'm thinking high expectations set, consistent enforcement, team building, show them football is a positive and we're there for them. Kids will fall to the wayside of course. Am I wrong for thinking that what our coaches did to us or team-orriented punishments are the wrong course of action?
|
|
|
Post by fatkicker on Aug 15, 2008 6:45:05 GMT -6
remember.....
never cut a player.....
you can always run the heck out of 'em......make 'em quit.........but never run 'em off........
make it to where it's their decision..... not yours..... that they quit....
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Aug 15, 2008 7:10:38 GMT -6
I get what you're saying. I'm not in favor of cutting kids except of course for serious violations of rules or repeated violations of rules, etc. I guess I'm all about second chances and third chances in some cases...that's just me. I know not everyone is like that, but I want to try and avoid "leaving a child behind" (sorry, couldn't help the dig at the current educational mantra). Clear expectations with consistentency is key IMO, and the head coach believes the same thing. My issue I guess or my wish is that we can do more than this. We can increase our chances or speed up the turnaround if we have some sort of positive reinforcement. I know everyone has examples to counter this statement, but psychology tells us that punishment doesn't work. Reinforcement (positive or not) is the best thing to change human behavior. I'm all for consequences, but in addition to that...that's what I'm searching for right now in my career. I spoke with my HC last night about this matter and during the discussion we talked of players showing up late. Everyday they'll be set conditioning work and we'll add to that conditioning work as needed. Example...we start with 10 40's. His plan is to start practice at 3:30, regardless of who's there. We're not stopping practice, we're not changing anything for kids that show up late. They will just jump in and keep going. At the end of practice, say if we had 10 kids late, we'll add 10 40's on to the conditioning. Everyone pays the price and the idea is that peer pressure will take care of the late problem or the late problems will take care of themselves. I'm not necessarily against this but my worry is we have no leaders. Our players (hell our staff) is not a "team". We're not bought in to anything. So I'm worried about morale. I'm worried about the overall attitude just getting worse and kids will quit because of the conditioning. I have never been accused of being kind-hearted or mushy mushy, but I know this sounds that way. But like I said, we're not a team. We'll have 80-100 players on Monday and 8 coaches. After the head coach, I've been around the team/school/program more than anyone else, and I only know about 25 different kids or so (off-season attendance was terrible) and I'm only close to the HC. My thought is if I'm a player in this day and age and I've known nothing but losing in so many facets of my life especially in football, why am I going to do extra because this other guy that I don't know and don't care about shows up late? Why should I do anything for him? I don't know him and don't care about him. I don't hardly know this coach who's yelling at me for being late. Forget this! Please don't get on me for being to touchy-feely. I agree with what you're thinking! IT'S FOOTBALL!!! I know, I know, I agree. However, I'm thinking high expectations set, consistent enforcement, team building, show them football is a positive and we're there for them. Kids will fall to the wayside of course. Am I wrong for thinking that what our coaches did to us or team-orriented punishments are the wrong course of action? Short answer-yes.
|
|
|
Post by coachnichols on Aug 15, 2008 7:26:43 GMT -6
So Phantom, you're saying I should go with what my gut told me in the first place (June when I was pissed off about the off-season attendance of 10 kids) and keep it old school? Here's what we're going to do, get on board or get the F out?
I see what you're saying dcohio. I guess what I'm hung up on is some of these players don't know anything other than the way they are (the opposite of what we want). Quitting or like your example, forcing them to quit seems to be the easy way out. I guess I'm getting soft in my old age. When I started coaching at a school in this same district I thought the opposite of how I'm thinking now. I was all for exactly what you detailed in your post. Now I guess I'm thinking more about players and helping players than building a program in the mold of the program I grew up in in high school (i.e. small town values, 99% white, working class, etc.)
I agree with what you're saying dcohio, don't get me wrong. I'm not disputing that. What it comes down to I guess is I'm trying to save the world, if you know what I mean. I'm thinking to ideallistically or something like that. Problem is like I said, I think what you and phantom have said is probably the best course of action for the program, but that course of action will probably get our HC fired in 2-3 years because we'll go 1-8 each year in a league where our good athletes will quit, transfer to another school, and play.
(Great quote by the way! "Motivation is simple. You eliminate those who are not motivated." ~ Lou Holtz / Arkansas)
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Aug 15, 2008 8:46:30 GMT -6
I agree with what you're saying dcohio, don't get me wrong. I'm not disputing that. What it comes down to I guess is I'm trying to save the world, if you know what I mean. I'm thinking to ideallistically or something like that. (Great quote by the way! "Motivation is simple. You eliminate those who are not motivated." ~ Lou Holtz / Arkansas) We had a situation where a great friend of mine was in the 1st year of taking over the "big time" program in the area lots of pressure and expectations on us at this school. He's freaking out cause a few kids quit because they weren't happy about this or that (as soph. playing varsity). We had an old school guy coaching with us who was a big time D-1 coach and respected all over the football community at all levels. His quote on the whole thing "Just remember that Jesus only got 11 of 12 so ya can't save em all" So don't feel bad if you loose a few over the course. Remember you also have a stake physically and mentally( we all know what a season from hell can do to you in both areas) in the season and you don't want to kill yourself by coaching a group of guys who don't buy into it get the kids who get it on the field and make examples of them. Keep up with the peer justice, making the team pay, you would be amazed at how some kids will rise up and get stuff straight when they are getting run into the ground because of a few jerk offs.
|
|
|
Post by Coach Vint on Aug 15, 2008 10:16:57 GMT -6
I went through this at a huge inner city school and I understand exactly what you are going through. The first key is the off-season, that is where you can set expectations. You do not have to be an a-hole to hold kids accountable. I yelled myself silly and looking back it didn't do any good. The first key I see is that you mentioned a lack of staff unity. If your staff is not on the same page your kids will not ever come together. One suggestion is to have a staff bar-b-que. You might even invite the families. Right before everyone eats have each staff member introduce themselves and their family. After the bar-b-que sit down with the staff and get everyone on the same page. Second, every kid has influence. You have leaders, but right now they are not positive leaders. Have a team meeeting and let your players vote on three or four captains. Then, put together a unity council with two or three kids from each class. Let the players vote on this. Then, schedule a weekly captains meeting. Meet once a week with your unity council. Third, make sure your expectations are clearly laid out. If you are late to practice X will happen. If you are late twice, Y will happen. If you are late 3 times, Z will happen. You never have to raise your voice. In fact, don't even pay attention to those who are late. Drop them down the depth chart and give them a reminder after practice. After you give them your reminder, ask them if they understand why they ran. If they don't, tell them they don't have to come back until they do. Then, call their parent and explain to them the situation. I agree you must keep a paper trail. Take attendence each day. Our program had lost 20 straight games going into our first year. We developed some leaders and became a perennial playoff team. If you have clear expectations, earn their trust, and are consistent with your approach, you will be able to build. Start with the staff and do this immediately. You have to make good choices to bring them together. If you would like, PM me your number and I will give you a call. I don't have many right answers, but I have been where you are and would be glad to help if I can.
|
|
|
Post by cqmiller on Aug 15, 2008 11:07:48 GMT -6
I'm with 19delta...
Set the standard as high as you would want it with a top-notch program and most of the kids will push to reach it... The ones who don't even try need to be weeded out! Understand that although the goal you tell the players may be extremely high, you and your staff need to have smaller, more realistic goals for progress.
Example: If one of the problems is off-season attendance... If your goal is 80%, but it's been more like 20% before you got there, then set the goal at 80%. All of your coaches need to be pushing the kids toward 80%, telling them that they will accept nothing less than 80%, but in reality if year 1 you get it up to 40% (that's 20% better than the year before), then year 2 60%, year 3 70%, and by year 4 you should be at 80% or higher! I would take a 10% increase each year at our school!
If you expect nothing from them, that's what you'll get... If you expect everything from them, that's what you'll get as well!
|
|
kr7263
Sophomore Member
Posts: 228
|
Post by kr7263 on Aug 15, 2008 14:23:58 GMT -6
My problem with giving kids too much of a second chance is that they could care less about you, your programs future and the other kids in the program. I cannot allow a 16 year old kid to determine my career future; the programs future and the future of the "good kids". To me a second chance requires repentance and humility. If a kid admits to you and the team they messed up and they pay for it (by whatever means you deem necessary) than it has meaning to them. When a kid messes up, gives excuses and explanations without remorse, even if they fulfill a penalty - IMO that kid will be big time trouble when the chips are down. Lastly, without high expectations and follow through - I doubt you will have many wins regardless and you will have to put up with some real pain in the butts all year long. I would rather loose with a few kids that are committed than to play with a bunch of jerks.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Aug 15, 2008 15:27:39 GMT -6
Some GREAT posts here. cqmiller, fatkicker, phantom dcohio...obvious those guys have been in this situation before.
Here's what it comes down to for me: Kids WANT to do it the "right" way...they WANT to have pride and work hard and do the things it takes to be a winner. The problem, IMO, is that, too often, the ADULTS who are responsible for the kids don't do their job...they DON'T create, foster, encourage, and DEMAND competition, accountability, discipline, and an honest day's work.
You are either coaching it that way OR you are letting it happen...there is NO OTHER ANSWER than those two options.
Coaching is hard...not the game planning, not the practices, not the Xs and Os. What is HARD is managing people...making a decision that, while it may be the "right" decision, it is a HARD decision because someone is going to be disappointed in the end.
And for those of us who have worked in inner city programs, having those high standards is even MORE important...by cutting kids too much slack...by not having high standards...by letting the inmates run the asylum, we, as coaches, are not doing those kids ANY favors. At some point in their lives, they are going to HAVE to be accountable...accountable to a wife, to a child, to a job. If we let kids cut corners now, is it any surprise that they will cut corners when it REALLY matters?
It's not about being a harda$$ or being unsympathetic. It's about being in a position where you MUST influence kids to make the right decision when everything and everyone is telling them not to.
|
|
|
Post by talexander on Aug 16, 2008 4:04:17 GMT -6
Great posts--my take is that you need to run your program how you feel it should be run. Set up rules according to what you believe in and stick to them. Its not about being a "hard ass", or whatever label seems to apply. Kids who are worth anything will try to reach the standard. I also think a discussion is in order in terms of what admin's vision is for the program. I would be surprised if admin would want a team of shitbirds representing their school.
I made this mistake last year--I took over a team of shitbirds two days before the season started. The previous assistants were left in place, and I was worried about kids leaving, taking heat, etc. Although behavior improved from previous years, I tolerated more than my philosophy normally allows to make things "go smoother". WORST coaching mistake I have ever made in 12 years of football. We won initially (started 5=0), but I was miserable. Kids were lazy, and we ended up getting our asses kicked in league. It would have been better to lose kids than win a few games. This year, I am not sure if we have the talent, but our kids are hardworking and do things the right way. Even if we only win a game or two, it will be far more enjoyable that when we were winning last year the wrong way.
As for allowing kids to be late for practice, my philosophy is to ask myself "what would happen in real life if a kid did this?" That is to say, when they get out into the real world, is their boss going to wait until they show up to start the workday at their workplace? Not saying that It should happen the first time they are late, but in real life people get fired for being late. Consequences should match offense, and progressively get more severe the more often it happens. I try to relate rules to real life to our team from time to time to drive home how important rules are.
|
|
|
Post by 19delta on Aug 16, 2008 4:53:13 GMT -6
As for allowing kids to be late for practice, my philosophy is to ask myself "what would happen in real life if a kid did this?" That is to say, when they get out into the real world, is their boss going to wait until they show up to start the workday at their workplace? Not saying that It should happen the first time they are late, but in real life people get fired for being late. Consequences should match offense, and progressively get more severe the more often it happens. I try to relate rules to real life to our team from time to time to drive home how important rules are. Great post! Being a member of a football team is practice for the real world. Coaches are not doing ANY FAVORS by not having consequences for kids who don't meet the standards. In fact, by letting those kids slide by, I would argue that you are actually setting those kids up for failure. At some point in the future, that kid is going to have to be accountable. If he doesn't learn how to be accountable from you, who is going to teach him?
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 16, 2008 7:16:48 GMT -6
they key is to do it your way but to turn the screws slowly. nobody likes drastic changes, it makes us (creatures of habit) very uncomfortable.
I prefer a system of " consequences" and "rewards". spell it all out ahead of time so that a player knows clearly the results of his decision making. do your players know what "screwing up" is?
we use a point system and quite honestly the upper classmen who may have been coddled in the past in some ways may not buy in as rapidly as a hungry underclassman who is eager to impress and please the staff. the end result is a slow turn of the screws, training the youngers how things are going to be while tolerating the resistance in steering the olders in a new direction. kids will be confused if certain behaviors were tolerated or even encouraged in the past but are no longer tolerated and encouraged. - in some cases, its not their fault. there is no reason to kick a player out of the program if the program truly is to teach them about life. let them make their mistakes, hold them accountable and provide corrective discipline.
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Aug 16, 2008 15:59:16 GMT -6
Guys, nice job. Learned alot. Best thread on the board
|
|