|
Post by knightfan64 on Mar 9, 2023 5:13:37 GMT -6
Had this discussion with a coaching buddy and figured I’d get a few opinions on it. Is the idea of a coach staying one place for 20-30 years about to be a thing of the past once this older generation retires? I had the opportunity to coach and play for a guy who was a head coach at the school for 20 years. Prior to that he had done 19 years as an assistant and head coach at a previous school with one year of pg ball in between. That’s what I grew up knowing but looking back at my coaching career and seeing older fellas hang it up while younger guys seemingly come and go in certain places. The area I moved to 7 years ago has 4 schools in the county, and in a decade the four schools have combined to now have 13 coaches for example. And this is in a small rural area where imo expectations aren’t as high in 3/4 schools. So my question I guess is how it looks in your area? You got a bunch of seasoned vets roaming the sideline or is it seemingly every 4-5 years boom a new coach is in?
|
|
|
Post by CS on Mar 9, 2023 5:21:16 GMT -6
Had this discussion with a coaching buddy and figured I’d get a few opinions on it. Is the idea of a coach staying one place for 20-30 years about to be a thing of the past once this older generation retires? I had the opportunity to coach and play for a guy who was a head coach at the school for 20 years. Prior to that he had done 19 years as an assistant and head coach at a previous school with one year of pg ball in between. That’s what I grew up knowing but looking back at my coaching career and seeing older fellas hang it up while younger guys seemingly come and go in certain places. The area I moved to 7 years ago has 4 schools in the county, and in a decade the four schools have combined to now have 13 coaches for example. And this is in a small rural area where imo expectations aren’t as high in 3/4 schools. So my question I guess is how it looks in your area? You got a bunch of seasoned vets roaming the sideline or is it seemingly every 4-5 years boom a new coach is in? Possibly. Say you win for a while but hit a losing skid all of a sudden. Parents won’t blame their kids they’ll blame you and want a fresh face for the program
|
|
|
Post by knightfan64 on Mar 9, 2023 6:05:46 GMT -6
Had this discussion with a coaching buddy and figured I’d get a few opinions on it. Is the idea of a coach staying one place for 20-30 years about to be a thing of the past once this older generation retires? I had the opportunity to coach and play for a guy who was a head coach at the school for 20 years. Prior to that he had done 19 years as an assistant and head coach at a previous school with one year of pg ball in between. That’s what I grew up knowing but looking back at my coaching career and seeing older fellas hang it up while younger guys seemingly come and go in certain places. The area I moved to 7 years ago has 4 schools in the county, and in a decade the four schools have combined to now have 13 coaches for example. And this is in a small rural area where imo expectations aren’t as high in 3/4 schools. So my question I guess is how it looks in your area? You got a bunch of seasoned vets roaming the sideline or is it seemingly every 4-5 years boom a new coach is in? Possibly. Say you win for a while but hit a losing skid all of a sudden. Parents won’t blame their kids they’ll blame you and want a fresh face for the program I’ve seen that before for sure. I think we mentioned it in the bad admin thread too, but admin are also more geared to listen to the parents now in those situations. Every coach I talk to says find good admin. Conversely, I found a former superintendent of the coach i mentioned above. He mentioned early on in the coach’s tenure, the AD was trying everything he could to can the coach. Wouldn’t buy him anything, would blame him for everything and dug up dirt to try and smear the coach’s name. The super said “So here I was brand new to the area…..so I fired the AD who was stirring crap up and gave the coach one who would help”. The coach was there another 16 years after that episode. Gotta have admin that got your back otherwise stories change
|
|
|
Post by jstoss24 on Mar 9, 2023 6:59:27 GMT -6
My high school coach was at my high school for 21 years. Won 138 games, made the playoffs 15 times, sent dozens of players to play college football, constantly adapted the offense to fit the players, from flexbone, to a pistol veer, to a spread option, to a heavy RPO offense, back to flexbone, offense scored 27 PPG or more 17 times, defense allowed under 20 PPG 13 times, and most importantly, his biggest priority was building young men.
He did all these things, won all these games, and a few parents got mad because their kids weren't playing or they thought the flexbone wouldn't get their kids recruited and played the politics game and got him fired. So, to answer your question, I think it's far less likely to have coaches stay that long, but it's not because coaches want to leave.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Mar 9, 2023 7:30:05 GMT -6
I think people coaching for 20+ years is a thing of the past. Let alone in one place.
|
|
|
Post by irishdog on Mar 9, 2023 8:07:13 GMT -6
Yes, those days are over and for many of the reasons mentioned in the above posts. Also, why those things have changed is because of a lack of TRUST, a lack of LOYALTY, a lack of PATIENCE, and the social environment of INSTANT GRATIFICATION. Parents don't trust the coaches. Administrators aren't loyal to the coaches. Neither group is patient with a coach in building a solid foundation. And finally there are more kids today that have been raised in an atmosphere that teaches them if it's too hard...quit.
|
|
|
Post by agap on Mar 9, 2023 8:08:00 GMT -6
I think I counted 17 other assistant coaches I’ve coached with at a few different schools. None of them are coaching anymore for various reasons, but most just quit coaching.
|
|
|
Post by wolverine55 on Mar 9, 2023 8:24:50 GMT -6
I think the increasing workload put on teachers--and most of this extra work is tedious and not rewarding--impacts how many teachers continue to coach long into their careers. I'm fortunate to be in a district that pays fairly well which also means many decide they don't need that stipend (and all the work that comes with it) after just a few years.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Mar 9, 2023 9:18:16 GMT -6
People were asking this question 30 years ago. Yet, some people ended up coaching places 20-30 years at the same place since then.
It is rare. It has ALWAYS been rare. It will continue to happen, but be rare.
|
|
|
Post by jgordon1 on Mar 9, 2023 9:42:59 GMT -6
you might be able to do it as an assistant
|
|
|
Post by coachphillip on Mar 9, 2023 10:07:56 GMT -6
Thought the same thing about coaching, in general, for that long may not be a common thing anymore. Coaching is so much work that a lot of guys are opting out. I don't even chalk it up to the "these young guys nowadays" type of stuff. Just a TON of hoops for the sake of putting people through it.
|
|
|
Post by coachcb on Mar 9, 2023 10:13:27 GMT -6
I s'pose it depends on the program that's built and one's tolerance for bullchit. A guy I consider a mentor took over a school's football program the year it opened. He didn't build it into a powerhouse but they were certainly competitive. Over his 30+ years in the program, they made four state title appearances, won two and were a consistent presence in the playoffs.
They were a Flexbone program and were quite good at what they did. Towards the end of his career, they had a two rough seasons as numbers were down. Unfortunately, those two seasons ended up defining his career for a lot of people. He took a lot of chit for not being "modern", not throwing the ball enough, etc..etc.. I said he saw those two seasons coming from a mile away but that he wasn't going to quit. He started the program and he wasn't going to quit until he was ready to retire from teaching.
The school has had five HCs since he left and they haven't made a playoff appearance since.
|
|
|
Post by larrymoe on Mar 9, 2023 10:26:34 GMT -6
Thought the same thing about coaching, in general, for that long may not be a common thing anymore. Coaching is so much work that a lot of guys are opting out. I don't even chalk it up to the "these young guys nowadays" type of stuff. Just a TON of hoops for the sake of putting people through it. The juice isn't worth the squeeze anymore.
|
|
|
Post by MICoach on Mar 9, 2023 11:21:30 GMT -6
I think the increasing workload put on teachers--and most of this extra work is tedious and not rewarding--impacts how many teachers continue to coach long into their careers. I'm fortunate to be in a district that pays fairly well which also means many decide they don't need that stipend (and all the work that comes with it) after just a few years. I think there are a lot of factors that stem from teaching and have had an impact on coaching. In my area until about a year ago there was a huge teacher surplus so a lot of newer teachers ended up in less desirable jobs. A lot of these schools have limited athletic offerings (charters). Additionally, it leads teachers to end up changing jobs more often early in their career (rising from crap job --> OK job --> good job). If you weren't actively interested in coaching football (or any sport), then both of those things would probably limit the likelihood that you'd end up doing it. Less coaches in general then means less people staying at coaching jobs for a long time.
|
|
|
Post by MICoach on Mar 9, 2023 11:22:51 GMT -6
you might be able to do it as an assistant I feel like this is definitely more common. I know a couple guys who have been assistants in the same program but under several different head coaches for multiple decades.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 9, 2023 11:34:17 GMT -6
Had this discussion with a coaching buddy and figured I’d get a few opinions on it. Is the idea of a coach staying one place for 20-30 years about to be a thing of the past once this older generation retires? I had the opportunity to coach and play for a guy who was a head coach at the school for 20 years. Prior to that he had done 19 years as an assistant and head coach at a previous school with one year of pg ball in between. That’s what I grew up knowing but looking back at my coaching career and seeing older fellas hang it up while younger guys seemingly come and go in certain places. The area I moved to 7 years ago has 4 schools in the county, and in a decade the four schools have combined to now have 13 coaches for example. And this is in a small rural area where imo expectations aren’t as high in 3/4 schools. So my question I guess is how it looks in your area? You got a bunch of seasoned vets roaming the sideline or is it seemingly every 4-5 years boom a new coach is in? Was it ever really THAT common? I ask because from what I've seen we remember those 20 year guys but when you look at the rest of the teams in their league they change coaches a lot and always have.
|
|
|
Post by silkyice on Mar 9, 2023 11:37:25 GMT -6
Had this discussion with a coaching buddy and figured I’d get a few opinions on it. Is the idea of a coach staying one place for 20-30 years about to be a thing of the past once this older generation retires? I had the opportunity to coach and play for a guy who was a head coach at the school for 20 years. Prior to that he had done 19 years as an assistant and head coach at a previous school with one year of pg ball in between. That’s what I grew up knowing but looking back at my coaching career and seeing older fellas hang it up while younger guys seemingly come and go in certain places. The area I moved to 7 years ago has 4 schools in the county, and in a decade the four schools have combined to now have 13 coaches for example. And this is in a small rural area where imo expectations aren’t as high in 3/4 schools. So my question I guess is how it looks in your area? You got a bunch of seasoned vets roaming the sideline or is it seemingly every 4-5 years boom a new coach is in? Was it ever really THAT common? I ask because from what I've seen we remember those 20 year guys but when you look at the rest of the teams in their league they change coaches a lot and always have. Agreed That was my exact point on my earlier post.
|
|
|
Post by Defcord on Mar 9, 2023 12:30:17 GMT -6
I think people coaching for 20+ years is a thing of the past. Let alone in one place. This is what scares me. It’s seems to be that people just aren’t wanting to make the commitment to the profession long term as much as they used to. And I don’t think it’s a flaw in the coaches character. I think paying a few thousand dollars to a guy to work year around and deal with bullshitt just isn’t worth it to a lot of guys. My stipend is relatively decent and I still don’t think it represents the actual value of time and effort I commit to the job. I can’t imagine being a guy that makes 1500, 2500 whatever looking my wife in the eyes and trying to explain how a hundred or hundred and fifty extra dollars a month is more valuable to our family than my presence.
|
|
|
Post by senatorblutarsky on Mar 9, 2023 12:57:45 GMT -6
I had a conversation a few days ago with another (rival) coach who has been the HC at his (private) school for 43 years now. They have been up and down in his career... they've won several state titles... had a few 0-9 years too. My question was simple “How did you stay at the same place for all those years?” Basically he said he loves where he lives... and also mentioned that he has changed jobs at the school every so often (teacher, AD, transportation director, etc.), so that gave him some new challenges. I asked because I am in my 33rd year... I’ve been in five schools (one school I was at for two separate stints) and four states. For my last 3 jobs I was there for: 6 years, 9 years and now 11 years in my current job. I remember Bill Walsh saying in coaching there is s "shelf life" of about 10 years. I also remember Spike Dykes saying once that my popularity decreases 10% every year. I’m in year 13… do the math.” I am always antsy to leave… and we’ve been good. I like where I am… we are understaffed in football, but I have good coaches. Kids are good. Facilities suck, but we kind of embrace that. But leaving now isn’t that easy, though I would like to take on a new challenge. I live in a small, isolated town (fine with that… not thrilled about still having over 3 feet of snow on the ground and it is snowing again today… and we won’t even hit the low 30s for 10 days according to my weather app), so if I change jobs I move. I interviewed for one that I would have liked to accept… but the real estate market there and here basically means if I wanted a similar house, I would end up paying about $100,000 more. Plus, it would be yet another state I would add to my list of places lived… and the retirement figures are better if I stay here or return to a state where I am even more vested. As you get older, that becomes more important… I wish I had more sense when I was younger (though it was fun). When I was in Colorado, I remember talking to a coach I had known since high school. He was in a big district outside of Denver. He said the disadvantage to working where he worked was that there were 12 high schools in the district; the advantage was there were 12 high schools in the district. Changing jobs without having to change houses would certainly have an impact on being able to take on a new challenge at another school. Back to the original question, I think it was more common before the 2000s to see a coach put in 15-20 years at maybe 1-3 places before becoming an administrator. I agree that now there aren’t many of us old dinosaurs left. Even in my current situation, I’ve been here 11 years and am the longest tenured coach in our region (conference). I’m not going to make predictions, but I don’t like the direction high school athletics (especially football) is taking right now. Between parents being more difficult, AAU “suggesting” kids focus on one sport (basketball), the concussion scare, etc… I wouldn’t bet a lot of money that high school football will even be around 50 years from now… at least not in its current format (7 on 7 leagues maybe…) This is what scares me. It’s seems to be that people just aren’t wanting to make the commitment to the profession long term as much as they used to. And I don’t think it’s a flaw in the coaches character. I think paying a few thousand dollars to a guy to work year around and deal with bullshitt just isn’t worth it to a lot of guys. My stipend is relatively decent and I still don’t think it represents the actual value of time and effort I commit to the job. I can’t imagine being a guy that makes 1500, 2500 whatever looking my wife in the eyes and trying to explain how a hundred or hundred and fifty extra dollars a month is more valuable to our family than my presence.
I agree… and I do believe it is a responsibility of coaches to protect this game… but at what cost? Eventually, it won’t seem to be worth the headaches.
|
|
|
Post by knightfan64 on Mar 9, 2023 13:07:49 GMT -6
Had this discussion with a coaching buddy and figured I’d get a few opinions on it. Is the idea of a coach staying one place for 20-30 years about to be a thing of the past once this older generation retires? I had the opportunity to coach and play for a guy who was a head coach at the school for 20 years. Prior to that he had done 19 years as an assistant and head coach at a previous school with one year of pg ball in between. That’s what I grew up knowing but looking back at my coaching career and seeing older fellas hang it up while younger guys seemingly come and go in certain places. The area I moved to 7 years ago has 4 schools in the county, and in a decade the four schools have combined to now have 13 coaches for example. And this is in a small rural area where imo expectations aren’t as high in 3/4 schools. So my question I guess is how it looks in your area? You got a bunch of seasoned vets roaming the sideline or is it seemingly every 4-5 years boom a new coach is in? Was it ever really THAT common? I ask because from what I've seen we remember those 20 year guys but when you look at the rest of the teams in their league they change coaches a lot and always have. Maybe I was in an odd area. Had my coach who I worked for coach 20 years at one school. Another area coach pull, if I remember correctly 10-11, another one pull 16-17 before becoming the AD at said school. Another area coach retired after 30+ years and was then followed up by a guy who’s put in 15 currently. That’s one district with 4 long coaching runs but I understand what you’re saying bc I have seen even successful schools rotate through head coaches quickly while winning titles
|
|
|
Post by jg78 on Mar 12, 2023 12:33:48 GMT -6
Bingo.
With few exceptions, you have to just love coaching for it to be worth your time. It needs to be your hobby.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Mar 12, 2023 13:27:54 GMT -6
I think people coaching for 20+ years is a thing of the past. Let alone in one place. This is what scares me. It’s seems to be that people just aren’t wanting to make the commitment to the profession long term as much as they used to. And I don’t think it’s a flaw in the coaches character. I think paying a few thousand dollars to a guy to work year around and deal with bullshitt just isn’t worth it to a lot of guys. My stipend is relatively decent and I still don’t think it represents the actual value of time and effort I commit to the job. I can’t imagine being a guy that makes 1500, 2500 whatever looking my wife in the eyes and trying to explain how a hundred or hundred and fifty extra dollars a month is more valuable to our family than my presence. I would be interested in getting opinions on just how much "year round work" took place on average in the 60s/70s maybe the 80s. At least just for football. Also interested in how many coaches were NOT educators back then. I am betting it was few.
|
|
|
Post by bucksweepdotcom on Mar 12, 2023 15:03:27 GMT -6
"I would be interested in getting opinions on just how much "year round work" took place on average in the 60s/70s maybe the 80s. At least just for football. Also interested in how many coaches were NOT educators back then. I am betting it was few."
Not from a hotbed but I didn't see my HC until the first day of practice and not again once the season ended. He was not a teacher. We did have a PE teacher in the school that we kind of considered the "coach" but no offseason anything. This was in the mid late 80s. I did hear of the coach in the 70s ran a good program within the season but not to much off season stuff maybe a week of illegal practices before the first official practice. But once the season started it was pretty intense.
|
|
mc140
Sophomore Member
Posts: 220
|
Post by mc140 on Mar 12, 2023 19:31:08 GMT -6
In Illinois coaching 20 plus is a thing of the past. Most people who get a decent paying job just stop coaching and never leave.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 12, 2023 22:20:53 GMT -6
This is what scares me. It’s seems to be that people just aren’t wanting to make the commitment to the profession long term as much as they used to. And I don’t think it’s a flaw in the coaches character. I think paying a few thousand dollars to a guy to work year around and deal with bullshitt just isn’t worth it to a lot of guys. My stipend is relatively decent and I still don’t think it represents the actual value of time and effort I commit to the job. I can’t imagine being a guy that makes 1500, 2500 whatever looking my wife in the eyes and trying to explain how a hundred or hundred and fifty extra dollars a month is more valuable to our family than my presence. I would be interested in getting opinions on just how much "year round work" took place on average in the 60s/70s maybe the 80s. At least just for football. Also interested in how many coaches were NOT educators back then. I am betting it was few. I graduated in 1971 which means that I played in 1967-70. All of our coaches were school employees. My first school was a small school which entered a consolidation with two others after my soph year. At school 1 we had two coaches. We had no off-season program. The coaches coached other sports in the winter or spring. After football season it was "See ya later". We'd have a team meeting toward the end of winter where we'd get a "workout program" which consisted of a handout of exercises. Shortly before the end of school we had a "fitness test" consisting of a times mile. Then we were told when practice would start in August. The second, bigger, school was more organized. We had five coaches, all teachers. We had an actual off-season program. After Christmas we'd lift and do agility drills for, I guess, 90 minutes, three times a week. In Spring we started "intramural track", which was some lifting and running. The lifting really consisted of letting us use the weight room with no organized program. In the summer they'd open the weight room for a couple of hours in the morning but it was pretty much come when you get here and lift on your own. We'd also run plays twice a week. Not all of the coaches would be there at every session. 7-on-7 or team camps? Nothing of the sort. So, the off-season time commitment for coaches was a lot less than what's done today. I should mention that we won our district three out of the four years.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Mar 13, 2023 5:20:12 GMT -6
I would be interested in getting opinions on just how much "year round work" took place on average in the 60s/70s maybe the 80s. At least just for football. Also interested in how many coaches were NOT educators back then. I am betting it was few. I graduated in 1971 which means that I played in 1967-70. All of our coaches were school employees. My first school was a small school which entered a consolidation with two others after my soph year. At school 1 we had two coaches. We had no off-season program. The coaches coached other sports in the winter or spring. After football season it was "See ya later". We'd have a team meeting toward the end of winter where we'd get a "workout program" which consisted of a handout of exercises. Shortly before the end of school we had a "fitness test" consisting of a times mile. Then we were told when practice would start in August. The second, bigger, school was more organized. We had five coaches, all teachers. We had an actual off-season program. After Christmas we'd lift and do agility drills for, I guess, 90 minutes, three times a week. In Spring we started "intramural track", which was some lifting and running. The lifting really consisted of letting us use the weight room with no organized program. In the summer they'd open the weight room for a couple of hours in the morning but it was pretty much come when you get here and lift on your own. We'd also run plays twice a week. Not all of the coaches would be there at every session. 7-on-7 or team camps? Nothing of the sort. So, the off-season time commitment for coaches was a lot less than what's done today. I should mention that we won our district three out of the four years. At the 2nd school, were those coaches coaching other sports as well? While the football offseason workload was less, were they working in season on other sports?
|
|
bbrown2804
Sophomore Member
[F4:BBrown2804]
Posts: 102
|
Post by bbrown2804 on Mar 13, 2023 6:21:51 GMT -6
I think people coaching for 20+ years is a thing of the past. Let alone in one place. This is what scares me. It’s seems to be that people just aren’t wanting to make the commitment to the profession long term as much as they used to. And I don’t think it’s a flaw in the coaches character. I think paying a few thousand dollars to a guy to work year around and deal with bullshitt just isn’t worth it to a lot of guys. My stipend is relatively decent and I still don’t think it represents the actual value of time and effort I commit to the job. I can’t imagine being a guy that makes 1500, 2500 whatever looking my wife in the eyes and trying to explain how a hundred or hundred and fifty extra dollars a month is more valuable to our family than my presence. I've been out of coaching the last two years and I miss it terribly. But I'll be honest: the benefits of not being absolutely exhausted for three months straight in the fall plus the time I've been able to spend with my young kids has not been lost on me.
While I definitely plan on getting back to it in the near future, I can absolutely understand why someone would look at the commitment and sacrifices involved and conclude that around $3k (and that's assuming you have the max number of years of experience) before taxes isn't enough to justify those sacrifices.
|
|
|
Post by flballcoach on Mar 13, 2023 7:51:25 GMT -6
I just hung it up as a head coach this off season. I am going to switch with my assistant who is the head track coach and I am his assistant there so it will be a smooth change. I told the kids it will just be him yelling at them now instead of me. I just couldn't justify or do the year round thing anymore. Chasing kids to get to weight room, get and stay eligible, not get in trouble at school etc. It just gets to be a lot. (before anyone says you should establish culture or anything like that I am at an urban school and those of you who have done it will understand) I've had one summer off (the covid year) and that was the first time in 23 summers at the time I didn't have to worry about doing weight room or 7 on 7. Sunday 7 on 7 and Mon-Thurs weights with maybe 2 weeks off in the summer, just don't want to do it anymore. I will show up the first day of practice, coach and then as soon as the last play is run in practice I will be headed to the car. I will help during the school day with the administrative stuff and with the kids but I am 44, I want to fish and play golf and travel. I told the kids this and its funny they are like "we totally get it coach". This make sense to anyone? Just don't want the year round grind anymore?
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Mar 13, 2023 9:44:38 GMT -6
I graduated in 1971 which means that I played in 1967-70. All of our coaches were school employees. My first school was a small school which entered a consolidation with two others after my soph year. At school 1 we had two coaches. We had no off-season program. The coaches coached other sports in the winter or spring. After football season it was "See ya later". We'd have a team meeting toward the end of winter where we'd get a "workout program" which consisted of a handout of exercises. Shortly before the end of school we had a "fitness test" consisting of a times mile. Then we were told when practice would start in August. The second, bigger, school was more organized. We had five coaches, all teachers. We had an actual off-season program. After Christmas we'd lift and do agility drills for, I guess, 90 minutes, three times a week. In Spring we started "intramural track", which was some lifting and running. The lifting really consisted of letting us use the weight room with no organized program. In the summer they'd open the weight room for a couple of hours in the morning but it was pretty much come when you get here and lift on your own. We'd also run plays twice a week. Not all of the coaches would be there at every session. 7-on-7 or team camps? Nothing of the sort. So, the off-season time commitment for coaches was a lot less than what's done today. I should mention that we won our district three out of the four years. At the 2nd school, were those coaches coaching other sports as well? While the football offseason workload was less, were they working in season on other sports? Good question. No, they only coached football.
|
|
|
Post by spartan on Mar 13, 2023 10:09:46 GMT -6
A's tend to stay they build a great program.
|
|