|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 27, 2009 2:54:03 GMT -6
Something on my mind this am as I reflect our rate of installation of offense, defense, special teams, teaching of fundamentals, discipline, rules of the game, situations, getting quality reps for starters, subs, scrubs....
how detailed do you get? We talk a big game here on the net but sometimes I wonder about some of the things I read, DO THESE GUYS REALLY COACH THAT WAY OR IS IT COACH SPEAK?
Heres a few examples:
We run double wing and 46 , we scrimmaged monday. Some of the things we struggled with in the scrimmage, qb footwork, center snap and step, ball security, backers ripping and crossing face of scoop blockers, pass rushers keeping contain on qb. Now all of those things require coaching. We cant just rely on superior athleticism because we dont have that.
We dont have as many plays installed as we did this time last year because we have more underclassmen starting and we dont have more than one defense (though we can show different looks and multiple stunts, we arent yet good at them) because we need to coach fundamentals and skills that are required to make our schemes go.
I was thinking that Id like to install a boot pass and a screen and a fake punt...but why bother if we dont double team well, dont log block well, dont block backers moving in space well. We need more time on that stuff. In other words, we dont yet run our bread and butter well because we dont have the fundamentals down. Similarly on defense we get reached at the dt spots, get put on skates,...why add another defense if we dont play the one we have well?
Id like to hear different philosophies on coaching the details and playing few defensive techniques and coaching the details intensely vs more of multiple approach , maybe less detailed in each defense? / less detailed for each offensive play etc.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Aug 27, 2009 5:25:34 GMT -6
You mean like technique vs rolling the ball out there? The 3 page thread on that last week ended up in the trash. Good luck (beware of actual exchange/discussion) I DO, however, wholeheartedly agree with your assertion, though Do you press on hoping that one day it will click, maybe piece by piece? Then it begs the question(s); - What are we expecting of the players and HOW are we teaching them (if they aren't getting it)?
- Did we not allocate enough instruction time? If so/not, how much is enough time?
- Did we allocate enough time, but the way we attempted to teach it fail?
- If we DO proceed, is there a more compelling reason other than us not having enough faith in our own coaching ability to train an athlete HOW to properly execute his assignment consistently?
I am amazed at how some guys "evaluate" their players, looking for new athletes when one doesn't function as he thought he should (however giving that failed player clear directions and drills on how to not screw up hadn't even crossed that coach's mind)
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Aug 27, 2009 6:00:37 GMT -6
I think a survey would find an inverse correlation between length of team period, and coaching of details. The longer a coach schedules for TEAM, the worse the details will be.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 27, 2009 6:46:45 GMT -6
Maybe, I run alot more slow motion team stuff right now so I can coach the details. Theres no point in adding another series for us when we dont run the one we have very well.
why add another coverage?
why add more stunts?
why work on anything other than get offs and pulling steps?
shoot, if we can block in space better then the plays we have will work better. If we can read "counter" then we dont need another defensive front...
|
|
|
Post by coachorr on Aug 27, 2009 6:54:15 GMT -6
We found out last night that what we are trying to do is too complex for the kids we have. We travelled with 22 kids and 9 of them have never played football before. These kids have never won a game. We are trying to install the Tony Franklin system, however, it has been above the kids in many degrees. Things we did bad, Dend getting reached in a 44 defense. Corners not staying home in a cover II (4-3 covII). Shotgun snap under pressure kids not being able to go both ways too tired and have never played that level of contact before. Missed assignments and tentativeness from the oline, slow and unaggressive running by the backs (4th and 2 we run lead option, the kid gets the pitch and tries to stop and make a cutback three yards from the sideline instead of falling forward), not understanding down and distance on both sides of the ball. This is what I plan to do. Work on I formation and run power, counter, power toss, fly sweep and lead. (We already run lead, Power and Jet). We are going to work on the center exchange, the drive block and the double team. Our defense did pretty well considering they were on the field for 60 plays. We are going to work on not getting reached, becoming better tacklers and staying lower on the defensive line. Special teams. We just have a lot of kids who can't remember what team they are on, in spite of a depth chart and pre-game review. Several IEP students who need some hand holding.
|
|
|
Post by coachorr on Aug 27, 2009 7:00:52 GMT -6
Our practice time is 75% individual and play review time and 25% Team and inside run time.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Aug 27, 2009 7:00:56 GMT -6
Orr brings up a good point with reference to the (h/t to Coverdale terms) "Cost" of a play.
It may take a while to get actually good at plays that involve timing or pulling linemen. Plays that require meticulous detail. Yes, you can and should be able to run them, but they may take considerable minutes to get proficient/good at them.
The main thing is to move the ball. With the TFS, for example, it doesn't take much to move the ball (and establish tempo) by simply installing fast screens. You don't block anyone (really) and you can get "good" at it very quickly (this is what Franklin did when he first got to Auburn (vs Clemson). You could spend 15 minutes and be able to run 41/51 fast screens and be proficient and coach up the skills later.....rather than banging your head on the wall trying to run mesh for a week.
In TDmaker's situation, could wedge be a good place to start, and THEN go into power/counter game (develop a competent play before moving on to more challenging skill sets)?
What is the 'economy' of teaching time involved?
My only concern (as with the last thread) was the lack of responsibility exhibited by COACHES, putting the blame on kids instead of themselves for why plays go bad.
|
|
|
Post by coachorr on Aug 27, 2009 7:06:17 GMT -6
The TF system is tough to run, if you can't snap it. And that was our major break down in my coaching, I should have put our best kid on our center in practice to see if he could snap. BTW, our starting center cracked his elbow, while skate boarding last week. At that point I should have taken out the gun snap. Moreover, our starting Z receiver, corner, and special teams returner snuck out of his house the night before the game. It was a major hurt to us.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Aug 27, 2009 7:17:26 GMT -6
The TF system is tough to run, if you can't snap it. **not picking on you, but just for the sake of this discussion..... you scrapped the entire system because you guys couldn't coach a shotgun snap? Did you guys not have enough faith in the offensive system or faith in y'alls ability to coach in it that would necessitate a change in offense? (I'd be asking the same thing if it were any other system that switched; DW, Veer, Wing-T) Players don't typically come pre-assembled to play in a system, we are supposed to coach up the 2's and 3's to be able to take the spot of the studs, right? **i'm in the same boat. We WERE a TFS client, but weren't good at anything (23 different plays in 12 practices), and 2 months later we are a not good 2-back under center veer team. We were a 4 man line Quarters defense, and now a 3 man line 1 high defense......the problems that plagued us in the old system, plague us in the 'new' system. And this rationale (not investing in fundamental teaching, but expecting a high return simply because a new bar napkin was used) baffles me, personnally.
I am doing what I can as a position coach, and clinging to the one position that doesn't get completely bastidized through sloppy fundamentals and egregious academic ignorance in scheme.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 27, 2009 7:41:44 GMT -6
This may be an example of what brophy's talking about.
We are a Houston Veer team. Our kids run it from at least ninth grade on. However, on Varsity we never run Triple Option in Team period until third day of two-a-days - gives kids time to rep, rep, rep so that when we do go 11-on-11 the ball is not on the ground every other play and the kids have some confidence in the plays.
In the meantime (first two days) we run base, simpler plays such as Dive, Dive-Option, Counter-Dive, Lead Option, Quick Pitch.
Some people I am aware of try to run Triple Option and give up quickly because they try to go too fast, expect too much too fast.
|
|
|
Post by amikell on Aug 27, 2009 8:56:29 GMT -6
I am amazed at how some guys "evaluate" their players, looking for new athletes when one doesn't function as he thought he should (however giving that failed player clear directions and drills on how to not screw up hadn't even crossed that coach's mind) Here's a story from yesterday that illustrates your point. I coach our Special Teams. I try to use PAT to get big guys on the field who may not see much playing time otherwise. We teach the line to step forward with their inside foot (it's on the heel of the inside man), then try to leave both feet, especially the inside foot in concrete. Punch hard and eye inside gap and blind punch outside gap. We're having trouble getting the guys to to leave their feet in place to not give ground. We have gotten better, but one kid wasn't getting it and kept opening up his inside gap. I yelled "keep your inside foot in concrete don't get pushed back." The kid comes to me afterward and says "How can I keep my foot in concrete when he keeps running over me." In frustration I tell him to "grow a sack and stop letting the guy run over you. Figure out how to stop it." Was there any coaching going on when I said that? Absolutely not. None, zip, zero, zilch. So after I calmed a bit I told him to lower his level and that should help. Now, the technique on this is not something we have spent much time on, but we have covered it, and it is a simple technique. So, when does the time come to find a new guy to replace this kid, b/c he simply doesn't get it, and can't get the job done? Is there a point, in this situation, when the coaching has failed? Or is it the kid who failed to take the coaching? Just some thoughts and questions. Hopefully this made sense.
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Aug 27, 2009 9:02:47 GMT -6
Brings clarity, or at least thought, to the adage "keeping it simple"
What exactly does that mean, and do number of plays have anything to do with it (as opposed to conceptualization of scheme).
When Hal Mumme came to Kentucky, he told reporters he only had 10 plays, and 7 of them were passes.
90 Series and Quick game Fast Screens Lead and Stretch
THAT, is keeping it simple and focusing on details.
And the reason they could focus on the details?
THEY LIMITED WHAT FUNDAMENTALS THEY NEEDED TO COVER.
What is really important to the success of said offense?
In the AR, your WR's only need 5 minutes of stalking blocking a month........
In the flexbone, your WR's only need 50 minutes of stalk blocking a week..........
I'm a big believer in whole-part-whole teaching.
You teach the whole scheme first. Basically, when we download a playbook off the internet, we do it to understand the scheme and how it fits together.
Get the players on the "what we are trying to do" train
Then, reinforce the essential fundamentals in Indy/Group/Skelly periods.
This is where the 4 or so things that MUST be done correctly are reinforced and become part of one's muscle memory.
For my offensive tackles, these are kick slide, punch, center of gravity, and foot movement.
I have a list of 14 things I want from them in pass pro, but those 4 are the essentials, and all I have time for really.
In TEAM, you are coaching effort and correcting assignment errors.
You SHOULD NOT be coaching fundamentals during this period. This is application of concepts time, and if a kid is thinking too much about HOW to do it, he will screw up.
It is your job as a coach to watch film, and then in those pre-TEAM practice periods, fix the "how we do it" mistakes.
Now, a coach can help an athlete who is messing up the HOW during team, by getting them to focus on the first phase of their muscle memory.
OL----"Timmy, all I want for you to focus on is taking your first step"
QB---"Gunner, just worry about keeping the ball loaded on your drop"
RB----"Just take a great counter step, Bobby"
You get the point.
If the kid does the first thing right, he will likely be lead to do the second thing right......then the third thing....and on and on.
"Over-coaching" is defined as being marred in a 45 minute TEAM period (that was scheduled for 25) where kids are given 5 corrections every play.
Those kind of practice make me want to shoot myself.....not in the head, just in the arm. Hopefully that pain will take me mind off the TEAM period that never ends.
|
|
|
Post by coach31 on Aug 27, 2009 9:04:32 GMT -6
Is the proliferation of schemes (spread, option, power, wing-t...) a problem. We spend alot of time making sure we line up correctly on defense by formation. On offense we have spend a lot of time teaching what-ifs based on front and pressure. I know this hurts our blocking and tackling, but if they blow an assignment the tech is not an issue. We spend 60% of our practice on individual time, but alot of that time ends up being assignment and alignment.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 27, 2009 9:19:23 GMT -6
Is the proliferation of schemes (spread, option, power, wing-t...) a problem. We spend alot of time making sure we line up correctly on defense by formation. On offense we have spend a lot of time teaching what-ifs based on front and pressure. I know this hurts our blocking and tackling, but if they blow an assignment the tech is not an issue. We spend 60% of our practice on individual time, but alot of that time ends up being assignment and alignment. Excellent point. Football, even at HS level, has gotten more complex the last couple of decades. As a result, simple is not always best, or even possible. We try to be somewhat multiple on defense. But as a general rule if you're spending more time on alignments and/or assignments than fundamentals and techniques, you may be doing too much and asking for trouble.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Aug 27, 2009 9:34:55 GMT -6
INDY - should teach 1,2 movements of what you're going over that day in GROUP GROUP - should teach 3-5 movements of what you're going over that day in TEAM TEAM - should teach entire assignment of what you're going to use in your GAME PLAN GAME PLAN - should be area / situation-specific based on what you are going to run GAME NIGHT
GAME NIGHT - should be auto pilot based on the investment/preparation you've made through the week.
Anything less than this is a waste of time.
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Aug 27, 2009 9:59:47 GMT -6
I strongly belive you must be detailed in your coaching. I have tried it before where I zoomed through all the little things and 1/2 of the plauyers got it the other 1/2 looked like deer in headlights.
I have gone back to teaching the small stuff in Indy time and actualy taking the time to explain why we are doing something. The kids actualy pick it up better if they know why they are doing something and what purpouse it serves they see it as having importance so they focus on it.
What ends up happeneing is that it takes longer which is fine I would rather things take longer and us run less stuff by the end of the year the stuff we do run will will be solid. The other thing we have see with our kids is: once they get little things ie: LB reading the Guards the next thing you give them they can do much better. Once they have some idea of the basics the more complex stuff can be easier to do.
I learned this the hard way, we isntalled a D it was complex had 3 different looks multiple stunts, 2 different fronts, 2 different coverage looks with a tottal of 8 different coverages. I thought "yeah we are gonna confuse the hell out of the teams we play"................. I was 1/2 right I confused the daylights out of some of my players! During this time I was so blind to what was happening that I was telling by coaches it's ok that thye don't call pass or run or that we don't have good angles of pursuit.
We abandoned 90% of the playbook by week 3 got down to the basics of pursuit, gap cancelation, and run fit we ened up being much more sound.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 27, 2009 10:05:58 GMT -6
Last year I had more junk in that we really needed or used. I promised myself Id coach more detailed and push for mastery of the very basics and then mastery of the details behind plays. Today I am teaching my linemen alternative ways to block our power/counter plays, stuff I brushed over last year wont be brushed over this year. We instead scrapped three pass protection schemes and some screens and some reverse passes and the single wing....basically we can hit each hole with a straight punch in the mouth or with misdirection and we can play action off that.
but we still (maybe because we have a rookie soph and a pair of freshmen on our oline) just cant seem to move forward. our qb seems to bog down when he gets tired (he plays defense too) and thats sort of Part II to the whole thing about details and the "full of hot air" conversations we all get into on the net, I mean I have been on the net here since the 90s and I cant ever remember someone talking about "when my kids get tired, we knew we did the right thing by keeping the tool box lighter"....
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Aug 27, 2009 10:15:25 GMT -6
seems to bog down when he gets tired ........when my kids get tired, we knew we did the right thing by keeping the tool box lighter".... being tired is one thing (fatigued effort), but if this "tired" means abandoning technique by losing focus, that is another thing. Technique, to be any good, has to be step-by-step muscle-memory execution (i.e. 1st step MUST be here. 2nd step is wrong if it isn't here). If a 3 step drop looks (read "times up") fine in the first half, but ends up all over the place in the 4th quarter, there is a breakdown of technique and this is a failure in technique coaching. Technique is the fundamental of executing the assignment of the position. These are the QUANTIFIABLES of the position that are essential if you plan on winning outside of athleting or muscling opponents. ** I lost my train of thought when I wrote that.....what I mean is If I am playing a musical instrument in a song, I am playing within that particular chord progression. There is a foundation of rhythm and melody. If I vamp and solo and go off the deep end......OR I "get lost", I can always essentially hit the 'reset' button in my mind (find my way home) and revert to the ROOT NOTE and scale of the song - I can't go wrong doing that, and consequently, I can play in ANY song when I have that foundation of modes and scales down. If I don't do that, then when I'm presented with an unfamiliar situation or I become disoriented / lose rhythm, then I'm pretty much sunk. The same concept works in football. When I am presented with a difficult situation, do I breakdown and get enveloped by my opponent (and screw my team mates over by getting beat/out of position)? or can I revert to my fundamentals and win my matchups one step at a time?
|
|
|
Post by phantom on Aug 27, 2009 10:24:21 GMT -6
seems to bog down when he gets tired ........when my kids get tired, we knew we did the right thing by keeping the tool box lighter".... being tired is one thing, but if this "tired" means abandoning technique, that is another thing. Technique, to be any good, has to be step-by-step muscle-memory execution (i.e. 1st step MUST be here. 2nd step is wrong if it isn't here). If a 3 step drop looks (read "times up") fine in the first half, but ends up all over the place in the 4th quarter, there is a breakdown of technique and this is a failure in technique coaching. Technique is the fundamental of executing the assignment of the position. These are the QUANTIFIABLES of the position that are essential if you plan on winning outside of athleting or muscling opponents. This is why I believe so strongly in repetition during fundamentals period. Learning technique is all about building habits. They have to be able to do it right without thinking about it even if they're tired
|
|
|
Post by CoachMikeJudy on Aug 27, 2009 10:30:19 GMT -6
As an Oline guy I am obsessed with details, but as I have moved from college-level to HS coaching I have found that details often need to take a back seat to the teaching of the "Big Picture" or the why's and how's of the system.
The guys I coach right now are in their 3rd yr with me (2nd as their Oline coach)- this season is the first time that I can truly expand the teaching to focus on the details at each position. This group was fundamentally unsound and lacked experience when we took over, and it has taken literally 1 full season for them to "get it" as a unit- they can literally teach me the system now.
So to answer the original question- Yes, I coach every single detail that I can but fundamentals trump details everytime.
|
|
|
Post by 42falcon on Aug 27, 2009 10:37:12 GMT -6
Whitemike are the details not the fundementals? Or am I getting to wordy? Here is what I mean: I am teaching the kid how to turn and go out of his backpedal I have explained the reason why it is time to turn and run I have demo'd it talked it through not in detail but given them the footwork they go they do it and it is brutal. So I stop and say OK I am going to explain the details of this and why you are doing it: toe in - open the hip - punch through Then we slow it down and rep this progression they all of a sudden get it (they may not do it 100% of the time but they get it) I guess that is what I mean by the details being the fundementals! Again I may be reading to much into it!
|
|
|
Post by coachorr on Aug 27, 2009 11:04:15 GMT -6
brophy, stop picking on me.
What I mean as far as the TF system, we will still call everything the same, however, 100% will be under center. We will still run fast and solid as well as some basic passing concepts like Smash, NCAA, Post/Out with shallow underneath on some of them.
We have always been a Jet Sweep team with veer, belly, power, sally and counter. We have installed Jet, power, lead, belly. This year we are not fast enough to get around end, and we are not strong enough to mis-direct and run underneath the D-End, but in the team's defense, I only called belly off of Jet motion once and never ran veer.
This year I have nothing to do with the offensive line. The guy we hired has a great understanding of blocking concepts, however, when I look down to that end of the field I see a lot more talking than I see repping. At this point I am going to have to go down there and teach the kids the progression of the following, 1) Drive Block 2)Gap offense double team 3) Pull and pin and pull and trap. And most importantly doing all of those blocks with execution and finish. The guy knows what he is doing, yet there is just that tenacity and effort missing and I think it has to do with not enough repition nor enough progression.
Moreover, our Q can only throw the football about 20 to 25 yards acurately.
This will be our offensive running package, Lead, power, counter, Jet, Orbit Sweep, quick trap. The only plays we will be adding are counter and Orbit sweep. Although we won't do as much motion and then trying to run plays underneath (belly, veer, power) we will be the same up front. We are going to have to abandon veer double option at this point because both of our guards are dyslexic and cannot remember to step away from the play.
|
|
|
Post by touchdownmaker on Aug 27, 2009 13:00:02 GMT -6
Heres an example...we play a wishbone team tomorrow...its a scrimmage essentially. My sam backer likes to jam and then peek into the backfield. does it really matter what the wishbone team runs at us if we dont even use our proper alignment, assignment and technique? should i bother to show the kids what these guys run taking up 30 minutes of valuable teaching time that I could use to get my sam linebacker into better habbits when playing 7 tech on the te?
same with my mike and will, they are so aggressive that they dont read and play counter well. Do I bother to teach them what triple option looks like right now if they dont even read cross key/alarms such as far back coming and far guard coming back? and what if they are taking on blocks with the wrong shoulder?...who cares what the other guys run if we dont have the discipline to take on blocks properly.
this is sort of my point. I think we all talk about all the "well, we attack this and they do this" stuff but what really happens ....WHO THE HECK KNOWS. I got sophs and freshmen out there and I dont know what way they are going to go lol. Good kids, working very hard and very coachable but not ready for more schemes...thats fur sure.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2009 13:15:33 GMT -6
For the opener I am just worried about having A PLAY that I can run without worry. So even if it is 3rd and 45, we have a play that we can run that does not turn the ball over. Same thing with a base defense, punt team, KOR, etc.
Then after the opener we can evaluate. There is a big difference between week one and two. Under the lights is the ultimate test.
|
|
|
Post by coachorr on Aug 27, 2009 13:17:37 GMT -6
Best play I could have ran last night would have been I Twins weak inside lead. We never ran it, because I was trying to get the kids to do our basic stuff first. I never got into a groove of what I should call and I wanted to just stick with one series: Jet, Veer, Belly.
|
|
|
Post by brophy on Aug 27, 2009 13:19:25 GMT -6
does it really matter what the wishbone team runs at us if we dont even use our proper alignment, assignment and technique?
Do I bother to teach them what triple option looks like right now if they dont even read cross key/alarms such as far back coming and far guard coming back? and what if they are taking on blocks with the wrong shoulder but doesn't that scenario give them the context in which to use their skill sets (and see how if they don't use it, it screws everyone else over)? THIS is what you will see..........and THIS is what you need to do/where to be (when you see it). a) INDY is this look (dive) with 2 offensive players b) GROUP is this look (dive) in half-line c) TEAM is this look (dive) altogether If you don't do that (scout look), then all I can imagine left to do is alignment. period. The disconnect (after alignment) comes from the movement (HOW to get to appropriate abosolute fit). There should be an absolute method of movement, how you want them to shuffle/run/slide/whatever into their gap. Staying disciplined in this flow reaction is what sets a player up to execute their assignment (tackle position / block destruction leverage / etc). If they screw this up (their pursuit leverage) then nothing they attempt to do later in this progression will work.
|
|
|
Post by CoachMikeJudy on Aug 27, 2009 13:20:35 GMT -6
Whitemike are the details not the fundementals? Or am I getting to wordy? Here is what I mean: I am teaching the kid how to turn and go out of his backpedal I have explained the reason why it is time to turn and run I have demo'd it talked it through not in detail but given them the footwork they go they do it and it is brutal. So I stop and say OK I am going to explain the details of this and why you are doing it: toe in - open the hip - punch through Then we slow it down and rep this progression they all of a sudden get it (they may not do it 100% of the time but they get it) I guess that is what I mean by the details being the fundementals! Again I may be reading to much into it! No- you're not too wordy... We are essentially saying the same thing- the technique in your example is the fundamental movement- backpedaling until he's broken my cushion and then turning to run is the fundamental. The details are the why and the specifics of the how- (toe in, open hip, punch through) are detials that will help him perform the fundamental at a greater efficiency. By details I mean the intricasies of the play/coverage/reads etc. To me fundamentals are the key elements, not the supportive elements of football. Form tackle technique, drive blocking technique, ball security are all fundamentals. My JV guys are all Frosh & Soph (we have no Frosh team) who have neither played organized football nor (by the looks of them) watch much organized football on TV. So for me to describe, in detail, why keeping our outside arm free on our double teams is crucial to bumping to LB- it would be a waste of time because they cannot take their steps and get off the ball low and quick without constant prompting form me... This tells me that they haven't learned the fundamental of being an offensive lineman, which at it's simplist form is coming off the ball low & hard and being the hammer. That tasty info regarding Dbl Teams is useless until they fire out of their stance (which is fundamental #1) consistently. In my mind hand placement on the Dbl team is a detail that can be learned later. Sorry for the long post
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Aug 27, 2009 13:48:01 GMT -6
Heres an example...we play a wishbone team tomorrow...its a scrimmage essentially. My sam backer likes to jam and then peek into the backfield. does it really matter what the wishbone team runs at us if we dont even use our proper alignment, assignment and technique? should i bother to show the kids what these guys run taking up 30 minutes of valuable teaching time that I could use to get my sam linebacker into better habbits when playing 7 tech on the te? same with my mike and will, they are so aggressive that they dont read and play counter well. Do I bother to teach them what triple option looks like right now if they dont even read cross key/alarms such as far back coming and far guard coming back? and what if they are taking on blocks with the wrong shoulder?...who cares what the other guys run if we dont have the discipline to take on blocks properly. this is sort of my point. I think we all talk about all the "well, we attack this and they do this" stuff but what really happens ....WHO THE HECK KNOWS. I got sophs and freshmen out there and I dont know what way they are going to go lol. Good kids, working very hard and very coachable but not ready for more schemes...thats fur sure. If there are things THAT MUST be done in your scheme----aka alignment and technique, then do that first. However, I agree with Brophy......you teach that in the context of stopping the triple option. And, as to your point about "do we talk a bigger game on the internet", you are probably right. We faced a West Virgina type of 2-back spread last week. They would run Iso Read, GT counter trey read, etc. Ideally, I would want my DE's getting hands on the OT, diagnosing the pressure and visual key, and making the play. All thru 2-a-days we worked get off and hand placement. We worked squeezing a down block, fighting a base block, and keeping our outside 1/2 free versus a reach block. THAT, is their muscle memory. Problem is, we don't have the time (or I don't have the ability) to get them use to the subtle difference between "the OT didn't block you because the QB is reading you", and "the OT didn't blocking you because Counter Trey is coming to kick your arse out" I get 25 minutes of defensive Indy a week, so what's important? We settled on 2 Points of Emphasis. 1. Get hands on the OT (jack him up). I sure as heck cannot handle them running ISO down our throats. If he blocks down...... 2. Hit the QB. Pretty much handles the option responsibilities part. It should be a give every time, and we won't worry about the QB keep or Bubble read option phase. Guess what? You've probably have a decent chance at a kickout block (though we still squeeze a down block initially). So what? Iso and QB keepers were NOT going to beat us. There are two ways we cripple our kids. 1. Poor teaching of fundamentals in camp (alignment, assignment, footwork, reads, etc.) 2. Information overload in weekly prep. Give each position 2-3 plays top that need stopped. Fit it together with the other positions, and GO. ALL of THAT was to point out this thought tdmaker: The technique constantly need corrected and reinforced through out the season......that is why Indy period is the most important period of the day. At the same time, don't give up gameplanning aspects with your kids. The right technique is not going to help if they have no idea what your expectations are versus triple option. And at the same time, when you are that young, go beyond limiting your offense......put your call sheet on a 3x5.
|
|
|
Post by dubber on Aug 27, 2009 13:59:12 GMT -6
I mean, you are a "core" guy, so
Power Counter Wedge Power Pass
Roll with that until your film study starts to glare with the fact you need to add trap (or whatever).
Then, the level of execution of that trap is not as essential, because of the level of conflict you have created by running the power to perfection........hell, the first time you go in quick motion and run it, you may not even need to block that 3 tech.
When we first went spread, it was grab bag city, especially on our passing routes.
So, we boiled it down to needing to throw a deep ball (to open up the running game) and having 2 ways to attack cover 3.
We got alot better.
We were hurt a little the first time someone went 2-high on us, but, again, WHO CARES? We weren't going anywhere without beating cover 3.
Point is, you are not going anywhere without being able to run Power. WHO CARES if trap looks like crap?
|
|
|
Post by jhanawa on Aug 27, 2009 22:19:01 GMT -6
Good stuff here..... What we do is: Pre-practice Chalk Talk & film (if available) what we are going over a certain subject or subjects today, even if it's repetitive...explain the big picture and emphasis the importance of the details.....this takes time, its expensive time wise.....but I think it pays off in the long term.... On the field, in Individual Time, we cover details in technique on the subject... In Group time, we put the pieces together In Team time, put it all together. Right now, we have been in pads two weeks and have moments of brilliance and moments of a serious CF....its normal, frustrating, but normal....
|
|