|
Post by lochness on May 31, 2007 12:46:27 GMT -6
I've always looked at "grab bagging" from the standpoint of not having a cohesive system, as well. In other words, there's no series in the run game and no progressive concepts in the passing game. Offenses that have plays that don't set each other up is a form of "grab bagging".
|
|
tedseay
Sophomore Member
Posts: 165
|
Post by tedseay on Jun 1, 2007 4:33:09 GMT -6
I translate this to: I promise to finish looking at your stuff soon! Sorry for the delay. I'm terrible. Chris: Don't you DARE waste time looking at my stuff -- get that engineering/reverse engineering article up on Smart Football prontissimo!
|
|
|
Post by optioncoach on Jun 1, 2007 19:47:44 GMT -6
I think "grab bagging" or the tendancy to try and do a little of everything is often a reaction to struggling to be successful, and teams are simply looking for something that will work. Teams that do a little bit of everything and still win are talented enough that they can line up and do anything.
|
|
|
Post by goldenbear76 on Jun 2, 2007 18:03:50 GMT -6
We're like a lot of coaches here as well. We run base out of I-pro set. We go gun, 2x2, 3x1. We have used Double Wing as our Goalline offense..however there are times in a game when we simply call double wing out to change of pace. We only run 3/4 plays out of DW. But we do have a rhyme to our madness. That multi formation you got listed up there seems kind of insane. Hey if they can pull it off..it would be a nightmare for a DC to stop. Its just..very difficult to run that many different sets with different plays. Did his plays look similar to the other formations he was using? or was it truly grab baggish?
|
|