|
Post by fkaboneyard on Aug 10, 2017 10:14:36 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by gccwolverine on Aug 10, 2017 11:00:08 GMT -6
Numbers are way down a the school as a whole. Lots of factors here not just "football is scary"
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 10, 2017 11:36:32 GMT -6
I wonder how many Sophomores, Juniors, Seniors they have.
In our state at bigger schools, JV teams are comprised almost entirely of Sophomores.
If as it appears from article they have 30+ Freshmen, that's certainly enough for a Freshman team.
|
|
|
Post by dytmook on Aug 10, 2017 12:57:21 GMT -6
We have 8 freshman and 48 total so I'd be thrilled to have their numbers
|
|
|
Post by hsrose on Aug 10, 2017 13:02:17 GMT -6
We're at 50 right now, 21 on JV (Freshmen & Sophomores), 29 (if 2 kids come out who are out of the area until school starts next week. We had 68 at this time last year. When I started here 5 seasons ago there was a Frosh, JV, and varsity levels. Frosh team went away the next season One issue was that it got to be too hard to schedule the games because teams were dropping all the time.
|
|
|
Post by chi5hi on Aug 10, 2017 13:24:04 GMT -6
Many, many moons ago...(when I was just a baby coach)...most schools around here had a Varsity squad and then a "B" (sophomore) and "C" (freshman) team.
In the late '60's and into the 70's, JV teams were invented because schools were getting upwards of 200 kids out for football and they needed something for them to do. They played the Varsity 2nd string and subs against this week's opponent's 2nd string and subs...called them Junior Varsity. There were enough kids to go around and schools, coaches, and parents wanted to see little Johnny play.
Just 10 years ago our school had a Frosh, Soph, and a JV team...as well as a Varsity. Not anymore.
I think those days are gone. I don't ever expect to see 80 guys on a squad again. In 2006 we had 102 sophomores come out for the JV squad! No lie. Also, no longer.
BTW...the crowds are getting smaller, too. In SoCal there's a High School on every corner.
I think, too, it has a lot to do with the caliber of athletes we see on the field. In the past, the kids were mainly technicians and occasionally you'd come up with a kid who had genuine athletic ability.
The regular local boys from the neighborhood were full of "school spirit" and just wanted to play something after school. Now we see guys who are D1 prospects when they're Juniors.
The "average" kid of days gone by thinks he doesn't have a chance of playing since he's behind a kid who has a 48" vertical leap, runs the 100 in 8 flat, and has fangs. And...he's correct! So, they play Basketball or LaCrosse...run track, specialize in Baseball, and (horror of horrors) soccer.
|
|
|
Post by freezeoption on Aug 10, 2017 18:27:00 GMT -6
back when I was in school, separate 7, 8, 9 10 grade teams, then jv which might have a few soph but mostly everyone that didn't play varsity, now my school is saying they have to coop because they don't have enough kids out
|
|
|
Post by wingtol on Aug 10, 2017 19:05:13 GMT -6
I guess the definition of JV is different everywhere. Our JV is typically 9-10 with some Jr's and soup sandwich Sr's playing. So hearing there is no JV team for them but still a 9-10 team doesn't make sense to me or most programs in this area since it's either Varsity or JV with the very rare freshman team in some places.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2017 5:27:35 GMT -6
Team here in PA cancelled its entire varsity season last year because they had 19 kids
Practice began just this past Monday, by Tuesday am there was a HC opening at that school
Sounds promising doesnt it
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 11, 2017 5:48:38 GMT -6
Two big reasons for lower numbers in our state:
Declining enrollment (especially in urban areas) and Pay to Play.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Aug 11, 2017 6:34:12 GMT -6
Team here in PA cancelled its entire varsity season last year because they had 19 kids Practice began just this past Monday, by Tuesday am there was a HC opening at that school Sounds promising doesnt it How big is that school? Some schools just don't have enough kids to have an 11-man football program.
|
|
|
Post by gccwolverine on Aug 11, 2017 6:53:19 GMT -6
Is anyone experiencing level numbers or increasing numbers? We were at 50 last year and we have 50 this year. Freshman class is down a bit only 10 but our JR high (7th and 8th) combined have 40 20 a piece. This is a single A school. Anyone staying consistent or increasing? Or is it all doom and gloom everywhere?
|
|
|
Post by rsmith627 on Aug 11, 2017 6:59:49 GMT -6
Ours are slightly down but we have known it was coming for years. It's more a result of the population here than anything. We'll be back up in a few years.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 11, 2017 7:19:13 GMT -6
Ours are slightly down but we have known it was coming for years. It's more a result of the population here than anything. We'll be back up in a few years.
You're "down" to what, 150 9-12?
Boo-hoo.
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Aug 11, 2017 7:26:37 GMT -6
Is anyone experiencing level numbers or increasing numbers? We were at 50 last year and we have 50 this year. Freshman class is down a bit only 10 but our JR high (7th and 8th) combined have 40 20 a piece. This is a single A school. Anyone staying consistent or increasing? Or is it all doom and gloom everywhere? Our numbers aren't great but they're not precipitously down from when I started almost 40 years ago. Every team has had 40-ish varsity and 30-40 JV with some years a little less, some a little more.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith627 on Aug 11, 2017 7:36:59 GMT -6
Ours are slightly down but we have known it was coming for years. It's more a result of the population here than anything. We'll be back up in a few years.
You're "down" to what, 150 9-12?
Boo-hoo.
I have 42 on JV this year. Normally it's around 55. Frosh are about the same, and our 8th grade numbers were also slightly down. I know I definitely have no right to complain here, as I'm in a good situation compared to probably most guys. I know Macomb Dakotas numbers are actually up.
|
|
|
Post by mrjvi on Aug 11, 2017 7:37:45 GMT -6
Trying to re-build a small school program. Had 28 9-12 and 18 7th and 8th at the parent meeting last night. Since Basketball had success last year, many good players are doing "fall basketball". Everyone says once you win games you'll be fine. Hard to do w/o some athletes. You can only build so many.
|
|
|
Post by 44dlcoach on Aug 11, 2017 7:46:17 GMT -6
The numbers are up at my old place a little bit, a big part of that is the last graduating class only had like 12 seniors and the current senior class is closer to 40. I regard both as outliers, typical is more like high 20s low 30s for a senior class. But I'm guessing it's more a product of population growth in our city as much as anything. Everybody's numbers seem to be up slightly.
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 11, 2017 7:47:44 GMT -6
Everyone says once you win games you'll be fine. Speaking from experience - "Everyone" is wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 11, 2017 9:33:01 GMT -6
Team here in PA cancelled its entire varsity season last year because they had 19 kids Practice began just this past Monday, by Tuesday am there was a HC opening at that school Sounds promising doesnt it How big is that school? Some schools just don't have enough kids to have an 11-man football program. 1198 with about 51% male. They literally have one of the best football programs in the state no more than 200 yards from their front door. Their numbers have been going down drastically over the years
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Aug 11, 2017 11:15:09 GMT -6
Whats crazy is I thought LBP was the largest HS in the country. I know they have (or recently had) enrollment numbers topping 5,000.
|
|
|
Post by hsrose on Aug 11, 2017 15:45:00 GMT -6
Just talked with a HC that I coached with a few years ago. He's in one of the more competitive leagues in the NorCal area (EBAL) and we talked about numbers.
His school has 2,300 students. They just cut their JV 2 days ago and have gone Fr/So and varsity. They had 22 Frosh, 20 JV, and 47 varsity. This years Junior class had 55 frosh, says there are 24 left from that class.
Another team in their league has 22 frosh, 20 JV, 44 varsity, but they have no intention of cutting anything.
Another team in the league has 54 varsity, but usually carries 65+.
One of the upper tier smaller schools just dropped their JV and has frosh and varsity.
Another team at a large, 2k+ school, has 27 varsity.
LBP had 4464 per recent assessment by US New and World Report, 5090 in 2010 per Wikipedia.
|
|
|
Post by mariner42 on Aug 11, 2017 16:10:19 GMT -6
We have a really bad problem with attrition between 9th and 10th grade and then 10th and 11th. From frosh groups of around 45-50 I get a JV group of 35 or so and I then pass on about 20 to the varsity.
This year has been particularly rough in that from 45 freshmen I've gotten 30ish sophomores.
Not a lot of kids are committing to a four year career these days, lots of dabbling and moving on when the work gets serious.
|
|
|
Post by 3rdandlong on Aug 11, 2017 23:27:39 GMT -6
My issue with Long Beach Poly is the fact that they hired Antonio Pierce in the first place. I even made a comment about it on this board. Hiring a former NFL player," whose full time job is at ESPN and who openly said he will be there when he can is a slap in the face to so many qualified HS coaches in SoCal who are far more qualified. The Jack Rabbits went with the splash hire and cared more about style than substance. I cannot confirm nor deny the hiring is the reason for their low numbers, but why wouldn't they hire an actual coach??!!
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Aug 12, 2017 9:42:20 GMT -6
We have a really bad problem with attrition between 9th and 10th grade and then 10th and 11th. From frosh groups of around 45-50 I get a JV group of 35 or so and I then pass on about 20 to the varsity. This year has been particularly rough in that from 45 freshmen I've gotten 30ish sophomores. Not a lot of kids are committing to a four year career these days, lots of dabbling and moving on when the work gets serious. Is it because the work gets serious, or is it a combination of increased (possibly excessive) demands plus a realization that they won't really play? One thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned when talking about dwindling numbers is that the same "entitlement" issues we complain about regarding other aspects of football/life. I see many threads mocking (deservedly so) parents for whining about little Johnny not being able to play. It would seem a natural offshoot of that is little Johnny simply not coming out.
|
|
|
Post by rsmith627 on Aug 12, 2017 9:48:26 GMT -6
We have a really bad problem with attrition between 9th and 10th grade and then 10th and 11th. From frosh groups of around 45-50 I get a JV group of 35 or so and I then pass on about 20 to the varsity. This year has been particularly rough in that from 45 freshmen I've gotten 30ish sophomores. Not a lot of kids are committing to a four year career these days, lots of dabbling and moving on when the work gets serious. Is it because the work gets serious, or is it a combination of increased (possibly excessive) demands plus a realization that they won't really play? One thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned when talking about dwindling numbers is that the same "entitlement" issues we complain about regarding other aspects of football/life. I see many threads mocking (deservedly so) parents for whining about little Johnny not being able to play. It would seem a natural offshoot of that is little Johnny simply not coming out. I was thinking about this too, but from a different angle. How many of you with lower numbers are missing kids that you think would have been key contributors? As I mentioned early, ours are down, but talent hasn't vastly dipped. If anything it's less babysitting going on.
|
|
|
Post by bigmoot on Aug 12, 2017 10:10:00 GMT -6
Is it because the work gets serious, or is it a combination of increased (possibly excessive) demands plus a realization that they won't really play? One thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned when talking about dwindling numbers is that the same "entitlement" issues we complain about regarding other aspects of football/life. I see many threads mocking (deservedly so) parents for whining about little Johnny not being able to play. It would seem a natural offshoot of that is little Johnny simply not coming out. I was thinking about this too, but from a different angle. How many of you with lower numbers are missing kids that you think would have been key contributors? As I mentioned early, ours are down, but talent hasn't vastly dipped. If anything it's less babysitting going on. for me it's the depth. we only have 35 or so kids each year. that one kid is important, he may be the 3rd guard, or backup ILB. makes us real thin.
|
|
|
Post by carookie on Aug 12, 2017 10:13:57 GMT -6
My issue with Long Beach Poly is the fact that they hired Antonio Pierce in the first place. I even made a comment about it on this board. Hiring a former NFL player," whose full time job is at ESPN and who openly said he will be there when he can is a slap in the face to so many qualified HS coaches in SoCal who are far more qualified. The Jack Rabbits went with the splash hire and cared more about style than substance. I cannot confirm nor deny the hiring is the reason for their low numbers, but why wouldn't they hire an actual coach??!! I don't know Antonio Pierce personally, never met him before, and for all I know he could be a tremendous coach. But I can tell you that the name of the game for big time SoCal schools is "Recruiting". Yup, thats right, getting talent to come to your high school. One of the best ways to do this is to hire on a few NFL players as coaches and hope the name sells to parents and kids alike. This doesn't mean that the former players are bad coaches, they could be very good; just that their NFL recognition bring an additional benefit. Once again I don't know about LBP specifically just addressing one of the underlying premises of your point.
|
|
|
Post by 50slantstrong on Aug 12, 2017 14:57:26 GMT -6
That's what happens when you hire a big name NFL player and not a coach to run your program. They used to win the title in their division every other year without breaking a sweat, then they went a couple of seasons "only" going 11-2 or something like that, entitled parents said the HC was an underachiever, the admin bought in and fired him.
Even worse, afterwards they could've hired any coach in California. Instead they hired a retired NFL player who was a full time TV analyst to run the program full time. I respected Pierce as a player but he is over his head as a major HS head coach. The admin screwed the pooch and another couple years like this and Poly will go the way of the majority of former Southern California public school power houses.
|
|
|
Post by coachd5085 on Aug 12, 2017 15:24:52 GMT -6
I was thinking about this too, but from a different angle. How many of you with lower numbers are missing kids that you think would have been key contributors? As I mentioned early, ours are down, but talent hasn't vastly dipped. If anything it's less babysitting going on. for me it's the depth. we only have 35 or so kids each year. that one kid is important, he may be the 3rd guard, or backup ILB. makes us real thin. 35 kids on Varsity? 35 kids 9-12? I get what you are saying, but if you are talking about having 35 kids on Varsity, then that is supporting what I mentioned above. 35 kids on varsity...with only 22 starting positions on O and D means someone is not playing. Not playing on Friday, in today's social environment, could very well mean not playing football.
|
|