|
Post by coacht65 on Apr 7, 2017 6:51:18 GMT -6
Personally, I use and love Evernote to organize everything I find. Plus, you can "clip" directly from most source straight into Evernote. I also use Google drive a lot. Prefer it over the Microsoft stuff.
|
|
|
Post by coacht65 on Apr 7, 2017 6:36:22 GMT -6
3) Loaning something you paid for to someone however is NOT unethical nor illegal (providing you didn't make back up copies for yourself). You paid for THAT particular object or . You can trade/lend THAT particular object. You don't have to the rights or ownership to the concepts/material included in the object, but you do own that particular object. I disagree, I believe that's unethical. You bought it for your use. Giving it to someone else outside your program, whatever the means (whether trade, loan, sell, or just giving), is basically you transferring the title, even if temporary, to someone who didn't buy it. They have no right to it. Is it illegal? No idea. I'll just stick to ethics. This is knowledge for sale, and once someone watches it, they've gained that knowledge. You purchased that knowledge, now you're allowing someone else to gain that knowledge without paying for it. It's not like once you don't have the DVD you no longer have that knowledge. Give someone a music CD, and you no longer have the music (unless you copied it, but that's another story). Give someone a coaching DVD that you've watched, you still have the knowledge, and now they do too. Look, I'm not sure it's all that big of a deal. But it's certainly on the wrong side of a strict interpretation of right/wrong. If you were to put the content of one of those DVD's on a public access drive (say Google Drive) and post the link on here for everyone, would that be right, just because you bought it? There's no difference in the underlying act of loaning it to your buddy who coaches at another school or posting it on here for all to see. There's a difference of degree, but not of concept - people who didn't buy it are now accessing that knowledge. Again - big deal when you're talking small scale? Probably not. I mean, most of us exceed speed limits when we drive, but we don't consider ourselves criminals. There are two concepts we are talking about - what is moral vs what is legal when it comes to using a DVD. Legally, there is no debate. Once you purchase a dvd, you have the legal right to lend it, resell it or run it over with your car. You can also "display" it, as long as it is done privately and not for money. This would include letting your staff watch it as a group. You can also make excerpts from it and use it in a presentation. This is all "fair use" under the law. What you can't do is copy the entire thing and give or sell that copy to someone else (you can make a copy for personal use or other "fair use"). This includes putting it on the Internet or on a drive share and giving people access to it. It also likely includes the Hudl scenario, though that is a much closer call, and an argument could be made there that it would be considered "fair use". Morally, it is a different argument and subject to debate. Personally, my morals fit pretty tightly within the confines of the law. That said, personally, I would have no moral issue with putting a copy on Hudl for my staff to use, even though that technically MAY not be allowed. To me, that is the same as us watching it as a group. I would not, however, feel comfortable making copies and give them to my staff.
|
|
|
Post by coacht65 on Mar 6, 2017 22:26:53 GMT -6
hsrose Thanks for posting this video. Really good stuff, and I absolutely recommend folks watch it. Here is the powerpoint that goes with the video. Very helpful to scroll through it while watching the presentation. Dr. Uzma Samadani: Brain Injury In Sports
|
|