dragon
Sophomore Member
Posts: 187
|
Post by dragon on Dec 10, 2007 16:02:01 GMT -6
I know it's not even the New Year yet, but I know most everyone out there has already started consulting with others and researching ideas.
What changes to your offensive/defensive schemes will you/your staff be researching?
What areas of your schemes will you be adjusting or getting rid of completely, and why?
Do you have an overall personal goal for this offseason, if so what is it?
If you have any other off season related ideas post those as well.
Hopefully this can spark some discussion.
|
|
|
Post by coachbdud on Dec 10, 2007 16:24:00 GMT -6
we are a fly team and i am researching some spread and air raid passing concepts(i started researching this as soona s this season ended, ive traded for a lot of spread type DVDs and have been readin a lot of articles and posts on this board ), we will be returning some great slot receivers/flys and last year teams really loaded the box against us and our lack of a passing game really hurt us, we are rebuilding a program and think this year we have a realistic shot at being a 5-5 or 6-4 playoff team.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Dec 10, 2007 16:29:13 GMT -6
Move towards; 1) Mumme-style Tempo Air Raid 2) Refining program manual and leadership training 3) Competitive Team Social Psychology 4) More Slack!!! 5) Making quarters a base concept for 42 (becomes 43)
Move away; A) paring down unnecessary jargon in playbook B) simplifying implementation calendar C) streamline offense/defense package (2 -3 concepts)
|
|
|
Post by chris5ft2 on Dec 10, 2007 17:09:06 GMT -6
Similarly to Brophy, I will be looking at overall ways of simplifying the offence, in terms of concepts and the play calling system.
I'll also be looking at ways of getting some more smash-mouth football involved, to fit the local climate (rain and mud!)
|
|
|
Post by coachmallory on Dec 10, 2007 17:12:10 GMT -6
Different ways to defend 22 personel out of 4-3 Route reading instead of landmark drops
Tempo - air raid Huge line splits Blocking w/ hands not shoulder
|
|
|
Post by ajreaper on Dec 10, 2007 17:28:32 GMT -6
Likely moving from an I based offense to the flexbone. Doing alot of reading and gathering of and watching of tape. Also made a change in how and who does our off season speed and agility work- brought in Velocity to run it and I've been very pleased thus far with how thats been going.
|
|
|
Post by pantherpride91 on Dec 10, 2007 17:48:27 GMT -6
Looking to try to get the jet sweep into our offense
Also maybe some lead/load option
Work on controlling the tempo better...maybe some no huddle or candence changes
We have a good amount of speed coming back but lose our bruiser fullback...all predicated on what the HC wants to really change though....
|
|
|
Post by ccscoach on Dec 10, 2007 18:29:14 GMT -6
Moving from 4-2-5 to 3-3-5 defense coverages won't change still base robber but need to find out more about how the front works. Looking at the way AFA, TULSA, and WVU play there defense.
|
|
|
Post by morris on Dec 10, 2007 18:34:57 GMT -6
Changing from a Power I to a spread QB centered run game. Trying to get as much information as I can about it.
We are also looking at refining everything from practice to skill sets to playcalling.
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Dec 10, 2007 18:37:57 GMT -6
My old team: Build ATTITUDE.
My new team:
Trying to get some carry over between offensive schemes.
By that I mean:
Having the same concepts (not necessarily talking about passing here) in 5-wide that we have in 22 personnel.
Instead of running seperate schemes, running "our offense" more cohesively
|
|
|
Post by Coach Bruce on Dec 10, 2007 19:08:14 GMT -6
When you say '22 personel", you mean 2 wides on each side? I know, i know, I'm slow.
|
|
|
Post by theprez98 on Dec 10, 2007 19:32:13 GMT -6
When you say '22 personel", you mean 2 wides on each side? I know, i know, I'm slow. 22 is the combination of RBs, WRs, and TEs. Depending on what order they're using. If you use the order I specified, it would mean 2 RBs, 2 WRs, and 1 TE. The last # is assumed, since the number of backs and receivers will add to 5.
|
|
|
Post by CVBears on Dec 10, 2007 19:44:19 GMT -6
Question I'm trying to answer: Is the pistol formation like communism (good in theory, bad in practice) Major thing researching: One back running game w/ and w/out TE's and from 2x2 or 3x1 with out any motion Major project: streamlining the defense while adding a 46 package
|
|
|
Post by dacoachmo on Dec 10, 2007 20:52:43 GMT -6
1) finding a NEW coaching job...
|
|
trojan
Junior Member
[F4:wingtcoach.com] [F4:wingtcoachdon]
Posts: 494
|
Post by trojan on Dec 10, 2007 20:56:07 GMT -6
We've run jet & rocket out of our Wing-T, but we have run ZERO complimentary plays. Gotta change that next season.
|
|
|
Post by aztec on Dec 10, 2007 21:04:02 GMT -6
We are going to move away from the 3-3 and go back to our base 4-3. I just want to see if my opponents are reading this. And I think will will become a spread offense that throws the ball about 70% of the time. Many opposing coaches of mine are on this board and many hate to deal with our shifting option offense and our stemming prowling stunting 3-3. Overall I will keep refining our stack and looking to simply and clean up any un-needed verbage. This last year I was really able to stream line it. I like to break down what we ran and see what was a good investment of time and what was not. It is was not a good investment of time it normally gets dropped from the playbook. Also I look for what stunts worked the best and what burned us the most and look to refine or drop that stunt.
|
|
coach24
Sophomore Member
Posts: 195
|
Post by coach24 on Dec 10, 2007 21:19:43 GMT -6
I already run the spread. I am looking to simplify the passing game to concepts and get rid of the passing tree, and put in a no huddlewith wrist bands. Watching film and asking ofr any ideas. We will be very young sophs, some fresh jun, 5 sen. I coach at a very small school with no jv program. Mod and varsity. We are trying to merge with another school for just football. I hope it happens it will give us a JV. If anyone has merged with another school please let me know how it has worked for you.........
|
|
|
Post by coachmallory on Dec 11, 2007 5:25:03 GMT -6
When you say '22 personel", you mean 2 wides on each side? I know, i know, I'm slow. 22 is the combination of RBs, WRs, and TEs. Depending on what order they're using. If you use the order I specified, it would mean 2 RBs, 2 WRs, and 1 TE. The last # is assumed, since the number of backs and receivers will add to 5. The first number is the number of backs and the second number is the number TEs.
|
|
|
Post by cjkal30 on Dec 11, 2007 6:56:11 GMT -6
I am looking into the Air raid passing game! We run the ball well but need a passing game to go along. Also looking into the Shot Gun Fly sweep package!
|
|
|
Post by lochness on Dec 11, 2007 7:07:22 GMT -6
I am going to install the (INSERT NAME OF WHOEVER WINS THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP) offense this offseason! Can anyone send me a playbook?
Also, if you have any film of Tim Tebow, can you send that to me too? I want to show it to my QB so he can be like Tim.
|
|
|
Post by revtaz on Dec 11, 2007 8:31:19 GMT -6
I need to be able to "BLITZ MORE."
I hate blanket statements. I might as well say "We need to run the ball."
|
|
|
Post by tog on Dec 11, 2007 8:40:32 GMT -6
we are looking at ways to expand the wing-t emphasis of our offense and cut back on some of the option stuff
just based on the talent we have
we already have ways to run more wing-t type concepts within what we do, just looking at making it better/more streamlined with more carryover to our base base stuff of zone read and veer from the gun
basically trap powers leads etc
we are also looking at adding a couple of screens to the arsenal as our qb coming back is excellent at throwing them
|
|
|
Post by Coach Huey on Dec 11, 2007 8:55:10 GMT -6
22 is the combination of RBs, WRs, and TEs. Depending on what order they're using. If you use the order I specified, it would mean 2 RBs, 2 WRs, and 1 TE. The last # is assumed, since the number of backs and receivers will add to 5. The first number is the number of backs and the second number is the number TEs. could be anything, really. in some systems, the first number indicates the number of TE's with the 2nd number indicating backs. in other systems the first number indicates # of receivers with the last number being number of backs. also, TE's & receivers are the numbers. could be anything really -- all dependent on the terminology a particular coach uses. (for us -= 1st # is WR / 2nd # is RB)
|
|
|
Post by airraider on Dec 11, 2007 9:56:26 GMT -6
I want to become more pressure oriented on defense and run some man schemes. I also want to do a good job on teaching the why to my kids above the how.
On offense, I want to clean up the offense more and do a better job of communication during our no huddle stuff.
|
|
|
Post by kurtbryan on Dec 11, 2007 12:58:05 GMT -6
We are going to add to our A-11 by implementing:
1. Shotgun zone sweep 2. Trap off of the sweep 3. QB keeper off of the sweep 4. Waggle and Boot off of the sweep 5. Flooding to the INside, opposite of our Basic Flood Routes Outside 6. Keeping our eyes and ears open to do more still
Kurt
|
|
bigcroz
Junior Member
Go STAGS!!
Posts: 356
|
Post by bigcroz on Dec 11, 2007 20:54:33 GMT -6
Jet/Rocket based wing t and want to find some adjustments in blocking schemes to nuetralize the adjustments that we saw this year. As well as expand our passing game to take advantage of our talent.
Refine our 3-3 to eliminate the stunts, blitzes that did not work.
|
|
|
Post by cometcoach on Dec 12, 2007 16:23:10 GMT -6
2nd year DC - took over in June and had to learn on the fly:
1. Redefining (or defining for that matter) my Defensive Philosophy for the 4-2-5
2. Implementing Zone Fire Blitzes
3. Researching the Under Front for a change of pace vs. TE run schemes - Got beat up vs. some Double Tight Sets in our last game.
4. Looking for a versatile goal-line package
|
|
|
Post by senatorblutarsky on Dec 12, 2007 16:39:43 GMT -6
Defensively- we've explored about everything every year... we always run the same D...I'm sure we will again. We might add a new wrinkle to rotation coverage. (no real research on this)
Offensively- no real change either, but some adjustment on emphasis on: 1. misdirection running game over power (last of a long line of good FBs graduates... we will have smaller, quicker backs). Double Dive/Belly might be more of a staple. (some research) 2. Some read based passing game. We have done it before, but really simplified with a freshman QB (primary route or single route plays only- except for a double screen). I'd like to branch out and run a small package of combo routes. (I = antithesis of a passing guru, thus the need for the most research here).
|
|
|
Post by dlsmith99320 on Dec 13, 2007 11:46:08 GMT -6
I am going to run the shotgun spread offense options, zone runs and traps,screens, and a handfull of passing plays I am going to pick 5 plays with a few different formations that will be our as close to perfect "base" plays I have a system and a plan and now I need to put it all together.
|
|
|
Post by cjamerson on Dec 13, 2007 12:01:11 GMT -6
We are going from Wing T (buck series) to Double Tight Double Wing. New head coach is bringing it with him. Trying to learn as much as I can. Not just the plays, but the nuances of it. The when, why, and what.
Defensively...we are gonna try to learn some new concepts. Getting to the ball and tackling the BC is a concept we will try to implement.
|
|