|
|
Post by attacktheseam on Aug 31, 2015 14:30:51 GMT -6
This probably would be better for the off season but none the less.
What does it take for a program to be successful year after year? And why do some schools seem to have it figured out and others are stuck in the gutter year after year?
|
|
|
|
Post by fantom on Aug 31, 2015 18:43:48 GMT -6
This probably would be better for the off season but none the less. What does it take for a program to be successful year after year? And why do some schools seem to have it figured out and others are stuck in the gutter year after year? Staff continuity and the weight room. |
|
|
|
Post by coachwoodall on Aug 31, 2015 19:03:57 GMT -6
Too many variables. It's like asking, "Why did that rain drop hit my left ear instead of my right".
The question you're trying to ask is, "How can I take my team from A to B, because we're doing P, D, and Q."
I've coached teams that in A ball that could compete up with the AAA boys. I've coached teams in AAA that got waxed by mediocre AA/A teams. I've coached AAAA against AAAA teams and asked, " Why the hades can't they be any better?"
If you're doing A, B, and C well, then you can focus on X, Y, and Z. It's all a matter of context.
|
|
|
|
Post by blb on Aug 31, 2015 20:32:16 GMT -6
This probably would be better for the off season but none the less. What does it take for a program to be successful year after year? And why do some schools seem to have it figured out and others are stuck in the gutter year after year? Staff continuity and the weight room.
Also Vertical Continuity in the Xs and Os or at least terminology.
Kids that play all four years in HS = Frosh, JV, Varsity.
That's what a program is, as opposed to just fielding teams every year.
|
|
|
|
Post by John Knight on Sept 1, 2015 12:18:39 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by sweep26 on Sept 3, 2015 13:14:22 GMT -6
That is a nice article Coach!! Thank you for sharing. |
|
